Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1997 Nov;78(5):456–461. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.5.456

Reduction in treatment delay by paramedic ECG diagnosis of myocardial infarction with direct CCU admission

M Millar-Craig 1, A Joy 1, M Adamowicz 1, R Furber 1, B Thomas 1
PMCID: PMC1892296  PMID: 9415003

Abstract

Objectives—To establish the feasibility of training paramedics to diagnose acute myocardial infarction by ECG before hospital admission and whether direct paramedic coronary care admission, arranged by very high frequency (VHF) radio communication with the coronary care unit (CCU), would reduce delay of thrombolysis treatment.
Design—Prospective controlled study.
Setting—District general hospital CCU and a local district ambulance paramedic service.
Patients—124 patients with ECG evidence of myocardial infarction or ischaemia admitted directly to the CCU by the paramedic service were compared with 123 patients admitted by the emergency department and subsequently transferred to the CCU.
Main outcome measures—ECG diagnostic accuracy by paramedics, and interval durations for CCU admission and thrombolysis.
Results—ECG diagnostic accuracy by the paramedics was 87.5% in the training phase and 92% in admission. The total call to thrombolysis interval was reduced from 154 to 93 minutes and the "door to needle" interval was reduced from 97 to 37 minutes.
Conclusions—Trained paramedics can reliably diagnose myocardial infarction by ECG. The use of a direct admission procedure, by a VHF radio link to the CCU, substantially reduces the time interval for thrombolytic treatment after acute myocardial infarction.

 Keywords: myocardial infarction;  electrocardiogram;  thrombolysis;  paramedic

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.0 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Distribution and management of patients in phase I. 

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Distribution and management of patients in phase II.

Figure 3  .

Figure 3  

Open in a new tab

Comparison of mean delay times between phases I and II.    

Figure 4  .

Figure 4  

Open in a new tab

Time from call to emergency services to arrival in the coronary care unit.    

Figure 5  .

Figure 5  

Open in a new tab

Door to needle time.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahmad R. A., Bond S., Burke J., Singh S. P., Watson R. D. Patients with suspected myocardial infarction: effect of mode of referral on admission time to a coronary care unit. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Apr;42(357):145–147. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Applebaum D., Weiss A. T., Koren G., Ben David Y., Hasin Y., Gotsman M. S. Feasibility of pre-hospital fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med. 1986 May;4(3):201–204. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(86)90065-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aufderheide T. P., Hendley G. E., Woo J., Lawrence S., Valley V., Teichman S. L. A prospective evaluation of prehospital 12-lead ECG application in chest pain patients. J Electrocardiol. 1992;24 (Suppl):8–13. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(10)80004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baxt W. G. Prophylactic lidocaine. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Nov;19(11):1342–1343. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82304-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Birkhead J. S. Time delays in provision of thrombolytic treatment in six district hospitals. Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and a Cardiology Committee of Royal College of Physicians of London. BMJ. 1992 Aug 22;305(6851):445–448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6851.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Briggs R. S., Brown P. M., Crabb M. E., Cox T. J., Ead H. W., Hawkes R. A., Jequier P. W., Southall D. P., Grainger R., Williams J. H. The Brighton resuscitation ambulances: a continuing experiment in prehospital care by ambulance staff. Br Med J. 1976 Nov 13;2(6045):1161–1165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6045.1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foster D. B., Dufendach J. H., Barkdoll C. M., Mitchell B. K. Prehospital recognition of AMI using independent nurse/paramedic 12-lead ECG evaluation: impact on in-hospital times to thrombolysis in a rural community hospital. Am J Emerg Med. 1994 Jan;12(1):25–31. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90192-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kereiakes D. J., Weaver W. D., Anderson J. L., Feldman T., Gibler B., Aufderheide T., Williams D. O., Martin L. H., Anderson L. C., Martin J. S. Time delays in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a tale of eight cities. Report from the Pre-hospital Study Group and the Cincinnati Heart Project. Am Heart J. 1990 Oct;120(4):773–780. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(90)90192-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McMurray J., Rankin A. Cardiology--I: Treatment of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and angina pectoris. BMJ. 1994 Nov 19;309(6965):1343–1350. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pantridge J. F., Geddes J. S. A mobile intensive-care unit in the management of myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1967 Aug 5;2(7510):271–273. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90110-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Parry G., Wrightson W. N., Hood L., Adams P. C., Reid D. S. Delays to thrombolysis in the treatment of myocardial infarction. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993 Jan;27(1):19–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pell A. C., Miller H. C., Robertson C. E., Fox K. A. Effect of "fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction on delay to thrombolysis. BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):83–87. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rawles J. Treatment of myocardial infarction and angina. Review underestimated the benefit of early thrombolysis. BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):465–466. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.465a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roth A., Barbash G. I., Hod H., Miller H. I., Rath S., Modan M., Har-Zahav Y., Keren G., Bassan S., Kaplinsky E. Should thrombolytic therapy be administered in the mobile intensive care unit in patients with evolving myocardial infarction? A pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Apr;15(5):932–936. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90219-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rule S., Brooksby P., Sanderson J. Use of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction by general practitioners. Postgrad Med J. 1993 Mar;69(809):190–193. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.809.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sharkey S. W., Bruneete D. D., Ruiz E., Hession W. T., Wysham D. G., Goldenberg I. F., Hodges M. An analysis of time delays preceding thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1989 Dec 8;262(22):3171–3174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weaver W. D., Cerqueira M., Hallstrom A. P., Litwin P. E., Martin J. S., Kudenchuk P. J., Eisenberg M. Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1993 Sep 8;270(10):1211–1216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weston C. F., Penny W. J., Julian D. G. Guidelines for the early management of patients with myocardial infarction. British Heart Foundation Working Group. BMJ. 1994 Mar 19;308(6931):767–771. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6931.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. White N. M., Parker W. S., Binning R. A., Kimber E. R., Ead H. W., Chamberlain D. A. Mobile coronary care provided by ambulance personnel. Br Med J. 1973 Sep 22;3(5881):618–622. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5881.618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES