Skip to main content
Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1983 Oct 15;129(8):839–841.

Statistical assessment of two methods of measuring scoliosis before treatment.

E F Robinson, W D Wade
PMCID: PMC1875632  PMID: 6616390

Abstract

Regression analysis has shown that the Ferguson and Cobb methods of measuring spinal curvature give comparable results, at least before the scoliosis is treated. When the Cobb angle was calculated by multiplying the Ferguson angle by 1.38, the results were accurate to within 5 degrees in 28 (76%) of 37 cases. Any further debate over the merits of the two methods should focus on their inter- and intraobserver reproducibility and their applicability after corrective treatment.

Full text

PDF
839

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Keim H. A. Scoliosis. Clin Symp. 1978;30(1):1–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kittleson A. C., Lim L. W. Measurement of scoliosis. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1970 Apr;108(4):775–777. doi: 10.2214/ajr.108.4.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Marklund T. Scoliosis angle. Conceptual basis and proposed definition. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1978;19(1A):78–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Moll J. M., Liyanage S. P., Wright V. An objective clinical method to measure lateral spinal flexion. Rheumatol Phys Med. 1972 Feb;11(5):225–239. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/11.5.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES