Skip to main content
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 2004 Jun;90(Suppl 4):iv29–iv32. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.037606

Secondary prevention clinics: improving quality of life and outcome

N Campbell
PMCID: PMC1876309  PMID: 15145910

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.0 KB).

Figure 1 .

Figure 1

Effect of nurse led clinics on health behaviour. The figure shows the percentage improvement in the intervention group compared to the control group (comparing mean scores for diet in Belfast and Maryland and proportions reaching targets elsewhere).

Figure 2 .

Figure 2

Effect of nurse led clinics on drug treatment and risk factors. The figure shows the percentage improvement in the intervention group compared to the control group (mean values for total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure are compared for the Belfast and Maryland studies and proportions on treatment or reaching targets elsewhere).

Figure 3 .

Figure 3

Effect of nurse led clinic on quality of life—percentage change in SF-36 scores, clinic versus control. Higher score represents improvement.5

Figure 4 .

Figure 4

Effect of nurse led clinic on total deaths. Adapted from Murchie et al6 with permission. CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen Jerilyn K., Blumenthal Roger S., Margolis Simeon, Young Deborah Rohm, Miller Edgar R., 3rd, Kelly Kathleen. Nurse case management of hypercholesterolemia in patients with coronary heart disease: results of a randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2002 Oct;144(4):678–686. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.124837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell N. C., Thain J., Deans H. G., Ritchie L. D., Rawles J. M., Squair J. L. Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: randomised trial of effect on health. BMJ. 1998 May 9;316(7142):1434–1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cupples M. E., McKnight A. Five year follow up of patients at high cardiovascular risk who took part in randomised controlled trial of health promotion. BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):687–688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cupples M. E., McKnight A. Randomised controlled trial of health promotion in general practice for patients at high cardiovascular risk. BMJ. 1994 Oct 15;309(6960):993–996. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6960.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moher M., Yudkin P., Wright L., Turner R., Fuller A., Schofield T., Mant D. Cluster randomised controlled trial to compare three methods of promoting secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care. BMJ. 2001 Jun 2;322(7298):1338–1338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Murchie Peter, Campbell Neil C., Ritchie Lewis D., Simpson Julie A., Thain Joan. Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ. 2003 Jan 11;326(7380):84–84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7380.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES