Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 1973 Sep;72(3):403–416.

Smooth Muscle Regeneration in the Ureter

Electron Microscopic and Autoradiographic Observations

Mark D Kiviat, Russell Ross, Julian S Ansell
PMCID: PMC1904028  PMID: 4728891

Abstract

The cellular events taking place during reconstitution of the rabbit ureteral wall following resection of a portion of its circumference were studied utilizing electron microscopy and autoradiography. It was shown that hyperplasia takes place in the smooth muscle of the ureteral remnant during the first 2 postoperative weeks and that spindle-shaped cells possessing the ultrastructural characteristics of myoblasts migrate from the edges of the remnant into the defect, resulting in regeneration of the muscularis within 5 to 6 weeks of the time of injury.

Full text

PDF
403

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAKER R., SEEBODE J., BATIPPS F., LONGFELLOW D., DIPASQUALE N. REGENERATION OF THE TOTAL LENGTH OF URETER IN THE DOG. J Urol. 1964 Dec;92:621–626. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64022-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BOYARSKY S., DUQUE O. Ureteral regeneration in dogs: an experimental study bearing on the Davis intubated ureterotomy. J Urol. 1955 Jan;73(1):53–61. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67366-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CARO L. G., PALADE G. E. PROTEIN SYNTHESIS, STORAGE, AND DISCHARGE IN THE PANCREATIC EXOCRINE CELL. AN AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDY. J Cell Biol. 1964 Mar;20:473–495. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.3.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gabbiani G., Majno G. Dupuytren's contracture: fibroblast contraction? An ultrastructural study. Am J Pathol. 1972 Jan;66(1):131–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gabbiani G., Ryan G. B., Majne G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia. 1971 May 15;27(5):549–550. doi: 10.1007/BF02147594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HAMM F. C., WEINBERG S. R. Experimental studies of regeneration of the ureter without intubation. J Urol. 1956 Jan;75(1):43–51. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66773-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HINMAN F., Jr, OPPENHEIMER R. O. The effect of urinary flow upon ureteral regeneration in the absence of splint. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1956 Oct;103(4):416–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HINMAN F., Jr, OPPENHEIMER R. Smooth muscle regeneration in repair of experimental ureteral defects; the significance of the double lumen. J Urol. 1956 Mar;75(3):428–432. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66830-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUFFMAN W. L., MCCORKLE H. F., PERSKY L. Ureteral regeneration following experimental segmental resection. J Urol. 1956 May;75(5):796–800. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66886-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoffman R. C., Albers D. D. Ureteral regeneration following segmental resection. An experimental study. Invest Urol. 1972 Jan;9(4):300–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huber J. D., Parker F., Odland G. F. A basic fuchsin and alkalinized methylene blue rapid stain for epoxy-embedded tissue. Stain Technol. 1968 Mar;43(2):83–87. doi: 10.3109/10520296809115048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KIMBROUGH J. C., FURST J. N., WORGAN D. K., DENSLOW J. C. Intubated ureterotomy: report of animal experimentation and clinical cases. J Urol. 1950 Jul;64(1):74–84. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68607-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaye G. I., Siegel L. F., Pascal R. R. Cell replication of mesenchymal elements in adult tissues. II. Replication of smooth muscle cells in the colonic muscularis externa of adult rabbits. Am J Anat. 1971 Sep;132(1):93–102. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001320110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LAPIDES J., CAFFERY E. L. Observations on healing of ureteral muscle: relationship to intubated ureterotomy. J Urol. 1955 Jan;73(1):47–52. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67365-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MESSIER B., LEBLOND C. P. Cell proliferation and migration as revealed by radioautography after injection of thymidine-H3 into male rats and mice. Am J Anat. 1960 May;106:247–285. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001060305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Majno G., Gabbiani G., Hirschel B. J., Ryan G. B., Statkov P. R. Contraction of granulation tissue in vitro: similarity to smooth muscle. Science. 1971 Aug 6;173(3996):548–550. doi: 10.1126/science.173.3996.548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Murray M., Schrodt G. R., Berg H. G. Role of smooth muscle cells in healing of injured arteries. Arch Pathol. 1966 Aug;82(2):138–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. OPPENHEIMER R., HINMAN F., Jr Ureteral regeneration: contracture vs. hyperplasia of smooth muscle. J Urol. 1955 Oct;74(4):476–484. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67306-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Poole J. C., Cromwell S. B., Benditt E. P. Behavior of smooth muscle cells and formation of extracellular structures in the reaction of arterial walls to injury. Am J Pathol. 1971 Mar;62(3):391–414. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ross G., Jr, Thompson I. M., Keown K. K., Jr, Judy B. B., Gammel G. E. Further observations on the role of smooth muscle regeneration. J Urol. 1969 Jul;102(1):49–52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)62070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ross R., Benditt E. P. Wound healing and collagen formation. V. Quantitative electron microscope radioautographic observations of proline-H3 utilization by fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1965 Oct;27(1):83–106. doi: 10.1083/jcb.27.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ross R., Klebanoff S. J. The smooth muscle cell. I. In vivo synthesis of connective tissue proteins. J Cell Biol. 1971 Jul;50(1):159–171. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.1.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shires T. K., Trias F. G., Cooper F., Albers D. D. Ureteral regeneration. The effects of wrapping with silastic sheeting. Invest Urol. 1970 Jan;7(4):290–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. TRAUTNER K., RAASCHOU F. Histological examination of the regeneration of the ureter in dogs after intubated ureterotomy. J Urol. 1954 Mar;71(3):274–286. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67788-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. WEAVER R. G., HENDERSON J. H. Ureteral regeneration: experimental and clinical. J Urol. 1954 Sep;72(3):350–357. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67593-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. WEAVER R. G. Ureteral regeneration: experimental and clinical. II. J Urol. 1957 Feb;77(2):164–172. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66538-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. WEINBERG S. R., PENG B., KAMHI B., ULLMAN A., HAMM F. C. Improved regeneration of the ureter after diversion of urine by proximal ureterotomy. J Urol. 1961 May;85:749–758. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)65420-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES