Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1993 Feb;37(2):317–321. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.2.317

Susceptibilities of Mycoplasma bovis, Mycoplasma dispar, and Ureaplasma diversum strains to antimicrobial agents in vitro.

E A ter Laak 1, J H Noordergraaf 1, M H Verschure 1
PMCID: PMC187660  PMID: 8452363

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the susceptibility of various strains of Mycoplasma bovis, Mycoplasma dispar, and Ureaplasma diversum, which are prevalent causes of pneumonia in calves, to 16 antimicrobial agents in vitro. The MICs of the antimicrobial agents were determined by a serial broth dilution method for 16 field strains and the type strain of M. bovis, for 19 field strains and the type strain of M. dispar, and for 17 field strains of U. diversum. Final MICs for M. bovis and M. dispar were read after 7 days and final MICs for U. diversum after 1 to 2 days. All strains tested were susceptible to tylosin, kitasamycin, and tiamulin but were resistant to nifuroquine and streptomycin. Most strains of U. diversum were intermediately susceptible to oxytetracycline but fully susceptible to chlortetracycline; most strains of M. bovis and M. dispar, however, were resistant to both agents. Strains of M. dispar and U. diversum were susceptible to doxycycline and minocycline, but strains of M. bovis were only intermediately susceptible. Susceptibility or resistance to chloramphenicol, spiramycin, spectinomycin, lincomycin, or enrofloxacin depended on the species but was not equal for the three species. The type strains of M. bovis and M. dispar were more susceptible to various antimicrobial agents, including tetracyclines, than the field strains. This finding might indicate that M. bovis and M. dispar strains are becoming resistant to these agents. Antimicrobial agents that are effective in vitro against all three mycoplasma species can be considered for treating mycoplasma infections in pneumonic calves. Therefore, tylosin, kitasamycin, and tiamulin may be preferred over oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline.

Full text

PDF
317

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews B. E., Leach R. H., Gourlay R. N., Howard C. J. Enhanced isolation of Mycoplasma dispar by substitution of ampicillin for benzylpenicillin in growth media. Vet Rec. 1973 Dec 8;93(23):603–603. doi: 10.1136/vr.93.23.603-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloomster T. G., Lynn R. J. Effect of antibiotics on the dynamics of color change in Ureaplasma urealyticum cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):598–600. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.598-600.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Devriese L. A., Haesebrouck F. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Mycoplasma bovis using Tween 80 hydrolysis as an indicator of growth. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1991 Dec;38(10):781–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1991.tb00943.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamdy A. H., Miller C. C. Antibiotics for bovine mycoplasmas. J Dairy Sci. 1971 Oct;54(10):1541–1544. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(71)86061-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hannan P. C., O'Hanlon P. J., Rogers N. H. In vitro evaluation of various quinolone antibacterial agents against veterinary mycoplasmas and porcine respiratory bacterial pathogens. Res Vet Sci. 1989 Mar;46(2):202–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kishima M., Hashimoto K. In vitro sensitivities to antimicrobial drugs of ureaplasmas isolated from the bovine respiratory tract, genital tract and eye. Res Vet Sci. 1979 Sep;27(2):218–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Matsuoka T., Muenster O. A., Ose E. E., Tonkinson L. Orally administered tylosin for the control of pneumonia in neonatal calves. Vet Rec. 1980 Aug 16;107(7):149–151. doi: 10.1136/vr.107.7.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pilaszek J., Truszczyński M. Antibiotikasensibilität der Ureaplasmen vom Rind. Arch Exp Veterinarmed. 1986 Jan;40(1):88–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Poumarat F., Martel J. L. Antibiosensibilité in vitro des souches françaises de Mycoplasma bovis. Ann Rech Vet. 1989;20(2):145–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shipley A., Bowman S. J., O'Connor J. J. T-strain mycoplasmas in non-specific urethritis. Med J Aust. 1968 May 11;1(19):794–796. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1968.tb28909.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stipkovits L., Varga Z., Laber G., Böckmann J. A comparison of the effect of tiamulin hydrogen fumarate and tylosin tartrate on mycoplasmas of ruminants and some animal ureaplasmas. Vet Microbiol. 1984 Apr;9(2):147–153. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(84)90030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Taylor-Robinson D., Furr P. M. Clinical antibiotic resistance of Ureaplasma urealyticum. Pediatr Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;5(6 Suppl):S335–S337. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198611010-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Taylor-Robinson D., Williams M. H., Haig D. A. The isolation and comparative biological and physical characteristics of T-mycoplasmas of cattle. J Gen Microbiol. 1968 Nov;54(1):33–46. doi: 10.1099/00221287-54-1-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ter Laak E. A., Pijpers A., Noordergraaf J. H., Schoevers E. C., Verheijden J. H. Comparison of methods for in vitro testing of susceptibility of porcine Mycoplasma species to antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Feb;35(2):228–233. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.2.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wachowski C., Kirchhoff H. Untersuchung der Empfindlichkeit von Mycoplasma-bovis-Feldstämmen gegenüber verschiedenen Antibiotika und Chemotherapeutika. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1986 Feb 1;99(2):41–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. ter Laak E. A., Noordergraaf J. H., Dieltjes R. P. Prevalence of mycoplasmas in the respiratory tracts of pneumonic calves. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1992 Oct;39(8):553–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1992.tb01205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. ter Laak E. A., Wentink G. H., Zimmer G. M. Increased prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis in the Netherlands. Vet Q. 1992;14(3):100–104. doi: 10.1080/01652176.1992.9694342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES