Skip to main content
Current Oncology logoLink to Current Oncology
. 2007 Apr;14(2):70–73. doi: 10.3747/co.2007.109

Recent advances in the tumour biology of the GPI-anchored carcinoembryonic antigen family members CEACAM5 and CEACAM6

CHF Chan, CP Stanners
PMCID: PMC1891201  PMID: 17576469

INTRODUCTION

On its discovery in 1965 by Gold and Freedman1 in the blood of patients with colorectal cancer, human carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA (since re-designated CEACAM5)] was initially thought to be a tumour-specific antigen. Although CEACAM5 was subsequently found in normal tissues, its consistent overexpression in many cancers has made it a tumour marker widely used for patient management and a popular molecular target for novel cancer therapies.

After the cloning of CEACAM5 cdna in 19862, other CEACAM5-related cell adhesion molecules were also identified in humans and other mammalian species 35. The CEACAM family members are highly glycosylated proteins that belong to the immunoglobulin gene superfamily6. In humans, the CEACAM family consists of membrane-linked and secretory glycoproteins. The former are anchored to the cell surface either by a glycophosphatidyl–inositol (gpi) anchor or a transmembrane domain. The gpi-anchored members include CEACAM5 (the original CEA), CEACAM6, CEACAM7, and CEACAM83. Thus far, the gpi-anchored CEACAMs have been detected only in primates, and not in lower mammals35,7.

The enormous volume of literature describing the aberrant expression of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 in various types of cancers, the prognostic values of such expression, and CEACAM5-targeted therapies has tended to dilute studies revealing the significant biologic functions of these antigens and their potential clinical implications. This editorial overview highlights current knowledge of the biologic functions of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 in relation to tumorigenesis.

CEACAM5 AND CEACAM6 IN HUMAN CANCERS

CEACAM5 is overexpressed in cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, liver, gallbladder, lung, breast, female reproductive system, medullary thyroid, urinary bladder, and prostate3,811. Similarly, CEACAM6 is overexpressed in cancers of the colon, stomach, pancreas, lung, breast, and female reproductive system, and in leukemia3,8. Overall, CEACAM5 or CEACAM6, or both, are overexpressed in as many as 70% of all human tumours12. In addition, that overexpression is often associated with poor prognosis—specifically, poor clinical outcome and reduced survival1316.

This overwhelming correlation suggests an instrumental role for these molecules in tumorigenesis. In fact, CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 have a variety of tumorigenic effects on cells cultured in vitro and in in vivo model systems. Overexpression of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 impedes myogenic, adipogenic, neurogenic, and colonic differentiation programs1719, inhibits anoikis and apoptosis in colon and pancreatic cancer cells2022, disrupts cell polarization and tissue architecture19, enhances liver metastasis22,23, increases chemoresistance24, and increases colon-tumour25 and lung-tumour (Chan et al. Higher incidence of spontaneous lung tumours in the CEABAC mice. In preparation) susceptibility in a transgenic mouse model.

This broad spectrum of tumorigenic effects arises from functions at the molecular level. CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 have been shown to activate integrin signalling pathways26,27. Proteins that are gpi-anchored, including CEACAM5 and CEACAM6, are often localized in the membrane microdomains called “lipid rafts” 28. These rafts carry specific subsets of signalling molecules and are freely mobile on the cell membrane. Growing evidence suggests the presence of specific types of lipid rafts 28,29. CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 have been shown to be co-localized with integrin α5β1 in the same specific lipid rafts 30.

CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 function as intercellular adhesion molecules because of parallel and anti-parallel self-binding of their extracellular domains 31, and therefore small CEACAM5- and CEACAM6-containing lipid rafts can cluster together to form bigger rafts 29, thus co-clustering their associated signalling elements. This co-clustering could underlie the observed activation of downstream signalling cascades, such as the integrin signalling pathway, including elements ILK, PI3K, and AKT 26. This mode of signal activation would critically depend on the cell-surface level of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6. That is, the downstream signal and consequent cellular behaviour would depend in a nonlinear threshold fashion on the concentration of CEACAM5, CEACAM6, or both.

CEACAM5 AND CEACAM6 IN COLORECTAL CANCER

Colorectal cancers are the end result of multiple transformational events in normal epithelia. A set of neoplastic events, termed the adenoma–carcinoma sequence, was originally proposed by Vogelstein and colleagues for traditional adenomas 32. The loss of functional APC causes a transition from normal epithelium to aberrant crypt foci (acf), the earliest detectable tumorigenic change, followed by Kras activation (adenoma formation), loss of SMAD2 and SMAD4, and TP53 inactivation (carcinoma formation). With growing knowledge of the genetics of colorectal cancers, more gene mutations are being placed into this basic paradigm, although all the events are not necessarily present and their sequence can vary 33,34.

In contrast to the traditional adenomatous polyps, hyperplastic polyps are commonly believed not to progress to malignant lesions 35. However, in recent years, sessile serrated adenoma, serrated adenoma, and mixed polyps (a subgroup of hyperplastic lesions showing a serrated feature) have been shown to have malignant potential 36. These serrated lesions show frequent BRAF (a member of the RAF family of serine and threonine kinases) mutations and widespread dna methylation, and they have recently been considered premalignant lesions that follow the serrated pathway of neoplastic transformation as proposed by Jass and colleagues 3638. A general inhibition of anoikis caused by mutation in a specific gene can lead to serrated polyp formation 37. Mutations in or downregulation of hMLH1 or MGMT (methylguanine methyltransferase) can then lead to progression to msi-h (high level of microsatellite instability) and msi-l (low level of microsatellite instability) colorectal cancers respectively 38.

Although CEACAM5—and to a lesser extent CEACAM6—are consistently overexpressed in most colorectal cancers and have a broad range of tumorigenic effects, they have not yet been assigned to any proposed pathway. On the one hand, the overexpression of CEACAM5 in 30%–90% of acfs suggests that this overexpression can be an early event in the adenoma–carcinoma sequence 39,40. On the other hand, CEACAM5 overexpression in serrated polyps and its anti-apoptotic ability may suggest its involvement in the serrated pathway 41. Similarly, the overexpression of CEACAM6 in hyperplastic polyps and traditional adenomas alike suggests that CEACAM6 may also be involved in these neoplastic pathways 42.

A transgenic mouse containing both the CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 genes in a large (187 kb) piece of human genomic dna (the CEABAC mouse) has recently been constructed 43. At low-to-moderate expression levels of CEACAM5 or CEACAM6 (or both), a partial block in cell differentiation, a mild-to-moderate colonocyte hyperproliferation, and an inhibition of anoikis or apoptosis are evident in the transgenic colon. These mice are found to be significantly more prone to develop carcinogen-induced colon tumours, specifically the traditional adenomatous type 25. At higher (tumour-like) expression levels, a complete block in cell differentiation and extreme colonocyte hyperproliferation can be observed. These mice show massively enlarged colons comprising continuous non-focal cytologic and architectural abnormalities, including dysplastic features and serrated morphology. These results suggest that, although moderate expression levels of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 can cause an imbalance of tissue homeostasis leading to increased tumour susceptibility following the classical pathway of colonic neoplasia, tumour-like expression levels alone produce a severe imbalance leading directly to tumour formation, specifically the serrated subtype. Hence, we propose that CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 can play a significant role in both neoplastic pathways (Chan et al. Colorectal hyperplasia and dysplasia due to human CEA and CEACAM6 expression in transgenic mice. Submitted manuscript).

CONCLUSION

CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 are commonly considered inert tumour markers, despite the discovery and documentation of their tumorigenic functions over the past two decades. Nevertheless, because of their ectopic or deregulated overexpression in up to 70% of all tumours, CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 represent popular targets for novel cancer therapies, including cancer vaccines, cellular immunotherapy, radioimmunotherapy, and antibody therapy. With growing knowledge of the effects of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 on tumour biology, novel therapeutic strategies that focus more on perturbing the tumorigenic functions of these antigens may now be indicated.

Footnotes

Richard J. Ablin, Phd, Research Professor of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine and the Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A., and Phil Gold, Phd md, Professor of Medicine, Physiology, and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Section Editors.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gold P, Freedman SO. Demonstration of tumor-specific antigens in human colonic carcinomata by immunological tolerance and absorption techniques. J Exp Med. 1965;121:439–62. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.3.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beauchemin N, Benchimol S, Cournoyer D, Fuks A, Stanners CP. Isolation and characterization of full-length functional cdna clones for human carcinoembryonic antigen. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7:3221–30. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.9.3221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hammarstrom S, Olsen A, Teglund S, Baranov V. The nature and expression of the human CEA family. In: Stanners CP, ed. Cell Adhesion and Communication Mediated by the CEA Family: Basic and Clinical Perspectives. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998: 1–30.
  • 4.Zimmermann W. The nature and expression of the rodent CEA families: evolutionary considerations. In: Stanners CP, ed. Cell Adhesion and Communication Mediated by the CEA Family: Basic and Clinical Perspectives. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998: 31–55.
  • 5.Zhou GQ, Zhang Y, Hammarstrom S. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) gene family in non-human primates. Gene. 2001;264:105–12. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00595-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Paxton RJ, Mooser G, Pande H, Lee TD, Shively JE. Sequence analysis of carcinoembryonic antigen: identification of glycosylation sites and homology with the immunoglobulin supergene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:920–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.4.920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Naghibalhossaini F, Yoder AD, Tobi M, Stanners CP. Evolution of a tumorigenic property conferred by glycophosphatidyl–inositol membrane anchors of CEA gene family members during the primate radiation. Mol Biol Cell. 2007 doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-10-0884. in press, [Epub February 7, 2007] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Logsdon CD, Simeone DM, Binkley C, et al. Molecular profiling of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis identifies multiple genes differentially regulated in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:2649–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chu PG, Ishizawa S, Wu E, Weiss LM. Hepatocyte antigen as a marker of hepatocellular carcinoma: an immunohistochemical comparison to carcinoembryonic antigen, cd10, and α -fetoprotein. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:978–88. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200208000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Takano T, Miyauchi A, Matsuzuka F, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma by rt-pcr using rna extracted from leftover cells within a needle used for fine needle aspiration biopsy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:951–5. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.3.5558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Genega EM, Hutchinson B, Reuter VE, Gaudin PB. Immunophenotype of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2000;13:1186–91. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chevinsky AH. CEA in tumors of other than colorectal origin. Semin Surg Oncol. 1991;7:162–6. doi: 10.1002/ssu.2980070309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gaglia P, Caldarola B, Bussone R, et al. Prognostic value of CEA and ferritin assay in breast cancer: a multivariate analysis. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988;24:1151–5. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90121-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ballesta AM, Molina R, Filella X, Jo J, Gimenez N. Carcinoembryonic antigen in staging and follow-up of patients with solid tumors. Tumour Biol. 1995;16:32–41. doi: 10.1159/000217926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jantscheff P, Terracciano L, Lowy A, et al. Expression of CEACAM6 in resectable colorectal cancer: a factor of independent prognostic significance. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3638–46. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.55.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sakao Y, Nakazono T, Sakuragi T, Natsuaki M, Itoh T. Predictive factors for survival in surgically resected clinical ia peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1157–62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eidelman FJ, Fuks A, DeMarte L, Taheri M, Stanners CP. Human carcinoembryonic antigen, an intercellular adhesion molecule, blocks fusion and differentiation of rat myoblasts. J Cell Biol. 1993;123:467–75. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.2.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stanners CP. Contributions of the human CEA family to malignant transformation. In: Stanners CP, ed. Cell Adhesion and Communication Mediated by the CEA Family: Basic and Clinical Perspectives. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998: 141–54.
  • 19.Ilantzis C, DeMarte L, Screaton RA, Stanners CP. Deregulated expression of the human tumor marker CEA and CEA family member CEACAM6 disrupts tissue architecture and blocks colonocyte differentiation. Neoplasia. 2002;4:151–63. doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ordonez C, Screaton RA, Ilantzis C, Stanners CP. Human carcinoembryonic antigen functions as a general inhibitor of anoikis. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3419–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Soeth E, Wirth T, List HJ, et al. Controlled ribozyme targeting demonstrates an antiapoptotic effect of carcinoembryonic antigen in ht29 colon cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:2022–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Duxbury MS, Ito H, Zinner MJ, Ashley SW, Whang EE. CEACAM6 gene silencing impairs anoikis resistance and in vivo metastatic ability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:465–73. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jessup JM, Thomas P. CEA and metastasis: a facilitator of site-specific metastasis. In: Stanners CP, ed. Cell Adhesion and Communication Mediated by the CEA Family: Basic and Clinical Perspectives. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998: 195–222.
  • 24.Duxbury MS, Ito H, Benoit E, Waseem T, Ashley SW, Whang EE. A novel role for carcinoembryonic antigen–related cell adhesion molecule 6 as a determinant of gemcitabine chemoresistance in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3987–93. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chan CH, Cook D, Stanners CP. Increased colon tumor susceptibility in azoxymethane treated CEABAC transgenic mice. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:1909–16. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Camacho–Leal P, Zhai AB, Stanners CP. A co-clustering model involving α 5β 1 integrin for the biological effects of gpi-anchored human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) J Cell Physiol. 2007 doi: 10.1002/jcp.20989. [in press]. [Epub February 7, 2007] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Duxbury MS, Ito H, Ashley SW, Whang EE. c-Src-dependent cross-talk between CEACAM6 and α vβ 3 integrin enhances pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell adhesion to extracellular matrix components. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;317:133–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Screaton RA, DeMarte L, Draber P, Stanners CP. The specificity for the differentiation blocking activity of carcino-embryonic antigen resides in its glycophosphatidyl–inositol anchor. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:613–26. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.3.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nicholson TB, Stanners CP. Specific inhibition of gpi-anchored protein function by homing and self-association of specific gpi anchors. J Cell Biol. 2006;175:647–59. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200605001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ordonez C, Zhai AB, Camacho–Leal P, DeMarte L, Fan MM, Stanners CP. gpi-anchored CEA family glycoproteins CEA and CEACAM6 mediate their biological effects through enhanced integrin α 5β 1–fibronectin interaction. J Cell Physiol. 2007;210:757–65. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Taheri M, Saragovi U, Fuks A, Makkerh J, Mort J, Stanners CP. Self recognition in the Ig superfamily. Identification of precise subdomains in carcinoembryonic antigen required for intercellular adhesion. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:26935–43. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M909242199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 1996;87:159–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Smith G, Carey FA, Beattie J, et al. Mutations in APC, Kirsten-ras, and p53—alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:9433–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122612899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Takayama T, Ohi M, Hayashi T, et al. Analysis of K-ras, APC, and β -catenin in aberrant crypt foci in sporadic adenoma, cancer, and familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:599–611. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.27203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Crawford JM. The gastrointestinal tract. In: Cotran RS, Robbins SL, Kumar V, eds. Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994; 755–829.
  • 36.Jass JR, Baker K, Zlobec I, et al. Advanced colorectal polyps with the molecular and morphological features of serrated polyps and adenomas: concept of a “fusion” pathway to colorectal cancer. Histopathology. 2006;49:121–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02466.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jass JR, Whitehall VL, Young J, Leggett BA. Emerging concepts in colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:862–76. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.35392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jass JR. Serrated adenoma of the colorectum and the dna–methylator phenotype. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005;2:398–405. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pretlow TP, Roukhadze EV, O’Riordan MA, Chan JC, Amini SB, Stellato TA. Carcinoembryonic antigen in human colonic aberrant crypt foci. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1719–25. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90812-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ilantzis C, Jothy S, Alpert LC, Draber P, Stanners CP. Cell-surface levels of human carcinoembryonic antigen are inversely correlated with colonocyte differentiation in colon carcinogenesis. Lab Invest. 1997;76:703–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jass JR, Filipe MI, Abbas S, Falcon CA, Wilson Y, Lovell D. A morphologic and histochemical study of metaplastic polyps of the colorectum. Cancer. 1984;53:510–15. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3<510::aid-cncr2820530324>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Scholzel S, Zimmermann W, Schwarzkopf G, Grunert F, Rogaczewski B, Thompson J. Carcinoembryonic antigen family members CEACAM6 and CEACAM7 are differentially expressed in normal tissues and oppositely deregulated in hyperplastic colorectal polyps and early adenomas. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:595–605. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64764-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chan CH, Stanners CP. Novel mouse model for carcino-embryonic antigen–based therapy. Mol Ther. 2004;9:775–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Oncology are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES