Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 1984 Jun;115(3):397–402.

Growth of human squamous head and neck cancer in vitro.

M A Cobleigh, P A Gallagher, J H Hill, E L Applebaum, W P McGuire
PMCID: PMC1900523  PMID: 6375391

Abstract

This study was undertaken to define the cloning efficiency of squamous head and neck (H/N) cancer in soft agar. Twenty squamous cell carcinomas of H/N origin were mechanically dissociated and cultured in the human tumor clonogenic assay ( HTSCA ). No growth was observed. Nine ascites specimens from separate patients with ovarian cancer were cultured during the same time period, and six grew, all with more than 30 colonies per plate. Thirty-one additional H/N specimens were enzymatically dissociated and cultured in the HTSCA . Again, no growth was observed. Sixteen of these enzymatically dissociated specimens were simultaneously cultured in identical media without agar. Five specimens grew. We conclude that squamous carcinoma of H/N requires anchorage and fibroblast support for successful growth in culture. Suspension in semisolid media is less effective than liquid tissue culture systems for in vitro growth of this tumor type.

Full text

PDF
397

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Johns M. E. The clonal assay of head and neck tumor cells: results and clinical correlations. Laryngoscope. 1982 Jul;92(7 Pt 2 Suppl 28):1–26. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198207001-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mattox D. E., Von Hoff D. D. In vitro stem cell assay in head and neck squamous carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1980 Oct;140(4):527–530. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90205-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rheinwald J. G., Beckett M. A. Tumorigenic keratinocyte lines requiring anchorage and fibroblast support cultured from human squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1981 May;41(5):1657–1663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rupniak H. T., Hill B. T. The poor cloning ability in agar of human tumour cells from biopsies of primary tumours. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1980 May;4(5):479–486. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(80)90035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Salmon S. E., Hamburger A. W., Soehnlen B., Durie B. G., Alberts D. S., Moon T. E. Quantitation of differential sensitivity of human-tumor stem cells to anticancer drugs. N Engl J Med. 1978 Jun 15;298(24):1321–1327. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197806152982401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. TENNANT J. R. EVALUATION OF THE TRYPAN BLUE TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINATION OF CELL VIABILITY. Transplantation. 1964 Nov;2:685–694. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196411000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Von Hoff D. D., Casper J., Bradley E., Sandbach J., Jones D., Makuch R. Association between human tumor colony-forming assay results and response of an individual patient's tumor to chemotherapy. Am J Med. 1981 May;70(5):1027–1041. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90859-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES