Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1992 Sep 26;305(6856):746–747. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6856.746

Outcome of breech delivery at term.

J G Thorpe-Beeston 1, P J Banfield 1, N J Saunders 1
PMCID: PMC1883401  PMID: 1422330

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To compare neonatal mortality and morbidity in term infants presenting by the breech and delivered vaginally or by caesarean section. DESIGN--Population based comparison of outcomes. Data derived from the St Mary's maternity information system. SETTING--North West Thames Regional Health Authority, 1988-90. SUBJECTS--3447 singleton fetuses presenting by the breech at term. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Intrapartum and neonatal mortality, low Apgar scores, intubation at birth, and admission to special care baby units. RESULTS--After the exclusion of babies with congenital anomalies the incidence of intrapartum and neonatal death associated with vaginal birth was 8/961 (0.83%) compared with 1/2486 (0.03%) in babies born by caesarean section (relative risk 20, 95% confidence interval 2.5 to 163). The numbers of low Apgar scores and neonatal intubation were doubled in babies born vaginally or by emergency caesarean section compared with those delivered by elective operation. CONCLUSIONS--The good neonatal outcome associated with elective caesarean delivery of the term breech fetus may influence the decision of women and their obstetricians about mode of delivery.

Full text

PDF
746

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bingham P., Hird V., Lilford R. J. Management of the mature selected breech presentation: an analysis based on the intended method of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Aug;94(8):746–752. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bingham P., Lilford R. J. Management of the selected term breech presentation: assessment of the risks of selected vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for all cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jun;69(6):965–978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bithell J. F., Stewart A. M. Pre-natal irradiation and childhood malignancy: a review of British data from the Oxford Survey. Br J Cancer. 1975 Mar;31(3):271–287. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1975.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christian S. S., Brady K., Read J. A., Kopelman J. N. Vaginal breech delivery: a five-year prospective evaluation of a protocol using computed tomographic pelvimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):848–855. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91082-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collea J. V., Chein C., Quilligan E. J. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 May 15;137(2):235–244. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90780-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feldman G. B., Freiman J. A. Prophylactic cesarean section at term? N Engl J Med. 1985 May 9;312(19):1264–1267. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198505093121926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gimovsky M. L., Wallace R. L., Schifrin B. S., Paul R. H. Randomized management of the nonfrank breech presentation at term: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 May 1;146(1):34–40. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90923-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hytten F. E. Breech presentation: is it a bad omen? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Nov;89(11):879–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05049.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kiely J. L. Mode of delivery and neonatal death in 17,587 infants presenting by the breech. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Sep;98(9):898–904. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Paterson C. M., Saunders N. J. Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region. BMJ. 1991 Oct 5;303(6806):818–821. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6806.818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosen M. G., Dickinson J. C. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of indicators for success. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Nov;76(5 Pt 1):865–869. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199011000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sachs B. P., McCarthy B. J., Rubin G., Burton A., Terry J., Tyler C. W., Jr Cesarean section. Risk and benefits for mother and fetus. JAMA. 1983 Oct 28;250(16):2157–2159. doi: 10.1001/jama.250.16.2157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES