Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1993 Mar;37(3):507–511. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.3.507

Activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and oxacillin in experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-hyperproducing Staphylococcus aureus.

A Pefanis 1, C Thauvin-Eliopoulos 1, G M Eliopoulos 1, R C Moellering Jr 1
PMCID: PMC187700  PMID: 8460919

Abstract

Using a rat model of aortic valve infective endocarditis, we previously found that oxacillin was equally effective against an oxacillin-susceptible strain of Staphylococcus aureus and a beta-lactamase-hyperproducing borderline oxacillin-susceptible strain of S. aureus; also, ampicillin-sulbactam was less effective than oxacillin against both isolates and at low doses was less effective against the borderline-susceptible strain than against the fully oxacillin-susceptible strain (C. Thauvin-Eliopoulos, L. B. Rice, G. M. Eliopoulos, and R. C. Moellering, Jr., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:728-732, 1990). In the present study, we extended this work, using alternative treatment schedules and additional bacterial strains. Extending treatment with low doses of ampicillin-sulbactam (500 and 250 mg/kg of body weight per day, respectively) to 6.5 days resulted in equalization of effectiveness against the previously studied strains BOSSA-1 and OSSA-1 (3.75 +/- 1.61 log10 and 4.71 +/- 1.79 log10 CFU of residual viable bacteria per g, respectively). Against the borderline oxacillin-susceptible strain BOSSA-1, increasing the sulbactam dosage from 500 to 2,000 mg/kg/day while maintaining a fixed dose of ampicillin (1,000 mg/kg/day) by continuous infusion resulted in lower bacterial counts (4.93 +/- 1.84 log10 versus 3.65 +/- 1.26 log10 CFU of residual viable bacteria per g, respectively), but this difference was of only borderline significance; differences in efficacy between the low-dose and high-dose sulbactam regimens were exaggerated when intermittent intravenous administration was used (6.19 +/- 1.90 log10 versus 3.37 +/- 1.41 log10 CFU/g, respectively; P < 0.001). However, for any individual sulbactam dosage, the model of administration (continuous versus intermittent infusion) did not affect the activity of the regimen. When additional strains were used in the model, oxacillin and ampicillin-sulbactam (1,000 plus 2,000 mg/kg/day) were equally effective against both oxacillin-susceptible and borderline oxacillin-resistant strains of S. aureus. These results support the predictions that oxacillin would be clinically effective in the treatment of infections caused by borderline oxacillin-susceptible strains of S. aureus and that, except at very low doses, ampicillin-sulbactam would also be as effective against borderline-susceptible strains as against fully oxacillin-susceptible strains of S. aureus.

Full text

PDF
507

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barg N., Chambers H., Kernodle D. Borderline susceptibility to antistaphylococcal penicillins is not conferred exclusively by the hyperproduction of beta-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Oct;35(10):1975–1979. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.10.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cantoni L., Wenger A., Glauser M. P., Bille J. Comparative efficacy of amoxicillin-clavulanate, cloxacillin, and vancomycin against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in rats. J Infect Dis. 1989 May;159(5):989–993. doi: 10.1093/infdis/159.5.989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chambers H. F., Archer G., Matsuhashi M. Low-level methicillin resistance in strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Apr;33(4):424–428. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.4.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Godfrey K. Statistics in practice. Comparing the means of several groups. N Engl J Med. 1985 Dec 5;313(23):1450–1456. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198512053132305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirano L., Bayer A. S. Beta-Lactam-beta-lactamase-inhibitor combinations are active in experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-producing oxacillin-resistant staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Apr;35(4):685–690. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.4.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McDougal L. K., Thornsberry C. The role of beta-lactamase in staphylococcal resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and cephalosporins. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 May;23(5):832–839. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.5.832-839.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Callaghan C. H., Morris A., Kirby S. M., Shingler A. H. Novel method for detection of beta-lactamases by using a chromogenic cephalosporin substrate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Apr;1(4):283–288. doi: 10.1128/aac.1.4.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Santoro J., Levison M. E. Rat model of experimental endocarditis. Infect Immun. 1978 Mar;19(3):915–918. doi: 10.1128/iai.19.3.915-918.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thauvin-Eliopoulos C., Rice L. B., Eliopoulos G. M., Moellering R. C., Jr Efficacy of oxacillin and ampicillin-sulbactam combination in experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-hyperproducing Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 May;34(5):728–732. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.5.728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thauvin C., Eliopoulos G. M., Willey S., Wennersten C., Moellering R. C., Jr Continuous-infusion ampicillin therapy of enterococcal endocarditis in rats. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Feb;31(2):139–143. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.2.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tomasz A., Drugeon H. B., de Lencastre H. M., Jabes D., McDougall L., Bille J. New mechanism for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: clinical isolates that lack the PBP 2a gene and contain normal penicillin-binding proteins with modified penicillin-binding capacity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Nov;33(11):1869–1874. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.11.1869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Unal S., Hoskins J., Flokowitsch J. E., Wu C. Y., Preston D. A., Skatrud P. L. Detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1685–1691. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1685-1691.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES