Skip to main content
PMC home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1997 Sep;41(3):399–403. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.3.399

Prediction of recurrent choledocholithiasis by quantitative cholescintigraphy in patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy

K Lai 1, N Peng 1, G Lo 1, J Cheng 1, R Huang 1, C Lin 1, J Huang 1, H Chiang 1, L Ger 1
PMCID: PMC1891486  PMID: 9378399

Abstract

Background—Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is widely used for the removal of stones from the bile duct, but stones recur in about one fifth of patients. 
Aims—To investigate hepatic clearance by quantitative cholescintigraphy (QC) in patients after EST and to discern the relationship between biliary emptying and stone recurrence. 
Methods—One hundred and forty nine patients who had EST and clearance of the bile duct for choledocholithiasis were selected. All patients were confirmed to have complete EST by sphincter of Oddi manometry and underwent QC soon after normalisation of liver function. Regular clinical follow up was performed for each patient. 
Results—During a mean 36 month follow up, 22 (14.8%) patients developed recurrent stones in the bile duct. Irrespective of the status of the gall bladder, patients with recurrent stones had a slower hepatic clearance of radioisotope during QC compared with patients without stone recurrence, but only the differences in cholecystectomised patients had statistical significance. After carrying out multivariate analysis, one parameter of QC, percentage clearance of maximal count at 45 minutes, was found to be the only significant factor for stone recurrence. All recurrent stones in the common bile duct were successfully removed at endoscopy. 
Conclusion—Slower hepatic clearance as shown by QC is an important factor responsible for stone recurrence after sphincter ablation. 



Keywords: hepatic clearance; recurrent choledocholithiasis; quantitative cholescintigraphy; endoscopic sphincterotomy

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bar-Meir S., Chamovitz D. 99mTc-DISIDA vs. endoscopic biliary manometry in assessing sphincter of Oddi function. Hepatology. 1989 Nov;10(5):895–896. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840100526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cetta F. Do surgical and endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent or facilitate recurrent common duct stone formation? Arch Surg. 1993 Mar;128(3):329–336. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420150085016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cicala M., Scopinaro F., Corazziari E., Vignoni A., Viscardi A., Habib F. I., Torsoli A. Quantitative cholescintigraphy in the assessment of choledochoduodenal bile flow. Gastroenterology. 1991 Apr;100(4):1106–1113. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90289-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cotton P. B. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; (apples and oranges). Gut. 1984 Jun;25(6):587–597. doi: 10.1136/gut.25.6.587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darweesh R. M., Dodds W. J., Hogan W. J., Geenen J. E., Collier B. D., Shaker R., Kishk S. M., Stewart E. T., Lawson T. L., Hassanein E. H. Efficacy of quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy and fatty-meal sonography for evaluating patients with suspected partial common duct obstruction. Gastroenterology. 1988 Mar;94(3):779–786. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90254-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elta G. H., Barnett J. L., Ellis J. H., Ackermann R., Wahl R. Delayed biliary drainage is common in asymptomatic post-cholecystectomy volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 Jul-Aug;38(4):435–439. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70472-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Geenen J. E., Toouli J., Hogan W. J., Dodds W. J., Stewart E. T., Mavrelis P., Riedel D., Venu R. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: follow-up evaluation of effects on the sphincter of Oddi. Gastroenterology. 1984 Oct;87(4):754–758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gregg J. A., De Girolami P., Carr-Locke D. L. Effects of sphincteroplasty and endoscopic sphincterotomy on the bacteriologic characteristics of the common bile duct. Am J Surg. 1985 May;149(5):668–671. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(85)80152-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hansell D. T., Millar M. A., Murray W. R., Gray G. R., Gillespie G. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients with intact gallbladders. Br J Surg. 1989 Aug;76(8):856–858. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hawes R. H., Cotton P. B., Vallon A. G. Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy. Gastroenterology. 1990 Apr;98(4):1008–1012. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90026-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hill J., Martin D. F., Tweedle D. E. Risks of leaving the gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Br J Surg. 1991 May;78(5):554–557. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Holbrook R. F., Jacobson F. L., Pezzuti R. T., Howell D. A. Biliary patency imaging after endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy with gallbladder in situ. Clinical impact of nonvisualization. Arch Surg. 1991 Jun;126(6):738–742. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410300084012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ikeda S., Tanaka M., Matsumoto S., Yoshimoto H., Itoh H. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: long-term results in 408 patients with complete follow-up. Endoscopy. 1988 Jan;20(1):13–17. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Joshi S. N., George E. A., Perrillo R. P. Quantitative temporal analysis of 99mTechnetium p-isopropyl-iminodiacetic acid (PIPIDA) as a measure of hepatic function in health and disease. Gastroenterology. 1981 Dec;81(6):1045–1051. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lygidakis N. J. The incidence and significance of common bile duct dilatation in biliary calculous diseases. World J Surg. 1984 Jun;8(3):327–334. doi: 10.1007/BF01655066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Løtveit T., Osnes M., Larsen S. Recurrent biliary calculi: duodenal diverticula as a predisposing factor. Ann Surg. 1982 Jul;196(1):30–32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198207000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Osnes M., Løotveit T., Larsen S., Aune S. Duodenal diverticula and their relationship to age, sex, and biliary calculi. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1981;16(1):103–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peng N. J., Lai K. H., Tsay D. G., Liu R. S., Su K. L., Yeh S. H. Efficacy of quantitative cholescintigraphy in the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Nucl Med Commun. 1994 Nov;15(11):899–904. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199411000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Persson B., Olsson J. Variations of common bile duct diameter after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Radiol. 1991 Winter;16(1):45–48. doi: 10.1007/BF01887303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Prat F., Malak N. A., Pelletier G., Buffet C., Fritsch J., Choury A. D., Altman C., Liguory C., Etienne J. P. Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterology. 1996 Mar;110(3):894–899. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8608900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Seifert E. Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Endoscopy. 1988 Aug;20 (Suppl 1):232–235. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shaffer E. A., Hershfield N. B., Logan K., Kloiber R. Cholescintigraphic detection of functional obstruction of the sphincter of Oddi. Effect of papillotomy. Gastroenterology. 1986 Mar;90(3):728–733. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)91130-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Torsoli A., Corazziari E., Habib F. I., Cicala M. Pressure relationships within the human bile tract. Normal and abnormal physiology. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1990;175:52–57. doi: 10.3109/00365529009093127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES