Abstract
The use of computers in clinical electrocardiography is increasing rapidly; however, the role of computers with respect to the electrocardiographer has not been established. At present all electrocardiograms (ECGs) processed by computer are also interpreted by electrocardiographers; hense effort is duplicated. In an investigation of whether conditions can be defined under which the electrocardiographer can use the computer more profitably by eliminating some of the duplication, ECGs recorded in a university teaching hospital were processed by a computer program and subsequently reviewed by 1 of 10 electrocardiographers. For ECGs interpreted as showing normal sinus rhythm the rate of agreement between computer and human reviewer was 99%. For those showing a normal ECG pattern (contour) the rate of direct agreement was only 88%. However, the rate of occurrence of clinically significant differences was only 1.64%; hence the rate of essential agreement for this classification was 98.36%. Other classifications with good agreement were myocardial infarction, sinus bradycardia and sinus tachycardia. Therefore, in circumstances comparable to those of this investigation it is feasible for electrocardiographers to use computers to reduce greatly their workload without compromising the quality of the service provided.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bonner R. E., Crevasse L., Ferrer M. I., Greenfield J. C., Jr A new computer program for analysis of scalar electrocardiograms. Comput Biomed Res. 1972 Dec;5(6):629–653. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(72)90043-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cornfield J., Dunn R. A., Batchlor C. D., Pipberger H. V. Multigroup diagnosis of electrocardiograms. Comput Biomed Res. 1973 Feb;6(1):97–120. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(73)90065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crevasse L., Ariet M. A new scalar electrocardiographic computer program. Clinical evaluation. JAMA. 1973 Nov 26;226(9):1089–1093. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu K. C., Francis D. B., Gau G. T., Smith R. E. Development and performance of Mayo-IBM electrocardiographic computer analysis programs (V70). Mayo Clin Proc. 1973 Apr;48(4):260–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pipberger H. V., McCaughan D., Littmann D., Pipberger H. A., Cornfield J., Dunn R. A., Batchlor C. D., Berson A. S. Clinical application of a second generation electrocardiographic computer program. Am J Cardiol. 1975 May;35(5):597–608. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90044-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wartak J., Milliken J. A., Karchmar J. Computer program for diagnostic evaluation of electrocardiograms. Comput Biomed Res. 1971 Jun;4(3):225–238. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(71)90028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolf H. K., MacInnis P. J., Stock S., Helppi R. K., Rautaharju P. M. Computer analysis of rest and exercise electrocardiograms. Comput Biomed Res. 1972 Aug;5(4):329–346. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(72)90066-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]