Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 7;107(11):4250–4256. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4406

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of CML study patients with CCR

Characteristic Value
Median age, y (range) 51.8 (20-74)
Sex, % male 60
Median time from leukemia diagnosis to start of imatinib mesylate, mo (range) 8.9 (0-165)
“Early” CML diagnosis*, % 46
Baseline CML diagnosis, % chronic phase/% accelerated phase 85/15
New CML (Hasford) risk scoreat diagnosis,20%
    Low risk 55
    Intermediate risk 36
    High risk 9
Additional cytogenetic abnormalities at baseline, % 13
Median percentage of Ph-positive metaphases at baseline (25%-75% levels) 100 (95-100)
Average imatinib mesylate dose, mg/d
    Chronic phase 450
    Accelerated phase 590
Other concomitant therapies, with imatinib mesylate, %
    None 65
    IFN or Ara-C 31
    Tipifarnib 1
    Donor leukocytes 1
    Hsp70 vaccine 1
Median time from start of imatinib mesylate to CCR, mo (range) 9.5 (2.4-57)
Median time from start of imatinib mesylate to major cytogenetic response, mo (range) 5.5 (1-57)
Median time of follow-up after imatinib mesylate, mo (range) 29 (8-59)
Median time of follow-up after CCR, mo (range) 13 (0-32)
Median interval between monitoring visits, mo (range) 3.2 (0.1-21)
Median number of laboratory monitoring visits (range) 6 (1-16)

N = 85. No significant difference was observed between patients with durable CCR (n = 62) and patients with disease progression (n = 23) for all listed variables. Percentages given in table are percent of total patients.

IFN indicates interferon-α; Ara-C, cytarabine.

*

< 6 months before imatinib mesylate.

Euro score.

Ph < 35%.