Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Immunology
. 2002 Feb;127(2):289–292. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01750.x

Anti-platelet antibodies associated with the Canale–Smith syndrome bind to the same platelet glycoprotein complexes as those of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura patients

T GRODZICKY *, J B BUSSEL *, K B ELKON *
PMCID: PMC1906334  PMID: 11876752

Abstract

The Canale–Smith syndrome (CSS) is an inherited disease characterized by massive lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly and systemic autoimmunity to erythrocytes and platelets. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disease in which approximately 60–80% of patients have anti-platelet antibodies directed against specific platelet glycoprotein complexes (GPCs) located on their membrane: GP IIb/IIIa, GPIb/IX, and GPIa/IIa. Almost all (95–100%) of the antibody-positive patients have antibodies directed against GPIIb/IIIa alone, or in combination with other glycoprotein targets. Our objective was to determine the specificities of the anti-platelet antibodies in CSS patients. The detection of anti-platelet antibodies was performed using a commercially available ELISA, the Pak-AUTO (GTI, Brookfield, WI), in which highly purified GPIIb/IIIa, GPIb/IX, and GPIa/IIa are immobilized on microtitre plates, incubated with serum or plasma, and subsequently developed with an antihuman polyclonal immunoglobulin. Of 14 CSS patients tested, 11 (79%) had anti-platelet antibodies in their serum directed toward at least one of the three major GPC, nine (82%) of which were against GPIIb/IIIa alone or in combination. Antibodies detected in the sera of ITP patients had similar specificities. No such antibodies were detected in samples from 25 consecutive normal controls. These results demonstrate that a genetically defined defect in lymphocyte apoptosis results in a humoral autoimmune response with anti-platelet specificities very similar to the common idiopathic form of autoimmune thrombocytopenia.

Keywords: Canale–Smith syndrome, autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, human lymphoproliferative, syndrome anti-platelet, antibodies idiopathic, thrombocytopenic, purpura autoimmune disease, platelet glycoprotein complexes, Fas mutations

INTRODUCTION

The Canale–Smith Syndrome (CSS) [1,2], also known as the autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) [3], or the human lymphoproliferative syndrome (HLPS) [4], is an uncommon disease of childhood characterized by lymphadenopathy/ splenomegaly, autoimmune cytopenias (most frequently affecting the platelets and erythrocytes), and an increase (> 5%) in circulating double-negative T cells. The disease is most commonly associated with mutations in Fas (APO-1/CD95) leading to defective apoptosis of activated lymphocytes [26]. This, in turn, leads to progressive accumulation of activated lymphocytes and inappropriate survival of autoreactive cells.

The thrombocytopenia in CSS is similar to that observed in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in that it is antibody mediated, is characterized by remissions and exacerbations, and is generally responsive to the same modalities of therapy [24,710]. Up to 90% of patients with the chronic form of ITP have platelet-associated anti-platelet IgG antibodies directed against specific platelet glycoprotein complexes (GPCs), GPIIb/IIIa, GPIb/IX, and GPIa/IIa, located on the platelet membrane [7,9,11]. Free circulating autoantibodies to GPIIb/IIIa and/or anti-GPIb/IX are detected in 30–50% of ITP patients [7,9]. Anti-platelet antibodies can also be detected in normal individuals. However, these antibodies occur in low titre and are usually directed toward internal platelet proteins, such as intermediate filaments or cytoskeletal proteins [12,13].

So far, there has been little or no characterization of the autoantibodies produced by patients with CSS. To address whether the serum anti-platelet antibodies in CSS were similar to those observed in ITP and/or exaggerated the low-level autoantibodies observed in normal individuals, we evaluated their antigenic specificity in a cohort of CSS patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

CSS was diagnosed on the basis of a chronic disease of early childhood characterized by lymphoaccumulation and systemic autoimmunity [1]. All 14 of the patients included in this study have been described previously and had defective lymphocyte apoptosis caused by Fas mutations [2,5]. Their haematological and major clinical manifestations are listed in Table 1. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a blood platelet count <150 000/μl. Although some of these patients had previously been transfused, none had been pregnant, nor had any been treated with heparin or quinidine prior to the detection of the anti-platelet antibodies. Samples from 54 patients with ITP known to be positive for serum glycoprotein-specific antibodies and 25 consecutive normal individuals were also studied.

Table 1.

Clinical features of CSS patients

Patient Sex Age of onset Clinical manifestations
P1 F 15 years LAD/AIT/chronic hepatitis B and C Thyroid and breast adenomas/basal cell carcinomas
P2 M 7 months LAD/AIHA/AIT (S)
P3 M 4 months LAD/SM (S)/AIHA/AIT/neutropenia
P4 F 2·5 years LAD/HSM/AIHA/AIT/aPL Reversible CNS disease/mGN
P5 M Neonate LAD/SM (S)/AIHA/AIT
P6 M 2 years LAD/HSM/AIHA/AIT/aCL/urticarial rashes
P7 M Neonate LAD/HSM (S)/AIHA/AIT
P8 F Neonate SM (S)/severe AIHA, AIT, and neutropenia Rashes
P8 mother F Neonate LAD/SM/AIHA
P9 F Neonate LAD/SM (S)/AIHA/neutropenia/lymphopenia Oral ulcerations/premature ovarian failure
P9 brother M Neonate LAD/SM (S)/AIHA/Hodgkin’s disease
P10 M Neonate LAD/HSM (S)/AIHA/AIT/urticarial rashes
P10 mother F 12 years LAD/SM/AIT/Hodgkin’s disease
P11 M 4 years LAD/SM/AIHA/AIT/Guillain–Barré syndrome

LAD, Lymphadenopathy; HSM, hepatosplenomegaly; AIHA, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia; aPL, antiphospholipid antibodies; CNS, central nervous system; mGN, membranous glomerulonephritis; SM, splenomegaly; (S), splenectomy; AIT,autoimmune thrombocytopenia; aCL, anticardiolipin antibodies.

Anti-platelet antibody detection

The detection of anti-platelet antibodies was performed using blinded samples and a commercially available ELISA, the Pak-AUTO (GTI, Brookfield, WI) that detects antibodies reactive with GPCs GPIIb/IIIa, Ib/IX, and Ia/IIa. Briefly, highly purified platelet GPCs GPIIb/IIIa, GPIb/IX, and GPIa/IIa from detergent-solubilized platelets are immobilized using mouse MoAbs specific for the relevant GPCs in wells of microtitre plates. Serum or plasma (diluted 1:4 in buffer containing mouse serum) or platelet eluates from patients or normal controls were incubated with the immobilized GPCs and subsequently washed. Bound anti-platelet antibodies were detected by ELISA using an alkaline phosphatase-linked anti-human immunoglobulin reagent (IgG, IgA, IgM). Control sera were used in each assay with a specific internal standard. A positive test was defined as twice the absorbance of the internal standard (1+). The results corresponding to values twice, three, or four times the value of the internal standard were scored as 2+, 3+ and 4+, respectively.

Western blot analysis was performed in six of the 11 CSS patients with anti-platelet antibodies (those with the highest antibody titres), according to methods described previously [14,15], using extracts of 108 platelets per lane as a source of antigens. Sera were tested at a dilution of 1:50 and ECL reagents for IgM, IgG, and IgA detection.

RESULTS

Of the 14 CSS patients tested, 11 (79%) had serum or plasma anti-platelet antibodies directed toward at least one of the three major GPCs (GPIIb/IIIa, GPIb/IX, and GPIa/IIa). Nine of the 11 (82%) patients with autoantibodies recognized GPIIb/IIIa alone, or in combination, versus 83% of ITP patients’ sera. Eight (73%) and three (27%) of the anti-platelet antibody-positive CSS patients recognized GPIa/IIa and GPIb/IX, respectively, alone or in combination, versus 61% and 18% of ITP patients’ sera (Table 2 and Fig. 1). No such antibodies were detected in 25 consecutive normal controls. None of the CSS patients had anti-platelet antibodies reactive with HLA antigens suggestive of alloantibodies. To determine whether CSS patients had autoantibodies to other platelet antigens that were not detected in the ELISA, Western blot analysis of total platelet lysates was performed. All six of these patients had weak, but detectable, bands in the molecular weight regions corresponding to the platelet GPCs detected by the ELISA (not shown). Of the 11 CSS patients with detectable anti-platelet antibodies, 10 had autoimmune thrombocytopenia (ranging from 92 to 132 × 109/l) (Tables 1 and 2). Thrombocytopenia was not observed in patients without anti-platelet antibodies. Titres of anti-platelet antibodies were not systematically tested over time in all CSS patients, but two patients (P9 and P10) who initially were negative upon testing remained negative in samples taken over 3–4 years, and one patient (P6) with anti-platelet antibodies remained positive despite recovery of the platelet count to normal.

Table 2.

Results of anti-platelet antibody detection in CSS patients(Pak-AUTO ELISA)

Anti-platelet GPC specificity
CSS patient GPIIb/IIIa GPIa/IIa GPIb/IX
P1 4+ 2+ Negative
P2 1+ 1+ Negative
P3 Negative 1+ Negative
P4 1+ 1+ Negative
P5 1+ 1+ Negative
P6 3+ 2+ 1+
P7 2+ 2+ 1+
P8 1+ 1+ Negative
P8 mother Negative Negative Negative
P9 1+ Negative Negative
P9 brother Negative Negative Negative
P10 Negative Negative 1+
P10 mother Negative Negative Negative
P11 1+ Negative Negative

CSS, Canale–Smith syndrome; GPC, glycoprotein complex; 1+ to 4+, intensity of positive ELISA reaction (1+ = twice the value of the absorbance of the internal standard and the cut-off value for positivity; 2+, 3+ and 4+ correspond to twice, three times, and four times the cut-off value for positivity, respectively).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Frequency of anti-platelet autoantibodies in Canale–Smith Syndrome (CSS) and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) patients by ELISA. ▪, CSS; □, ITP.

DISCUSSION

Immune-mediated thrombocytopenia is amongst the most frequent manifestations of autoimmunity in CSS [25, 10]. We observed that almost 80% of these patients had autoantibodies directed against one of the three major GPCs, GPIIb/IIIa, GPIb/IX, or GPIa/IIa, that are common targets of autoantibodies in patients with ITP [7,9]. Furthermore, most of these CSS patients, like patients with ITP [7,9,11,16], had antibodies to GPIIb/IIIa, either alone or in combination. Reactivity against GPIa/IIa and GPIb/IX was also similar in CSS compared with ITP. In view of the insensitivity of the Western blot method, we cannot exclude the possibility that other autoantibodies such as those against glycoprotein V were also present in these samples.

The above findings indicate that Fas deficiency leads to a humoral autoimmune response typical of the idiopathic variety of thrombocytopenia, raising the possibility that a defect in peripheral tolerance, possibly related to regulation of apoptosis, may also cause ITP. This is unlikely to be a Fas mutation, since most ITP patients do not develop prominent lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly, and a previous study failed to detect Fas defects in ITP patients, but did identify a subgroup of patients with resistance to ceramide-mediated apoptosis [17]. In humans, downstream effectors of apoptosis [18] or another apoptosis pathway could be involved in ITP, especially in those patients with associated haemolytic anaemia (Evans syndrome [19]).

Anti-platelet antibodies are occasionally observed in normal individuals [13] and may be induced by drugs, infections, transfusion of blood products, or pregnancy [79,11,15]. In normal subjects, the anti-platelet antibodies are low-titre and usually directed toward internal platelet proteins, such as intermediate filaments or cytoskeletal proteins, rather than surface GPCs, as in ITP [12,13]. Although certain drugs and viral infections have been shown to induce anti-GPC antibodies [13,20,21], they are usually transient and the initiating agent is apparent. The absence of any other identifiable cause, as well as the chronicity and antigenic specificity of the anti-platelet autoantibodies, indicates that immune thrombocytopenia in CSS is caused by a loss of tolerance to platelet surface antigens.

The Fas pathway of programmed cell death plays a pivotal role in the elimination of antigen-primed lymphocytes in the peripheral immune system [5,22]. Mutations in Fas or FasL in mice result in lymphoaccumulation and systemic autoimmunity in all strains of mice, although the clinical manifestations vary considerably, depending upon the strain background [2329]. In some strains, such as MRL, mice produce anti-dsDNA autoantibodies and develop autoimmune disease very similar to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with vasculitis and glomerulonephritis [24]. At the other end of the spectrum, C57Bl/6 mice produce anti-ssDNA and rheumatoid factors, but have minimal clinical expression of autoimmunity [25,26]. Despite the fact that CSS/ALPS occurs in an outbred population, each member of which has different MHC as well as different B and T-cell repertoires, the core clinical expression of disease (autoimmune haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopenia) is identical [26,10] and the specificity of the humoral response appears to be similar.

The relatively restricted specificity of autoantibodies in CSS could be explained by several factors. Heterozygous Fas mutations in humans are usually dominant negative in action and profoundly impair lymphocyte apoptosis, leading to clinical expression early in life [26,10]. It is possible that peripheral tolerization to cell surface antigens, such as platelet GPCs, occurs in the neonatal period and early infancy, and that there is a stringent requirement for Fas in this process. Since the major source of antigens to which developing B cells would be exposed in the bone marrow are of haematopoietic origin, it is perhaps not surprising that autoimmune responses are directed against these multivalent cell surface antigens. In contrast, intracellular antigens that are targeted in SLE are oligovalent, and may require anergy, rather than apoptosis, as the major mechanism of B-cell tolerance induction [30,31].

In conclusion, knowledge that mutations in a defined molecular genetic pathway of apoptosis lead to a humoral anti-platelet response very similar to that observed in ITP provides insight into the mechanisms of tolerance toward multivalent cell membrane antigens. These findings also suggest that regulation of apoptosis requires a more thorough evaluation in idiopathic forms of autoimmune-mediated thrombocytopenia.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Janice G. McFarland and her staff from The Blood Center of South-eastern Wisconsin for their technical expertise, insights and helpful comments. This work was supported by grants from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada-Medical Research Council of Canada-Novartis Fellowship Award (T.G.) and the National Institutes of Health (K.B.E.).

References

  • 1.Canale VC, Smith HC. Chronic lymphadenopathy simulating malignant lymphoma. J Pediatr. 1967;70:891–9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(67)80262-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Drappa J, Vaishnaw AK, Sullivan KE, Chu JL, Elkon KB. Fas gene mutations in the Canale–Smith Syndrome, an inherited lymphoproliferative disorder associated with autoimmunity. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1643–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199611283352204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fisher GH, Rosenberg FJ, Straus SE, et al. Dominant interfering Fas gene mutations impair apoptosis in a human autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Cell. 1995;81:935–46. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90013-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rieux-Laucat F, Le Deist F, Hivroz C, et al. Mutations in Fas associated with human lymphoproliferative syndrome and autoimmunity. Science. 1995;268:1347–9. doi: 10.1126/science.7539157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vaishnaw AK, Orlinick JR, Chu JL, Krammer PH, Chao MV, Elkon KB. The molecular basis for apoptotic defects in patients with CD95 (Fas/Apo-1) mutations. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:355–63. doi: 10.1172/JCI5121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rieux-Laucat F, Blachère S, Danielan S, et al. Lymphoproliferative syndrome with autoimmunity: a possible genetic basis for dominant expression of the clinical manifestations. Blood. 1999;94:2575–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McMillan R. Chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:1135–47. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198105073041904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Karpatkin S. Autoimmune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura. Lancet. 1997;349:1531–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)12118-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McMillan R, Imbach PA. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura. In: Loscalzo J, Schafer AI, editors. Blackwell Scientific Publications. 1st. Boston, MA: Thrombosis and hemorrage; 1994. pp. 575–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Straus SE. Moderator, an inherited disorder of lymphocyte apoptosis: the autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:591–601. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-7-199904060-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang ZY, Shen ZX. Megakaryocytes and platelets in immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1997;10:89–107. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3536(97)80052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tomiyami Y, Kekomaki R, McFaland J, Kunicki TJ. Antivinculin antibodies in sera of patients with immune thrombocytopenia and normal subjects. Blood. 1992;79:161–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wadenvik H, Stockelberg D, Hou M. Platelet proteins as autoantibody targets in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1998;424:26–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1998.tb01230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Beardsley DS, Speigel JE, Jacobs MM, Handin RI, Lux IV SE. Platelet membrane glycoprotein IIIa contains target antigens that bind anti-platelet antibodies in immune thrombocytopenia. J Clin Invest. 1984;74:1701–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI111587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mayer JLR, Beardsley DS. Varicella-associated thrombocytopenia: autoantibodies against platelet surface glycoprotein V. Pediatr Res. 1996;40:615–9. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199610000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kiefel V, Santoso S, Weishait M, Mueller-Eckhardt C. Monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA): a new tool for the identification of platelet-reactive antibodies. Blood. 1987;70:1722–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dianzani U, Bragardo M, DiFranco D, et al. Deficiency of the Fas apoptosis pathway without fas gene mutations in pediatric patients with autoimmunity/lymphoproliferation. Blood. 1997;89:2871–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang J, Zheng L, Lobito A, et al. Inherited human caspase-10 mutations underlie defective lymphocyte and dendritic cell apoptosis in Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome Type II. Cell. 1999;98:47–58. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80605-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang WC. Evans syndrome in childhood: pathophysiology, clinical course, and treatment. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1988;10:330–8. doi: 10.1097/00043426-198824000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gottschall JL, Elliot W, Lianos E, McFarland JG, Wolfmeyer K, Aster RH. Quinine-induced immune thrombocytopenia associated with hemolytic uremic syndrome: a new clinical entity. Blood. 1991;77:306–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nardi MA, Liu L-X, Karpatkin S. GPIIIa-(49–66) is a major pathophysiologically relevant antigenic determinant for anti-platelet GPIIIa of HIV-1-related immunologic thrombocytopenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:7589–94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Grodzicky T, Elkon KB. Apoptosis in rheumatic diseases. Am J Med. 2000;108:73–82. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00332-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Choi Y, Ramnath VR, Eaton AS, et al. Expression in transgenic mice of dominant interfering Fas mutations: a model for Human Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome. Clin Immunol. 1999;93:34–45. doi: 10.1006/clim.1999.4767. 10.1006/clim.1999.4767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang Y, Nose M, Kamoto T, Nishimura M, Hiai H. Host modifier genes affect mouse autoimmunity induced by the lpr gene. Am J Pathol. 1997;151:1791–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Izui S, Kelley VE, Masuda K, Yoshida H, Roths JB, Murphy ED. Induction of various autoantibodies by mutant gene lpr in several strains of mice. J Immunol. 1984;133:227–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Warren RF, Caster SA, Roths JB, Murphy ED, Pisetsky DS. The influence of the lpr gene on B cell activation: differential antibody expression in lpr congenic mouse strains. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1984;31:65–77. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(84)90190-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Davidson WF, Calkins C, Hugin A, Giese T, Holmes KL. Cytokine secretion by C3H-lpr and -gld T cells, hypersecretion of IFN and tumor necrosis factor by stimulated CD4+ T cells. J Immunol. 1991;146:4138–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jachez B, Montecino-Rodriguez E, Fonteneau P, Loor F. Partial expression of the lpr locus in the heterozygous state: presence of autoantibodies. Immunol. 1988;64:31–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ogata Y, Kimura M, Shimada K, et al. Distinct expression of lprcg in the heterozygous state on different genetic backgrounds. Cell Immunol. 1993;148:91–102. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1993.1093. 10.1006/cimm.1993.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Santulli-Marotto S, Retter MW, Gee R, Mamula MJ, Clarke SH. Autoreactive B cell regulation: peripheral induction of development arrest by lupus-associated autoantigens. Immunity. 1998;8:209–19. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80473-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shinde S, Gee R, Santulli-Marotto S, Bockenstedt LK, Clarke SH, Mamula MJ. T cell autoimmunity in Ig transgenic mice. J Immunol. 1999;162:7519–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES