Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 56 (1); 46–56.
A population pharmacokinetic model for paclitaxel in the presence of a novel P-gp modulator, Zosuquidar (LY335979)
S. Callies, D. P de Alwis, A. Harris, P. Vasey, J. H. Beijnen, J. H. Schellens, M. Burgess & L. Aarons
P. 52. The publisher regrets that Table 3 was printed incorrectly. The correct Table is printed below.
Table 3.
Basic model | Categorical relationship (final model) | Continuous relationship | |
---|---|---|---|
OBJF | 8727.003 | 8703.350 | 8680.895 |
Parameters (value (SE%)) | |||
CL changing with time* | |||
Slope (θ2) (lh−2) | 9.35 (7.32) | 10.0 (7.92) | 9.66 (6.95) |
Min CL (θ1) (lh−1) | 7.64 (12.2) | 8.48 (12.9) | 8.59 (29.9) |
t50 (θ4) (h) | 8.76 (16.4) | 9.36 (28.2) | 7.27 (102) |
γ1 (θ3) | 2.94 (23.5) | 2.68 (30.2) | 2.12 (95.3) |
Effect of zosuquidar on paclitaxel CL | |||
Decrease with LY Cmax>350(µgl−1) (%) | – | 25.2 (12.4) | – |
Emax (lh−1) | – | – | 5.49 (43.5) |
LY Cmax50 (µgl−1) | – | – | 328 (15.4) |
γ2 | – | – | 9.18 (129) |
V1 (l) | 7.93 (14.0) | 7.95 (13.8) | 8.38 (13.0) |
V2 (l) | 198 (7.78) | 196 (7.81) | 194 (16.0) |
Q2 (lh−1) | 11.1 (7.37) | 10.8 (9.35) | 11.2 (11.3) |
Q3 (lh−1) | 6.57 (15.8) | 6.76 (16.4) | 6.35 (39.4) |
V3(l) | 7.00 (15.4) | 7.51 (18.9) | 10.2 (164) |
ω CL (%) | 27.2 (33.2) | 25.9 (29.7) | 24.8 (34.3) |
ω CL-Q2 (%) | 32.6 (23.4) | 30.5 (23.2) | 29.6 (24.7) |
ω Q2 (%) | 44.5 (28.0) | 43.7 (26.1) | 43.5 (37.0) |
ω CL-V2 (%) | 29.3 (30.7) | 26.1 (38.4) | 24.2 (39.5) |
ω Q2-V2 (%) | 40.7 (29.9) | 39.6 (29.2) | 37.5 (35.1) |
ωV2 (%) | 43.7 (26.6) | 42.8 (26.0) | 40.9 (31.4) |
ωV1 (%) | 38.5 (58.6) | 40.0 (52.4) | 41.7 (58.6) |
ω IOV CL (%) | 20.9 (33.2) | 15.2 (53.9) | 16.1 (56.2) |
ω IOV V1 (%) | 57.5 (39.6) | 54.5 (42.8) | 46.6 (47.9) |
Residual variance (%) | 22.7 (7.75) | 22.9 (7.77) | 22.5 (8.00) |
During the infusion *postinfusion with INF the length of the infusion and time the time from the start of the infusion.