Skip to main content
PMC home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1997 Dec;41(6):817–820. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.6.817

Prospective evaluation of the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with biofeedback

C Vaizey 1, A Roy 1, M Kamm 1
PMCID: PMC1891593  PMID: 9462216

Abstract

Background—Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is often resistant to medical and surgical treatment. 
Aim—To determine whether biofeedback retraining is a useful treatment for this condition. 
Patients—Thirteen consecutive patients with SRUS (three men, median age 34 years, median duration of symptoms three years) underwent treatment. Previous surgical treatment had failed in five. 
Methods—Patients were evaluated prospectively. Anorectal physiological studies were performed in 11 patients before treatment. A standardised questionnaire was used before and after treatment, and all but two patients were examined after treatment. 
Results—Median follow up was nine months (range 3-22 months). After treatment four patients were asymptomatic, and four felt improved. Symptom improvement or elimination occurred in: need to strain (7/13 patients), digitation (7/11), laxative use (5/9). Time in the toilet (median 30 v 10 minutes, before v after treatment) and number of visits to toilet (6 v 3/day) were also improved. Three patients were able to maintain employment before treatment compared with eight after treatment. The solitary ulcer did not heal completely in any of the nine patients examined after treatment, but improved in four. Previous surgery, the macroscopic appearance of the ulcer, the presence of pelvic floor paradox, and other physiological parameters did not predict outcome. 
Conclusion—Biofeedback retraining is a useful treatment for this condition. Long term studies are now required. 



Keywords: solitary rectal ulcer syndrome; biofeedback therapy

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (63.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Binnie N. R., Papachrysostomou M., Clare N., Smith A. N. Solitary rectal ulcer: the place of biofeedback and surgery in the treatment of the syndrome. World J Surg. 1992 Sep-Oct;16(5):836–840. doi: 10.1007/BF02066979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ederle A., Bulighin G., Orlandi P. G., Pilati S. Endoscopic application of human fibrin sealant in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Endoscopy. 1992 Oct;24(8):736–737. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eigenmann P. A., Le Coultre C., Cox J., Dederding J. P., Belli D. C. Solitary rectal ulcer: an unusual cause of rectal bleeding in children. Eur J Pediatr. 1992 Sep;151(9):658–660. doi: 10.1007/BF01957567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Farthing M. J., Lennard-jones J. E. Sensibility of the rectum to distension and the anorectal distension reflex in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1978 Jan;19(1):64–69. doi: 10.1136/gut.19.1.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ho Y. H., Ho J. M., Parry B. R., Goh H. S. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: the clinical entity and anorectal physiological findings in Singapore. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995 Feb;65(2):93–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1995.tb07268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kamm M. A., Lennard-Jones J. E. Rectal mucosal electrosensory testing--evidence for a rectal sensory neuropathy in idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 May;33(5):419–423. doi: 10.1007/BF02156270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kang Y. S., Kamm M. A., Engel A. F., Talbot I. C. Pathology of the rectal wall in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and complete rectal prolapse. Gut. 1996 Apr;38(4):587–590. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.4.587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kang Y. S., Kamm M. A., Nicholls R. J. Solitary rectal ulcer and complete rectal prolapse: one condition or two? Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(2):87–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00341203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keighley M. R., Shouler P. Clinical and manometric features of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984 Aug;27(8):507–512. doi: 10.1007/BF02555506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kiff E. S., Swash M. Normal proximal and delayed distal conduction in the pudendal nerves of patients with idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Aug;47(8):820–823. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.8.820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lam T. C., Lubowski D. Z., King D. W. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1992 Mar;6(1):129–143. doi: 10.1016/0950-3528(92)90023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Madden M. V., Kamm M. A., Nicholls R. J., Santhanam A. N., Cabot R., Speakman C. T. Abdominal rectopexy for complete prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Jan;35(1):48–55. doi: 10.1007/BF02053338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nicholls R. J., Simson J. N. Anteroposterior rectopexy in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1986 Mar;73(3):222–224. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rau B. K., Harikrishnan K. M., Krishna S. Laser therapy of solitary rectal ulcers: a new concept. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994 Jan;23(1):27–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rogers J., Laurberg S., Misiewicz J. J., Henry M. M., Swash M. Anorectal physiology validated: a repeatability study of the motor and sensory tests of anorectal function. Br J Surg. 1989 Jun;76(6):607–609. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tjandra J. J., Fazio V. W., Church J. M., Lavery I. C., Oakley J. R., Milsom J. W. Clinical conundrum of solitary rectal ulcer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Mar;35(3):227–234. doi: 10.1007/BF02051012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES