Abstract
The development of an in vivo procedure for the induction of massive proliferation, directed migration, and neurodifferentiation (PMD) in the damaged adult central nervous system would hold promise for the treatment of human neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease. We investigated the in vivo induction of PMD in the forebrain of the adult rat by using a combination of 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of the substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons and infusions of transforming growth factor α (TGFα) into forebrain structures. Only in animals with both lesion and infusion of TGFα was there a rapid proliferation of forebrain stem cells followed by a timed migration of a ridge of neuronal and glial progenitors directed toward the region of the TGFα infusion site. Subsequently, increasing numbers of differentiated neurons were observed in the striatum. In behavioral experiments, there was a significant reduction of apomorphine-induced rotations in animals receiving the TGFα infusions. These results show that the brain contains stem cells capable of PMD in response to an exogenously administered growth factor. This finding has significant implications with respect to the development of treatments for both acute neural trauma and neurodegenerative diseases.
Neurogenesis in the adult mammalian central nervous system has been demonstrated in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus and in the olfactory bulbs of adult birds and rodents, and it has been shown that these cells arise from a rostral migratory stream originating in the subventricular zone (SVZ) (1–3). The SVZ is rich in pluripotent stem cells (4–7), and such cells have also been demonstrated to exist in varying degrees throughout the neuraxis (8–10). While it has been shown that these cells can proliferate in vitro in response to extracellular signals and growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and ligands that bind the type I family of tyrosine kinase receptors, including epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor α (TGFα) (11–13), in vivo studies of proliferation, migration, and differentiation (PMD) have met with only limited success (14, 15). Successful demonstration of in vivo PMD in neural tissue would provide tools to begin to develop drugs to treat neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease.
Recent evidence suggests that a combination of extracellular signals and microenvironmental conditions may be necessary for the in vivo stimulation of neuroepithelial stem cells, including extracellular matrix molecules, paracrine and juxtacrine cell–cell signaling, and growth factor delivery and concentration (16). Magavi et al. (17) have demonstrated local in vivo neurogenesis in adult mice in response to microenvironmental modification by targeted apoptosis. However, to date, no studies have demonstrated the induction of the massive proliferation, directed migration, and differentiation of endogenous neuroepithelial stem cells into neurons in the broader regions of the nervous system, which would allow repopulation of, and regeneration of, damaged neural tissue. In the present study, we demonstrate the in vivo induction of massive PMD in the forebrain of the adult rat following unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioning of the substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons and infusions of TGFα into ipsilateral forebrain structures.
Materials and Methods
Adult male Sprague–Dawley albino rats (240–350 g) (n = 130) were obtained from Simonsen Laboratories (Gilroy, CA). The animals were maintained in a temperature- and humidity-controlled campus vivarium. All aspects of animal handling and surgery were in accordance with current National Institutes of Health guidelines and University of California at Irvine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols. 6-OHDA and TGFα were administered as follows.
6-OHDA Lesions.
Animals were anesthetized with i.p. xylazine (8 mg⋅kg−1) and ketamine (100 mg⋅kg−1) (Western Medical Supply, Arcadia, CA). A chilled sterile solution of 1.0–4.8 mg/ml of 6-OHDA (Sigma) in 0.9% saline with 0.01% ascorbic acid was prepared immediately before injection. The animals were immobilized in a Kopf stereotaxic device and placed on a warm mat at 37°C. Using aseptic techniques, 2.5–8 μl of 6-OHDA solution was stereotaxically injected at the rostral border of the substantia nigra–ventral tegmental area (SN-VTA) (+3.7 A/P; +2.1 M/L; +2.0 D/V) at a rate of 1 μl⋅min−1 using interaural zero as a reference. The total duration of surgery was approximately 45 min.
Growth Factor Infusions.
Osmotic minipumps (models 2002 and 2004, Alzet) were used for TGFα and artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) infusions. They were implanted at a predetermined period contemporaneous with, or after, the 6-OHDA lesion. The minipumps were filled with approximately 200 μl of a solution containing 10, 50, or 100 μg of TGFα (Stem Cell Pharmaceuticals) in aCSF for experimental animals or plain aCSF for control animals and incubated overnight in normal saline at 37°C before implantation. Under aseptic conditions, the 5-mm cannula attached to the minipump (Brain Infusion Kit, Alzet) was stereotaxically implanted into the left caudate–putamen (+1.2 A/P; +2.7 M/L) using bregma as a reference. The minipump was placed s.c. in the interscapular region. The infusate was delivered directly into the striatum by the minipump at a rate of approximately 0.5 μl⋅h−1. The animals (n = 130) were subdivided into groups receiving simultaneous infusions (TGFα, n = 25; aCSF, n = 13), infusions 2 weeks after 6-OHDA (TGFα, n = 20; aCSF, n = 11), controls receiving infusions without a 6-OHDA lesion (TGFα, n = 8; aCSF, n = 8), intraventricular infusion with 6-OHDA lesion (n = 2), or 6-OHDA lesion without any infusion (n = 43).
Behavior Testing.
The apomorphine-induced rotation technique was used to test behavioral changes in both the 6-OHDA lesioned and nonlesioned animals. A fresh solution of apomorphine (0.25 mg/ml) was prepared each time. The animal was set on a rotometer bowl and its behavior was observed for 5 min. It then received an s.c. injection of apomorphine (2.5 mg/kg body weight) and was placed back in its cage and allowed to rest for 10 min. Apomorphine-induced rotations were thereafter observed at 10-min intervals, each session lasting 5 min for a total of 15 min.
In Situ Hybridization Histochemistry.
TGFα mRNA probes were generated from a 550-nt XbaI–BamHI cDNA fragment from the 5′ end of rat TGFα, subcloned into pGEM 7Zf (Promega). Antisense and sense probes were transcribed with SP6 and T7 polymerases, respectively. Rat EGF receptor (EGFr) mRNA probes were produced from a 718-bp BamHI–SphI insert from the 5′ end of the gene in pGEM 7Zf. Probes for rat tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) were created by using the 1.3-kDa BamHI–EcoRI fragment subcloned into pGEM 7Zf. Antisense subclones for EGF receptor and TH were transcribed with T7 polymerase. Sense subclones for EGF receptor and TH were transcribed with SP6 polymerase. All probes were radiolabeled by transcription in the presence of 35S-labeled UTP (NEN).
In situ nucleic acid hybridization was performed according to Simmons et al. (44). Parallel sections from experimental and control animals were hybridized overnight at 65°C with sense or antisense probes at a concentration of 107 cpm/ml. Adjacent sections from the same animals were hybridized to each of the probes so that direct comparison could be made of their anatomical distributions.
Slides from experimental and control animals were grouped together and apposed with 14C-labeled brain paste standards to autoradiographic Beta Max Hyperfilm (Amersham Pharmacia) for 3–7 days. After successful development of the autoradiography film, analysis and quantitation was done by using mcid (Imaging Research, St. Catherine's, ON, Canada). Densitometry readings were sampled at multiple sites within each anatomical region of interest and averaged. Relative concentrations of TGFα and EGF receptor from the hybridization process were then estimated by using a computer-generated third-degree polynomial standard curve constructed from the 14C brain paste standards. The estimated values for each region in each treatment group were then averaged and their standard errors were calculated. Brain regions ipsilateral to the experimental treatments were compared with the corresponding regions in control brains at approximately the same positions. Significance of the comparisons was determined by using the Student t test.
BrdUrd Administration.
Animals received 50 mg/kg BrdUrd (Boehringer Mannheim) i.p. hourly for 3 days from the day of surgery.
Tissue Preparation.
Animals were killed at timed intervals between 1 and 28 days by either decapitation or perfusion. After decapitation, the brains were quickly removed and frozen in isopentane at −20°C. Coronal cryostat sections were cut at 40 μm and thaw adhered to Vectabond (Vector Laboratories)-coated slides. The sections were postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 1 h, rinsed in phosphate buffer and air dried, then stored at −20°C until processed.
After cardiac perfusion first with saline then 4% paraformaldehyde, the brains were quickly removed and postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h, then cryoprotected in 30% sucrose overnight at 4°C. The brains were then cooled and cut at −20°C on a freezing microtome.
Immunohistochemistry.
Perfused brain tissue was cut on a freezing microtome at 40 μm, and free-floating sections were placed in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4. Blocking was done by using 10% normal goat serum with 0.4% Triton X in PBS for 1 h before primary antibody incubation. Primary antibodies were dissolved in blocking solution as follows. Rabbit anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (1:400, Dako), mouse anti-β-III tubulin (1:100, R & D Systems), rabbit anti-β-III tubulin (1:10,000, R & D Systems), rabbit anti-tyrosine hydroxylase (1:1,000, Sigma), rabbit anti-s100β (1:2,500, R & D Systems), mouse anti-nestin (1:20, Hybridoma Bank), mouse anti-doublecortin (1:250, kind gift of C. Walsh), and rat anti-dopamine transporter (DAT; Chemicon, 1:5,000). The tissues were then incubated overnight at room temperature in primary antibody and then rinsed in PBS and incubated in biotinylated or fluorescent secondary antibodies (anti-mouse, anti-rabbit, anti-rat) in blocking solution. Biotinylated primaries were visualized by using ABC solution (Vector ABC Elite) for 1 h, followed by diaminobenzidine-peroxidase histochemistry (Sigma).
For BrdUrd immunocytochemistry, DNA was denatured by using 50% formamide in 2× SSC for 2 h at 65°C, and tissue sections were then rinsed in 2× SSC for 5 min and incubated in 2 M HCl at 37°C for 30 min. The tissue slices were then rinsed in 0.1 M boric acid, pH 8.5, for 10 min, followed by a 5-min rinse in PBS. For double labeling, tissues were incubated with anti-BrdUrd and either anti-TH or anti-DAT primary antibodies, then processed for fluorescence as above.
Silver Staining for Cellular Morphology.
Cells were labeled by using a modification to the Nauta method, similar to procedure 1 of Fink-Heimer (18). Free-floating sections were placed into 0.05% potassium permanganate before treatment with fresh 1% hydroquinone/1% oxalic acid and were then treated with successive uranyl nitrate/silver nitrate solutions of increasing concentration. After another rinse, the sections were reacted in ammoniacal silver, then in ethanol/citric acid/paraformaldehyde reducer, and finally in sodium thiosulfate. After staining, sections were mounted on glass slides, dehydrated, and cover-slipped.
Results
Morphological Studies of PMD Induction.
We first determined conditions sufficient to induce the massive proliferation of multipotential stem cells originating in the SVZ and the subsequent directed migration of these neuroprogenitor cells into the striatum. We used combinations of infusions of TGFα into the ipsilateral striatum, and 6-OHDA injections into the ipsilateral SN-VTA (Fig. 1). Because TGFα-responsive stem and neuroprogenitor cells in the SVZ have been shown to express EGFr mRNA, we used in situ nucleic acid hybridization and other anatomical and behavioral techniques to demonstrate TGFα responsiveness in the SVZ. In animals receiving 6-OHDA lesions of SN-VTA and aCSF control infusions into the striatum, there was no significant change in the expression of EGFr mRNA in the SVZ (Fig. 1a). In a second control group receiving TGFα infusions, but no 6-OHDA lesions, there was a significant increase in the expression of EGFr mRNA in the SVZ for the duration of the infusion (Fig. 1b). In the experimental group receiving both a 6-OHDA lesion and a TGFα infusion, there was also a significant increase of EGFr mRNA expression in the SVZ. In animals that received more than 9 days of TGFα infusion, there was also an additional ridge (or thick-layered sheet in three dimensions) of EGFr mRNA-positive cells encroaching into the striatum from the SVZ (Fig. 1c). This ridge was most pronounced in animals that received concurrent 6-OHDA lesion and 10, 50, or 100 μg of total TGFα infusion, but also was present in animals receiving TGFα infusions starting 14 days after the 6-OHDA lesion. Both the 50- and 100-μg dose appeared to be equally effective, and the 10-μg dose was minimally less effective in inducing ridge formation.
In a serial time-course analysis, after 4–6 days (Fig. 2a) of continuous TGFα infusion in lesioned animals, there was a pronounced thickening of the SVZ. By 9 days (Fig. 2b), however, the ridge separates en masse from the SVZ, as well as at later time periods from 14 to 21 days, appearing progressively lateral to the SVZ toward the site of the TGFα infusion (Fig. 2c). The exact shape and apparent movement of the ridge depends on the site of the TGFα infusion. For example, a ventral striatal infusion results in an S-shaped ridge (Fig. 2c), whereas a dorsal striatal infusion resulted in a shorter and thicker ridge mass adjacent to the dorsal SVZ. The ridge of cells is observed whether the TGFα infusion is started concurrent with the lesion 2 days before or 14 days after the lesion. To determine whether this directed migration is limited to striatal targets, infusions of TGFα were made into the septum. In these cases, there was a massive proliferation of the SVZ, and a subsequent ridge appeared medially in the septum toward the TGFα infusion site (Fig. 2d). Additionally, in some cases a smaller ridge of cells could also be seen on the medial side of the contralateral SVZ in the septum (Fig. 2e) or migrating through the corpus callosum (Fig. 2d). In the cases where there was an infusion of TGFα into the lateral ventricle in 6-OHDA-lesioned animals, there was a temporary proliferation of SVZ cells but no migratory ridge.
Characterization of the Ridge.
To further characterize the cells in the ridge, we used a series of morphological and immunocytochemical techniques (Fig. 3). Silver staining revealed fusiform cells in the ridge, oriented orthogonal to the most adjacent area of the SVZ. This is consistent with the possibility that these cells are migrating from the SVZ in parallel (Fig. 3a). After TGFα infusion into the brain, systemically administered 5′BrdUrd was incorporated into the SVZ with a specific and massively increased incorporation in the first 3 days. Subsequently, 5′-BrdUrd positive cells were seen in the ridge, striatum, external capsule, and cortex adjacent to the infusion cannula (Figs. 3b and 4a), indicating that the ridge cells were recently generated de novo. To determine the lineage and differentiation of the cells in and around the ridge, we first stained for nestin, a cytoskeletal marker for early lineage neuronal and glial progenitors. The SVZ and ridge cells were nestin-positive from the fourth day of TGFα infusion (Fig. 3c). To determine whether the ridge cells are of restricted glial and/or neuronal lineages, we stained for s100β (astrocytic lineage) and β-III tubulin (neuronal lineage). At 1, 4, 7, and 9 days (data not shown) of TGFα infusion, there was no evidence of significant positive staining of these markers, but starting at 14 days, β-III tubulin positive cells were seen (Figs. 3d and 4b). s100β positive cells were also seen in and around the ridge (data not shown). Immunofluorescence staining was also carried out on adjacent tissue sections to verify that the ridge is densely populated with BrdUrd-positive cells (Fig. 4a) and that large clusters of β-III tubulin-positive neuronal precursors are present in the BrdUrd-rich ridge (Fig. 4 b and c). Doublecortin, a marker for migrating young neurons, is also present in the ridge cells (Fig. 4 d and e).
Staining for these restricted astrocytic and neuronal lineage markers was, however, greatly reduced by 28 days. To determine whether TGFα infusions in these same 6-OHDA-lesioned animals result in the new appearance of differentiated neurons in the striatum, TH and DAT immunoreactivity was carried out. Within the second to third week of infusion, occasional TH- and DAT-positive cells were seen near the infusion cannula. From the third and fourth week of infusion, increasing numbers of TH-positive (Fig. 3 f and g) and DAT-positive (Fig. 4 f and h) cells were seen in the striatum. In double-labeling experiments, some newly generated (BrdUrd-positive) neurons were also DAT-positive (Fig. 4 f–h) or TH-positive (data not shown).
Recovery of Function.
To determine whether there is a functional correlate of the repopulation of neural cells in the striatum observed in the morphological and immunocytochemical studies, we carried out two sets of behavioral tests in some of these animals (Table 1). One group received a unilateral 6-OHDA lesion of the SN-VTA, and 14 days later, they received a 14-day continuous infusion of either aCSF or TGFα into the ipsilateral striatum. Rotational behavior in response to systemically administered apomorphine was tested before the lesion and then subsequently weekly for 4 weeks, both before and after the TGFα/aCSF infusions. In this rodent model of Parkinson's disease, there was a statistically significant (P < 0.05, two-tailed t test) 31.5% improvement in the rotational behavior of the TGFα versus aCSF-treated control animals.
Table 1.
Animal | Rotations/5
min
|
% change | |
---|---|---|---|
Preinfusion | Postinfusion | ||
TGFα | |||
1 | 66.5 | 14.5 | −78.2 |
3 | 48.0 | 14.5 | −69.8 |
4 | 60.0 | 25.0 | −58.3 |
5 | 60.0 | 40.0 | −33.3 |
6 | 58.5 | 39.5 | −32.5 |
7 | 163.5 | 140.5 | −14.1 |
8 | 50.0 | 49.0 | −2.0 |
9 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 0.0 |
11 | 103.5 | 185.7 | 79.4 |
Mean | 71.4 | 60.2 | −15.8 |
SD | 37.2 | 57.1 | |
aCSF | |||
1 | 66.0 | 45.0 | −31.8 |
2 | 158.5 | 151.0 | −4.7 |
3 | 42.0 | 41.0 | −2.4 |
4 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 0.0 |
5 | 71.0 | 71.0 | 0.0 |
6 | 94.0 | 96.0 | 2.1 |
7 | 38.0 | 41.0 | 7.9 |
8 | 144.5 | 158.5 | 9.7 |
9 | 63.5 | 100.5 | 58.3 |
10 | 101.0 | 162.0 | 60.4 |
11 | 84.0 | 138.0 | 64.3 |
Mean | 82.0 | 94.9 | 15.7 |
SD | 40.4 | 50.5 | |
t test | (2-tailed) | 0.046 |
Apomorphine-induced rotations in 6-OHDA-lesioned animals, and 14 days later infused for 14 days with aCSF (control) or TGFα (experimental group). The order of animals is by descending order of % change of rotation. The percent improvement of rotational behavior (three 5-min periods) between the TGFα-treated animals and aCSF-treated animals was 31.5% (significant at P < 0.05, two-tailed t test). The TGFα animals received either 50 or 100 μg TGFα. Animals receiving 10 μg TGFα did not show significant improvement and were not included in this analysis.
A separate group of animals (individual animal data not shown) received TGFα, aCSF, or no infusions starting contemporaneously with the 6-OHDA lesion, as opposed to 2 weeks after the 6-OHDA lesion. In the groups that received either no infusion or an aCSF infusion, contralateral rotational behavior in response to an apomorphine injection was observed at each of 3- to 4-week intervals after the day when the animals received both the 6-OHDA injection and either aCSF infusion or no striatal infusion at all. In contrast, 10 of the 11 TGFα-treated animals did not exhibit rotational behavioral asymmetry following apomorphine injections during the entire 4-week period. Other motor behaviors such as exploratory behavior in the cage and consummatory behavior, on the other hand, did not appear to be adversely affected in the TGFα-treated animals.
Discussion
These findings provide evidence of induced coordinated proliferation, directed migration en masse, and phenotypic differentiation into TH-positive neurons and DAT (therefore, likely dopaminergic) of neural stem cells and their progenitors in the mammalian central nervous system in vivo. The parallel morphological and behavioral rotation experiments, coupled with the finding of newly generated (BrdUrd positive) and phenotypically specialized (TH-, DAT-positive dopamine neurons), indicate the usefulness of exogenous TGFα administration in the amelioration and reversal of symptoms of Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders, as well as acute central nervous system injury, for example, due to trauma and stroke. We found that the combination of TGFα infusion and endogenous stimuli arising from the injury signals in experimental animals resulted in a massive proliferation of the cells of the SVZ, followed by a directed migration en masse toward TGFα infusion sites in the striatum, septum, and external capsule or cortex. Further, we demonstrated a progressive pattern of proliferation, migration, maturation, and differentiation of newly generated cells, leading to neuronal and glial phenotypes with “spontaneous” differentiation and phenotypic specialization of some neurons, correlated with a desirable functional result (i.e., reversal of motor dysfunction).
The embryonic germinal layer of the central nervous system that is retained in the adult SVZ throughout the neuraxis is responsive to microenvironmental signals and can proliferate and differentiate in response to TGFα and other growth factors (19). Developmental changes in expression of the type I family of tyrosine kinase receptor family in neuroprogenitor cells have been shown to influence their proliferation, migration, and differentiation (16, 20). Both EGF and TGFα, members of the EGF family that bind to the other members of this family (Erb1 and possibly others) (21, 22), are present in the basal ganglia (23–26), although TGFα mRNA expression has been shown to greatly exceed that of EGF (27). TGFα has been shown to influence proliferation and migration of ganglionic eminence cells in the embryo (28) and proliferation of SVZ cells in vivo (29) and in vitro (30), a mechanism mediated via the EGF receptor (12, 31). The EGFr family of receptors is expressed in striatal and SVZ cells in both adult and developing brains (26, 32, 33). The observed increased expression of EGFr mRNA in the early stages of TGFα infusion in this study is consistent with a TGFα-dependent, EGFr-mediated mechanism of progenitor cell proliferation, as has been shown in other studies (31, 34).
Although progenitor cell proliferation in response to growth factors has been demonstrated in vitro, it has become clear that in vivo differentiation and migration requires additional microenvironmental signals. In vitro cell proliferation and migration and differentiation has been shown in response to microenvironmental cues provided by the substrate (e.g., fibronectin and/or integrins) (35) or altered in relation to neighboring cells, implying a cell–cell paracrine or contact mechanism (36). In vivo, however, it appears that microenvironmental manipulation using injury paradigms may also be effective in stimulating proliferation and migration of neural precursors, as demonstrated using several injury models such as apoptosis (17), ischemia (37, 38), and chemical toxicity (39, 40). The injury signal produced by the 6-OHDA lesion and infusion cannulae in our study may similarly result in a cascade of timed microenvironmental stimuli that may promote the migration en masse of neural progenitors from the SVZ in response to TGFα. Although other factors may ultimately interact to produce optimal PMD under various experimental and clinical conditions, it is surprising that application of a single neurotrophic factor (TGFα) in an injured brain region is sufficient to effect such significant repair mechanism(s) with positive functional results. TGFα may have several mechanisms of action, perhaps through interactions with multiple TGFα/EGF receptor subtypes (41), which lead to behavioral recovery, such as PMD of stem and progenitor cells, which replace lost circuits and functions; induction of new phenotypic expression in preexisting cells; and neuroprotection against cytotoxic or apoptotic signals. TGFα may be an important endogenous trophic factor in both central and peripheral tissues throughout development, adulthood, and in response to injury and degeneration of tissue. For example, an increase in TGFα levels has been measured in the striata of some Parkinson's disease patients (42, 43). Perhaps the TGFα released endogenously in degenerative disorders is not at a high enough concentration to offset the progressive neural loss with a compensatory stimulation of PMD. Exogenously administered TGFα over a threshold level in patients with Parkinson's disease or other chronic and acute neural damage may then lead to system-specific regeneration and protection of neural circuitry, as well as reversal of clinical symptoms.
Acknowledgments
We thank Sanjay Patel and Sarah Mungania for technical expertise, Michael Kobrin (with M.K.) for the TGFα and EGFr cDNA clones, and Dr. C. Walsh for doublecortin antibody. We also thank Andrszej Sledziewski and Alan Upshall for their valuable comments. This research was supported in part by a University of California, Irvine, College of Medicine Medical Research Associates Grant (M. Roosevelt), National Institutes of Health Grant NS 15321, and a sponsored research grant from Stem Cell Pharmaceuticals. Fellowship funds (to S.R.) were from the University of California, Irvine, Committee of 1000, National Institutes of Health Predoctoral Fellowship NS 0735-5, and the University of California, Irvine, Chancellor's Fellowship Fund. S.L. was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS26761, the American Parkinson's Disease Foundation, and the American Foundation for Aging Research. Fellowship funds (to I.O.) are from National Institutes of Health Predoctoral Fellowship NS10175.
Abbreviations
- PMD
massive proliferation, directed migration, and neurodifferentiation
- TGFα
transforming growth factor α
- SVZ
subventricular zone
- EGF
epidermal growth factor
- EGFr
epidermal growth factor receptor family
- 6-OHDA
6-hydroxydopamine
- aCSF
artificial cerebrospinal fluid
- TH
tyrosine hydroxylase
- SN-VTA
substantia nigra–ventral tegmental area
- DAT
dopamine transporter
References
- 1.Goldman S A, Nottebohm F. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:2390–2394. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alvarez-Buylla A. Experientia. 1990;46:948–955. doi: 10.1007/BF01939388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Luskin M B. Neuron. 1993;11:173–189. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90281-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lois C, Alvarez-Buylla A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:2074–2077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johansson C B, Momma S, Clarke D L, Risling M, Lendahl U, Frisén J. Cell. 1999;96:25–34. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80956-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.García-Verdugo J M, Doetsch F, Wichterle H, Lim D A, Alvarez-Buylla A. J Neurobiol. 1998;36:234–248. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(199808)36:2<234::aid-neu10>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Clarke D L, Johansson C B, Wilbertz J, Veress B, Nilsson E, Karlström H, Lendahl U, Frisén J. Science. 2000;288:1660–1663. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5471.1660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reynolds B A, Weiss S. Science. 1992;255:1707–1710. doi: 10.1126/science.1553558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weiss S, Dunne C, Hewson J, Wohl C, Wheatley M, Peterson A C, Reynolds B A. J Neurosci. 1996;16:7599–7609. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-23-07599.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alonso G. J Comp Neurol. 1999;414:149–166. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19991115)414:2<149::aid-cne2>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Murphy M, Drago J, Bartlett P F. J Neurosci Res. 1990;25:463–475. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490250404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reynolds B A, Tetzlaff W, Weiss S. J Neurosci. 1992;12:4565–4574. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-11-04565.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vescovi A L, Reynolds B A, Fraser D D, Weiss S. Neuron. 1993;11:951–966. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90124-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Craig C G, Tropepe V, Morshead C M, Reynolds B A, Weiss S, van der Kooy D. J Neurosci. 1996;16:2649–2658. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-08-02649.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zigova T, Pencea V, Wiegand S J, Luskin M B. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1998;11:234–245. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1998.0684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Burrows R C, Wancio D, Levitt P, Lillien L. Neuron. 1997;19:251–267. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80937-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Magavi S S, Leavitt B R, Macklis J D. Nature (London) 2000;405:951–955. doi: 10.1038/35016083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Giolli R A, Karamanlidis A N. Neuroanatomical Research Techniques. New York: Academic; 1978. pp. 211–240. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bartlett P F, Brooker G J, Faux C H, Dutton R, Murphy M, Turnley A, Kilpatrick T J. Immunol Cell Biol. 1998;76:414–418. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.1998.00762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lillien L, Wancio D. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1998;10:296–308. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1997.0659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Todaro G J, Fryling C, De Larco J E. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:5258–5262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Twardzik D R, Todaro G J, Reynolds F H, Jr, Stephenson J R. Virology. 1983;124:201–207. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(83)90307-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fallon J H, Seroogy K B, Loughlin S E, Morrison R S, Bradshaw R A, Knauer D J, Cunningham D D. Science. 1984;224:1107–1109. doi: 10.1126/science.6144184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fallon J H, Annis C M, Gentry L E, Twardzik D R, Loughlin S E. Growth Factors. 1990;2:241–250. doi: 10.3109/08977199009071510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wilcox J N, Derynck R. J Neurosci. 1988;8:1901–1904. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-06-01901.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kornblum H I, Gall C M, Seroogy K B, Lauterborn J C. Neuroscience. 1995;69:1025–1029. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00392-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lazar L M, Blum M. J Neurosci. 1992;12:1688–1697. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-05-01688.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Burrows R C, Lillien L, Levitt P. Dev Neurosci. 2000;22:7–15. doi: 10.1159/000017422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tropepe V, Craig C G, Morshead C M, van der Kooy D. J Neurosci. 1997;17:7850–7859. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-20-07850.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chalazonitis A, Kessler J A, Twardzik D R, Morrison R S. J Neurosci. 1992;12:583–594. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-02-00583.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Junier M. Prog Neurobiol. 2000;62:443–473. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00017-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Seroogy K B, Gall C M, Lee D C, Kornblum H I. Brain Res. 1995;670:157–164. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)01300-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seroogy K B, Numan S, Gall C M, Lee D C, Kornblum H I. NeuroReport. 1994;6:105–108. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199412300-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alexi T, Hefti F. Neuroscience. 1993;55:903–918. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90307-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Testaz S, Delannet M, Duband J. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:4715–4728. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.24.4715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dutton R, Bartlett P F. Dev Neurosci. 2000;22:96–105. doi: 10.1159/000017431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.von Bartheld C S. Histol Histopathol. 1998;13:437–459. doi: 10.14670/HH-13.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Justicia C, Planas A M. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:128–132. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199902000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Herzog C, Otto T. Brain Res. 1999;849:155–161. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kay J N, Blum M. Dev Neurosci. 2000;22:56–67. doi: 10.1159/000017427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kornblum H I, Yanni D S, Easterday M C, Seroogy K B. Dev Neurosci. 2000;22:16–24. doi: 10.1159/000017423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Javoy-Agid F, Ruberg M, Taquet H, Bokobza B, Agid Y, Gaspar P, Berger B, N′Guyen-Legros J, Alvarez C, Gray F, et al. Adv Neurol. 1984;40:189–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mogi M, Harada M, Kondo T, Riederer P, Inagaki H, Minami M, Nagatsu T. Neurosci Lett. 1994;180:147–150. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90508-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Simmons D, Arriza J, Swanson L. J Histotechnol. 1989;12:169–181. [Google Scholar]