Skip to main content
Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1983 Dec 15;129(12):1275–1277.

Accuracy of registration of invasive cervical cancer.

J A Husted, T W Anderson, R Gallagher
PMCID: PMC1875693  PMID: 6652593

Abstract

The quality of the data recorded by the British Columbia Cancer Registry for 521 new cases of invasive cervical cancer was evaluated. The registry's pathological diagnosis in all new registrations of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in British Columbia between 1977 and 1979 was compared with a best estimate of the true diagnosis, which was determined from the results of the provincial cervical cytology screening program and the clinical charts at the Cancer Control Agency of British Columbia. The registry's data overestimated the true incidence of invasive cervical cancer by approximately 55%, since 184 (35%) of the cases were incorrectly registered. Of the 184, 141 (77%) were cases of preinvasive cervical cancer, 26 (14%) did not meet the criteria for a true case (i.e., they were not newly diagnosed in British Columbia between 1977 and 1979) and 17 (9%) were cases of invasive cancer of another primary site. In addition, 28 cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in the province during the study period had not been reported to the registry. Thus, both over-reporting and under-reporting occurred. There is a need for constant evaluation of registry data if cancer registries are to fulfil their potential contribution to cancer control programs and research.

Full text

PDF
1275

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews F. J., Linehan J. J., Melcher D. H. Cervical cancer in younger women. Lancet. 1978 Oct 7;2(8093):776–778. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92659-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anello C., Lao C. U.S. trends in mortality from carcinoma of cervix. Lancet. 1979 May 12;1(8124):1038–1038. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92796-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkowitz R. S., Ehrmann R. L., Lavizzo-Mourey R., Knapp R. C. Invasive cervical carcinoma in young women. Gynecol Oncol. 1979 Dec;8(3):311–316. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(79)90040-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyes D. A., Worth A. J., Anderson G. H. Experience with cervical screening in British Columbia. Gynecol Oncol. 1981 Oct;12(2 Pt 2):S143–S155. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(81)90070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gallagher R. P., Elwood J. M. Recent trends in recorded incidence and mortality from uterine cancer. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1982;62:83–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Saxén E. A. Cancer registry: aims, functions and quality control. Arch Geschwulstforsch. 1980;50(6):588–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yule R. Mortality from carcinoma of the cervix. Lancet. 1978 May 13;1(8072):1031–1032. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90751-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES