Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 1992 Oct;141(4):773–776.

A stem cell niche theory of intestinal crypt maintenance based on a study of somatic mutation in colonic mucosa.

E D Williams 1, A P Lowes 1, D Williams 1, G T Williams 1
PMCID: PMC1886625  PMID: 1415475

Abstract

In both large and small intestine, mutagen administration leads to the occurrence of isolated crypts that are completely populated by a mutated phenotype; therefore, it has been proposed that crypts are maintained by a single stem cell. We show in mice that a single dose of mutagen leads to an early transient increase in frequency of colonic crypts that show a partial mutated phenotype and a later increase in frequency of crypts that show a complete mutated phenotype. This increase reaches a plateau at about the same time as the disappearance of partially mutated crypts. The same is true in the small intestine, but the time course is much slower. We propose an explanation based on multiple crypt stem cells that occupy a "stem cell niche," with random cell loss after stem cell division. A small difference in the number of crypt stem cells that occupy the niche provides a simple explanation for the surprisingly large difference in the time course of phenotypic changes in the large and small intestines after administration of a single dose of mutagen.

Full text

PDF
773

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Griffiths D. F., Davies S. J., Williams D., Williams G. T., Williams E. D. Demonstration of somatic mutation and colonic crypt clonality by X-linked enzyme histochemistry. Nature. 1988 Jun 2;333(6172):461–463. doi: 10.1038/333461a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Potten C. S., Loeffler M. Stem cells: attributes, cycles, spirals, pitfalls and uncertainties. Lessons for and from the crypt. Development. 1990 Dec;110(4):1001–1020. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.4.1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schmidt G. H., Winton D. J., Ponder B. A. Development of the pattern of cell renewal in the crypt-villus unit of chimaeric mouse small intestine. Development. 1988 Aug;103(4):785–790. doi: 10.1242/dev.103.4.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schofield R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells. 1978;4(1-2):7–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Thomas G. A., Williams D., Williams E. D. The demonstration of tissue clonality by X-linked enzyme histochemistry. J Pathol. 1988 Jun;155(2):101–108. doi: 10.1002/path.1711550205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Winton D. J., Blount M. A., Ponder B. A. A clonal marker induced by mutation in mouse intestinal epithelium. Nature. 1988 Jun 2;333(6172):463–466. doi: 10.1038/333463a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Winton D. J., Ponder B. A. Stem-cell organization in mouse small intestine. Proc Biol Sci. 1990 Jul 23;241(1300):13–18. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1990.0059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wolpert L. Stem cells: a problem in asymmetry. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1988;10:1–9. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1988.supplement_10.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES