Skip to main content
Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1983 Dec 15;129(12):1271–1273.

Problems in determining the incidence of cervical cancer.

E A Clarke, S Hilditch
PMCID: PMC1875689  PMID: 6652592

Abstract

Since cancer registries have different recording practices, the incidence rates that they report must be compared with caution. Indexes of reliability of recording indicated that in 1971 the reported incidence of cervical cancer in Ontario was too high. In 1971 Ontario used a method of passive reporting of cancer cases: the Ontario Cancer Registry linked hospital reports, death certificates and reports from the Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation's treatment centres to produce a single record for each case. Pathological confirmation was requested for cases thus recorded by the registry. In 26% of cases a diagnosis other than cervical cancer was indicated. With these cases omitted, the incidence rate became 15.1/100 000, as opposed to the 20.5/100 000 reported by the registry.

Full text

PDF
1271

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clarke E. A., Anderson T. W. Does screening by "Pap" smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study. Lancet. 1979 Jul 7;2(8132):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)90172-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Morgan P. P. Challenges in screening for cancer of the cervix: delivery, technology and evaluation of programs. Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Oct 1;127(7):571–572. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES