Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1992 May 16;304(6837):1287–1290. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6837.1287

Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction.

P Hjortdahl 1, E Laerum 1
PMCID: PMC1881840  PMID: 1606434

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the influence of continuity of care on patient satisfaction with consultations. DESIGN--Direct and episodic specific evaluation of patient satisfaction with recent consultation. SETTING AND SUBJECTS--A representative sample of 3918 Norwegian primary care patients were asked to evaluate their consultations by filling in a questionnaire. The response rate was 78%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--The patient's overall satisfaction with the consultation was rated on a six point scale. Continuity of care was recorded as the duration and intensity of the present patient-doctor relationship and as patients' perception of the present doctor being their personal doctor or not. RESULTS--The multivariate analysis indicated that an overall personal patient-doctor relationship increased the odds of the patient being satisfied with the consultation sevenfold (95% confidence interval 4.9 to 9.9) as compared with consultations where no such relationships existed. The duration of the patient-doctor relationship had a weak but significant association with patient satisfaction, while the intensity of contacts showed no such association. CONCLUSION--Personal, continuous care is linked with patient satisfaction. If patient satisfaction is accepted as an integral part of quality health care, reinforcing personal care may be one way of increasing this quality.

Full text

PDF
1287

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Banahan B. F., Jr, Banahan B. F., 3rd Continuity as an attitudinal contract. J Fam Pract. 1981 Apr;12(4):767–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fitzpatrick R. M., Hopkins A. P., Harvard-Watts O. Social dimensions of healing: a longitudinal study of outcomes of medical management of headaches. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(8):501–510. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patient satisfaction: II--Designing a questionnaire and conducting a survey. BMJ. 1991 May 11;302(6785):1129–1132. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6785.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. BMJ. 1991 Apr 13;302(6781):887–889. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6781.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Freeman G. Continuity of care in general practice: a review and critique. Fam Pract. 1984 Dec;1(4):245–252. doi: 10.1093/fampra/1.4.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(6):637–644. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90012-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935–939. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris R. T. Improving satisfaction through action research. J Appl Behav Sci. 1978 Jul-Aug;14(3):382–399. doi: 10.1177/002188637801400313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hjortdahl P., Borchgrevink C. F. Continuity of care: influence of general practitioners' knowledge about their patients on use of resources in consultations. BMJ. 1991 Nov 9;303(6811):1181–1184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6811.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hjortdahl P. General practice and continuity of care: organizational aspects. Fam Pract. 1989 Dec;6(4):292–298. doi: 10.1093/fampra/6.4.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keeley D. The future of general practice: Personal care or the polyclinic? BMJ. 1991 Jun 22;302(6791):1514–1516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6791.1514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marquis M. S., Davies A. R., Ware J. E., Jr Patient satisfaction and change in medical care provider: a longitudinal study. Med Care. 1983 Aug;21(8):821–829. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198308000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Murphy M. Somatisation: embodying the problem. BMJ. 1989 May 20;298(6684):1331–1332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6684.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pascoe G. C. Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):185–210. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Roter D. L., Hall J. A., Katz N. R. Relations between physicians' behaviors and analogue patients' satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care. 1987 May;25(5):437–451. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198705000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ware J. E., Jr, Snyder M. K. Dimensions of patient attitudes regarding doctors and medical care services. Med Care. 1975 Aug;13(8):669–682. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197508000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES