Skip to main content
Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1983 Jul 15;129(2):129–131.

Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries.

W P Cockshott, J K Jenkin, M Pui
PMCID: PMC1875260  PMID: 6407744

Abstract

In the diagnosis of ankle injuries routine radiography is often productive. An international survey of the average number of radiographs made of injured ankles suggested that two projections are adequate to detect fractures. This was confirmed in a prospective study of 242 patients coming to a hospital emergency department with recent ankle injuries. All the fractures could be identified on an anteroposterior or a lateral projection, although some were more obvious on an oblique view. As well, all the fractures were associated with malleolar soft-tissue swelling. Thus, radiography for acute ankle injuries could safely be restricted to patients with soft-tissue swelling, and fractures could be diagnosed using only two routine projections, though for management purposes additional projections might be needed. With a policy of limiting the use of radiography substantial cost reductions are possible.

Full text

PDF
129

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brand D. A., Frazier W. H., Kohlhepp W. C., Shea K. M., Hoefer A. M., Ecker M. D., Kornguth P. J., Pais M. J., Light T. R. A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays. N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 11;306(6):333–339. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202113060604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks S. C., Potter B. T., Rainey J. B. Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Feb 21;282(6264):607–608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6264.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GARFIELD J. S. Is radiological examination of the twisted ankle necessary? Lancet. 1960 Nov 26;2(7161):1167–1169. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(60)92356-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johannsen A. Radiological diagnosis of lateral ligament lesion of the ankle. A comparison between talar tilt and anterior drawer sign. Acta Orthop Scand. 1978 Jun;49(3):295–301. doi: 10.3109/17453677809005768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mandell J. Isolated fractures of the posterior tibial lip at the ankle as demonstrated by an additional projection, the "poor" lateral view. Radiology. 1971 Nov;101(2):319–322. doi: 10.1148/101.2.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. de Lacey G., Bradbrooke S. Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries. Br Med J. 1979 Jun 16;1(6178):1597–1598. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6178.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES