Association of Resistin Gene 3'-Untranslated Region EX4-44G-->A Polymorphism with Obesity- and Insulin-Related Phenotypes in Turkish Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Abstract

Resistin, an adipocyte-secreted hormone, has been associated with obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in some, but not all, rodent models. In humans, the exact function of resistin is unkown. Because 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) single nucleotide substitutions (SNPs) have been shown to affect gene expression, we examined the EX4-44G-->A SNP in the 3'-UTR of exon 3 within the resistin gene. The objective of this study was to investigate, for the first time in a Turkish study group, whether the 3'-UTR EX4-44G-->A variation in the resistin gene influences the development of T2DM, obesity and insulin-related phenotypes. We analyzed the genotype frequencies of the EX4-44G-->A polymorphism of the resistin gene in 116 type 2 diabetic and 102 normal subjects. Serum lipids, obesity-related and insulin-related phenotypes were analyzed. No significant difference for genotypic frequencies were observed for the BseRI restriction site in type 2 diabetic patients as compared to controls. Waist-to-hip ratio, BMI, body fat and apoAI levels were found to be affected by resistin genotype. In the control group, BMI (p < 0.01), HIS (p < 0.05) and BF (p < 0.05) levels were found to be elevated, whereas HOMA β-cell index (p < 0.01) and apo AI (p < 0.05) levels were found to be decreased in GG genotype carriers. In the diabetic group, the GG genotype carriers were found to have higher BMI levels (p < 0.001), waist-to-hip ratio (p < 0.05), body fat (p < 0.01), HOMA (p < 0.001) and fasting insulin (p < 0.05), but lower HbA1c levels in comparison to GC + AA carriers. These data suggest that, in the Turkish study group, the EX4-44G-->A polymorphism of the resistin gene is associated with insulin and obesity-related phenotypes.

Introduction

Insulin resistance precedes and predicts the onset of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) [1, 2]. Although insulin resistance (IR) correlates with fat mass and obesity, the mechanism associated with elevated body fat which causes reduced insulin sensitivity (IS) is unknown. Resistin, as an insulin antagonist, modulates several steps in the insulin signaling pathway and may play a role in the pathogenesis of IR. Resistin is overexpressed in the human adipose tissue of obese individuals and is likely to modulate insulin sensitivity [3]. Resistin is, therefore, a candidate gene for IR and T2DM. Resistin gene variations in ethnic populations and its familial transmission suggest that IR is genetically determined.

Adipocytes secrete a number of factors that might modulate IS, including resistin [3], free fatty acids (FFAs) [4], TNF-α [5], interleukin-6 (IL-6) [6] and adiponectin [7] among other probable factors. Resistin, a cysteine-rich, adipocyte-specific secretory factor, was first identified in mouse adipocytes. Resistin levels are increased in both genetically and diet-induced obese mice. It has been suggested that resistin links obesity to diabetes. Exogenous resistin was found to alter glucose tolerance and insulin action in mice, while thiazolidinedione treatment greatly downregulates resistin expression. Resistin protein neutralization enhances blood glucose uptake and IS [8].

The EX4-44G→A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the resistin gene is present in the 3'-UTR of exon 3, 60 bp 3' from the stop codon and 8 bp 5' from the AATAAA polyadenylation signal. Published studies of resistin gene expression in humans are controversial. Resistin mRNA is not detectable in the white adipose tissue (WAT) of lean subjects [9]. Although resistin transcript is found in the WAT of obese individuals, no correlation has been found between body weight, adiposity, IR and resistin mRNA level [9, 10]. Resistin receptors and their mechanisms of action are unknown. Intraperitoneally administered resistin elevates blood glucose and insulin concentration in mice and impairs hypoglycemic response to insulin infusion. Additionally, anti-resistin antibodies decrease blood glucose and improve IS in obese mice [8]. Resistin may be an important link between increased fat mass and IR. The finding that the markedly increased serum levels of resistin in obese mice are reduced by rosiglitazone and other thiazolidinediones that increase IS, indicate that resistin is a mediator of IR. Resistin may regulate fat mass through negative feedback: it is increased during adiposcyte differentiation, but also seems to inhibit adipogenesis. Since energy metabolism differs in mice and humans, it is probable that the physiology of resistin in mice is different from humans. Mutations in the resistin gene may contribute to genetic susceptibility to IR and T2DM in humans.

We examined the resistin gene 3'-UTR EX4-44G→A polymorphism in type 2 diabetic and normal subjects, to establish whether this variation in the resistin gene might contribute to insulin and obesity-related traits.

Methods

Population sample

We studied 116 (age: 57.41 ± 9.14 years) unrelated type 2 diabetic patients (48 men and 68 women), who were outpatients of the Turkish Diabetes Hospital (İstanbul, Turkey). Age at diabetes onset was 43.91 ± 11.25 years. Type 2 diabetic patients were selected according to WHO criteria [11]. Of the 116 type 2 diabetic patients, 65 were treated with sulphonylurea drugs, 38 with metformin and 13 with sulphonylurea drugs in combination with metformin. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine and informed consent was obtained from each participant. The control group consisted of 102 (age: 55.15 ± 11.58 years) unrelated healthy individuals (31 men, 71 women) without medication, who either attended a routine health check at a general practice or were staff of the Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine (Istanbul University, Turkey). The hepatic and endocrine functions of the patients were normal and all were relatively well controlled with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >6-7% (normal range >7%). Patients with macro- and microangiopathic complications were excluded from this study. No member of the sample populations admitted to alcohol intake and none had a history of smoking.

Clinical and biochemical evaluation

Blood samples were collected after overnight (>12 h) fasting. Serum was obtained after leaving the blood tubes for 30 minutes at room temperature, followed by 10 minutes centrifugation. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and overweight was defined as a value of ≥25 kg/m² [12]. The biochemical analyses included determination of fasting plasma glucose, triacylglycerol (TAG), total cholesterol (T-Chol), apolipoprotein E (apo E), apolipoprotein AI (apo AI) and apolipoprotein B (apo B). Serum TAG and T-Chol levels were measured using standard enzymatic methods (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), automated on an AU5021 (Olympus, Merck). Serum apo E was determined by turbidimetry automated on a Cobas Mira analyzer (Roche, Meylan, France). Serum apo AI and apo B were determined by immunonephelometry on a Behring Nephelometer analyzer with Behring reagents (Behringwerke, Marburg, Germany). Sera were analyzed without pretreatment and diluted in double-distilled water when lipid or apolipoprotein levels exceeded reference values. Pooled sera were included in each series of measurements for apo E. Between assays the coefficient of variation of these methods was 2.14%, 4.66%, 0.95%, 1.52%, 2.92%, 4.34%, 1.53% respectively for T-Chol, TAG, glucose, apo E, apo AI and apo B.

Waist-to-hip ratio

Waist circumference was measured at the level of umbilicus while the subject was standing and breathing normally. Hip circumference was measured at the level of greatest hip girth.

The quantification of body fat

At first, lean body mass (LBM) was calculated by the formulas described by Hume [13]. For males the LBM is calculated as follows: LBM (kg) = 0.32810 × weight (in kg) + 0.33929 × height (in cm) - 29.5336 and for females: LBM (kg) = 0.29569 × weight (in kg) + 0.41893 × height (in cm) - 43.2933. Body fat was calculated by subtracting lean body mass from present body weight (PBW).

Pancreatic β-cell secretory capacity

Pancreatic β-cell secretory capacity was estimated by the β-cell index (index of β-cell secretory force, HOMA β-cell index) using the formula proposed by Hosker et al. [14]: HOMA β-cell index = 20 × I^F / (G^F - 3.5) where I^F = fasting insulin (in μU/ml) and G^F = fasting plasma glucose (in mg/dl).

The rate of insulin resistance

The rate of insulin resistance was evaluated by the homeostatic model assessment devised by Matthews et al. [15] and calculated by the formula described by Bonora et al. [16]: Insulin resistance (IR) = fasting serum insulin (in μU/ml) × fasting plasma glucose (in mmol/l) / 22.5.

Hepatic insulin sensitivity

Hepatic insulin sensitivity was assessed using the following formula devised by Matsuda and DeFronzo [17]: hepatic insulin sensitivity (HIS) = k / G^F (in mg/dl) × I^F (in µU/ml) where k = 22.5 × 18 = 405.

Molecular analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes by a salting out procedure [18]. The 3'-UTR of exon 3 (EX4-44G→A), was amplified by PCR using the resistin BseRI protocol with the relevant primers (Gibco BRL, Rockville, MD, USA): RE1:5'-AGAGTCCACGCTCCTGTGTT- 3' and RE2:5'-TCATCATCATCATCTCCAGGTT- 3' [19]. The final amplification products were submitted to digestion with the restriction BseRI and visualized on 1.5% agarose gel. The resistin allele with the restriction sites present for the enzyme BseRI is designated as A and the allele lacking the restriction site as G.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using Unistat 5.1 software. Data are expressed as numbers and percentages for discrete variables and as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. Serum TAG were logarithmically transformed before the analysis to obtain normal distribution of data. Bonferroni correction for multiple testing has been applied (Table 2). Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for genotype frequencies was estimated by the Chi-square test. p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Table 2. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects.

^LegendValues represent mean ± SD. ns: not significant. p values are corrected for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni). a: control vs. diabetes. b: resistin genotype effect (GA + AA vs. GG). c: difference of resistin genotypes between diabetic and control groups. WHR: waist-to-hip ratio. HOMA: homeostasis model assessment (= 20 × fasting insulin / (fasting plasma glucose - 3.5)). Apo: Apolipoprotein. Insulin resistance = fasting serum insulin (in μU/ml) × fasting plasma glucose (in mmol/l) / 22.5. Hepatic insulin sensitivity = k / fasting insulin × fasting plasma glucose (where k = 22.5 × 18 = 405).

Results

The genotype frequency distributions for the type 2 diabetic and control groups with respect to BseRI polymorphism are compared in Table 1. The sequence variant was found in 26 of 116 diabetic subjects (7 homozygous and 19 heterozygous) and in 16 of the control subjects (3 homozygous and 13 heterozygous). The frequency of the EX4-44G→A allele was not significantly different among groups (χ² = 1.818, p = 0.397). The clinical characteristics of the study subjects and the effects of resistin EX4-44G→A polymorphism are shown in Table 2.

Table 1. Resistin genotype frequencies in type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects.

^LegendResults are expressed as numbers (percentages). The resistin genotype frequencies of the control and diabetic groups were compared using the Chi-square test and no significance was found (χ² = 1.818, p = 0.397).

No significant difference was observed for the analyzed lipid and lipoprotein levels when the diabetic and control groups were compared. Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (p < 0.05), fasting glucose (p < 0.001), insulin (p < 0.001), HbA1c (p < 0.001), IR (p < 0.001) and HOMA β-cell index (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in diabetic patients compared to controls, whereas HIS (p < 0.001) was higher in controls. ApoAI (p < 0.05), WHR (p < 0.001), BF (p < 0.001) and BMI (p < 0.001) measures differed as a function of resistin genotypes. To test whether the EX4-44G→A SNP could be associated with any of the obesity, insulin or diabetes-related phenotypes, we compared clinical and metabolic parameters (BMI, blood glucose, insulin, HOMA β-cell index, BF, IR, HIS and lipid profile) between resistin EX4-44G→A SNP genotypes for control subjects (Table 3) and type 2 diabetic patients (Table 4). The AA genotype carriers were combined with GA genotype carriers because of the low sample number. In the control group, BMI (p < 0.01) and body fat (p < 0.05) levels were found to be elevated, while HOMA (p < 0.05) and apo AI (p < 0.05) levels were found to be decreased in GG genotype carriers when compared to GA + AA genotype carriers (Table 3). In the diabetic group, the GG genotype carriers were found to have higher BMI (p < 0.001), waist-to-hip ratio (p < 0.05), body fat (p < 0.01), HOMA (p < 0.001) and fasting insulin (p < 0.05) but lower HbA1c levels (p < 0.05) in comparison to GC + AA genotype carriers (Table 4).

Table 3. Clinical and biochemical characteristics by resistin genotypes in the control group.

^LegendValues are expressed as mean ± SD. p: value of resistin genotype effect (GA + AA vs. GG). Groups were compared using Student's t-test for the variables. ns: not significant. BMI: body mass index. WHR: waist-to-hip ratio. HOMA: homeostasis model assessment (= 20 × fasting insulin / (fasting plasma glucose - 3.5)). Apo: Apolipoprotein. Insulin resistance = fasting serum insulin (in μU/ml) × fasting plasma glucose (in mmol/l) / 22.5. Hepatic insulin sensitivity = k / fasting insulin × fasting plasma glucose (where k = 22.5 × 18 = 405).

Table 4. Clinical and biochemical characteristics by resistin genotypes in the type 2 diabetic group.

^LegendValues are expressed as mean ± SD. p: value of resistin genotype effect (GA + AA vs. GG). Groups were compared using Student's t-test for the variables. ns: not significant. BMI: body mass index. WHR: waist-to-hip ratio. HOMA: homeostasis model assessment (= 20 × fasting insulin / (fasting plasma glucose - 3.5)). Apo: Apolipoprotein. Insulin resistance = fasting serum insulin (in μU/ml) × fasting plasma glucose (in mmol/l) / 22.5. Hepatic insulin sensitivity = k / fasting insulin × fasting plasma glucose (where k = 22.5 × 18 = 405).

Discussion

Possible relationships between resistin gene polymorphisms and T2DM have been investigated in various studies [20-27]. Specifically, the analysis of a Japanese population consisting of 99 T2DM patients and 99 controls did not find any associations between three intronic SNPs and T2DM [23]. In another study, the coding region SNP (EX4-44G→A) was examined in 198 obese, 207 diabetic and 186 control subjects in an Italian population and was not found to be associated with obesity and T2DM [19]. Another study from Italy including 203 nondiabetic subjects from Sicily and 456 nondiabetic subjects from the Gargano region identified an ATG repeat in the 3'-UTR of the human resistin gene asociated with increased insulin sensitivity [20]. Wang et al. [28] examined resistin variants located in the promoter, intron 2, intron 3, 3'-UTR and 3'-flanking regions in a population of Northern European ancestry consisting of 68 patients with T2DM, 61 nondiabetic individuals with a family history of diabetes mellitus and 118 nondiabetic controls with no family history of diabetes mellitus. They found no association between the eight SNPs and one GAT microsatellite examined and either T2DM or BMI. Two 5'-flanking variants were associated with BMI but not with T2DM in a Canadian population. Interestingly, the same variants had no association with BMI or T2DM in a population from Scandinavia [21]. Ma et al. [22] showed that the 181G-A resistin gene variant is not associated with T2DM. Furthermore, Urbanek et al. [29] found no association between an SNP in the promoter region of the resistin gene and obesity or IR.

Only two studies have found an association between a resistin gene polymorphism and T2DM, one in a Chinese [25] and one in a Japanese [26] population. Specifically, Tan et al. [25] found an association between the 3'-UTR +62G-A polymorphism and a decresed risk for T2DM as well as a lower prevalence of hypertension in the A allele carriers in the diabetic but not in the control group. Osawa et al. [26] found that the -420G/G resistin genotype is associated with an increased promoter activity through specific Sp1/3 binding, which, in turn, leads to increased resistin levels and to an increased risk of T2DM. In general, it has been observed that the pattern of traits associated with resistin polymorphisms has been highly contradictory. In the present study we found an association between the presence of the 3'-UTR EX4-44G→A polymorphism of the resistin gene and BMI, HOMA, body fat and apo AI levels in the control group and BMI, HOMA, body fat, and fasting insulin in the T2DM group.

Patients with T2DM have, as a group, higher IR than nondiabetics. It is known that IR is virtually universal and maximal when BMI exceeds 30 kg m-2 [30]. Studies in humans support the hypothesis that resistin has a potential role in insulin resistance [31-33]. However, the role of resistin in insulin resistance in humans is controversial. In the present study, no significant relationship was found between EX4-44G→A polymorphism and IR. Sentinelli et al. [19] have analyzed the frequency of EX4-44G→A SNP of the resistin gene and found no significant association between this variant and diabetes and obesity. Regarding BMI, only one, namely the -420C→G polymorphism, has been shown to be associated with BMI in Brazilian women but not in men [34]. Interestingly, Engert et al. also found an association between the -420C→G as well as the -537A→C polymorphims and BMI in a Canadian but not in a Scandinavian population [21]. In our study, the EX4-44G→A variant of the resistin gene was found to be associated with BMI, BF and WHCR levels and thus with obesity. In agreement with the genotype frequency found by Sentinelli et al. [19], we did not find any significant difference among the T2DM and control groups, when the frequency of resistin genotypes were compared. Sentinelli et al. could not show any significant differences in clinical and metabolic parameters between EX4-44G→A carriers and noncarriers [19]. In contrast, we observed significant differences in the levels of apoAI, body fat, HOMA and BMI between GC and GG genotypes of the resistin gene in the controls, while body fat, HOMA, insulin and BMI levels were found to differ among genotypes of the T2DM group. Ethnic differences as well as variable gene-environment interactions influencing the phenotypic expression of the variant could be possible explanations for the discordant results between the Turkish subjects in the present study and the Italian subjects [19]. Furthermore, it cannot be ruled out that the associations found in the present study may be due to another polymorphism in linkage disequilibrium with the variant studied.

To date, among the resistin variants investigated, only one has been associated with HDL cholesterol levels, namely +1084G→A [35], and one with TAG levels, namely an ATG repeat [20]. Both are located in the 3'-UTR. Associations have been published between various resistin gene SNPs and serum TAG and fasting blood glucose concentrations [23] as well as HDL cholesterol levels [35]. Interestingly, plasma resistin levels per se have also been shown not to be associated with LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and TAG levels [36]. In the present study we found an association of EX4-44G→A polymorphism only with apo AI. Apo AI levels were higher in controls with the GC genotype when compared to the GG phenotype. Although the exact role of resistin in the pathogenesis of T2DM has not been established, the allele and genotype frequencies of several SNPs of the resistin gene have been compared between T2DM patients and controls. In concordance with our results, associations between T2DM and resistin gene polymorphisms were not found in most of the studies [20, 21-24, 28], while only in a few studies was an association between 3'-UTR 62G-A variant and a decreased risk of T2DM observed [25, 26].

In conclusion, the present study suggests that, in a Turkish population, the EX4-44G→A polymorphism of the resistin gene is associated with obesity and insulin-related phenotypes. Altough our data would support a functional role of resistin in human HIS, additional work is needed to explore the role of resistin in IS, IR and obesity. Further studies and the functional analysis of this variant are required to clarify the role of the resistin gene polymorphism in the pathophysiology of T2DM. The hypothesis proposed by this study must be replicated in other populations with a higher number of subjects in order to confirm the significance of this variant in the relationship of obesity and insulin-related traits.