Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1992 Jun 6;304(6840):1491–1494. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491

Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.

P Brennan 1, A Silman 1
PMCID: PMC1882212  PMID: 1611375

Full text

PDF
1491

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COCHRANE A. L., GARLAND L. H. Observer error in the interpretation of chest films; an international investigation. Lancet. 1952 Sep 13;2(6733):505–509. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(52)90291-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Feinstein A. R., Cicchetti D. V. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543–549. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Maclure M., Willett W. C. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;126(2):161–169. doi: 10.1093/aje/126.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SCHILLING R. S., HUGHES J. P., DINGWALL-FORDYCE I. Disagreement between observers in an epidemiological study of respiratory disease. Br Med J. 1955 Jan 8;1(4905):65–68. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4905.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Thompson W. D., Walter S. D. A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(10):949–958. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90031-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES