Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of gangliosides from lymphoid (spleen and thymus) and other (brain, liver, lungs and muscle) tissues of C57BL/6 mice lacking the gene for β2-microglobulin (β2M), a constitutive component of the MHC class I molecule. Ganglioside fractions in the tissues of mice homozygous (β2M−/−) and heterozygous (β2M−/+) for the gene deletion were determined by high performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), followed by immunostaining with specific polyclonal antibodies. Ubiquitous gangliosides Gm3(Neu5Ac) and Gm3(Neu5Gc) were the dominant gangliosides in the lungs of the control β2M−/+ mice, whereas the homozygous knockout mice had substantially decreased expression of these structures. The lungs of the β2M−/− mice also had reduced expression of T-lymphocyte-specific Gm1b-type gangliosides (Gm1b and GalNAc-Gm1b). β2M-deficient mice also had more Gm1a and Gd1a gangliosides in the liver, and several neolacto-series gangliosides were increased in the brain and lungs. This study provides in vivo evidence that the β2M molecule can influence the acquisition of a distinct ganglioside assembly in different mouse organs, implicating its non-immunological functions.
Keywords: gangliosides, antibodies, TLC immunostaining, gene knockout mice, β2-microglobulin, MHC class I
INTRODUCTION
β2-microglobulin (β2M) is a polypeptide that associates with polymorphic MHC class I proteins encoded by H-2K, H-2D and Qa/Tla loci in the mouse, or HLA-A,-B or-C loci in the human [1]. β2M is necessary for the function of MHC class I proteins in the presentation of foreign antigens to the immune system [2]. Although class I MHC is primarily known for its function in cell-mediated immune recognition, recent findings suggest that class I MHC molecules may play a role in the re-modelling and plasticity of connections in the developing and mature mammalian central nervous system [3]. Mice with the β2M gene disrupted by targeted mutation do not express β2M protein and therefore, lack class I MHC antigen on the surface of most cells [4,5]. Mouse strains with this mutation have no obvious defects and breed normally [4,5]. They possess almost no CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes in the thymus, but their peripheral lymphoid organs can clear certain virus infections [6].
Gangliosides are acidic glycosphingolipids (GSLs) characterized by the presence of one or more sialic acid units in the oligosaccharide chain. The parent compounds are Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc, which play crucial roles in various biological functions [7]. GSLs are ubiquitous, highly conserved membrane components with an important biological role in cell surface recognition [8] and modulation of the function of a variety of membrane-associated proteins [9]. GSLs are assembled as ‘rafts’[10] or ‘glycosignalling domains’[11] in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, and these clustered GSLs, but not non-clustered GSLs, exert biological activities. Clusters of liquid-ordered GSL and cholesterol molecules in the exoplasmic leaflet of the T-cell plasma membrane constitute microdomains, which play an essential role in T-cell receptor signalling [12]. Surface cross-linking of many glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins and Gm1 ganglioside leads to cell stimulation following the coalescence of microdomains and activation of the associated Src family protein tyrosine kinases [12]. There are a wealth of data on the specific roles of gangliosides in the regulation of the immune response. The examples of such effects are the inhibition of lymphoproliferation [13] and modulation of CD4 by helper T lymphocytes [14], suppression of cytotoxic activity of natural killer cells [14] and inhibition of monocyte accessory function [15].
GSLs may also interact with MHC gene products. MHC class I and II gene expression in astrocytes can be specifically suppressed by a mixture of brain gangliosides [16]. In addition, brain ganglioside GT1b has been shown to modulate MHC class I gene expression in astrocytes [17]. As a first step in elucidating the interactions between MHC I and GSLs, we analysed ganglioside expression patterns in different organs from mice deficient in the β2M gene compared with control mice heterozygous for the gene knockout. Specific polyclonal antibodies were used to detect three groups of gangliosides on high-performance thin-layer chromatograms [18]: GM3, a ubiquitous ganglioside; lymphocyte-specific GM1b-type gangliosides (GM1b, GalNAc-GM1b), GM1a and GD1a, and neolacto-series gangliosides, a newly-characterized ganglioside group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Mice lacking the gene for β2M were originally generated by Zijlstra et al[4]. They were bred onto a C57BL/6 background and kept under standard housing conditions (laboratory rodent chow and water ad libitum, and a 12h light-dark cycle) at the Animal Facility of the Rijeka University School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia. Mice used in the study were either homozygous (β2M–/–) or heterozygous (β2M–/+) for the β2M gene knockout. They came from the same litters, and the β2M–/– phenotype was checked by the absence of CD8 antigen using flow cytometry. Lymphocytes from heterozygous β2M–/+ mice had similar expression of MHC class I molecules and immunological characteristics as the lymphocytes from the wild-type (C57BL/6) mice [5].
For ganglioside analysis, females aged 10 weeks were killed by cervical dislocation under CO2 anaesthesia; the tissues were dissected out and stored at – 20°C until GSL extraction.
Isolation of GSLs from tissues
Brain, liver, lungs, thigh muscle, spleen and thymus were dissected from 10 animals of each group. Animals were perfused with 20 ml cold 0·1 m phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7·4, immediately after CO2 sacrification. Identical tissues were pooled, minced with a scalpel, suspended in distilled water in a 1/2 ratio (w/v), homogenized for 10 min with a dispersing tool (Polytron PT1200C, Kinematica AG, Littau/Luzern, Switzerland) and isolated according to standard procedures [19]. Briefly, GSLs were extracted with chloroform/methanol (2/1, v/v), chloroform/methanol (1/1, v/v) and chloroform/methanol (1/2, v/v) (10-fold volumes of the tissue wet weight) for 30 min with sonication. The combined extracts were evaporated and resuspended in chloroform/methanol/water (30/60/8, by volume); gangliosides were isolated by anion exchange chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose CL-6B (Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany) [20]. The ganglioside fraction was incubated for 1 h at 37°C in aqueous 1 N NaOH to saponify phospholipids, followed by neutralization with acetic acid and dialysis. Gangliosides were further purified by adsorption chromatography on Iatrobeads 6RS-8060 (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) [21]. After column chromatography purification, the final ganglioside fractions were adjusted to defined volumes of chloroform/methanol (2/1) corresponding to 4 mg wet tissue weight/μl for the liver and 2 mg wet tissue weight/µl for all other tissues.
Thin-layer chromatography and reference gangliosides
The gangliosides were separated on silica gel 60 pre-coated high-performance thin-layer chromatography plates (HPTLC-plates, size 10 × 10 cm, thickness 0·2 mm, Merck Darmstadt, Germany) using chloroform/methanol/water (120/85/20, each by volume) with 2 mm CaCl2, and visualized with resorcinol [22]. A ganglioside mixture composed of GM3(Neu5Ac), IV3Neu5Ac-nLcOse4Cer (IV3nLc4), IV6Neu5Ac-nLcOse4Cer (IV6nLc4) and VI3Neu5Ac-nLcOse6Cer (VI3nLc6) was isolated from human granulocytes as previously described [23]. GM3(Neu5Gc) was purified from a mouse–mouse hybridoma [24]. Gangliosides from a murine T lymphoma YAC-1 and a lymphoreticular tumour cell line MDAY-D2 were isolated according to established procedures [25,26] (see Table 1). Human brain gangliosides were purchased from Supelco Inc. (Bellefonte, PA, USA).
Table 1.
Relative quantities of resorcinol-stained ganglioside fractions in the lungs of mice homozygous (−/−) or heterozygous (+/−) for the β2MG gene knockout
| Percent total density* | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ganglioside fraction | −/− Mice | +/− Mice | Homo-hetero density ratio † |
| GM3(1) | 12 | 20 | 0·4 |
| GM3(2) | 18 | 25 | 0·5 |
| GM1 | 5 | 8 | 0·4 |
| GD1a | 25 | 9 | 1·7 |
| GT1b | 20 | 22 | 0·6 |
| Not identified | 20 | 16 | 0·8 |
Density of individual bands was expressed as the percentage of the total density for all bands.
Ratio of densitometric peaks for individual gangliosides fraction from homozygous (−/−) and heterozygous (+/−) mice.
Antibodies and cholera toxin B subunit (choleragenoid)
Polyclonal chicken anti-GM3(Neu5Ac) and anti-GM3(Neu5Gc) antibodies have been characterized in our previous reports [24,27]. Rabbit anti-GgOse4Cer antiserum used for the detection of GM1b and GD1α has also been described in earlier publications [28,29]. Highly specific chicken anti-GalNAc-GM1b antibody has been described in detail elsewhere [25,26], as well as chicken anti-nLcOse4Cer antibody used for the analysis of neolacto-series gangliosides [27,30,31]. Cholera toxin B subunit (= choleragenoid) specific for ganglioside GM1 was from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany) and goat anti-choleragenoid antiserum from Calbiochem (Frankfurt, Germany).
TLC immunostaining
The overlay technique was carried out according to Magnani et al[32], with some modifications [18,33]. All GSL-specific antibodies were used at 1:1000 dilutions. Secondary rabbit anti-chicken IgG, goat anti-rabbit IgG and rabbit anti-goat IgG antisera, all affinity chromatography-purified and labelled with alkaline phosphatase (0·6 mg/ml), were purchased from Dianova (Hamburg, Germany) and used at 1:2000 dilution. Briefly, the silica gel was fixed with polyisobutylmethacrylate, and unspecific protein binding was blocked by a 15 min incubation of the plate with solution A (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS, supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin and 0·02% NaN3). The plates were then overlaid for 1 h with anti-GSL antibodies. Unbound antibodies were removed by washing each plate five times with solution B (0·05% Tween 21, 0·02% NaN3 in PBS). After 1 h of incubation with secondary antibodies diluted 1:2000 in solution A, the plates were washed again, followed by two rinses with glycine buffer (0·1 m glycine, 1 mm ZnCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, pH 10·4), to remove phosphate. Bound antibodies were visualized with 0·05% (w/v) 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (Biomol, Hamburg, Germany) in glycine buffer. Each antibody analysis was performed three times, with identical results.
TLC immunostaining of neolacto-series gangliosides
Neuraminidase treatment of neolacto-series gangliosides with (α2–3)-substituted sialic acid is necessary prior to immunostaining with anti-nLcOse4Cer antibody, whereas (α2–6)-sialylated neolacto-type gangliosides can be detected without enzyme treatment because sialylation at position 6 of the terminal galactose does not hinder recognition [30]. Fixed silica gel plates were incubated with 2·5 mU/ml Vibrio cholerae neuraminidase (Behring Werke AG, Marburg, Germany) for 2 h at 37°C in the buffer described above, followed by immunostaining with anti-nLcOse4Cer antibody [30]. Neolacto-series gangliosides from human granulocytes, composed of GM3(Neu5Ac), IV3nLc4, IV6nLc4 and VI3nLc6, served as references [23].
TLC immunostaining of GM1b-type gangliosides
Terminally-sialylated gangliosides with a GgOse4Cer backbone (GM1b, GD1α) were detected as described previously [26,28]. After chromatography of gangliosides and silica gel fixation, the plate was incubated for 2 h at 37°C with 2·5 mU/ml V. cholerae neuraminidase (Behring Werke AG) in 0·05 m sodium acetate, 9 mm CaCl2, pH 5·5. Desialylated gangliosides were immunostained with polyclonal anti-GgOse4Cer antibody.
TLC detection of GM1a-type gangliosides
The TLC binding assay using choleragenoid for specific detection of GM1 was developed by Magnani et al[34] and was used with modifications [29]. A fixed silica gel plate was overlaid with 250 ng/ml choleragenoid (Sigma) diluted in solution A for 2 h at room temperature, followed by goat anti-choleragenoid (Calbiochem) and secondary rabbit anti-goat IgG antibody incubation (both diluted 1:2000). Bound antibodies were visualized as described above. To reveal the presence of GD1a, GD1b and GT1b, the plates were incubated with 5 mU/ml V. cholerae neuraminidase (2 h, 37°C) prior to combined choleragenoid immunostaining [35].
Semi-quantitative estimation of ganglioside fractions
For semi-quantitative estimation, resorcinol and immunostained chromatograms were scanned with a CD60 scanner (Desaga, Heidelberg, Germany) equipped with an IBM compatible personal computer and densitometric software. Ganglioside amounts corresponding to identical wet weight quantities of each tissue were applied, and bands were measured in reflectance mode at 580 nm (resorcinol) and 630 nm (indolylphosphate) with a light beam slit of 0·1 × 2 mm. These scanning parameters give a linear response in the range 0·15–3·0 µg sialic acid per band [36] and have proved to be convenient for a reproducible quantification of picomolar amounts of individual ganglioside species [37,38].
RESULTS
Expression of GM3
Resorcinol-stained thin-layer chromatograms of gangliosides from the brain and lungs of β2M–/– and control β2M+/– mice showed twofold lower expression of GM3 (1) and (2) fractions in the lungs of control β2M+/– mice compared with those in β2M–/– mice (Fig. 1a and Table 1). Mice heterozygous (+/–) for β2M gene knockout were chosen as controls because they came from the same litters as homozygous mice and had similar immunological characteristics [5] they also had similar expression of gangliosides on resorcinol-stained thin-layer chromatograms (data not shown) as wild-type (C57BL/6) mice.
Fig. 1.

Resorcinol stain (a) and anti-GM3(Neu5Gc) TLC immunostain (b) of ganglioside fractions from the brain and lungs of β2M−/− and control β2M+/− mice. (a) Shows chromatograms of ganglioside amounts corresponding to 10 mg brain (Br) and 60 mg lungs wet weight (Lu), whereas for TLC immunostaining (b), one third of ganglioside quantities were applied in the same order. In both panels, 3 µg GM3(Neu5Gc) (lane S1) and 10 µg human granulocyte gangliosides (lane S2) were used as references.
The separation of individual murine gangliosides on HPTLC plates as double or triple bands is a common feature, due to the variation in the ceramide portion (C16-or C24-fatty acids) and oligosaccharide moiety (Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc) [24]. The upper band in our samples was composed of GM3(Neu5Ac) with a C24-fatty acid, and the lower band was GM3(Neu5Ac) with a C16-fatty acid and GM3(Neu5Gc) with a C24-fatty acid. In immuno-overlay assays, which can detect as little as 0·5 pmol (0·64–1·0 ng) of GM3[33], the expression of GM3(Neu5Gc) was similar in organs from homozygous and control heterozygous mice (data not shown), except for the lungs (Fig. 1b). Ganglioside extracts from the lungs of β2M–/– mice did not bind anti-GM3(Neu5Gc) antibody, whereas control β2M+/– lung extracts had a band of C24-fatty acid-substituted GM3(Neu5Gc). Human granulocyte gangliosides (Fig. 1b, lane S2) did not bind this antibody, indicating the high specificity of the anti-GM3(Neu5Gc) antibody, which does not react with GM3(Neu5Ac) or any ganglio-or neolacto-series gangliosides [24]. Staining with anti-GM3(Neu5Ac) antibody showed a similar expression pattern, i.e. GM3(Neu5Ac) was abundant in the lungs of β2M+/– mice compared with the trace quantities found in the lungs of homozygotes (data not shown).
Expression of neolacto-series gangliosides
The anti-nLc4 antibody detects terminally (α2–3)-sialylated neolacto-series gangliosides (IV3nLc4 and VI3nLc6) after V. cholerae neuraminidase treatment, whereas visualization of IV6nLc4 is feasible without enzyme treatment [30]. The most prominent difference in the expression of these gangliosides between the two groups of mice was found in the brains and lungs. Brains from β2M–/– mice showed an almost eightfold greater expression of the IV6nLc4(C24) fraction compared with control β2M+/– mice (Fig. 2 and Table 2).
Fig. 2.

Detection of neolacto-series gangliosides in the brain, liver, lungs, muscle and spleen of β2M−/− and control β2M+/− mice. Ganglioside amounts corresponding to 3·3 mg brain (Br), 13·3 mg liver (Li), 20 mg lungs and muscle (Lu and Mu, respectively) and 13·3 mg spleen wet weight (Sp) were chromatographed together with 2·5 µg human granulocyte gangliosides (lane S). The TLC immunostain was performed with anti-nLcOse4Cer antibody after V. cholerae neuraminidase treatment.
Table 2.
Relative quantities of immunostained nLc-type ganglioside TLC fractions in the brain and lungs of mice homozygous (−/−) or heterozygous (+/−) for the β2MG gene knockout
| Brain | Lungs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent total density* | Percent total density* | |||||
| Ganglioside fraction | −/− Mice | +/− Mice | Homo-hetero density ratio | −/− Mice | +/− Mice | Homo-hetero density ratio† |
| GM3(1) | 10 | – | – | 14 | 27 | 0·5 |
| GM3(2) | 15 | 19 | 1·2 | 20 | 30 | 0·7 |
| GM3(3) | 4 | – | – | 4 | 7 | 0·5 |
| IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4(4) | – | 8 | – | 13 | 6 | 2·3 |
| IV3Neu5Ac-nLc4(5) | 11 | 10 | 1·1 | 11 | 8 | 1·3 |
| IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4(6) | 25 | 7 | 7·7 | 20 | 16 | 1·3 |
| IV6Neu5Ac-nLc4(7) | – | 5 | – | 17 | 6 | 3·0 |
| VI3Neu5Ac-nLc6(8) | 10 | 20 | 1·1 | 1 | – | – |
| VI3Neu5Ac-nLc6(9) | 6 | – | 1·1 | – | – | – |
| Not identified | 19 | 31 | – | – | – | – |
Density of individual bands was expressed as the percentage of the total density for all bands.
Ratio of the densitometric peak for individual ganglioside fraction from homozygous (−/−) and heterozygous (+/−) mice.
The lungs of β2M–/– mice strongly expressed double bands of (α2–3)-sialylated IV3nLc4 and (α2–6)-sialylated (IV6nLc4) neolacto-core gangliosides, compared with the amounts of these gangliosides in the lungs of the control mice (Fig. 2 and Table 2).
The anti-nLc4Cer antibody recognizes a neolactodiglycosyl residue (Galβ1–4GlcNAc) but can cross-react with the LacCer (Galβ1–4Glc residue). Thus, the anti-nLc4 overlay assay after V. cholerae neuraminidase pre-treatment, which cleaves neuraminic acid and leaves lactosylceramide accessible for antibody binding, also detects GM3 ganglioside. This staining confirmed the reduced expression of GM3 in the lungs of β2M–/– mice compared with control β2M+/– mice (Fig. 2).
Expression of GM1b, GD1α and GalNAc-GM1b
Terminally-sialylated ganglio-series gangliosides GM1b and GD1α have been reported to be typical gangliosides of mouse leucocytes [20,39]. GalNAc-GM1b, the elongation product of the GM1b ganglioside, has been reported to be a marker of mature and/or stimulated T lymphocytes [40]. GM1b and GD1α are detectable on HPTLC plates with an anti-GgOse4Cer antibody after V. cholerae neuraminidase treatment [25]. This combined treatment is highly specific and allows sensitive detection down to 10 ng of GgOse4Cer core gangliosides in complex GSL mixtures [33]. Ganglioside fractions from murine lymphoma YAC-1 and lymphoreticular MDAY-D2 cell lines, known to express high levels of GM1b-type gangliosides [25,26], were used as standards and their major gangliosides are listed in Table 3.
Table 3.
Major gangliosides from murine lymphoma YAC-1 and lymphoreticular MDAY-D2 cells
| Ganglioside fraction | Fatty acid | Symbol* | Sialic acid | YAC-1 | MDAY-D2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -II | 24:0,24:1 | GM2 | Neu5Ac | − | + |
| -I | 16:0 | GM2 | Neu5Ac | − | + |
| 0 | 24:0,24:1 | GM1a | Neu5Ac | − | + |
| I | 16:0 | GM1a | Neu5Ac | − | + |
| 24:0,24:1 | *GM1b | Neu5Ac | + | + | |
| II | 16:0 | *GM1b | Neu5Ac | + | + |
| 24:0,24:1 | GalNAc-GM1b | Neu5Ac | + | + | |
| 24:0,24:1 | *GM1b | Neu5Gc | + | − | |
| III | 16:0 | *GM1b | Neu5Gc | + | − |
| 16:0 | GalNAc-GM1b | Neu5Ac | + | + | |
| 24:0,24:1 | GalNAc-GM1b | Neu5Gc | + | − | |
| IV | 16:0 | GalNAc-GM1b | Neu5Gc | + | − |
| V | 24:0,24:1 | GD1a | Neu5Ac | − | + |
| VI | 16:0 | GD1a | Neu5Ac | − | + |
| VII | 24:0,24:1 | *GD1α | Neu5Ac | − | + |
| VIII | 16:0 | *GD1α | Neu5Ac | − | + |
MDAY-D2 cells express Neu5Ac-substituted-and lack Neu5Gc-containing gangliosides [26], whereas YAC-1 cells are characterized by high expression of Neu5Gc-substituted GM1b-type gangliosides [25]. HPTLC immuno-overlay analysis of GM1b and GD1α showed a sevenfold lower expression of GM1b in the lungs of β2M–/– mice (Fig. 3,Table 4) separating at positions I (= GM1b(Neu5Ac) with C24-fatty acid) and II (=GM1b(Neu5Ac) with C16-fatty acid) of YAC-1 and MDAY-D2 reference gangliosides (see Table 3), indicating down-regulation of terminally-sialylated GM1b ganglioside in the lungs of β2M−/– mice. Both groups of mice showed similar expression of GM1b in the spleen and thymus (Fig. 3). The same was true for the brain (data not shown), where GM1b is known to be a minor constituent [29].
Fig. 3.

Resorcinol stain (a) and TLC immunostaining (b) of GM1b-type gangliosides from the lungs, spleen and thymus of β2M−/− and β2M+/− mice. In (a), ganglioside amounts corresponding to 60 mg (lungs, Lu) and 40 mg wet weight (spleen and thymus, Sp and Th, respectively) were chromatographed together with 10 µg YAC-1 (lane S1) and 10 µg MDAY-D2 gangliosides (lane S2). In (b), one third of ganglioside quantities were applied in the same order. YAC-1 and MDAY-D2 gangliosides are marked with roman numerals from II to VIII and their structures are given in Table 3. Crosses indicate impurities that did not stain with resorcinol.
Table 4.
Relative quantities of immunostained GM1b-type ganglioside TLC fractions in the lungs of mice homozygous (−/−) or heterozygous (+/−) for the β2MG gene knockout
| Percent total density* | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ganglioside fraction | −/− Mice | +/− Mice | Hetero-homo density ratio† |
| GM1b (I) | 46 | 39 | 7·1 |
| GM1b (II) | 54 | 44 | 6·8 |
| Not identified | – | 17 | – |
Density of individual bands was expressed as the percentage of the total density for all bands.
Ratio of the densitometric peak for individual ganglioside fraction from heterozygous (+/−) and homozygous (−/−) mice.
Anti-GalNAc-GM1b antibody does not bind to other ganglio-or neolacto-series gangliosides [26], and it does not discriminate between Neu5Ac-and Neu5Gc-substituted GalNAc-GM1b. In the HPTLC immuno-overlay assay of ganglioside extracts from the lungs, spleen and thymus of β2M–/– mice, this antibody stained only a single band of GalNAc-GM1b in the spleen fraction (Fig. 4) at position III (=GalNAc-GM1b(Neu5Ac) with C16-fatty acid and/or GalNAc-GM1b(Neu5Gc) with C24-fatty acid) of reference YAC-1 and MDAY-D2 gangliosides (see Table 3). Two positive GalNAc-GM1b bands were detected in the lungs of the control β2M+/– mice at positions II and III (Fig. 4), most likely GalNAc-GM1b(Neu5Ac) with C24-or C16-fatty acid, respectively. These bands were absent in the lunggangliosides of β2M–/– mice (Fig. 4). This indicated that GalNAc-GM1b expression, like that of its precursor GM1b, was down-regulated in the lungs of β2M–/– mice. The brain, liver and muscle of both types of mice failed to express GalNAc-GM1b (data not shown).
Fig. 4.

Anti-GalNAc-GM1b TLC immunostaining of ganglioside fractions from the lungs, spleen and thymus of β2M−/− and control β2M+/− mice. Ganglioside amounts corresponding to 20 mg lungs (Lu) and 13·3 mg spleen and thymus wet weight (Sp and Th, respectively) were chromatographed together with 3 µg YAC-1 (lane S1) and 10 µg MDAY-D2 gangliosides (lane S2). YAC-1 and MDAY-D2 gangliosides are marked with roman numerals according to Table 3.
Expression of GM1a-type gangliosides
The expression patterns of GM1a-type gangliosides in the tissues of mice homo-or heterozygous for the β2M gene knockout were very similar (data not shown), except for the liver tissue (Fig. 5). Resorcinol staining of liver gangliosides from β2M+/– mice, which have been bred onto the C57BL/6 background, confirmed previous reports that GM1 and GD1a gangliosides cannot be detected by resorcinol staining of ganglioside extracts from the liver of C57BL/6 mice [41]. However, traces of GM1 and GD1a gangliosides were clearly visible after resorcinol staining of ganglioside extracts from the liver of β2M–/– mice (Fig. 5a). Immunostaining with cholera toxin, which detects down to 0·01 ng (6·5 fmol) GM1[33], showed that GM1 was expressed in the liver of both β2M–/– and β2M+/– mice, but that the expression in β2M–/– mice was fourfold greater. Immunostaining with cholera toxin after V. cholerae neuraminidase, which also detects GD1a, GD1b and GT1b gangliosides, showed that the expression of GD1a was also four times stronger in the liver of β2M–/– than β2M+/– mice (Fig. 5c and Table 5).
Fig. 5.

Resorcinol stain (a), TLC immunostain with cholera toxin B subunit (B) and TLC immunostain with cholera toxin B subunit after V. cholerae neuraminidase treatment (c) of ganglioside fractions from the liver of β2M−/− and control β2M+/− mice. (a) Shows chromatograms of ganglioside amounts corresponding to 40 mg whereas for TLC immunostaining (b and c), ganglioside amounts corresponding to 1·3 mg liver wet weight were applied in the same order. As a reference, 10 µg human brain gangliosides (lane S) were applied at panel a and 250 ng in panels (b) and (c).
Table 5.
Relative quantities of ganglioside TLC fractions stained with cholera toxin after neuraminidase treatment in the liver of mice homozy-gous (−/−) or heterozygous (+/−) for the β2MG gene knockout
| Percent total density* | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ganglioside fraction | −/− Mice | +/− Mice | Homo-hetero density ratio† |
| GM1 | 38 | 32 | 3·9 |
| GD1a | 37 | 29 | 4·2 |
| GD1b | 13 | 22 | 1·4 |
| GT1b | 12 | 17 | 1·9 |
Density of individual bands was expressed as the percentage of the total density for all bands.
Ratio of the densitometric peak for individual ganglioside fraction from homozygous (−/−) and heterozygous (+/−) mice.
DISCUSSION
Immunochemical analysis of ganglioside expression in the tissues of β2M knockout mice showed that the β2M gene may be involved in the acquisition of distinct ganglioside assemblies in different mouse organs. GSLs have been implicated in immune cell circulation and/or localization of cells in lymphoid organs [9]. Our data indicate that the interaction between GSLs and immune cells is reciprocal and that the expression of functional class I MHC molecules on the surface of the cells may regulate the expression of GSLs.
Only traces of GM1b in the lungs and GD1α in the spleen and thymus were detected in β2M–/– mice compared with abundant expression in the control β2M+/– mice. This indicated a strong down-regulation of terminally-sialylated gangliosides with a GgOse4Cer backbone in the absence of β2M. GM1b is a typical ganglioside of murine T cells [20,42,43] and macrophages [39], and GM1b expression in the lungs may be related to the presence of T cells and macrophages in this organ [44]. GalNAc-GM1b, the elongation product of GM1b, was found in considerable quantities in the spleen and lungs, and in trace quantities in the thymus of β2M+/– mice. This correlates with previous findings by us and others that GalNAc-GM1b is a marker of activated T cells and macrophages [40,43,45]. Similar to GM1b, GalNAc-GM1b expression was considerably reduced in the lungs and thymus of the β2M–/– mice, indicating that β2M is indeed involved in the acquisition of this ganglioside by lymphoid cells.
High amounts of terminally-sialylated nLcOse4Cer were detected in both β2M–/– and control β2M+/– mice, particularly in the brain, lungs and spleen, and to a lesser extent in the muscle and liver. However, very little is known about the cell type-specific expression of neolacto-series gangliosides in murine organs. Increased expression of ganglioside IV6nLc4(C24) in the brain of β2M–/– compared with the control β2M+/– mice may be related to the role of class I MHC molecules in the central nervous system [3]. It has been shown that class I MHC molecules are expressed by specific sets of neurones that undergo activity-dependent changes [46], and that mice lacking either β2M or CD3ζ exhibit abnormalities in connections between these neurones [3]. Neolacto-series gangliosides are well characterized in acoustic neurinoma samples [47] and the peripheral nervous system [48] in humans, but additional biochemical and morphological studies are needed to address the possible role of neolacto-series gangliosides in the murine central nervous system.
GM3 is a ubiquitous ganglioside and has been implicated in the regulation of tyrosine kinase activity and its signal transduction [49,50]. GM3 also has immunomodulatory actions, such as the inhibition of natural killer cell activity [14] and the induction of CD4 internalization in human peripheral blood T lymphocytes [51]. The major difference in ganglioside expression among the five tissues analysed in our study was the almost complete absence of GM3 in the lungs of β2M–/– compared with the control β2M+/– mice. GM3 is abundant in adult lungs, and its appearance changes during pre-natal and post-natal development [52,53]. Its role in the lungs is unknown but is probably not related to the interaction with pulmonary surfactant apoproteins [53]. The lungs of adult β2M–/– mice lack obvious morphological pathology (our unpublished data), but this does not exclude a possible role for the β2M molecule in lung homeostasis.
The pattern of ganglioside expression in β2M knockout mice partly overlapped the pattern we observed in TNFR1(p55) knockout mice [54]; in both models, there was decreased expression of GM3 and GM1b-type gangliosides in the lungs. This is not surprising because TNFR1-dependent responses include stimulation of class I MHC antigen expression on the cell surface [55].
Mice lacking the β2M gene had greater expression of GM1a and GD1a in the liver than the control animals. The locus controlling liver GM1(NeuGc) expression has been mapped 1 cm centromeric to H-2K [56] and named Ggm-1 [57]. In humans, β-N-acetyl-galactosamine β-1,3-galactosyltransferase (β3Gal-T4), which is involved in GM1/GD1 ganglioside synthesis, has been mapped to 6p21.3, next to the HLA-B associated transcript-3 [58]. These data indicate a close relationship between the enzymes involved in glycosphingolipid synthesis and the MHC. Thus, a possible explanation for the increased GM1/GD1 expression in β2M–/– mice could be the increased activity of the GM1/GD1 ganglioside synthase gene as part of the compensatory change in MHC gene transcription. This is not likely, since the disruption of the β2M gene prevents the synthesis of β2M mRNA but does not interfere with the transcription or stability of MHC class I-heavy chain mRNA [4]. Increased β3Gal-T4 activity in β2-microglobulin knockout mice may instead be related to disruption in the cellular trafficking of this enzyme in cells lacking β2-microglobulin. β2-microglobulin associates with molecules other than the classical MHC gene. These non-classical class I genes, termed MHC class IB genes, have functions unrelated to the immune system [59–61]. They encode β2M-associated cell-surface molecules, most of which have yet to be assigned a function. β2M knockout mice have an iron overload, which has been ascribed to the altered expression of non-classical MHC class I gene products that control iron absorption [59–61]. It is tempting to postulate that β3Gal-T4 is such a β2M-associated molecule. The enzyme is normally located either in the Golgi apparatus or at the surface of the cell [62,63]. It is possible that β3Gal-T4 travels to the cell surface in a complex with β2-microglobulin. When this transfer is blocked, the enzyme stays in the Golgi and, especially in metabolically-active hepatocytes, produces high quantities of GM1a and GD1a gangliosides from the substrates which are more accessible in the Golgi than in the extracellular space. Such an association between β3Gal-T4 and β2-M is only hypothetical and awaits experimental proof. Combined biochemical, histological and cytological approaches [42] to ganglioside synthesis and expression in mouse tissues would be the best approach to elucidate the relationship between β2M and non-classical MHC gene products.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the research grant from the Croatian Ministry of Science and Technology (‘Inflammation in the nervous system: The role of cytokines and chemokines’, no. 1080110, A. Marusˇi´c), a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, SFB 549 ‘Macromolecular processing and Signalling in the Extracellular Matrix’, project B07, J. Müthing), and performed under the framework of bilateral scientific co-operation between Germany and Croatia (BMBF project KRO-002–99). We thank Ms Baranski and Dr M. Krohn (International Bureau of the BMBF) for administrative help. We are grateful to Prof. Dr Stipan Jonji´c (Rijeka University School of Medicine, Croatia) for his kind gift of b2M knockout mice and Prof. Dr Marko Mesaric (Zagreb University School of Medicine, Croatia) who supplied Split University School of Medicine, Croatia, with chemicals and equipment for the first experiments of GSL isolation.
APPENDIX
The designation of the glycosphingolipids follows the IUPAC-IUB recommendations [64] and the nomenclature of Svennerholm [65]. Lactosylceramide or LacCer, Galß1–4Glcß1–1Cer; gangliotriaosylceramide or GgOse3Cer, GalNAcß1–4Galß1– 4Glcß1–1Cer; gangliotetraosylceramide or GgOse4Cer, Galß1– 3GalNAcß1–4Galß1–4Glcß1–1Cer; lacto-N-neotetraosylceramide or nLcOse4Cer or nLc4, Galß1–4GlcNAcß1–3Galß1–4Glcß1– 1Cer; lacto-N-norhexaosylceramide or nLcOse6Cer or nLc6, Galß1–4GlcNAcß1–3Galß1–4GlcNAcß1–3Galß1–4Glcß1–1Cer; GM3, II3Neu5Ac-LacCer; GM2, II3Neu5Ac-GgOse3Cer; GM1 or GM1a, II3Neu5Ac-GgOse4Cer; GM1b, IV3Neu5Ac-GgOse4Cer; GalNAc-GM1b, IV3Neu5Ac-GgOse5Cer; GD3, II3(Neu5Ac)2-LacCer; GD1α, IV3Neu5Ac,III6Neu5Ac-GgOse4Cer; GD1a, IV3Neu5Ac,II3Neu5Ac-GgOse4Cer; GD1b, II3(Neu5Ac)2-GgOse4Cer; GT1b, IV3Neu5Ac,II3(Neu5Ac)2-GgOse4Cer. Only Neu5Ac-substituted gangliosides are presented in this list of abbreviations.
REFERENCES
- 1.Vitiello A, Potter TA, Sherman A. The role of β2-microglobulin in peptide binding by class I molecules. Science. 1990;250:1423–6. doi: 10.1126/science.2124002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Williams DB, Barber BH, Flavell RA, et al. Role of β2-microglobulin in the intracellular transport and surface expression of murine class I histocompatibility molecules. J Immunol. 1989;142:2796–806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huh GS, Boulanger LM, Du H, et al. Functional requirements for class I MHC in CNS development and plasticity. Science. 2000;290:2155–9. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5499.2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zijlstra M, Bix M, Simister NE, et al. β2-microglobulin deficient mice lack CD4–8+ cytolytic T cells. Nature. 1990;344:742–6. doi: 10.1038/344742a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Polic B, Jonjic S, Pavic I, et al. Lack of MHC class I complex expression has no effect on spread and control of cytomegalovirus infection in vivo. J Gen Virol. 1996;77:217–25. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-77-2-217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eichelberger M, Allan W, Zjilstra M, et al. Clearance of influenza virus respiratory infection in mice lacking class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med. 1991;174:875–80. doi: 10.1084/jem.174.4.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schauer R, Kelm S, Reuter G, et al. Biochemistry and role of sialic acids. In: Rosenberg A, editor. Biology of the sialic acids. New York: Plenum Press; pp. 7–67. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crocker PR, Feizi T. Carbohydrate recognition systems: functional triads in cell–cell interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996;6:679–91. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80036-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hakomori SI, Igarashi Y. Functional role of glycosphingolipids in cell recognition and signaling. J Biochem. 1995;118:1091–103. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Simons K, Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997;387:569–72. doi: 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hakomori SI, Handa K, Iwabuchi K, et al. New insights in glycosphingolipid function: ‘glycosignaling domain’, a cell surface assembly of glycosphingolipids with signal transducer molecules, involved in cell adhesion coupled with signaling. Glycobiology. 1998;8:xi–xi. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.glycob.a018822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ilangumaran S, He HT, Hoessli DC. Microdomains in lymphocyte signaling: beyond GPI-anchored proteins. Immunol Today. 2000;21:1–5. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(99)01494-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McKallip R, Li R, Ladisch S. Tumor gangliosides inhibit the tumor-specific immune response. J Immunol. 1999;163:3718–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bergelson LD. Serum gangliosides as endogenous immunomodulators. Immunol Today. 1995;16:483–6. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(95)80032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Heitger A, Ladisch S. Gangliosides block antigen presentation by human monocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1303:161–8. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(96)00091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Massa PT. Specific suppression of major histocompatibility complex class I and class II genes in astrocytes by brain-enriched gangliosides. J Exp Med. 1993;178:1357–63. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.4.1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Massa PT, Wu C. Modulation of major histocompatibility complex class I genes by interferon-gamma and ganglioside GT1b in astrocytes: involvement of protein tyrosine phosphatases. J Neurochem. 1996;67:1831–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67051831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Müthing J. Hounsell EF. Methods in molecular biology: glycoanalysis protocols. Totowa: Humana Press Inc; TLC in structure and recognition studies of glycosphingolipids; pp. 183–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ledeen RW, Yu RK. Gangliosides: structure, isolation and analysis. Meth Enzymol. 1982;83:139–91. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)83012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Müthing J, Egge H, Kniep B, Mühlradt PF. Structural characterization of gangliosides from murine T lymphocytes. Eur J Biochem. 1987;163:407–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb10813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ueno K, Ando S, Yu RK. Gangliosides of human, cat, and rabbit spinal cords and cord myelin. J Lipid Res. 1978;19:863–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Svennerholm L. Quantitative estimation of sialic acids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957;24:604–11. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(57)90254-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Müthing J, Unland F, Heitmann D, et al. Different binding capacities of influenza A and Sendai viruses to gangliosides from human granulocytes. Glycoconj J. 1993;10:120–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00731196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Müthing J, Steuer H, Peter-Katalinic J, et al. Expression of gangliosides GM3 (NeuAc) and GM3 (NeuGc) in myelomas and hybridomas of mouse, rat, and human origin. J Biochem. 1994;116:64–73. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Müthing J, Peter-Katalinic J, Hanisch FG, et al. Structural studies of gangliosides from the YAC-1 mouse lymphoma cell line by immunological detection and fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry. Glycoconjugate J. 1991;8:414–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00731293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Müthing J, Peter-Katalinic J, Hanisch FG, et al. The ganglioside GD1α is a major disialoganglioside in the highly metastatic murine lymphoreticular tumour cell line MDAY-D2. Glycoconjugate J. 1994;11:153–62. doi: 10.1007/BF00731155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Müthing J, Maurer U, Sˇosˇtaric K, et al. Different distribution of glycosphingolipids in mouse and rabbit skeletal muscle demonstrated by biochemical and immunohistological analyses. J Biochem. 1994;115:248–56. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Müthing J, Mühlradt PF. Detection of gangliosides of the GM1b type on high-performance thin-layer chromatography plates by immunostaining after neuraminidase treatment. Anal Biochem. 1988;173:10–7. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90151-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pörtner A, Peter-Katalinic J, Brade H, et al. Structural characterization of gangliosides from resting and endotoxin-stimulated murine B lymphocytes. Biochemistry. 1993;32:12685–93. doi: 10.1021/bi00210a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Müthing J, Neumann U. Selective detection of terminally α2–3 and α2–6 sialylated neolacto-series gangliosides by immunostaining on thin layer chromatograms. Biomed Chromatogr. 1993;7:158–61. doi: 10.1002/bmc.1130070312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Müthing J, Kemminer SE. Nondestructive detection of neutral glycosphingolipids with lipophilic fluorochromes and their employment for preparative high performance thin-layer chromatography. Anal Biochem. 1996;238:195–202. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Magnani JL, Nilsson B, Brockhaus M, et al. A monoclonal antibody-defined antigen associated with gastrointestinal cancer is a ganglioside containing sialylated lacto-N-fucopentaose II. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:14365–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Müthing J. High-resolution thin-layer chromatography of gangliosides. J Chromatogr A. 1996;720:3–25. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00499-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Magnani JL, Smith DF, Ginsburg V. Detection of gangliosides that bind cholera toxin: direct binding of 125I-labeled toxin to thin-layer chromatograms. Anal Biochem. 1980;109:399–402. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90667-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wu G, Ledeen R. Quantification of gangliotetraose gangliosides with cholera toxin. Anal Biochem. 1988;171:368–75. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ando S, Chang NC, Yu RK. High-performance thin-layer chromatography and densitometric determination of brain ganglioside compositions of several species. Anal Biochem. 1978;89:437–50. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90373-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mullin BR, Poore CMB, Rupp BH. Quantitation of gangliosides by scanning densitometry of thin-layer chromatography plates. J Chromatogr. 1983;278:160–6. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)84768-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Trbojevic-Cepe M, Kracun I. Determination of gangliosides in human cerebrospinal fluid by high-performance thin-layer chromatography and direct densitometry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1990;28:863–72. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1990.28.11.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yohe HC, Cuny CL, Macala LJ, et al. The presence of sialidase-sensitive sialosylgangliotetraosyl ceramide (GM1b) in stimulated murine macrophages. J Immunol. 1991;146:1900–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Horikawa K, Yamasaki M, Iwamori M, et al. Concanavalin A-stimulated expression of gangliosides with GalNAcß1–4 (NeuAcα2–3) Galß structure in murine thymocytes. Glycoconjugate J. 1991;8:354–60. doi: 10.1007/BF00731348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hashimoto Y, Suzuki A, Yamakawa T, et al. Expression of GM1 and GD1a in liver of wild mice. J Biochem. 1984;95:7–12. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a134604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kovacic N, Müthing J, Marusˇic A. Immunohistological and flow cytometric analysis of glycosphingolipid expression in mouse lymphoid tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 2000;48:1677–89. doi: 10.1177/002215540004801211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Müthing J, Schwinzer B, Peter-Katalinic J, et al. Gangliosides of murine T lymphocyte subpopulations. Biochemistry. 1989;28:2923–9. doi: 10.1021/bi00433a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kosco-Vilbois MH, Bonnefoy J-Y, Chvatchko Y. The physiology of murine germinal center reactions. Immunol Rev. 1997;156:127–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1997.tb00964.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Macala LJ, Yohe HC. In situ accessibility of murine macrophage gangliosides. Glycobiology. 1995;5:67–75. doi: 10.1093/glycob/5.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Corriveau RA, Huh GS, Shatz CJ. Regulation of class I MHC gene expression in the developing and mature CNS by neural activity. Neuron. 1998;21:505–20. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80562-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ogawa-Goto K, Abe T. Gangliosides and glycosphingolipids of peripheral nervous system myelins—a minireview. Neurochem Res. 1998;23:305–10. doi: 10.1023/a:1022497114813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ikeda A, Komatsuzuki A, Kasama T, et al. Detection of antibody to sialyl-i, a possible antigen in patients with Meniere’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1501:81–90. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(00)00012-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bremer EG. Glycosphingolipids as effectors of growth and differentiation. In: Hoekstra D, editor. Current topics in membranes. San Diego: Academic Press; pp. 387–411. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rebbaa A, Hurh J, Yamamoto H, et al. Ganglioside GM3 inhibition of EGF receptor mediated signal transduction. Glycobiology. 1996;6:399–406. doi: 10.1093/glycob/6.4.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sorice M, Pavan A, Misasi R, et al. Monosialoganglioside GM3 induces CD4 internalization in human peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Scand J Immunol. 1995;41:148–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1995.tb03547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Seyfried TN. Ganglioside abnormalities associated with failed neural differentiation in a T-locus mutant mouse embryo. Dev Biol. 1987;123:286–91. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90451-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Momoeda K, Hirota K, Utsuki T, et al. Developmental changes of neutral glycosphingolipids as receptors for pulmonary surfactant protein SP-A in the alveolar epithelium of murine lungs. J Biol Chem. 1996;119:1189–95. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Markotic A, Lümen R, Marusˇic A, et al. Ganglioside expression in tissues of mice lacking the tumor necrosis factor receptor 1. Carbohydr Res. 1999;321:75–87. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6215(99)00171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Collins T, Lapierre LA, Fiers W, et al. Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor increases mRNA levels and surface expression of HLA-A,B antigens in vascular endothelial cells and dermal fibroblasts in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:446–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.2.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sakaizumi M, Hashimoto Y, Suzuki A, et al. The locus controlling liver GM1 (NeuGc) expression is mapped 1 cM centromeric to H-2K. Immunogenetics. 1988;27:57–60. doi: 10.1007/BF00404445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hashimoto Y, Sakaizumi M, Nakamura Y, et al. Further studies on polymorphic expression of GM1 and GD1a in mouse liver. The presence of a third allele on the Ggm-1 locus. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1989;106:319–22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a122851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Amado M, Almeida R, Carneiro F, et al. A family of human beta3-galactosyltransferases. Characterisation of four members of a UDP-galactose: beta-N-acetyl-glucosamine/beta-N-acetyl-galactosamine beta-1,3-galactosyl-transferase family. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:12770–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.21.12770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rothenberg BE, Voland JR. Beta2 knockout mice develop parenchymal iron overload: a putative role for class I genes of the major histocompatibility complex in iron metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:1529–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Janeway CA, Travers P, Walport M, Capra JD. 4. London: Elsevier Science; 1999. Immunobiology. New York Garland Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Santos M, Schilham MW, Rademakers LH, et al. Defective iron homeostasis in beta 2-microglobulin knockout mice recapitulates hereditary hemochromatosis in man. J Exp Med. 1996;184:1975–85. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.5.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lopez LC, Youakim A, Evans SC, et al. Evidence for a molecular distinction between Golgi and cell surface forms of beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:15984–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Teasdale RD, Matheson F, Gleeson PA. Post-translational modifications distinguish cell surface from Golgi-retained beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase molecules. Golgi localization involves active retention. Glycobiology. 1994;4:917–28. doi: 10.1093/glycob/4.6.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN) Nomenclature of glycolipids. Recommendations 1997. Eur J Biochem. 257:293–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2570293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Svennerholm L. Chromatographic separation of human brain gangliosides. J Neurochem. 1963;10:613–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1963.tb08933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
