Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2007 Mar 19;51(6):2244–2246. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00229-07

Mutations in 16S rRNA and Ribosomal Protein S5 Associated with High-Level Spectinomycin Resistance in Pasteurella multocida

Corinna Kehrenberg 1, Stefan Schwarz 1,*
PMCID: PMC1891365  PMID: 17371823

Abstract

Pasteurella multocida isolates with high-level spectinomycin resistance in which no adenyltransferase genes could be demonstrated exhibited a C1192G transversion in the 16S rRNA of all six or five of the six rRNA operons and/or two different types of 3-bp deletions in the rpsE gene that codes for the ribosomal protein S5.


The most frequently detected mechanism of bacterial resistance to spectinomycin is the inactivation of the drug by adenyltransferases. Although adenyltransferase genes are widely distributed among bacteria isolated from animals, only one such gene, aadA14, in a bovine Pasteurella multocida isolate has so far been identified (11). Further studies of P. multocida isolates with high-level spectinomycin resistance showed that the aadA14 gene is not widespread (11), and none of the other known adenyltransferase genes could be detected among such isolates (11, 19). Besides mechanisms of enzymatic inactivation, mutations in 16S rRNA conferring spectinomycin resistance on a wide variety of bacteria (1-3, 5, 8, 10, 13, 17), but also on chloroplasts of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (9) and Nicotiana spp. (6, 20), have been described previously. All these 16S rRNA mutations are located in a specific region of helix 34. This region, encompassing the cross-linked positions 1063 to 1066 and 1190 to 1193 and known to be involved in spectinomycin binding, is tentatively referred to as the spectinomycin resistance-determining region (SRDR) within 16S rRNA. Furthermore, mutations in the protein S5, also known to be involved in the binding of spectinomycin to the bacterial ribosome, have been described previously (4, 7).

In the present study, we investigated 13 spectinomycin-resistant and 4 susceptible isolates for possible mutations in the rpsE gene and in the SRDR of 16S rRNA. All isolates were collected between 1999 and 2004 in individual cases of bovine respiratory tract infections and were investigated by SmaI macrorestriction analysis (12) and confirmed to be epidemiologically unrelated. MIC determination by broth macrodilution followed the specifications given in the document M31-A2 of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (15, 16) and confirmed that all 13 resistant isolates were highly resistant, with MICs of spectinomycin for these isolates ranging from 4,096 to >8,192 μg/ml, while MICs for the susceptible isolates were 16 μg/ml (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

MICs of spectinomycin for and mutations detected in the 13 spectinomycin-resistant and the 4 spectinomycin-susceptible P. multocida isolates

Isolate no. MIC (μg/ml) of spectinomycin Operons with C1192G transversion in 16S rRNA (no. of mutated operons/no. of operons present) Mutation in S5 protein
1 >8,192 A, B, C, D, E, F (6/6)
2 >8,192 A, B, C, D, E, F (6/6)
3 >8,192 A, B, C, D, E, F (6/6)
4 >8,192 A, B, C, D, E, F (6/6)
5 >8,192 A, B, C, D, E, F (6/6)
6 4,096 A, B, C, D, E (5/6)
7 8,192 A, B, C, D, E (5/6)
8 4,096 A, B, C, D, E (5/6)
9 4,096 B, C (2/6) 32-SF-33 → 32-I
10 >8,192 B, C (2/6) 32-SF-33 → 32-I
11 >8,192 B, C (2/6) 32-SF-33 → 32-I
12 >8,192 B, C (2/6) 32-SF-33 → 32-I
13 4,096 None (0/6) Loss of 23-K
14 16 None (0/6)
15 16 None (0/6)
16 16 None (0/6)
17 16 None (0/6)

Based on the knowledge of the whole genome sequence of P. multocida strain Pm70 (14), PCR assays which enabled the separate amplification of part of the 16S rRNA of each of the six rRNA operons of P. multocida were established. For these procedures, a common reverse primer was combined with forward primers specific for the six operons, designated A to F according to their order of occurrence in the Pm70 sequence (14). The primer sequences, annealing temperatures, and amplicon sizes are given in Table 2. A standard protocol was applied which consisted of an initial denaturation step for 1 min at 94°C followed by 34 cycles, each comprising 1 min of denaturation at 94°C, 2 min of annealing at the respective annealing temperature, and 3 min of primer extension at 72°C, and a final extension step for 7 min at 72°C. For the sequence analysis of the SRDRs of the six operons, the 20-mer primers 5′-GTAAGGAGGTGATCCAACCG-3′ and 5′-GGTAGTCCACGCTGTAAACG-3 were used. The primers PmS5-fw and PmS5-rv (Table 2) served for the PCR amplification of an 862-bp fragment encompassing the entire 501-bp rpsE gene, which codes for the ribosomal protein S5. The rpsE amplicons were cloned into pCR-Blunt II-TOPO (Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands) and sequenced completely by using standard M13 universal and reverse primers.

TABLE 2.

PCR primers used for the separate amplification of parts of the six 16S rRNA genes and the rpsE gene

Gene and region Primer designation Sequence (5′ → 3′) Amplicon size (bp) Annealing temp (°C)
16S rRNA, operon A 16S RNA PmA-fw GAGATAGTAGATACACCTCGCGTCG 1,740 60
16S rRNA, operon B 16S RNA PmB-fw TGGATAGAGCGTTGGCCTCC 1,976 62
16S rRNA, operon C 16S RNA PmC-fw CGCCTTGGCAGTCAATTCAG 2,179 58
16S rRNA, operon D 16S RNA PmD-fw TCACAGGTGGAGAAACAGATACCA 2,055 60
16S rRNA, operon E 16S RNA PmE-fw TGTGGTCAATTGAGTAATGCCTG 2,091 62
16S rRNA, operon F 16S RNA PmF-fw CTATGTATTAGAGTCCATTGCGGATCT 1,935 60
16S rRNA, operons A to F 16S RNA Pm-rv AGGAGGTGATCCAACCGCAG
Gene for 30S ribosomal protein S5 30S RNA PmS5-fw TGCATATGGCGAAGACCAAG 862 55
30S RNA PmS5-rv AAGTGATTGCACCGAACGG

Comparative analyses of 16S rRNA and rpsE gene sequences revealed the presence of four different types of mutations. The five isolates with the first type of mutation exhibited a C1192G transversion in all six operons, while all other positions so far known to be associated with spectinomycin resistance remained unchanged (Fig. 1a). The three isolates carrying the second type of mutation had this alteration in five of the six operons (Table 1). These eight P. multocida isolates did not reveal any structural alteration in the rpsE gene (Table 1). The third type of alteration, represented by four isolates, was characterized by the presence of the aforementioned transversion in only two of the six operons and an additional 3-bp deletion in the rpsE gene which resulted in the change of Ser32Ile and the loss of the subsequent amino acid Phe33 (Fig. 1b). In the single isolate representing the fourth type of alteration, no mutation in the SRDR of any of the six rRNA operons was detectable. However, a different 3-bp deletion in the rpsE gene which caused the loss of the amino acid Lys at position 23 was present (Fig. 1b). In contrast to the highly resistant isolates, all four susceptible isolates did not exhibit mutations in the SRDR of any rRNA operon or in the rpsE gene.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

(a) Secondary structure of 16S rRNA with the site of mutation in helix 34 depicted in detail. (b) Nucleotide and amino acid alignment of the 5′ ends of the rpsE genes and the corresponding amino acid sequences of ribosomal proteins S5 of the three representative P. multocida isolates 1, 9, and 13. Amino acids are given in the single-letter code. Boxes and boldface type indicate the altered regions.

Studies of Chlamydophila psittaci revealed that mutations at position 1192 have only very minor effects on the organism's biological fitness (1). A similar observation for Escherichia coli has also been reported previously (17). The growth curves determined in this study confirmed that P. multocida isolates exhibiting the C1192G mutation did not differ in their generation time from isolates not exhibiting this mutation (data not shown). The amino acids 19 to 33 in the N terminus of the ribosomal protein S5 form a loop structure which represents the RNA-binding region (4). Thus, the loss of the highly conserved Phe at position 33 accompanied by the exchange of Ser at position 32 for Ile may have an impact on the interaction of the S5 protein with helix 34 of the 16S rRNA and thus contribute to spectinomycin resistance. Early studies of spectinomycin resistance, which were based on the determination of net charges of peptides, identified the exchange of Val for Glu at position 21 or the exchange of Ser for Pro at position 22 (7). More recent studies using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight analyses also identified the Ser22Pro alteration (21). The amino acid positions 20 to 22 are known sites of mutations that produce spectinomycin resistance in E. coli, while the conserved Lys at position 23 is believed to interact with 16S rRNA (18). Thus, the loss of this conserved Lys residue detected in a single P. multocida isolate in this study is believed to have a negative impact on the binding of the mutated S5 protein to 16S rRNA. The observed high MIC of spectinomycin of 4,096 μg/ml for the respective P. multocida isolate may support this assumption.

In summary, this is to the best of our knowledge the first report of mutations in 16S rRNA and the ribosomal protein S5 associated with spectinomycin resistance in P. multocida. These findings indicate that in addition to enzymatic inactivation, mutations in 16S rRNA and/or ribosomal protein S5 are an efficient way to render P. multocida isolates highly resistant to spectinomycin.

Acknowledgments

We thank Vera Nöding, Roswitha Becker, and Kerstin Meyer for excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 19 March 2007.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Binet, R., and A. T. Maurelli. 2005. Fitness cost due to mutations in the 16S rRNA associated with spectinomycin resistance in Chlamydia psittaci 6BC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:4455-4464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brink, M. F., G. Brink, M. P. Verbeet, and H. A. de Boer. 1994. Spectinomycin interacts specifically with the residues G1064 and C1192 in 16S rRNA, thereby potentially freezing this molecule into an inactive conformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:325-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Criswell, D., V. L. Tobiason, J. S. Lodmell, and D. S. Samuels. 2006. Mutations conferring aminoglycoside and spectinomycin resistance in Borrelia burgdorferi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:445-452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davies, C., D. E. Bussiere, B. L. Golden, S. J. Porter, V. Ramakrishnan, and S. W. White. 1998. Ribosomal proteins S5 and L6: high resolution crystal structures and roles in protein biosynthesis and antibiotic resistance. J. Mol. Biol. 279:873-888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Stasio, E. A., D. Moazed, H. F. Noller, and A. E. Dahlberg. 1989. Mutations in 16S ribosomal RNA disrupt antibiotic-RNA interactions. EMBO J. 8:1213-1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fromm, H., M. Edelman, D. Aviv, and E. Galun. 1987. The molecular basis for rDNA-dependent spectinomycin resistance in Nicotiana chloroplasts. EMBO J. 6:3233-3237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Funatsu, G., E. Schiltz, and H. G. Wittmann. 1971. Ribosomal proteins. XXVII. Localization of the amino acid exchanges in protein S5 from two Escherichia coli mutants resistant to spectinomycin. Mol. Gen. Genet. 114:106-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Galimand, M., G. Gerbaud, and P. Courvalin. 2000. Spectinomycin resistance in Neisseria spp. due to mutations in 16S rRNA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1365-1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Harris, E. H., B. D. Burkhart, N. W. Gillham, and J. E. Boynton. 1989. Antibiotic resistance mutations in the chloroplast 16S and 23S rRNA genes of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: correlation of genetic and physical maps of the chloroplast genome. Genetics 123:281-292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Johanson, U., and D. Hughes. 1995. A new mutation in 16S rRNA of Escherichia coli conferring spectinomycin resistance. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:464-466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kehrenberg, C., B. Catry, F. Haesebrouck, A. de Kruif, and S. Schwarz. 2005. Novel spectinomycin/streptomycin resistance gene, aadA14, from Pasteurella multocida. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3046-3049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kehrenberg, C., and S. Schwarz. 2001. Molecular analysis of tetracycline resistance in Pasteurella aerogenes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2885-2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Makosky, P. C., and A. E. Dahlberg. 1987. Spectinomycin resistance at site 1192 in 16S ribosomal RNA of E. coli: an analysis of three mutants. Biochimie 69:885-889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.May, B. J., Q. Zhang, L. L. Li, M. Paustian, T. S. Whittam, and V. Kapur. 2001. Complete genomic sequence of Pasteurella multocida, Pm70. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3460-3465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals, 2nd ed. Approved standard. NCCLS document M31-A2. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
  • 16.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2004. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. Informational supplement. NCCLS document M31-S1. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
  • 17.O'Connor, M., and A. E. Dahlberg. 2002. Isolation of spectinomycin resistance mutations in the 16S rRNA of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and expression in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Curr. Microbiol. 45:429-433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ramakrishnan, V., and S. W. White. 1992. The structure of ribosomal protein S5 reveals sites of interaction with 16S rRNA. Nature 358:768-771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schwarz, S., C. Kehrenberg, S. A. Salmon, and J. L. Watts. 2004. In vitro activities of spectinomycin and comparator agents against Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica from respiratory tract infections of cattle. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:379-382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Svab, Z., and P. Maliga. 1991. Mutation proximal to the tRNA binding region of the Nicotiana plastid 16S rRNA confers resistance to spectinomycin. Mol. Gen. Genet. 228:316-319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wilcox, S. K., G. S. Cavey, and J. D. Pearson. 2001. Single ribosomal protein mutations in antibiotic-resistant bacteria analyzed by mass spectrometry. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3046-3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES