Herpes zoster is a clinical manifestation of the reactivation of latent varicella zoster virus infection. It is a cause of considerable morbidity, especially in elderly patients, and can be fatal in immunosuppressed or critically ill patients. The pain associated with herpes zoster can be debilitating, with a serious impact on quality of life, and the economic costs of managing the disease represent an important burden on both health services and society.1 Here we provide an overview of the disease and a summary of “best practice guidance” for the management of herpes zoster and its sequelae.
Summary points
Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia are common causes of debilitating neuropathic pain
Systemic antiviral agents reduce both the acute pain of herpes zoster and the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia
Corticosteroids, tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, and opioids reduce acute pain and may have additional effects on the reduction of postherpetic neuralgia
Tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, opioids, and lidocaine patches are effective in established postherpetic neuralgia
Large scale vaccination of children and older adults may have an important impact on the incidence of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia
Sources and selection criteria
We searched Pubmed (2001-6) by using the terms “herpes zoster OR postherpetic neuralgia” with the limits “meta-analysis and randomised controlled trial.” We searched all reviews in the Cochrane library with the same terms. We also reviewed recent recommendations made by an expert body on the management of herpes zoster sponsored by the International Association for the Study of Pain, the Neuropathic Pain Institute, and the VZV Foundation. We also drew heavily on published management guidelines from the British Infection Society, the International Herpes Management Forum, the German Dermatology Society, and the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
What is herpes zoster and who gets it?
Herpes zoster, or shingles, is the painful eruption of a rash, usually unilateral, caused by the varicella zoster virus. Varicella zoster virus usually persists asymptomatically in the dorsal root ganglia of anyone who has had chickenpox, reactivating from its dormant state in about 25% of people to travel along the sensory nerve fibres and cause vesicular lesions in the dermatome supplied by that nerve.
Herpes zoster is more common in people with diminished cell mediated immunity. This includes elderly people, patients with lymphoma, those receiving chemotherapy or steroids, and people with HIV. In contrast to herpes simplex, precise triggers for herpes zoster are not known.
How common is herpes zoster in general practice?
Population based studies show that the incidence of herpes zoster rises with age from approximately 2-3/1000 patient years in people aged 50 to 8/1000 patient years in those aged 70 and over.2 The average general practice of 1500 patients would therefore expect to have between three and five cases a year.
What are the clinical features?
Replication and transmission of the virus in the nerves and skin lead to the cardinal features of herpes zoster—pain and rash. In some people the rash is preceded by a prodromal phase lasting 48-72 hours or longer, consisting of throbbing pain and paraesthesia in the region of the affected sensory nerve. This may sometimes be confused with other acute medical conditions such as angina, cholecystitis, or renal colic, depending on the dermatome involved. The rash of herpes zoster is typically vesicular, affects a single dermatome, and lasts for three to five days before the lesions pustulate and scab (figure). In immunocompetent patients, the most frequent site of reactivation is the thoracic nerves followed by the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve (herpes zoster ophthalmicus), which can progress to involve all structures of the eye.3 If the mucocutaneous division of the VII cranial nerve, which innervates the ear and side of the tongue, or the VIII cranial nerve is involved, the development of lesions in the ear, facial paralysis, and associated hearing and vestibulary symptoms are known as Ramsay Hunt syndrome. Herpes zoster may also cause facial nerve palsy without vesicles occurring in the external meatus. Other rare complications include encephalitis, myelitis, retinitis, and hemiparesis, all of which are more common in immunocompromised patients.4
How is herpes zoster diagnosed?
Herpes zoster can usually be diagnosed clinically. However, early zoster and zoster presenting in the sacral and cervical area may be difficult to distinguish from herpes simplex. In these cases, the diagnosis can be confirmed by sending swabs to the local virology laboratory, but treatment should not be delayed while waiting for test results. The top of the lesion should be lifted and a sterile swab used to rub the base of the lesion. The swab should then be wiped across a sterile glass side or over three wells on a Teflon coated slide. The slide should be air dried and sent to the laboratory for staining with immunofluorescent antibodies. The swab can also be placed in viral transport medium or sterile saline, which is suitable for transporting to the laboratory within the next one to three days for detection of viral DNA by polymerase chain reaction.
Reactivation of varicella zoster virus in immunocompromised patients, especially those who have had bone marrow or solid organ transplants, may spread to involve the gut, liver, and other viscera. Although a typical rash is common, some cases present with abdominal pain and no evidence of rash. In the absence of rash, the diagnosis can be confirmed by measuring virus in the blood by polymerase chain reaction.w1
How serious is herpes zoster?
The rash is accompanied by severe pain, which, in some people, does not subside after healing but persists for months or years. This prolonged zoster associated pain, usually defined as pain persisting for more than four months after the rash has healed, is known as postherpetic neuralgia and is the most common complication of herpes zoster. The pain can be debilitating, exacerbated by the slightest touch, and lead to loss of employment, depression, and social isolation. Identification of patients at risk of developing postherpetic neuralgia is therefore crucial, as they stand to gain most from treatment. Several clinical and laboratory parameters have been suggested and evaluated as risk factors predicting postherpetic neuralgia (box 1), but they are by no means exhaustive.5 6
Box 1 Risk factors for development of postherpetic neuralgia after an attack of herpes zoster
Advanced age (>50 years)
Female sex
Presence of a prodrome
Severe or disseminated rash
Severe pain at presentation (visual analogue score >5)
Polymerase chain reaction detectable varicella zoster virus viraemia
Health economic studies estimate that shingles and postherpetic neuralgia cost the United Kingdom up to £73.8m (€108m; $147m) a year. The main medical costs—drugs, visits to the general practitioner, and hospital admissions—equate to between £74 and £198 for each episode of acute herpes zoster and £777 for each episode of postherpetic neuralgia.7 In patients aged under 65, acute herpes zoster is estimated to cost £526 per episode when the costs to wider society resulting from loss of productivity are also included.8
How is herpes zoster treated?
Many trials have compared interventions, concentrating on reductions in severity of pain as the key outcome measure. As zoster associated pain is a continuous spectrum ranging from the pain of the prodrome to the pain of established postherpetic neuralgia, considerable heterogeneity exists in the populations studied, making comparisons of the efficacy of agents across studies difficult. Also, as the severity of pain during an acute attack is an important predictor for the development and the severity of postherpetic neuralgia, interventions used during the acute phase may influence the outcome of interventions subsequently used to treat postherpetic neuralgia. Nevertheless, as clinicians are most likely to be confronted with either a patient with a herpes zoster rash or a patient with established postherpetic neuralgia, we will cover these two problems as separate entities.
What is effective treatment for an acute attack of herpes zoster?
Table 1 shows the drugs available for treating acute herpes zoster in immunocompetent adult patients.
Table 1.
Drug | Dose/frequency | Treatment duration | Efficacy | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aciclovir | 800 mg five times daily* | 7-10 days | Reduces acute pain and development of PHN | Most effective if started within 72 hours of onset of rash |
Famciclovir | 750 mg daily* or 250 mg three times daily | 7 days | Reduces acute pain and development of PHN | Most effective if started within 72 hours of onset of rash |
Valaciclovir | 1 g three times daily* | 7 days | Reduces acute pain and development of PHN | Most effective if started within 72 hours of onset of rash |
Brivudin | 125 mg daily | 7 days | Reduces acute pain and development of PHN | Licensed for treatment in Austria, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, and Spain |
Prednisolone | 60 mg daily initially, then taper dose | 21 days | Reduces acute pain | Use only in combination with antivirals. Reduce dose to 30 mg after 7 days and to 15 mg after a further 7 days, then stop |
Amitriptyline | 25 mg daily | 3 months | Reduces incidence of PHN; effect on acute pain uncertain | Use with care in elderly patients. An electrocardiogram should be done before treatment |
PHN=postherpetic neuralgia.
*Dose given in British National Formulary.
Systemic antivirals
Meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials suggest that the oral antiviral agents aciclovir, famcicolovir, and valaciclovir started within 72 hours of the onset of rash reduce both the severity and the duration of acute pain,9 10 as well as the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia.11 12 The nucleoside analogue brivudin has been shown to be as effective as famciclovir but superior to aciclovir in both healing acute lesions and reducing postherpetic neuralgia.13 14 15 The pharmacokinetics of oral antivirals differ considerably, so the patient's ability to adhere to a multiple dosing regimen should be considered when selecting an agent for treatment. Antiviral treatment is effective at an early stage when viral replication is still occurring. It should be given to patients who present within 72 hours of the onset of rash and to those aged over 50 with new vesicle formation or complications whenever they present.16 17 Published guidelines advise that herpes zoster ophthalmicus should always be treated with antivirals and the advice of an ophthalmologist sought.17 Likewise, visceral herpes zoster requires prompt admission to hospital and use of intravenous aciclovir (10 mg/kg, eight hourly).17
Corticosteroids
The addition of oral prednisolone to aciclovir treatment has been shown to reduce pain, speed healing of lesions, and enable a more rapid return to daily activities.18 Coadministration of steroids and antivirals should therefore be considered for older patients with appreciable pain who do not have a contraindication to steroids (such as diabetes or peptic ulcer disease). Expert opinion also supports the use of steroids in the treatment of acute idiopathic facial palsy in combination with aciclovir.17
Although oral steroids are of benefit in the acute attack, they have not been shown to have an effect on preventing postherpetic neuralgia.12 Likewise, a single dose of epidural methylprednisolone combined with a local anaesthetic is a useful addition to antiviral treatment for resolution of acute pain but has no effect on the development of postherpetic neuralgia.19 Repeated administration of epidural steroids combined with continuous infusion of anaesthetic for up to 21 days has been shown to reduce postherpetic neuralgia,20 but the risks and practicalities of interventions that need epidural administration remain to be resolved. The role of steroids in the management of herpes zoster is controversial, and the results of a systematic review of their efficacy in postherpetic neuralgia are eagerly awaited.w2
Tricyclic antidepressants
Tricyclic antidepressants have been widely used in the management of chronic neuropathic pain conditions.w3 Use in the acute phase of herpes zoster in elderly patients has been evaluated in a randomised placebo controlled trail of amitriptyline. Effects on reduction of acute pain were not evaluated, but a reduction in the prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia at six months was reported in the amitriptyline treated group.21 Although this trial provides some evidence for the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants in preventing postherpetic neuralgia, antivirals were also given but only at the attending physicians' discretion. If prescribed, tricyclic antidepressants should be used with caution, especially in elderly patients, in whom anticholinergic side effects may precipitate acute confusion or cardiac arrhythmias.
Other agents
Although opioid analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used in the management of acute pain syndromes, only the opioids oxycodone and tramadol have been subjected to formal trials in herpes zoster. Oxycodone reduces acute pain, but evidence for the prevention of postherpetic neuralgia is lacking; conversely, tramadol is efficacious in established postherpetic neuralgia but has not been studied for acute treatment.22 A randomised controlled trial has recently shown that a single 900 mg dose of the anticonvulsant gabapentin reduces acute pain in herpes zoster.23
Management of acute ophthalmic zoster
Herpes zoster affecting the first division of the trigeminal nerve is particularly aggressive and must be treated with antivirals, even if more than 72 hours have elapsed since onset. Oral antiviral agents should be accompanied by topical antiviral cream applied to the eye and corticosteroids where appropriate.17w4 Box 2 shows the complications of acute ophthalmic zoster.
Box 2 Complications of herpes zoster ophthalmicus
Conjunctivitis, episcleritis, and scleritis
Keratitis, iridocyclitis
Choroiditis, papillitis
Oculomotor palsy
Retinitis
Optic atrophy
What is effective treatment in established postherpetic neuralgia?
An expert subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology has done a systematic review of treatments for established postherpetic neuralgia.w5 Several recommendations were made, the strength of the evidence supporting them was ranked, and where possible absolute risk reduction rate, number needed to treat, and number needed to harm were calculated. Tricyclic antidepressants, the anticonvulsants gabapentin and pregabalin, controlled released oxycodone or morphine sulphate, and lidocaine patches were all classed as moderately to highly effective. Some evidence of efficacy was also found for topical capsaicin and aspirin creams and for intrathecally administered methylprednisolone. Non-drug treatments such as transcutaneous electrical stimulation and acupuncture were also evaluated and found to be ineffective. Table 2 summarises the supporting evidence.
Table 2.
Drug class and supporting studies | Study design | Measure of treatment effect (95% CI) |
---|---|---|
Tricyclic antidepressants | ||
Amitriptyline v placebow6 | Double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial | ARR=65%; NNT=1.6 (1.2 to 2.4) |
Amitriptyline v lorazepam and placebow7 | Randomised, placebo controlled, multi-armed, crossover trial | NNT=3.2 (2.1 to 6.6) |
Amitriptyline v nortriptylinew8 | Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial | NA |
Amitriptyline v maprotilinew9 | Randomised, double blind, crossover trial | NNT=32 for amitriptyline |
Desipramine v benztropinew10 | Randomised, active placebo controlled trial | ARR=63%; NNT=1.6 (1.1 to 2.6) |
Anticonvulsants | ||
Gabapentin v placebow11 | Randomised, dose titrated, double blind, placebo controlled trial | NNT=2.2 (1.7 to 3.0); NNH=10.3 |
Gabapentin v placebow12 | Randomised, dose titrated double blind, placebo controlled trial | ARR=29.5%; NNT=5.3 (3.6 to 10.2); NNH=11.2 |
Pregabalin v placebow13 | Randomised, placebo controlled trial | NNT=3.3 (2.3 to 5.9); NNH=3.7 |
Opioids | ||
Oxycodone v placebow14 | Double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial | ARR=65%; NNT=2.5 (1.7 to 5.1); NNH=38 |
Morphine or methadone v nortriptyline/desipramine and placebow15 | Double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial | NNT=3 (2 to 5.5) for opioids; NNT=6.2 (3.2 to 294) for tricylics |
Tramadol v placebow16 | Randomised, placebo controlled trial | NNT=4.7 (2.9 to 19) |
Topical lidocaine, aspirin, and capsaicin | ||
Lidocaine gel v placebow17 | Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial | NA |
Lidocaine polyethylene patch v placebow18 | Enriched enrolment, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial | NNT=2 (1.4 to 3.3) |
Aspirin cream v indometacin cream, diclofenac cream, and placebow19 | Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial | ARR=32%; NNT=3 (1.7 to 26.1) |
Capsaicin v placebow20 | Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial | NNT=3.2 (2.1 to 6.3) |
ARR=absolute risk reduction; NA=not available; NNH=number needed to harm; NNT=number needed to treat.
Can we prevent herpes zoster?
A live attenuated vaccine derived from the oka strain of varicella zoster virus has been shown to be highly effective in preventing primary varicella in children and was introduced into the US vaccination programme in 1996. A reduction in the number of cases of primary varicella zoster virus could have a major impact on the incidence of zoster in both the short term and longer term. Although the eradication of primary varicella would also lead to the eradication of herpes zoster, the cell mediated immunity responsible for suppression of latent infection needs to be repeatedly boosted by exposure to wild type virus circulating in the community. Concern exists that a reduction in the number of childhood cases of varicella could lead to a short term increase in herpes zoster in latently infected people. Early analyses of the incidence of herpes zoster in the United States after introduction of the vaccination programme have yet to support this theory.24 A large clinical trial of varicella zoster virus vaccine in adults aged over 60 in an attempt to boost waning immunity was recently reported.25 The vaccine was found to be highly effective at reducing both the number of cases of herpes zoster and the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia, suggesting that this may be an extremely useful intervention for reducing the burden of herpes zoster disease.
Ongoing research
Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia will remain important clinical problems for the foreseeable future. Several areas need further research, some of which are being tackled in ongoing studies. These include the development of biomarkers to identify people at risk of developing postherpetic neuralgia and clinical trials to determine exactly who should be treated when presenting more than 72 hours after onset of the rash. Research on the molecular pathogenesis of varicella zoster virus and mechanisms underlying latency will help in the design of more effective antiviral agents and inactivated (non-infectious) vaccines for use in immunocompromised patients.
Additional education resources
Johnson R, Patrick D, eds. Improving the management of varicella herpes zoster and zoster-associated pain: recommendations from the IHMF Management Strategies Workshop. International Herpes Management Forum, 2002. www.ihmf.org/library/monograph/m_11.pdf
Dworkin RH, Johnson RW, Breuer J, Gnann JW, Levin MJ, Backonja M, et al., Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44(suppl 1):1-26
Wareham DW. Postherpetic neuralgia. Clin Evid 2005;14:1017-25
Resources for patients
Ramsey Hunt Organisation (www.ramsayhunt.org/)—This support group provides both general information and an online discussion forum for patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome and neuropathic pain
VZV Research Foundation (www.vzvfoundation.org/)—Dedicated to combating all diseases caused by varicella zoster virus by providing research funding and educational material
American Academy of Family Physicians. Shingles patient information sheet (www.aafp.org/afp/20000415/2447ph.html)—A useful information sheet on shingles and its complications
After Shingles (www.aftershingles.com/index.html)—Extensive website providing advice for both patients and carers on the treatment of shingles and postherpetic neuralgia
Supplementary Material
Contributors: DWW did the initial literature search and prepared and wrote the first draft. JB advised on subsequent revisions and preparation of the final draft.
Competing interests: JB has received funding for work on the oka vaccine and varicella zoster virus from Merck, Sanofi Pasteur-MSD, GlaxoSmithKline, the Medical Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust. DWW: none declared.
References
- 1.Davies L, Cossins L, Bowsher D, Drummond M. The cost for treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics 1994;6:142-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hope-Simpson RE. The nature of herpes zoster: a long term study and a new hypothesis Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:9-20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mahalingam R, Wellish M, Wolf W, Dueland AN, Cohrs R, Vafai A, et al. Latent varicella zoster viral DNA in human trigeminal and thoracic ganglia. N Engl J Med 1990;323:627-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Whitley RJ. Varicella zoster. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2004
- 5.Jung BF, Johnson RW, Griffin DR, Dworkin RH. Risk factors for postherpetic neuralgia in patients with herpes zoster. Neurology 2004;62:1545-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Scott FT, Leedham-Green ME, Barrett-Muir WY, Hawrami K, Gallagher WJ, Johnson R, et al. A study of shingles and the development of postherpetic neuralgia in East London. J Med Virol 2003;70:S24-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Edmunds WJ, Brisson M, Rose JD. The epidemiology of herpes zoster and potential cost-effectiveness of vaccination in England and Wales. Vaccine 2001;19:3076-90.11312002 [Google Scholar]
- 8.Scott FT, Johnson RW, Leedham-Green M, Davies E, Edmunds WJ, Breuer J. The burden of herpes zoster: a prospective population based study. Vaccine 2006;24:1308-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shen MC, Lin HH, Lee SS, Chen YS, Chiang PC, Liu YC. Double-blind, randomized, acyclovir-controlled, parallel-group trial comparing the safety and efficacy of famciclovir and acyclovir in patients with uncomplicated herpes zoster. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2004;37:75-81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shafran SD, Tyring SK, Ashton R, Decroix J, Forszpaniak C, Wade A, et al. Once, twice or three times daily famciclovir compared with acyclovir for the oral treatment of herpes zoster in immunocompetent adults: a randomized multicenter, double-blind clinical trial. J Clin Virol 2004;29:248-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jackson JL, Gibbons R, Meyer G, Inouye L. The effect of treating herpes zoster with oral acyclovir in preventing postherpetic neuralgia: a meta analysis. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:909-12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alper BS, Lewis R. Does treatment of acute herpes zoster prevent or shorten postherpetic neuralgia? A systematic review of the literature. J Fam Pract 2000;49:255-64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wassilew S, Collaborative Brivudin PHN Study Group. Brivudin compared with famciclovir in the treatment of herpes zoster: effects in acute disease and chronic pain in immunocompetent patients: a randomized double-blind, multinational study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2005;19:47-55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wassilew SW, Wutzler P, Brivudin Herpes Zoster Study Group. Oral brivudin in comparison with acyclovir for improved therapy of herpes zoster in immunocompetent patients: results of a randomized, double-blind, multicentred study. Antiviral Res 2003;59:49-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wassilew SW, Wutzler P, Brivudin Herpes Zoster Study Group. Oral brivudin in comparison with acyclovir for herpes zoster: a survey study on postherpetic neuralgia. Antiviral Res 2003;59:57-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.British Society for the Study of Infection. Guidelines for the management of shingles: report of a working group of the British Society for the Study of Infection. J Infect 1995;30:193-200 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dworkin RH, Johnson RW, Breuer J, Gnann JW, Levin MJ, Backonja M, et al. Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:S1-26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Whitley RJ, Weiss H, Gnann JW Jr, Tyring S, Mertz GJ, Pappas PG, et al. Aciclovir with and without prednisone for the treatment of herpes zoster: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:376-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Van Wijck AJ, Opstelten W, Moons KG, van Essen GA, Stolker RJ, Kalkman CJ, et al. The PINE study of epidural steroids and local anaesthetics to prevent postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;367:219-24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pasqualucci A, Pasqualucci V, Galla F, De Angelis V, Marzocchi V, Colussi R, et al. Prevention of post-herpetic neuralgia: acyclovir and prednisolone versus epidural local anesthetic and methylprednisolone. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:910-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bowsher D. The effects of pre-emptive treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia with amitriptyline: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997;13:327-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boureau F, Legallicier P, Kabir-Ahmadi M. Tramadol in post-herpetic neuralgia: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pain 2003;104:323-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Berry JD, Petersen KL. A single dose of gabapentin reduces acute pain and allodynia in patients with herpes zoster. Neurology 2005;65:444-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jumaan AO, Yu O, Jackson LA, Bohlke K, Galil K, Seward JF. Incidence of herpes zoster, before and after varicella-vaccination-associated decreases in the incidence of varicella, 1992-2002. J Infect Dis 2005;191:2002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oxman MN, Levin MJ, Johnson GR, Schmader KE, Straus SE, Gelb LD, et al. A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2271-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.