Summary
Background
The distribution of Shigella serotypes is of epidemiological importance and antimicrobial therapy for shigellosis can prevent potential complications of shigellosis. Studies done fifty years ago in Ghana indicated the predominance of Shigella flexneri.
Objectives
To describe the distribution of Shigella serogroups and serotypes and their antibiogram profiles.
Study design
A prospective descriptive study.
Setting
The Microbiology Department of the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.
Methods
Consecutive stool specimens from patients with diarrhoea submitted between February 2004 and June 2005 were cultured for Shigella and the isolates typed with commercial anti-sera. The susceptibilities of the isolates were also tested against eleven antimicrobial agents by the disc diffusion method. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of isolates to ciprofloxacin were also determined by the E-test.
Results
Five hundred and ninety four diarrhoea stool specimens yielded 24 Shigella isolates with the following serogroup distribution: S. flexneri 70.8%, S. dysenteriae 16.7%, S. sonnei 8.3% and S. boydii 4.2%. Approximately 96% of the isolates were multi-drug resistant but all twenty four were susceptible to nalidixic acid and the fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin). The MICs of twenty one of the isolates to ciprofloxacin were ≤ 0.064 µg ml-1.
Conclusions
The predominance of S. flexneri was confirmed and Shigella isolates from Accra are susceptible to nalidixic acid and the fluoroquinolones. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance particularly to monitor the emergence of Shigella strains resistant to nalidixic acid and the fluoroquiolones is important.
Keywords: Shigella, serogroups, serotypes, multi-drug resistant, MIC
Introduction
The four species of the genus Shigella; S. dysenteriae, S. flexneri, S. boydii and S. sonnei cause a wide spectrum of illness from watery diarrhoea to fulminant dysentery. The low infectious inoculum, (as few as 10 organisms) render Shigella highly contagious. Shigellosis therefore occurs as an endemic disease in populations characterized by over-crowding, poor housing, poor sanitation and inadequate water supply. The predominant serogroups of Shigella occurring in a region also appears to be related to the socioeconomic development; and evidence also indicates that the severity of shigellosis is related to the infecting serogroup1. For example, S dysenteriae type 1, also known as Shiga bacillus, has been recognized as the major cause of epidemic dysentery for nearly 100 years. Pandemics of Shiga dysentery have spread across Central America, Bangladesh, South Asia and Central and East Africa2–4.
Antimicrobial therapy for shigellosis reduces the duration and severity of the disease and can also prevent potentially lethal complications. However, over the past few decades most bacteria have become progressively resistant to most of the first-line drugs used and the prevalence of multi-drug resistant strains is an important concern of treatment. It is also well documented that pandemic strains often exhibit multiple antibiotic resistance and induce severe illness with high case fatality in all age groups5. The current recommended antimicrobial of choice for the treatment of shigellosis is ciprofloxacin because of its efficacy, safety and reduced cost6.
In the tropics, most infections are due to S. flexneri, and infections primarily due to S. sonnei are less common7. Studies done in Ghana over a fifty year period indicate the predominance of S. flexneri8– 10, but only Agbodaze et al8 reported on the sensitivity of isolates to antimicrobial drugs.
Knowledge of the distribution of Shigella serotypes among clinical isolates is of epidemiological importance. Six years ago, the World Health Organisation (WHO) emphasized the need to understand the burden of shigellosis in developing countries11.
The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of current Shigella serogroups and serotypes from Accra and to compare data obtained with earlier studies in Accra and the Central region of Ghana . Current antibiogram profiles and the MICs of isolates to ciprofloxacin are also reported.
METHODS
Consecutive diarrhoea stool specimens submitted for culture and sensitivity tests at the Microbiology Department, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), between February 2004 and June 2005 were cultured for Shigella using standard bacteriological methods12. Non-diarrhoea stool specimens were excluded and basic demographic data (age and sex) were obtained from request cards which accompanied the specimens.
Stool specimens were plated onto full plate deoxycholate citrate agar and Salmonella Shigella agar (Oxoid, Maryland, USA) as primary plates and a loopfull also inoculated into selenite F broth. Suspicious pale colonies on solid plates, which were Gram negative and oxidase test negative were biochemically characterized. Presumptive Shigella isolates on Triple Sugar Iron agar (Oxoid, Maryland, USA) were typed by slide agglutination tests with Shigella polyvalent grouping (Mast Group Ltd., Merseyside, U.K.) and monovalent antisera (Denka Seiken Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Shigella isolates were tested for their susceptibility to 11 antimicrobials by the Kirby-Bauer method13. A control was set up using Escherichia coli, ATCC 25922, which was susceptible to all the tested drugs (ampicillin, 10µg; chloramphenicol, 30µg; cotrimoxazole, 25µg; tetracycline, 30µg; gentamicin 10Ég; amikacin, 30Ég; nalidixic acid, 30Ég; cefuroxime 30Ég; cefotaxime, 30Ég; ofloxacin, 5Ég; ciprofloxacin 5Ég). The commercial antimicrobial discs were purchased from Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom. Zone sizes were measured in milliliters and compared to standards for interpretation. The MICs of twenty three of the isolates to ciprofloxacin were determined by the E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). The E-test consists of a concentration gradient of ciprofloxacin (range of 0.002–32 µg ml-1) immobilized on one side of a strip which is placed on a seeded agar plate. After overnight incubation at 37°C, the intersection of the growth ellipse and the strip gives the MIC by direct reading.
Results
A total of 594 diarrhoea stool specimens were bacteriologically cultured and 24 Shigella isolates were obtained. This represents an isolation rate of 4.04%. All the 24 isolates were obtained from the primary plates and no mixed infection was observed. The age distribution of patients who were positive for Shigella ranged from 8months to 62 years with a mean age of 16.7 years. The age distribution and clinical isolates are shown in Table 1. Approximately 38% (9) of the patients who cultured positive for shigellosis were five years and below and 41.7% (10) were 20 years and above (Table 1). The ratio of females to males was 2.4:1.
Table 1.
Age group distribution of patients from whom Shigella isolates were obtained
Age group/years |
No. of Isolates |
Shigella serogroups isolates |
<1 | 2 | S.flexneri(1), S.dysenteriae (1) |
1–5 | 7 |
S.flexneri(5), S.dysenteriae (1) S. sonnei (1) |
6–10 | 2 | S.flexneri (1), S.sonnei(1) |
11–15 | 3 | S.flexneri(3) |
16–20 | 1 | S.flexneri(1) |
21–25 | - | - |
26–30 | 3 | S.flexneri(2), S.dysenteriae(1) |
31–35 | 2 | S.flexneri(1), S.dysenteriae(1) |
36–40 | 1 | S.flexneri (1) |
41–45 | 2 | S.flexneri (1), S.boydii (1) |
>45 | 1 | S.flexneri (1) |
Total | 24 |
All the four serogroups of Shigella; Groups A (S. dysenteriae), B (S. flexneri), C (S. boydii) and D (S. sonnei) were isolated. Shigella flexneri formed 70.8% (17) followed by S.dysenteriae at 16.7% (4), S. sonnei at 8.3% (2) and S. boydii 4.2% (1). Stereotyping for S.flexneri gave the following distribution; four types 2, three type 1, three type 6, two type 3, two group 7 (8), and one type 4. Two of the isolates which agglutinated with the group anti-sera for S.flexneri were however non-reactive for any of the tested anti-sera for serotyping supplied by the manufacturer (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan). All the S.dysenteriae were reactive to poly A and types 1–7 (Mast Group Ltd., U.K.). Typing with monovalent antisera from Denka Seiken, Japan showed that all the S.dysenteriae obtained were not the Shiga bacillus (epidemic strain). The isolated S.boydii was reactive to poly C2 and types 12, 13, 14 and 15 (Mast Group Ltd., U.K.).
The only S. boydii isolate encountered in the study was isolated from a Ghanaian who showed symptoms of shigellosis upon his return from the United Kingdom.
The overall percentage resistance in the various serogroups is as follows: ampicillin, 95.8%; tetracycline, 91.7%; cotrimoxazole, 91.7%; chloramphenical, 83.3%; amikacin, 37.5%; gentamicin, 37.5%; cefuroxime, 16.7%; cefotaxime, 12.5%; nalidixic acid, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, 0% each. A total of 12 distinct resistance patterns were encountered in all the Shigella strains tested (Table 2).
Table 2.
Distinct antibiograms of the 24 Shigella isolates from Accra
Resistance Pattern | Number of Isolates |
Am, Ch, Co, Te, Ak, Gn, Cu, Ct | 2 |
Am, Ch, Co, Ak, Gn, Cu, Ct | 1 |
Am, Ch, Co, Te, Ak, Gn | 4 |
Am, Co, Te, Ak, Gn | 1 |
Am, Ch, Co, Te, Gn | 1 |
Am, Ch, Co, Te, Ak | 1 |
Am, Ch, Co, Te, Ct | 1 |
Am, Ch, Co, Te | 8 |
Am, Ch, Te | 1 |
Am, Co, Te | 2 |
Am, Co, Gn | 1 |
Co, Te | 1 |
Am=ampicillin; Ch=chloramphenicol; Co=cotrimoxazole; Te=tetracycline; Ak=amikacin; Gn=gentamicin; Cu=cefuroxime; Ct=cefotaxime
Twenty-three of the isolates (96%) were multiple drug resistant (MDR). Two of the strains were however resistant to 8 of the 11 antimicrobials tested whilst all 24 were susceptible to nalidixic acid and the fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin). The MICs of twenty three of the isolates to ciprofloxacin were tested. Twenty one of the strains had MICs of ≤ 0.064 µg ml-1 and the other two were 0.125 µg ml-1 and 1.0 µg ml-1.
Discussion
In our present study, the isolation rate of 4.04% compares with a figure of 4.9% reported for work done in Calabar, Nigeria14. The two studies used similar cultural methods and media, and also sampled all age groups. Work done in Gomoa Fetteh8, a rural community in Ghana, which sampled children between 0–6 years gave an isolation rate of 14.5%. Using similar cultural methods and media, isolation rates of 34.8% was achieved in Uganda15, 2.2% in Northern Greece16 and 7.1% in Ethiopia17. Modern techniques like the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) could detect Shigella infection more rapidly than the conventional culture methods18. In developing countries, cost implication however prohibits the use of PCR for routine laboratory work. Other limitations of the PCR methods also include the inability to conduct sensitivity tests which are vital in directing the choice of antimicrobials for treatment.
The order of serogroups distribution observed in the present study had been reported earlier in several studies done in Ghana over a 50 year period (Table 3). The predominance of S. flexneri had also been reported elsewhere, especially in Africa. In Calabar, Nigeria, it was 55% between 1986 and 198814 and in Kolkata, India it was 54.4%19. In Ethiopia, Mache et al17 had S. flexneri distribution rate of 44% and in Northern Greece Kavaliotis et al16, recorded 55%.
Table 3.
Serogroups distribution of Shigella over a 50 year period in Ghana
Studies in Ghana |
S.flexneri n (%) |
S.dysenteriae n (%) |
S. boydii n(%) |
S. sonnei n(%) |
Total |
Present study | 17(70.8) | 4(16.7) | 1(4.2) | 2(8.3) | 24 |
8Agbodaze et al, 1989 | 38(80.9 | 7(14.9) | 1(2.1) | 1(2.1) | 47 |
9Afoakwa, 1973 | 690(82.1) | 94(11.4) | 30(3.6) | 23(2.9) | 827 |
10Hughes, 1955 | 159(76.3) | 22(10.7) | 2(1.0) | 25(12.0) | 208 |
Any anti-Shigella vaccine in any particular setting will depend in part on the representation of serotypes in the vaccine and on the relative epidemiological importance of the different serotypes in that setting11. For S. flexneri, several authors in the past have reported the predominance of serotype 2 in Africa. In a three year study, Afoakwa9 observed that the predominant serotype of S. flexneri varied from year to year and was shared among types 2, 3 and 4. In the present study, out of the seventeen S. flexneri isolates, the distribution was as follows: four type 2, three type 1, three type 6, two type 3, two groups 7(8), one type 4 and two isolates were non-reactive with the specific anti-sera supplied by the manufacturer (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan). A study with a larger sample size is required to make a firm conclusion on the predominance of S. flexneri type 2 in Ghana. Several studies suggest that the epidemic strain, Shigella dysenteriae type 1 is not frequently encountered in Ghana8–10.
The changing pattern in antimicrobial susceptibilities among Shigella isolated poses a major difficulty in the determination of an appropriate drug for the treatment of shigellosis19. Approximately 96% of the isolates in the study were classified as MDR based on their resistance to three or more of the tested drugs. Fifteen to twenty years ago, shigellosis was treated successfully with inexpensive drugs like chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, and tetracycline. Nineteen of the isolates were resistant to all these ‘first line’ drugs of choice according to the Standard Treatment Guidelines, Ghana20; indicating that resistance to these antibiotics may be more problematic than once thought. Our Shigella isolates were all susceptible to the fluoroquinolone antibiotics tested. Earlier studies in Ghana by Afoakwa9 and Hughes10 did not report on the antibiogram of the isolates. However, Agbodaze et al8 reported that approximately 94% of the Shigella strains they studied were sensitive to nalidixic acid. In Saudi Arabia, Shigella strains which became resistant to ‘first line’ drugs were successfully treated with nalidixic acid until emergence of resistance to the drug was detected21. The fluoroquinolones have been shown to be useful in the treatment of shigellosis21 and the current recommended treatment of choice for multiple drug resistant Shigella is ciprofloxacin6. Though the MICs of 91% (21) of the isolates to ciprofloxacin showed relatively low values (≤ 0.064 µg ml-1), its prescription and use must be monitored to prolong its effectiveness. Shigella isolates resistant to the fluoroquinolones has been reported in Japan22.
The high frequency of multiple antibiotic resistant Shigella isolates observed in this study most probably reflect the ease of access and the extensive use of these antibiotics in Accra and probably across the entire country. Laws regulating the sale and use of antimicrobial agents must be strictly enforced to prolong the effectiveness of the newer drugs. Continual surveillance of the use of these antimicrobials and the dissemination of such information is also required.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to thank the technical staff of the Department of Microbiology for their support of the work.
References
- 1.Faruque AS, Teka T, Fuchs GJ. Shigellosis in children: a clinico-epidemiological comparison between Shigella dysenteriae type 1 and Shigella flexneri. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1998;18:197–201. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1998.11747947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Centers for disease control and prevention. [CDC], author Health status of displaced persons following civil war. Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43:701–703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gangarosa EJ, Perera DR, Mata LJ, Mendizabal-Morris C, Guzman G, Reller LB. Epidemic Shiga bacillus dysentery in Central America. II. Epidemiologic studies in 1969. J Infect Dis. 1970;122:181–190. doi: 10.1093/infdis/122.3.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rahaman MM, Khan MM, Aziz KMS, Islam MS, Kibriya AK. An outbreak of dysentery caused by Shigella dysenteriae type 1 on a Coral Island in the Bay of Bengal. J Infect Dis. 1975;132:15–19. doi: 10.1093/infdis/132.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tuttle J, Ries AA, Chimba RM, Perera GU, Bean NH, Griffin PM. Antimicrobial resistant epidemic Shigella dysenteriae type 1 in Zambia: modes of transmission. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:371–375. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.2.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.World Health Organization, author. International note-recommended antibiotic of choice for the treatment of shigellosis. WHO Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2004;79(24) [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shears P. Review: Shigella infections. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1996;90(2):105–114. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1996.11813034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Agbodaze D, Arai S, Abrahams CA, Binka F. Shigella in childhood diarrhoea in rural Ghana; GSA/WASA/Conf 06 MD; 1982. pp. 309–320. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Afoakwa SN. Shigella serotypes isolated in Accra, Ghana. Ghana Med J. 1973;12:50–56. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hughes MH. Bacillary dysentery in Accra, Gold Coast. West Afr Med J. 1995;4:73–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.World Health Organization, author. Generic protocol to estimate the burden of Shigella diarrhoea and dysenteric mortality. WHO/V and B. 1999;99:26. [Google Scholar]
- 12.World Health Organization, author. Manual for laboratory investigations of acute enteric infections. Geneva: WHO; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turk M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standard single disc diffusion method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Eko FO, Utsalo SJ. Antimicrobial resistance trends of Shigellae isolates from Calabar, Nigeria. J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;94:407–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Legros D, Ochola D, Lwanga N, Guma G. Antibiotic sensitivity of endemic Shigella in Mbarara, Uganda. East Afr Med J. 1998;75:160–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kavaliotis J, Karyda S, Konstantoula T, Kansouzidou A, Tsagaropoulou H. Shigellosis of childhood in Northern Greece: Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data of hospitalized patients during the period 1971–1996. Scand J Infect Dis. 2000;32:207–211. doi: 10.1080/003655400750045358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mache A, Mengistu Y, Corley S. Shigella serogroups identified from adult diarrhoeal out-patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Antibiotic resistance and plasmid profile analysis. East Afr Med J. 1997;74:179–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thiem VD, Sethabutr O, von Seidlein L, et al. Detection of Shigella by a PCR assay targeting the ipaH gene suggests increased prevalence of shigellosis in Nha Trang, Vietnam. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2031–2035. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2031-2035.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Niyogi SK, Mitra U, Dutta P. Changing patterns of serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Shigella species isolates from children in Calcutta, India. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2001;54:121–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ghana National Drugs Programme [GNDP], author Standard treatment guidelines. Ghana: Ministry of Health; 2004. pp. 7–20. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Panhotra BR, Saxena AK, Al Mulhim K. Emergence of nalidixic acid resistance in Shigella sonnei isolated from patients having acute diarrhoeal disease: report from eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2004;57:116–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hireose K, Terajima J, Izumiya H, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Shigella sonnei isolates in Japan and molecular analysis of S. sonnei isolates with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinoles. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:1203–1205. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1203-1205.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]