Abstract
Combined immunohistologic and flow cytometric methods were used to monitor the regenerative response of the mouse liver following intraperitoneal administration of the hepatonecrotic agent carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). A slight increase in the percentage of liver nuclei engaged in DNA synthesis (S-phase population) was evident 1 day after CCl4. The percentage of S-phase nuclei increased thereafter, lasting until day 6 after CCl4 with a peak at day 2 after CCl4. The method of sampling used (every 24 hours) places the period of maximal DNA synthetic activity between 48 hours and 72 hours after inoculation of the hepatonecrotic agent; at 48 hours the number of S-phase nuclei was approximately five times higher than the nonregenerating liver. Modified multiparametric flow cytofluorimetric analysis of hepatic nuclei indicated that early repopulation of the liver in response to CCl4-induced necrosis involved the selective proliferation of a specific subpopulation of liver cells which contained diploid nuclei of high RNA content. These nuclei were also observed in control animals, suggesting the existence of a subcompartment of 2C DNA content G1 hepatocytes potentially programmed for replacement proliferation.
Full text
PDF




Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bauer K. D., Keng P. C., Sutherland R. M. Isolation of quiescent cells from multicellular tumor spheroids using centrifugal elutriation. Cancer Res. 1982 Jan;42(1):72–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darzynkiewicz Z., Sharpless T., Staiano-Coico L., Melamed M. R. Subcompartments of the G1 phase of cell cycle detected by flow cytometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6696–6699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darzynkiewicz Z., Traganos F., Melamed M. R. New cell cycle compartments identified by multiparameter flow cytometry. Cytometry. 1980 Sep;1(2):98–108. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990010203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darzynkiewicz Z., Traganos F., Sharpless T., Melamed M. R. Lymphocyte stimulation: a rapid multiparameter analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2881–2884. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.8.2881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuhlmann W. D. Immunoperoxidase labelling of alpha 1-fetoprotein (AFP) in normal and regenerating livers of a low and a high AFP producing mouse strain. Histochemistry. 1979 Nov;64(1):67–75. doi: 10.1007/BF00493355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lazareva M. N. Alpha-fetoprotein production by the synchronized regenerating murine liver. Its independence on the phases of the mitotic cycle. Oncodev Biol Med. 1981;2(1-2):89–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Provost E., Weber A., Schapira F., Boisnard-Rissel M., Guillouzo A. Immunolocalization of fetal aldolase isoenzymes in rat regenerating liver after carbon tetrachloride intoxication. Oncodev Biol Med. 1980;1(4-5):263–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melamed M. R., Darzynkiewicz Z., Traganos F., Sharpless T. Cytology automation by flow cytometry. Cancer Res. 1977 Aug;37(8 Pt 2):2806–2812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohanty M., Das P. K., Mittal A., Nayak N. C. Cellular basis of induced alpha-fetoprotein synthesis by hepatocytes of adult mouse after hepatotoxic injury and partial hepatectomy. Int J Cancer. 1978 Aug 15;22(2):181–188. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910220212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharpless T., Traganos F., Darzynkiewicz Z., Melamed M. R. Flow cytofluorimetry: discrimination between single cells and cell aggregates by direct size measurements. Acta Cytol. 1975 Nov-Dec;19(6):577–581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steele P. R., Yim A. P., Herbertson B. M., Watson J. Some cytofluorimetric studies of the nuclear ploidy of mouse hepatocytes. I. A simple method for isolation of hepatocyte nuclei using in situ perfusion of the liver. Br J Exp Pathol. 1981 Oct;62(5):469–473. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thornthwaite J. T., Sugarbaker E. V., Temple W. J. Preparation of tissues for DNA flow cytometric analysis. Cytometry. 1980 Nov;1(3):229–237. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990010309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
