Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2007 May 8;104(20):8502–8507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608877104

Caspase-9 regulates apoptosis/proliferation balance during metamorphic brain remodeling in Xenopus

Laurent Coen 1, Karine Le Blay 1, Isaline Rowe 1, Barbara A Demeneix 1,*
PMCID: PMC1895979  PMID: 17488818

Abstract

During anuran metamorphosis, the tadpole brain is transformed producing the sensorial and motor systems required for the frog's predatory lifestyle. Nervous system remodeling simultaneously implicates apoptosis, cell division, and differentiation. The molecular mechanisms underlying this remodeling have yet to be characterized. Starting from the observation that active caspase-9 and the Bcl-XL homologue, XR11 are highly expressed in tadpole brain during metamorphosis, we determined their implication in regulating the balance of apoptosis and proliferation in the developing tadpole brain. In situ hybridization showed caspase-9 mRNA to be expressed mainly in the ventricular area, a site of neuroblast proliferation. To test the functional role of caspase-9 in equilibrating neuroblast production and elimination, we overexpressed a dominant-negative caspase-9 protein, DN9, in the tadpole brain using somatic gene transfer and germinal transgenesis. In both cases, abrogating caspase-9 activity significantly decreased brain apoptosis and increased numbers of actively proliferating cells in the ventricular zone. Moreover, overexpression of XR11 with or without DN9 was also effective in decreasing apoptosis and increasing cell division in the tadpole brain. We conclude that XR11 and caspase-9, two key members of the mitochondrial death pathway, are implicated in controlling the proliferative status of neuroblasts in the metamorphosing Xenopus brain. Modification of their expression during the critical period of metamorphosis alters the outcome of metamorphic neurogenesis, resulting in a modified brain phenotype in juvenile Xenopus.

Keywords: cell proliferation, mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, Xenopus metamorphosis, XR11/Bcl-XL, germinal transgenesis


Thyroid hormone-induced anuran metamorphosis is marked by dramatic morphological remodeling and physiological changes in most of the tadpole tissues. Brain morphology alters radically as the tadpole changes from an herbivorous, swimming organism to a predatory frog (1). However, beyond the basic fact that remodeling of the CNS during metamorphosis involves cell-specific decisions inducing apoptosis, cell division, and differentiation, little data exist on where and how these processes are regulated. This is particularly true for neuronal apoptosis and the mechanisms regulating proliferation/apoptotic balance in the metamorphosing CNS.

Apoptosis is an evolutionary well conserved mechanism, essential for maintenance of tissue homeostasis and correct development of all multicellular organisms (for review see ref. 2). Two major apoptotic death pathways have been characterized, the extrinsic pathway triggered by membrane death receptors and the intrinsic pathway initiated in mitochondria (2). Apoptosis initiated by the mitochondrial pathway predominates in the developing brain (3, 4), and cell death in neurodegenerative disorders is directly or indirectly regulated by this pathway (5, 6). Further, phenotypes produced by inactivation of key apoptotic genes in mice, show an overriding role of the mitochondrial death route in neural development (7, 8).

The intrinsic mitochondrial pathway implicates conserved mechanisms involving proteases, called caspases (9, 10), and regulatory pro- and antiapoptotic mitochondrial factors (11, 12). These factors include the Bcl-2 family that are either proapoptotic (such as Bax) or antiapoptotic (such as Bcl-2), with the relative levels of each protein ultimately determining cell fate (13).

Xenopus is an excellent model to study apoptosis in vertebrate development, as apoptosis is central to metamorphic remodeling (14). Parallel to the essential role of mitochondrial apoptosis in mammal brain development, some data also point to the mitochondrial route in regulating brain apoptosis during metamorphosis. Such reports include the demonstrations of increases in mRNA encoding XR11, the Xenopus homologue to mammalian Bcl-XL (15), various caspases, including caspase-9 (C9) and caspase-3 (C3) (16, 17), and Apaf1 (D. Du Pasquier, personal communication) in brains of metamorphosing tadpoles. Further, XR11 plays neuron-specific roles in governing neuronal apoptosis, providing one of the few demonstrations of neuron-specific apoptotic programs linked to the mitochondrial death pathway in the metamorphosing nervous system (18).

Given the lack of insight into the mechanisms underlying the action of the mitochondrial pathway in neuronal cell death in amphibia, we examined the role of the Xenopus C9 and XR11, two key actors of the mitochondrial pathway, in regulation and maturation of the CNS during Xenopus laevis metamorphosis.

By studying phenotypes of single- or double-transgenic tadpoles, we show that C9 and XR11 are implicated not only in regulating apoptosis in the CNS during metamorphosis, but also that they increase numbers of actively proliferating neuroblasts in ventricular brain areas. Moreover, we show that perturbation of the proliferative pool of neuroblasts impacts on brain development, resulting in a modified brain morphology of juvenile Xenopus.

Results

Caspase-9 Activation Increases in Tadpole Brain During Metamorphosis.

To assess whether C9 is functionally active in metamorphosing X. laevis tadpole brains, we used an antibody (17) against active C9 on Western blots of tadpole brains. A 34-kDa band was detected (Fig. 1A), corresponding to conversion of pro-C9 into active C9, as predicted from cleavage sites in the procaspase sequence (17).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Caspase-9 mRNA and activated caspase-9 increase in metamorphic tadpole brains. (A) Activation of C9 was monitored by Western blotting on brain extracts of tadpoles at different stages of metamorphosis, by using an active C9 specific antibody. The 34-kDa band, corresponding to conversion of pro-C9 to active C9, as predicted from cleavage sites in the procaspase sequences (17), is seen from stage NF55 (onset of metamorphosis) up to stage NF63 (end of metamorphosis), peaking at stage NF60 (climax of metamorphosis). The immunoblot was repeated by using independent samples. Equal amounts of proteins were loaded per lane and subsequently confirmed by Ponceau-S staining (P). (B–G) Spatial distribution of C9 mRNA in Xenopus brains at stage NF63 with ISH, by using an antisense digoxigenin-labeled probe on coronal sections (B, D, and F). Strong localized expression of C9 mRNA is seen in the ventricular zone of the anterior (B), medial (D), and posterior (F) brain. Control adjacent sections were hybridized with a sense probe (C, E, and G), showing no labeling. ISH was done twice on independent groups of tadpoles showing identical results. VL, 3V, and 4V: lateral, third, and fourth ventricles. (Scale bars: B–G, 50 μm.) (H) Quantitative-PCR analysis of C9 and XR11 expression after T3-treatment of perchlorated tadpoles. Fold inductions were normalized against untreated tadpoles. Statistical analysis for PCR data were done comparing the means of ΔCT values ± SD, by using Student's t test (n ≥ 3): Differences were extremely significant for C9 (P < 0.001) and significant for XR11 (P < 0.05).

The kinetics of C9 activation was monitored on brain extracts at different stages between onset and end of metamorphosis. Fig. 1A shows that active C9 is present before (stage NF55) and during metamorphosis (stages NF57–63). From stages NF57 to NF60, the 34-kDa band intensifies, indicating that active C9 peaks during metamorphosis (stage NF60).

Caspase-9 mRNA Is Highly Expressed in the Metamorphosing Tadpole Brain.

Next, C9 mRNA distribution was followed during metamorphosis. In situ observations show widespread C9 expression in stage NF63 brains [Fig. 1 B–G; supporting information (SI) Fig. 5B]. Moreover, C9 expression is marked around the ventricles, zones of active cell proliferation (refs. 19 and 20; see also Fig. 3). Strong expression is found throughout the periventricular areas, from the forebrain [lateral ventricle (VL); Fig. 1B] to midbrain (third ventricle; Fig. 1D) and hindbrain (fourth ventricle; Fig. 1F). Similar distributions, but with weaker signals, were seen at stage NF57 (SI Fig. 5A). By using quantitative-PCR, C9 and XR11 expression was monitored after T3 treatment of perchlorated (hypothyroid) tadpoles (Fig. 1H). The means of ΔCT quantitative-PCR values were compared by using Student's t test. C9 expression increased significantly (P < 0.001), as did XR11 expression, but with a lesser fold increase than C9 (P < 0.05). Thus, T3 induces C9 and XR11 expression, confirming the metamorphic-related increase described previously by Northern blot (15, 16).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

DN9 expression increases active cell proliferation in the ventricular zone of transfected brain. SGT in brain was carried out at stage NF57 by using CMV-driven DN9-GFP or GFP constructs, and proliferation was compared between DN9 and controls at 3 and 15 days after transfection by using the PH3-antibody. (A–F) Mitotic cells were observed on para-sagittal sections at 15 days after transfection for control (B and magnification, C) and compared with DN9 (E and magnification, F), showing more proliferative cells in DN9-transfected brain. DAPI counterstaining shows the same anterior brain region compared with control (A) and DN9 transfections (D). Note at higher magnification the greater concentration of positive cells for DN9 (arrows) lining the ventricle. (G) PH3-positive cells were counted for the VL in the anterior brain, showing a strong increase in mitosis in brains transfected with DN9 vs. controls. Each experiment was repeated twice, giving similar results. Means ± SEM are given; n > 6 in each group; ∗∗∗, P < 0.001. (Scale bars: A-F, 100 μm.)

C9 distribution in brain was correlated with patterns of apoptosis and proliferation in premetamorphosis (stage NF57; SI Fig. 5A) and at the end of metamorphosis (stage NF63; SI Fig. 5B). Generally, TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells map with the C9 expression pattern all over the brain. However, proliferation patterns revealed by using the PH3-mitotic cell marker (21) showed some interesting differences. As expected, mitotic positive cells were largely distributed along ventricle borders, zones of active cell proliferation (19, 20). More interestingly, proliferation was highest at stage NF57, when C9 expression in the periventricular zone was weak (SI Fig. 5A), whereas, inversely, strongly increased C9 expression in this zone observed at stage NF63 was associated with a major decrease in positive PH3-mitotic cells (SI Fig. 5B).

Apoptosis Is Reduced in Transgenic Animals Expressing DN9, a Dominant-Negative Form of Caspase-9, and/or XR11, the Bcl-XL Xenopus Homologue.

To gain insight into the role of C9 during Xenopus neurogenesis, we used a dominant negative, DN9, fused to red fluorescent protein (RFP) (17). The transgene was expressed from the neuronal-specific promoter Nβt, giving Nβt-DN9-RFP transgenic animals. In parallel, we investigated the role of another factor linked to the mitochondrial pathway, the antiapoptotic XR11 fused to GFP and Nβt-driven (Nβt-XR11-GFP), previously analyzed for its role in neuron-specific death in the peripheral nervous system (18).

After crossings, F1 transgenic tadpoles overexpressing either the dominant negative alone (DN9xDN9), the Bcl-XL homologue alone (XR11xXR11), or both factors (XR11xDN9) were obtained and their phenotype analyzed.

Apoptosis was examined in WT and transgenic tadpoles by TUNEL labeling on sagittal sections of stage NF61 brains (SI Fig. 6). Widespread distribution of positive apoptotic cells was seen in brains of WT tadpoles. Apoptosis was most marked in the ventral part of the anterior brain, in the subpallium area (SI Fig. 6 A, B, D, and E). This ventral distribution in WT anterior brain is also seen on coronal sections at stages NF57 and NF63 (SI Fig. 5 A and B). In contrast, apoptosis in XR11xDN9 tadpoles was markedly reduced (SI Fig. 6 C and F). Although apoptosis could still be detected throughout the brain, there were fewer TUNEL-positive cells in the subpallium area compared with controls (SI Fig. 6, compare B′ and E′ with C′ and F′). A similar decrease in apoptosis was observed in DN9xDN9 and XR11xXR11 transgenic animals (data not shown).

Many studies show mutant mice for C3 and C9 share similar brain phenotypes (7, 8). Thus, we examined C3 activity in the same brain region in tadpoles at the end of metamorphosis (stage NF66). Western blots were performed on anterior and posterior brain extracts and C3 activity compared in both extracts for control and transgenic animals by using a specific antibody against active C3 (SI Fig. 7). Variations were seen in active C3 in the anterior and posterior brains of transgenics DN9xDN9 and XR11xDN9 tadpoles, but no anterior/posterior difference was seen in control brains (SI Fig. 7).

Thus, TUNEL labeling and C3 activity were decreased in the anterior brains of transgenic as compared with WT animals, at stages NF61 and NF66, respectively. Taken together, these results show reduced apoptosis, particularly in the forebrain, of transgenic animals overexpressing DN9 and/or XR11.

Mitosis Is Significantly Enhanced in Brains of Transgenic Animals During Metamorphosis.

Given the high levels of C9 expression in ventricles during metamorphosis (Fig. 1 and SI Fig. 5), we investigated the role of DN9 on proliferation in this period. Proliferation was quantified in transgenic lines and compared with controls by using PH3 as a marker of mitosis (Fig. 2). Mitotic PH3-labeled cells were counted on sagittal sections in the VL of the anterior brain, the third ventricle (3V), and the cerebellum (CB), at key stages of the metamorphosis: onset (stage NF55), climax (stage NF61), and completion (stage NF66) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Cell proliferation increases at metamorphic climax in brains of transgenics overexpressing DN9 and/or XR11. Cell proliferation was followed in Nβt-driven DN9-RFP (DN9xDN9), XR11-GFP (XR11xXR11), and double-transgenic XR11-GFP/DN9-RFP (XR11xDN9) tadpoles by using a PH3-antibody and compared with WT or Nβt-driven RFP and GFP transgenic controls at different stages of metamorphosis. (A) DAPI- labeled sagittal section of a brain showing the three areas analyzed: VL, 3V, and CB. Proliferating cells were counted in the cell layers bordering ventricles for each area. (B) PH3-positive cells were counted at stage NF55 (onset of metamorphosis), around the VL in the anterior brain (VL NF55), the 3V (3V NF55), and the CB (CB NF55). Note that mitosis was enhanced only in VL and CB for XR11xDN9, but overall proliferation at this stage did not differ between transgenics and WT. (C) PH3-positive cells were counted at stage NF61 (climax of metamorphosis), in the same areas as for stage NF55. Note that mitosis was strongly enhanced in all areas for all transgenics compared with WT. (D) PH3-positive cells were counted at stage NF66 (end of metamorphosis), in the same areas as B and C. Note that mitotic numbers only show a slight, but significant, increase in VL for XR11xDN9 and in CB for DN9xDN9 and XR11xDN9. Means ± SEM are given; n > 6 in each group; not significant (ns), P < 0.5; not quite significant (nqs), P < 0.1; ∗, P < 0.05; ∗∗, P < 0.01; ∗∗∗, P < 0.001. RPr, recessus preopticus; RI, recessus infundibuli; OT, optic tectum.

As controls, we used WT animals and Nβt RFP- or GFP-expressing transgenic animals. Comparison of cell proliferation between them showed no statistical differences, thus excluding effects of fluorescence or transgenesis on proliferation (data not shown). Thus, results obtained with the three transgenic lines were compared with WT in all experiments described hereafter.

At stage NF55, cell proliferation in the whole brain (notably in VL, 3V, and CB regions; Fig. 2A) showed no substantial differences between transgenics and WT (Fig. 2B). The only significant increases in the VL and CB areas were seen with double transgenics XR11xDN9.

During metamorphosis of WT tadpoles, cell proliferation significantly decreased throughout. Proliferation was highest at metamorphic onset (Fig. 2B) for the VL (<2,000 mitotic cells), the 3V (<5,000 mitotic cells), or the CB (<300 mitotic cells). However, as metamorphosis progressed, proliferation decreased by ≈50% in the VL and 80% in the 3V of WT animals at climax (Fig. 2C: <1,200 and 800 mitotic cells, respectively) and remained low until after metamorphosis (Fig. 2D: <1,300 and 500 mitotic cells, respectively), except in the CB, where mitosis decreased only by 60% at the end of metamorphosis (Fig. 2D: <120 mitotic cells).

In contrast, all of the transgenics showed an overall increase in cell proliferation during metamorphosis, with strong mitotic labeling at stage NF61 in all regions: VL, 3V, and CB (Fig. 2C). Increases in proliferation were similar in all transgenic lines at this stage, increasing 3-fold for VL and 3V areas and 2-fold for CB area compared with WT. Indeed, whereas in WT animals, mitotic cell numbers decreased in the VL, from stages NF55 to NF66, they increased in transgenics (as for both DN9xDN9 and XR11xXR11) or were maintained at a high level (as for XR11xDN9) at stage NF61. In transgenics, mitotic levels in VL and CB did not decrease until after metamorphosis (stage NF66; Fig. 2D). In some cases, levels at stage NF66 remained higher than in WT, as for XR11xDN9 that showed higher levels of mitosis, particularly in the VL and CB (Fig. 2D).

In the 3V, proliferation was mainly located in the recessus preopticus and recessus infundibuli (Fig. 2A) for WT at stage NF61, the optic tectum ventricle only showing low mitotic levels (data not shown). In contrast, transgenic labeling showed an extended ventricular distribution of mitotic cells throughout the 3V, including the optic tectum region, at stage NF61.

Overexpression of DN9 in the Ventricular Area Increases Cell Survival and Proliferation.

To confirm the functional role of C9 in regulating cell fate, we used somatic gene transfer (SGT; ref. 22) to express a CMV-driven DN9-GFP construct in the ventricular areas. This method targets cells in the neurogenic zone bordering the ventricles, a site of strong C9 expression (Fig. 1).

GFP labeling and luciferase activity were monitored as indicators of transfection efficiency and cell survival by using CMV-DN9-GFP or CMV-GFP coinjected with a luciferase reporter gene construct (SI Fig. 8). DN9 expression increased GFP-positive cell number and luciferase activity compared with controls (SI Fig. 8). Further, elimination of DN9-GFP-expressing cells was less than for GFP-expressing control cells and probably linked to increased survival of transfected cells expressing DN9.

To better understand the impact of DN9 overexpression by SGT, mitosis was monitored by using PH3 at 3 and 15 days after transfection (Fig. 3). A significant increase in numbers of positive cells for DN9-expressing brains was seen in the VL at 15 days after transfection (Fig. 3 A–F). Moreover, the proliferative area was enlarged with higher numbers of PH3 labeled cells lining the ventricle, whereas labeled cells were less frequent in controls (Fig. 3, compare C and F). Widespread enhancement of PH3 positive cells was also seen throughout the ventricles of DN9 transfected brains, as the SGT technique provides broad transfection of cells lining the brain ventricles (data not shown). Quantifying PH3-positive cells in the VL confirmed the significant enhancement of mitosis in DN9-GFP-transfected brains (Fig. 3G). Indeed, cell proliferation increased ≈2-fold after 15 days in tadpoles expressing DN9, an increase correlated with the high luciferase ratio (value = 8.5) seen at this time (compare Fig. 3G and SI Fig. 8E).

Brain Morphology of Metamorphosed Transgenic Animals Is Modified by DN9 and/or XR11 Expression.

At stage NF66, after metamorphosis, overall brain morphologies of each transgenic line were compared with WT (Fig. 4). Although the length and maximum width of the whole brain did not change in transgenics, the relative brain proportions were markedly modified (see Fig. 4I for a schema of the anterior brains of controls and the transgenic lines). In transgenics, the forebrain was more compact, particularly for the double-transgenic XR11xDN9 (Fig. 4I). Other morphological differences included more pronounced commissures in WT at the forebrain/midbrain and forebrain/olfactory bulb junctions and more prominent CB in transgenics (Fig. 4 A–H).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Overexpression of DN9 and/or XR11 during metamorphosis modifies brain morphology in transgenic animals. (A–H) Representative brains seen in dorsal (A–D) or lateral (E–H) views are shown for WT (A and E), XR11xXR11 (B and F), DN9xDN9 (C and G), and XR11xDN9 (D and H) tadpoles. Note that commissures at the junctions between olfactory bulb or medial brain with the anterior brain (compare arrows) are more marked in control than in transgenics. Note also the larger CB in transgenics vs. WT (compare arrowheads). (I) Schematic representation of the forebrain of WT and each transgenic seen in E, F, G, and H, respectively (lateral views). The form of the forebrain shows a progressive compaction, XR11xXR11 and DN9xDN9 corresponding to an intermediate state and XR11xDN9 to the most marked compaction. (J) Different measurements were done for transgenic and WT brains, width of the forebrain (H1), width of the midbrain (H2 and H4), and width of the optic tectum (H3), and ratios were calculated with respect to brain length from the rostral tip to rear of optic tectum (L). All ratios H/L given for each measure were significantly increased in all transgenics in comparison with WT. Means ± SEM are given; n > 6 in each group; ∗, P < 0.05; ∗∗, P < 0.01; ∗∗∗, P < 0.001.

Differences in brain morphology were analyzed by measurement of the ratios of the anterior brain (H1), the midbrain (H2 and H4), and the optic tectum (H3) vs. their length (L). All ratios were significantly increased in transgenic animals compared with WT (Fig. 4J), confirming that overexpression of DN9 and/or XR11 and the ensuing disruption of the balance between proliferation and cell death result in a distinctly compacted forebrain.

Discussion

Apoptosis is crucial to normal CNS development. Perturbation of regulation or execution of apoptosis dramatically affects brain development in mammals (for reviews, see refs. 4 and 23). We used Xenopus tadpoles to investigate the mechanisms maintaining the balance between cell death and proliferation during metamorphosis, a period comparable to the mammalian perinatal phase (24, 25).

We show that C9 mRNA is highly expressed in the neurogenic ventricular region during metamorphosis, and that neuronal-specific expression of DN9, a dominant negative against C9, reduces brain apoptosis. DN9 markedly modifies the equilibrium of proliferation and death, specifically in the neurogenic ventricular region, stimulating strong activation of mitosis throughout metamorphosis. Further, modulation of other actors in the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, namely, Xenopus XR11 (the homologue of mammalian Bcl-XL) produces a similar phenotype, that of increased numbers of actively proliferating cells and changes in overall brain morphology.

These findings confirm a central role for the mitochondrial route during morphogenesis of the developing amphibian brain. In particular, morphological remodeling is most evident in the anterior brain of DN9 and XR11 transgenics (Fig. 4I). Interestingly, it is also the forebrain that shows the most dramatic defects in C9 mutant mice, as well as for C3 and Apaf1 mutant mice (2628). Despite these marked changes in the CNS, no changes have been noted in the peripheral nervous system for these mice. Similarly, there was no modification of motoneuron death in the lateral motor column of XR11xDN9 Xenopus (data not shown), as seen for Nβt-XR11 animals (18), corroborating data in mice showing that C9 or C3 deletion does not modify elimination of spinal cord motoneurons (27, 29, 30).

The pattern of Xenopus C3 expression suggests that it, too, contributes to the regulation of neuronal death, as for C3-null mutant mice. The fact that active C3 was decreased in anterior brain for DN9 and XR11 transgenic animals suggests strongly that C3 is implicated in the transmission of death signals initiated by mitochondria in brain. The preponderant role of this caspase in apoptosis in mouse brain has been described in previous studies, demonstrating that this enzyme is a key actor in the regulatory proteolytic cascade in the CNS (26, 31). Moreover, the role of C3 seems to be more pronounced in the anterior tadpole brain, as this area is most affected when DN9 and XR11 are overexpressed. This observation could explain why morphological alterations are found mainly in the forebrain of postmetamorphic transgenic tadpoles.

C9 mRNA expression shows strong labeling in ventricular cells and the active form of C9 increased transiently during metamorphosis, with a peak at metamorphic climax (Fig. 1 and SI Fig. 9). Remarkably, increased C9 activity is correlated with decreased cell proliferation. Moreover, when DN9 (and/or XR11) are overexpressed, the most marked effect on proliferation is seen at climax, when active C9 is normally maximum (SI Fig. 9). Thus, expression of DN9 (and/or XR11) maintains proliferation, whereas the normal levels of C9 dampen proliferative levels. This suggests an important and specific role for C9 (and also XR11) controlling neuronal cell proliferation during the critical period of metamorphosis. The SGT experiments confirm that C9 can be a major player in maintaining the balance between cell death and proliferation. Indeed, when DN9 expression is limited by SGT to the neurogenic zone, where C9 is normally expressed, it results in increased mitosis. We infer that this effect results from inactivation of C9-dependent pathway, suggesting a direct effect of DN9 on this neurogenic population.

Finally, DN9 and XR11 overexpression does not simply abrogate apoptosis but also maintains the neurogenic pool in a proliferative state as we observed an increased rate of mitosis in the neuroblast population. Indeed, cell number is controlled by an intricate balance of cell death and cell proliferation. Deregulation of the apoptotic/proliferative balance leads to impaired development and many diseases including neurodegenerative disorders, viral infections, and tumors. It is clear that links between apoptosis and cell cycle control mechanisms exist and close interactions between factors implicated in cell cycle progression and pro- or anti-apoptotic factors implicated in death pathways have been reported (3235). Recently, it was shown that transgenic ES cell lines expressing Bcl-2 in presence of Leukemia Inhibitory Factor were sufficient to allow expansion of these mouse pluripotent stem cells in vitro, even in the absence of bone morphogenic proteins, underlying the close link existing between the maintenance of a proliferative state and the Bcl-2 factors implicated in the regulation of apoptotic processes (36).

Here we show that C9 and XR11 contribute to regulate both apoptosis and cell proliferation in the ventricular zone and perturbation of their expression leads to the modification of regulation of cell cycle of neuroblasts, with distinct consequences on final brain morphology.

Elucidating the mechanisms that link cell cycle control with apoptosis, and their regulation, will be important in understanding development of the nervous system and how neuronal cells do or do not evade these constraints, and thereby prevent uncontrolled proliferation. Xenopus could represent a useful model for analyzing these intricate mechanisms, particularly during metamorphosis, which is simultaneously associated with apoptosis, proliferation and differentiation. Future work could be directed toward identifying more precisely in the neurogenic zone, and using specific cell markers, which cell type(s) are directly affected by DN9 and XR11 overexpression.

In summary, our data provide in vivo evidence for a direct implication of C9 and XR11, two key regulators of the mitochondrial death pathway, in regulating the balance between neuronal apoptosis and proliferation in metamorphosing brain. To our knowledge, this report provides a previously undescribed role of specific apoptotic actors in modifying the outcome of metamorphic neurogenesis and brain remodeling.

Materials and Methods

Animals.

X. laevis tadpoles were raised as described (17) and staged according to Nieuwkoop and Faber (37). Animals were killed by decapitation after anesthesia. All animal studies were conducted according to the principles and procedures described in Guidelines for Care and Use of Experimental Animals.

C9 and DN9 Constructs.

Cloning of Xenopus tropicalis C9, mutation to DN9, and fusion to RFP (DN9-RFP) have been described (17). The RFP marker in CMV-DN9-RFP was replaced with GFP, giving the CMV-DN9-GFP construct. The pEGFP-C3 (as CMV-GFP) and pDsRed2-N1 (as CMV-RFP) vectors (Clontech, Ozyme, St. Quentin en Yveline, France) were used in control experiments. For transgenesis, the CMV promoter in CMV-RFP and CMV-DN9-RFP constructs was replaced by the Nβt promoter (18), giving the Nβt-RFP and the Nβt-DN9-RFP constructs.

SGT in Brain.

SGT in brain used a PEI-based method (22). For each injection (1 μl), 0.1 μg of pcDNA3-Luc (LUC plasmid) was coinjected with 0.4 μg of CMV-GFP or CMV-DN9-GFP constructs. In toto GFP labeling was observed on brains before luciferase activity was monitored on brain extracts by using a Luciferase Kit (Promega, Charbonnières, France).

Germinal Transgenesis.

Transgenesis was carried out according to the modified Kroll and Amaya protocol (18). For each transgenesis, 200 ng of ApaLI-linearized constructs was used. Transgenic animals were obtained for Nβt-RFP and Nβt-DN9-RFP constructs. Nβt-XR11-GFP and Nβt-GFP transgenics have been reported previously (18).

Generation of F1 Transgenic Animals.

Adult transgenic female and male Nβt-XR11-GFP or Nβt-DN9-RFP were self-crossed, giving transgenic lines expressing the XR11-GFP transgene (XR11xXR11) or the DN9-RFP transgene (DN9xDN9), respectively, in the nervous system. Adult Nβt-DN9-RFP and Nβt-XR11-GFP crossings gave a double transgenic line (XR11xDN9), expressing both transgenes.

Immunohistochemistry.

Brains from transgenic, WT, or SGT-brain-injected tadpoles were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde 3 h at 4°C before cutting on a cryostat. Sagittal (12 μm) or coronal (16 μm) sections were incubated with an antiphosphohistone H3 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Euromedex, Mundolsheim, France) diluted 1:300 in PBS-T buffer (phosphate-buffered saline, Tween 0.1%; Sigma, St. Quentin Fallavier, France) with 5% normal goat serum (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France) overnight at 4°C, after blocking nonspecific sites 1 h at room temperature in PBS-T buffer with 10% NGS. Detection used an anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 antibody (1:1,500; Invitrogen) and DAPI counterstaining. Sections were mounted in Moviol (Calbiochem, Merck Eurolab, Fontenay sous Bois, France).

In Situ Hybridization (ISH).

A 424-bp RT-PCR fragment was amplified from the X. tropicalis C9 sequence with primers (SI Table 1) and subcloned into the pGEMT-easy vector (Promega). Sense and antisense probes were synthesized with a digoxigenin (DIG) RNA-labeling kit (Roche, Meylan, France). ISH was performed on X. tropicalis brain cryostat sections (12 μm), after fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C, by using an adapted protocol (38). Labeling was revealed with alkaline phosphatase-coupled anti-DIG antibody (1:2,000; Roche) and BCIP/NBT (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium) color development (Roche). Sections were mounted in Moviol.

Western Blotting.

Dissected brains were flash-frozen. Brain extracts and Western blot were done as described (17), by using antiactive C9 (1:500; ref. 17) and antiactive C3 (1:2,000; CM1, Biosciences PharMingen, Le Pont de Claix, France) antibodies. Protein was quantified (39), and equal amounts (17 μg) were loaded per lane. After membrane transfer, Ponceau-S staining (Sigma) was used to confirm equivalent loading before Western blotting (40). Where appropriate (i.e., in samples from the same developmental stage), normalization of caspase activity was done by using the isotype I/II β-tubulin antibody (1/1,000; Sigma).

TUNEL Labeling.

Sections (12 μm/sagittal; 16 μm/coronal) from transgenics and WT brains were postfixed in paraformaldehyde 4% 20 min at room temperature. Antigenic sites were unmasked by two microwave cycles (5 min at 650 W, in 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 6), and TUNEL-positive cells were detected by using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit Fluorescein (Roche). Sections were counterstained with DAPI and mounted in Moviol.

Real-Time Quantitative-PCR.

One-month-old perchlorated tadpoles (41) were treated with T3 (10−8 M) for 80 h, with T3 renewed daily. Total brain RNAs from T3-treated vs. untreated tadpoles were extracted by using RNable (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France). Reverse transcription was done on 2 μg of total RNA with SuperScript II and hexamer oligonucleotides (Invitrogen), as per the manufacturer's instructions. cDNAs (1/20) were used for quantitative-PCR with C9, XR11, and EF1α primers (SI Table 1) by using the Power SYBR Green PCR kit and a 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France). Amplification specificity was optimized by determining the melting curves of the amplicons. Each point was repeated at least three times in duplicate. Data were analyzed by normalizing C9 and XR11 expression to that of the control gene EF1α. Student's t test was used to compare the means of ΔCT values ± SD.

Statisical Analysis of Results.

After analysis of variance where appropriate, Student's t test was used to analyze differences. Means ± SEM are shown. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We thank L. Sachs, G. Morvan, N. Pollet, R. Denver, and M. S. Clerget-Froidevaux for critical comments and help and G. Benisti and J. P. Chaumeil for animal care. I.R. was a Fellow of the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale. This work was supported by the Association pour la Recherche Contre le Cancer, the European Union Contract no. 506319 CASCADE, and X-OMICS-Proposal/Contract no. 512065.

Abbreviations

RFP

red fluorescent protein

VL

lateral ventricle

3V

third ventricle

CB

cerebellum

SGT

somatic gene transfer

ISH

in situ hybridization.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0608877104/DC1.

References

  • 1.Dodd MHI, Dodd JM. In: The Biology of Metamorphosis, Physiology of the Amphibia. Lofts B, editor. San Francisco: Academic; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Danial NN, Korsmeyer SJ. Cell. 2004;116:205–219. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00046-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gorman AM, Ceccatelli S, Orrenius S. Dev Neurosci. 2000;22:348–358. doi: 10.1159/000017460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nijhawan D, Honarpour N, Wang X. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:73–87. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mattson MP. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:120–129. doi: 10.1038/35040009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jordan J, Cena V, Prehn JH. J Physiol Biochem. 2003;59:129–141. doi: 10.1007/BF03179878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roth KA, D'Sa C. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2001;7:261–266. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ranger AM, Malynn BA, Korsmeyer SJ. Nat Genet. 2001;28:113–118. doi: 10.1038/88815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thornberry NA, Lazebnik Y. Science. 1998;281:1312–1316. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5381.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Degterev A, Boyce M, Yuan J. Oncogene. 2003;53:8543–8567. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Green DR, Kroemer G. Science. 2004;305:626–629. doi: 10.1126/science.1099320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spierings D, McStay G, Saleh M, Bender C, Chipuk J, Maurer U, Green DR. Science. 2005;310:66–67. doi: 10.1126/science.1117105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cory S, Adams JM. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:647–656. doi: 10.1038/nrc883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nakajima K, Fujimoto K, Yaoita Y. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005;16:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cruz-Reyes J, Tata JR. Gene. 1995;158:171–179. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00159-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nakajima K, Takahashi A, Yaoita Y. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:10484–10491. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.14.10484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rowe I, Le Blay K, Du Pasquier D, Palmier K, Levi G, Demeneix BA, Coen L. Dev Dyn. 2005;233:76–87. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Coen L, du Pasquier D, Le Mevel S, Brown S, Tata J, Mazabraud A, Demeneix BA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:7869–7874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.141226798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peunova N, Scheinker V, Cline H, Enikolopov G. J Neurosci. 2001;21:8809–8818. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-22-08809.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cai L, Brown DD. Dev Biol. 2004;266:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wei Y, Allis CD. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:266. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ouatas T, Le Mevel S, Demeneix BA, de Luze A. Int J Dev Biol. 1998;42:1159–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.De Zio D, Giunta L, Corvaro M, Ferraro E, Cecconi F. Sem Cell Dev Biol. 2005;16:281–294. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shi YB. Amphibian Metamorphosis. New York: Wiley; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bernal J. Vitam Horm. 2005;71:95–122. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(05)71004-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kuida K, Zheng TS, Na S, Kuan C, Yang D, Karasuyama H, Rakic P, Flavell RA. Nature. 1996;384:368–372. doi: 10.1038/384368a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kuida K, Haydar TF, Kuan CY, Gu Y, Taya C, Karasuyama H, Su MS, Rakic P, Flavell RA. Cell. 1998;94:325–337. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81476-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yoshida H, Kong YY, Yoshida R, Elia AJ, Hakem A, Hakem R, Penninger JM, Mak TW. Cell. 1998;94:739–750. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81733-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yaginuma H, Sato N, Homma S, Oppenheim RW. Arch Histol Cytol. 2001;64:461–474. doi: 10.1679/aohc.64.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oppenheim RW, Flavell RA, Vinsant S, Prevette D, Kuan CY, Rakic P. J Neurosci. 2001;21:4752–4760. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-13-04752.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Porter AG, Janicke RU. Cell Death Differ. 1999;6:99–104. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vermeulen K, Berneman ZN, Van Bockstaele DR. Cell Prolif. 2003;36:165–175. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2184.2003.00267.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Greene LA, Biswas SC, Liu DX. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11:49–60. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Alenzi FQ. Br J Biomed Sci. 2004;61:99–102. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2004.11732652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hipfner DR, Cohen SM. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:805–815. doi: 10.1038/nrm1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yamane T, Dylla SJ, Muijtjens M, Weissman IL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:3312–3317. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500167102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J. Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) 2nd Ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1967. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Butler K, Zorn A, Gurdon JB. Methods. 2001;23:303–312. doi: 10.1006/meth.2000.1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bradford MM. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–255. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Klein D, Kern RM, Sokol RZ. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1995;36:59–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.de Luze A, Sachs L, Demeneix B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:7322–7326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES