Skip to main content
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : JMD logoLink to The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : JMD
. 2002 Feb;4(1):37–43. doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60678-2

Lymphoid Tissues from Patients with Infectious Mononucleosis Lack Monoclonal B and T Cells

Julie A Plumbley *†, Hongxin Fan *, Phyllis A Eagan *, Aamir Ehsan *‡, Bertram Schnitzer §, Margaret L Gulley *‡
PMCID: PMC1906975  PMID: 11826186

Abstract

In typical cases of infectious mononucleosis (IM), lymphoid tissue is rarely submitted for pathological examination. When lymphoid tissues from IM cases are examined, the histological appearance of IM may be difficult to distinguish from malignant lymphoma. The purpose of this study was to address the utility of clinical molecular assays for T and B cell clonality in distinguishing IM from lymphoid malignancy. DNA was recovered from paraffin-embedded archival lymphoid tissues of 18 cases of IM and 13 control cases representing other reactive lymphoid hyperplasias. T cell receptor γ (TCR-γ) and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene rearrangements were assayed using our standard clinical polymerase chain reaction procedures targeting each of the four functional variable (V) families and the three joining (J) families of the TCR-γ gene, and framework III of the IgH gene, respectively. In 17 of 18 cases of IM, no monoclonal T or B cell populations were detectable. One case, the only spleen specimen in the study, had an oligoclonal pattern of TCR-γ rearrangements. The control cases representing other reactive hyperplasias also lacked monoclonality. The assays used were sensitive to clonal populations as small as 5% of cells. In this case series, no monoclonal lymphoid populations were identified in any case of IM. This finding suggests that molecular studies are useful in distinguishing IM from lymphoid neoplasms.


Lymphoid tissues are rarely biopsied in infectious mononucleosis (IM) patients unless the clinical course is atypical, possibly bringing lymphoma into the differential diagnosis. In our experience, features that may provoke biopsy include: the patient’s being unusually old or young for symptomatic primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, an unusually prolonged or severe clinical course, a negative heterophile antibody test, or insufficient numbers of circulating reactive lymphocytes to suggest a diagnosis of IM. Recognition by the pathologist of histology consistent with IM combined with a positive heterophile antibody test or EBV-specific serologies resolves the question in many cases. The presence of EBV-encoded RNA-1 (EBER1) transcripts in the tissue can confirm a diagnosis of IM, but may not necessarily exclude a malignant lymphoproliferative disorder.The causative agent of IM, EBV, is associated with about 40% of all T cell lymphomas, 5% of B cell lymphomas, most immunodeficiency-related B cell lymphoproliferations, and about 40% of Hodgkin’s lymphomas. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Lymphoid tissues from patients with IM often have histological features worrisome for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or Hodgkin’s disease. 8 It might be useful to employ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for T and B cell clonality as an adjunct to arriving at a correct diagnosis, but the expected results of clonality studies in tissues from IM patients have not been well defined. We were interested in whether or not tissues from patients with IM contain B or T cell clones as detected by routine clinical IgH and TCR-γ PCR assays for gene rearrangement. Using our routine clinical laboratory PCR assays for TCR-γ and IgH gene rearrangements, we retrospectively assayed for T and B cell clonality in paraffin-embedded tissues from a series of patients with well-documented IM.

Materials and Methods

Case Selection and Controls

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lymphoid tissues from 20 patients with IM were collected from the tissue archives of the hematopathology consultation services of two institutions, the University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio and the University of Michigan. The cases are listed in Table 1 . The patients included 18 males and two females ranging in age from 15 months to 80 years. Eleven of the patients were between 15 and 26 years old. The tissues included nine tonsils, nine lymph nodes, one nasopharyngeal mass, and one spleen. The diagnosis of IM had been established in these cases before inclusion in the study and was based on clinical history and serology, including report of the presence of IgM heterophile antibodies or specific EBV serologies indicative of primary EBV infection, and histopathological features of IM including EBV-encoded RNA in situ hybridization (EBER-ISH) showing EBV in significant numbers of lymphoid cells. In one case (case 12) EBER-ISH could not be evaluated because of inadequate RNA preservation, but EBV latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) immunohistochemistry revealed positive cytoplasmic and membrane staining in a substantial fraction of lymphoid cells, verifying the EBV-related nature of the lymphoproliferation.

Table 1.

Clinical Impression, Serology, and Histopathological Diagnosis in 20 Cases of IM

Case no. Age/gender Clinical impression Serological evidence of IM Tissue type and histological diagnosis
1 25 y/male IM, airway obstruction Heterophile Ab positive Tonsil: atypical reactive lymphoid hyperplasia consistent with IM
2 15 m/male IM, lymphadenopathy Heterophile Ab and specific EBV serologies positive Cervical lymph node: reactive pleomorphic immunoblastic proliferation with a predominance of T cells consistent with EBV infection
3 80 y/male Pharyngitis, no suspicion of IM Heterophile Ab positive Tonsil: reactive lymphoid hyperplasia consistent with EBV infection
4 17 y/female IM Heterophile Ab positive Tonsil: reactive immunoblastic proliferation consistent with IM
5 26 y/male Lymphadenopathy Heterophile Ab positive Cervical lymph node: atypical immunoblastic and plasmacytic hyperplasia consistent with acute EBV infection
6 32 y/male Airway obstruction Specific EBV serologies positive Tonsil: acute EBV tonsillitis
7 16 y/female Airway obstruction Specific EBV serologies positive Tonsil and minor salivary gland: reactive immunoblastic proliferation consistent with IM
8 38 y/male Nasopharyngeal mass Heterophile Ab positive and specific EBV serologies positive Nasopharyngeal mass: atypical immunoblastic proliferation suggestive of IM
9 17 y/male Cervical and inguinal lymphadenopathy Heterophile Ab positive Cervical lymph node: intense paracortical hyperplasia consistent with IM
10 21 m/male Airway obstruction Specific EBV serologies positive Tonsils and adenoids: paracortical expansion with immunoblastic proliferation consistent with IM
11 50 y/male IM, splenic rupture Specific EBV serologies positive Cervical lymph node: necrotizing lymphadenitis, probably infectious, with cells exhibiting large lobulated nuclei
12 5 y/male IM, enlarged tonsils & adenoids, sleep apnea Specific EBV serologies positive Tonsil: atypical lymphoid proliferation consistent with IM
13 23 y/male Lymphadenopathy Heterophile Ab and specific EBV serologies positive Inguinal lymph node: reactive lymphadentitis consistent with IM
14 41 y/male Lymphadenopathy Heterophile Ab and specific EBV serologies positive Lymph node: lymphoid tissue with reactive paracortical hyperplasia consistent with IM
15 19 y/male IM, splenic rupture Specific EBV serologies positive Spleen: benign reactive lymphoproliferation with increased lymphoplasmacellular elements within the red pulp
16 19 y/male 6 months symmetrically enlarged tonsils “atypical for IM” Specific EBV serologies positive Tonsil: reactive follicular hyperplasia with foci of necrosis. Adjacent are lymphoid cells with pleomorphic multilobated nuclei and immunoblasts. Favor IM.
17 17 y/male IM Heterophile Ab positive Posterior cervical lymph node: atypical immunoblastic proliferation. Suggest monospot.
18 3 y/male IM vs lymphoma Specific EBV serologies positive Lymph node from right neck: follicular hyperplasia with paracortical immunoblastic proliferation consistent with IM
19 15 y/male Lymphadenopathy Heterophile Ab positive Lymph node: highly atypical immunoblastic proliferation
20 20 y/male Tonsillar enlargement Heterophile Ab and specific EBV serologies positive Tonsils: reactive lymphoid hyperplasia with marked interfollicular hyperplasia supportive of viral etiology

Eight of these cases were reported in a previous study. 9 One patient (case 17) had a history of Hodgkin’s lymphoma diagnosed three years earlier. The original tumor tissue was not available for EBER testing nor was EBER testing performed at the time of the original diagnosis of Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

A non-IM, reactive control cohort consisted of thirteen paraffin-embedded lymphoid tissue specimens (eight tonsils, four lymph nodes, and one nasopharyngeal mass), all with follicular hyperplasia as the dominant histological feature. These specimens lacked EBER positivity by ISH. Parallel ISH assays showed that U6 control transcripts were preserved and available for hybridization in all thirteen cases, demonstrating that RNA was preserved in the tissues and available for hybridization. The patients ranged in age from 14 to 61 years and included six females and seven males.

Two monoclonal control cohorts consisted of five paraffin-embedded tissues (one lymph node, one gall bladder, two skin, and one bone marrow) that were morphologically consistent with T cell lymphoma and had been proven to contain clonal T cell lymphoproliferations by Southern blot for TCR-β chain gene rearrangement and ten paraffin-embedded tissues that had been previously diagnosed as B cell lymphomas by morphology combined with immunohistochemistry and/or flow cytometry. The TCR-γ PCR assay detected monoclonal populations in four of the five T cell malignancies. The IgH PCR assay detected monoclonal IgH gene rearrangements in seven of the ten B cell lymphomas.

EBER-ISH and LMP-1 Immunostain

In situ hybridization was performed using digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes targeting EBER1 and U6 control RNA, as previously described. 10 Antisense EBER1 probe is complementary to EBER1 transcripts present in latently infected cells. Detection of U6 in the target tissues signifies that RNA is preserved and available for hybridization.

For LMP-1 detection, paraffin sections were treated with 1 mg/ml pronase E (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) at 37°C for 5 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched using 0.1% sodium azide, 3% hydrogen peroxide in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 15 minutes. A cocktail of antibodies against LMP-1 (CS1–4; Dako, Glostrup Denmark) was diluted 1:50 in autobuffer and applied for 1 hour, followed by biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody, and DAB color reaction. Specific staining for LMP-1 is cytoplasmic and membranous.

Extraction of DNA from Paraffin-Embedded Tissues

Five sections 5 to 10 μm thick were cut from each paraffin-embedded tissue block using precautions to prevent DNA carryover between samples. The sections were placed in a microfuge tube and deparaffinized by rinsing three times with xylene followed by ethanol. Dried samples were then resuspended in TEN buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 8.0; and 20 mmol/L NaCl) containing proteinase K (200 μg/ml) and incubated overnight at 55°C. Proteinase K was then inactivated at 95°C for 10 minutes, and the tissue was pelleted by full speed microcentrifugation. The supernatant containing extracted DNA was transferred to a clean tube. One microliter and 0.1 μl quantities of supernatant were used as template in PCR assays.

Amplification of the Rearranged IgH Gene

Our routine clinical IgH rearrangement assay was used. It employs previously published primers targeting the framework 3 VH region and JH consensus sequences (Table 2) . 11 Each sample was run twice at different template dilutions (1 μl and 1 μl of a 1:10 dilution in saline). Template DNA was added to a 50-μl reaction mixture consisting of: 0.6 units AmpliTaq gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), 1X PCR buffer (Gibco Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L dNTPs (Applied Biosystems), and 1.0 μmol/L of FRIII and JHa primers. The PCR reaction was run in a Perkin Elmer GeneAmp PCR system 9700 thermal cycler programmed as follows: 10 minutes at 95°C followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 45 seconds, 55°C for 60 seconds, 72°C for 60 seconds; and ending with 72°C for 7 minutes. The following controls were included in each run: positive control (Raji Burkitt lymphoma cell line diluted 1:20 with tonsil DNA), negative control (DNA from a tonsillitis case), and a “blank” containing all of the reagents and no template DNA. The PCR products were electrophoresed in a 3.5% 2.5:1 NuSieve GTG agarose (BMA, Rockland, ME):Ultrapure DNA grade agarose (BioRad, Hercules, CA) gel in 0.5X TBE buffer containing 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide at 80 V for 2.5 hours and photographed using ultraviolet illumination.

Table 2.

Primer Sequences

Gene amplified Region Primer sequence Reference no.
Immunoglobulin FRIIIa ACACGGCC(T/C)GT(A/G)TATTACTGT 11
Heavy chain JHa ACCTGAGGAGACGGTGACC
T cell receptor γ V1-8 consensus TCTGG(A/G)GTCTATTACTGTGCCACCT 12
V9 GAGGTGGATAGGATACCTGAAACGT
V10 CAAGTCCGTAGAGAAAGAAGACATG
V11 GAGAAAGAAGATGAGGTGGTGTACC
JP TAATGATAAGCTTTGTTCCGGGACC
J1,J2 consensus TACCTGTGACAAC(A/C)AGTGTTGTTCC
JP1,JP2 consensus GAAGTTACTATGAGC(C/T)TAGTCCCTT
β-Globin control PCO3 ACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGC 13
βGII GTCTCCTTAAACCTGTCTTG

Amplification of the Rearranged TCR-γ Gene

Our routine clinical TCR γ rearrangement assay was also applied to these samples. It is a multiplex PCR which employs previously published primers targeting the V1–8, V9, V10, V11, JP, JP1,2, and J1,2 regions of the gene (see Table 2 ). 12 Each sample was run twice at different template dilutions (1 μl and 1 μl of a 1:10 dilution in saline). Template DNA was added to a 50-μl reaction mixture consisting of: 1.25 units of AmpliTaq gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems), 1X PCR buffer (Gibco), 2.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L dNTPs (Applied Biosystems), and 1.0 μmol/L each of the seven primers (V1–8 consensus, V9, V10, V11, JP, J1/2, and JP1/2). The PCR reaction was run in a Perkin Elmer Gene Amp system 9700 thermal cycler programmed as follows: 10 minutes at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 60 seconds; 55°C for 60 seconds; 72°C for 60 seconds; and ending with 72°C for 5 minutes and then held at 4°C. The following controls were run with each batch of specimens: positive control (Jurkat cell line DNA diluted 1:20 with tonsil DNA), negative control (DNA from a tonsillitis case), and a “blank” containing all reagents and no template DNA. The PCR products were electrophoresed in 10% polyacrylamide gels (BioRad) in 1X TBE buffer at 95V for approximately 75 minutes. The gel was then soaked for 10 to 20 minutes in 200 ml of 1X TBE buffer containing 20 μl of 10 mg/ml ethidium bromide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and photographed using ultraviolet illumination.

Interpretation Criteria

In the IgH assay, samples containing one or two crisp bands in the 75 to 130 base pair (bp) region, with or without a smear of polyclonal bands in the background, were interpreted as positive for clonal IgH rearrangement. In the TCR-γ assay, samples containing one or two crisp bands in the 90 to 150 bp region, with or without a smear of polyclonal bands in the background, were interpreted as positive for clonal TCR-γ gene rearrangement. More than two crisp bands within the region of interest were interpreted as oligoclonal. In both assays, bands should be in identical positions in the undiluted and 1:10 dilution lanes to be interpreted as monoclonal (or oligoclonal) and to exclude false positive results that can be caused by degraded DNA.

In the two cases having neither a polyclonal smear nor a clonal band on the IgH or TCR-γ assays, β-globin PCR was used to test for the presence of amplifiable DNA. The procedure is the same as for IgH PCR with the substitution of 0.5 μl of 50 pmol/μl primers for the PCO3 and BGII regions (Table 2) . 13 The β-globin product is 175 bp long.

Results

Twenty well-documented IM cases were studied. Characteristic histological features of IM were present on the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides of biopsy material from the IM patients, in levels superficial and deep to the sections cut for DNA extraction. These features include: paracortical expansion containing small and medium sized lymphocytes, plasma cells and variable numbers of atypical immunoblasts some of which mimic Reed-Sternberg cells, minimal or absent follicular hyperplasia, and variable necrosis. The spleen from an IM patient who died of spontaneous splenic rupture exhibited increased lymphoplasmacellular elements in the red pulp and a reactive-appearing expansion of the white pulp, but it lacked the immunoblastic population seen in the other IM tissues. Figure 1displays some of the histological features seen in our case series.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Microscopic features seen in this case series include a proliferation of monomorphous large lymphocytes mimicking non-Hodgkin lymphoma (case 19) (A) and, more typically seen in IM, a paracortical expansion containing variable numbers of atypical immunoblasts as well as small lymphocytes and plasma cells (case 20) (B), features which mimic Hodgkin or T cell lymphoma. C: EBER-ISH pattern typically seen in IM. Both large Reed-Sternberg-like cells and many small lymphocytes display evidence of EBV RNA (violet color reaction). A and B: H&E stain, original magnification, ×200, C: DAB with methyl green counterstain, original magnification, ×600.

In situ hybridization revealed EBER1 localized to a proportion of small lymphocytes, many immunoblasts, and the vast majority of Reed-Sternberg-like giant cells, as seen in Figure 1C . The proportion of EBER-positive cells varied widely among cases and by histological region within a given case. The percentage of tissue lymphocytes exhibiting evidence of EBV infection by EBER or LMP-1 positivity met or exceeded 1% in all cases.

Eighteen of 20 IM cases and all control cases had amplifiable DNA. The two IM cases lacking amplifiable DNA in both the TCR-γ and IgH assays were confirmed to lack amplifiable DNA by β-globin PCR and were thereafter excluded from analysis. The TCR-γ assay revealed no monoclonal T cell populations to a sensitivity of 5% of cells in 17 of 18 IM cases, and the IgH PCR assay revealed no monoclonal B cell populations to a sensitivity of 5% in any of the 18 IM cases. The only spleen specimen studied (case 15) contained an oligoclonal T cell population as demonstrated by the identical patterns of multiple bands in duplicate samples. (Figure 2)

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Lymphoid tissues from patients with IM displayed polyclonal results as shown above: IgH (lanes 1 to 4) and TCR-γ (lanes 5 to 8). Lanes a contain PCR products produced from undiluted template DNA. Lanes b contain PCR products produced from template DNA diluted 1:10. Lane 8, DNA extracted from the spleen (case 15), displays an oligoclonal pattern that is identical in both the undiluted and diluted specimens, eliminating concern for false positivity that may occur with degraded DNA. Neg , negative control, tonsil DNA; Pos, positive control, DNA from Jurkat (TCR-γ) or Raji (IgH) cell lines, undiluted in this photograph; Blk, blank, contains all reagents but no DNA; mw, molecular weight marker; bp, base pair.

Discussion

In this case series, lymphoid tissues from 18 IM patients lacked monoclonal B and T cells. We limited our study to cases in which the morphological appearance of the lymphoid tissue combined with clinical, serological, and EBER-ISH results firmly established the diagnosis of IM and eliminated lymphoma from the differential diagnosis. We did not attempt to address other EBV-related lymphoproliferations such as chronic active EBV infection, fatal IM, or virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome in the setting of EBV infection. Monoclonal T cells have been reported in some of these situations, and it has been suggested that these represent T cell lymphoma arising in the setting of IM. 14, 15

We were interested in documenting the presence or absence of B or T cell clones as detected by routine clinical PCR assays. Approximately 90% of T cell lymphomas have monoclonal gene rearrangement which can be detected by TCR-γ PCR. 16 Because of the small number of V regions within the TCR-γ gene, more rearrangements can be detected than can rearrangements of the TCR-β gene using a similarly complex PCR assay. Because of this, TCR-γ PCR is the more widely used test. In our laboratory we use a TCR-γ PCR assay as our routine assay for T cell clonality, and the same assay was used in this study. Similarly, we used our routine IgH PCR assay for this study. It targets the framework 3 region of the IgH gene and is expected to detect about 70% of B cell lymphomas. When applied to our clonal control cohorts the TCR-γ PCR assay detected clonal gene rearrangement in 80% (N = 5) of T cell malignancies previously shown to contain T cell clones by Southern blot analysis of the TCR-β gene. The IgH PCR assay detected clonal gene rearrangement in 70% (N = 10) of our control cohort of lymphomas in which B cell immunophenotype had been established by flow cytometry. Both of these assays are sensitive to clonal lymphocyte populations constituting as little as 5% of the lymphocytes in the specimen. We cannot exclude the possibility that assays with greater analytic sensitivity than ours might detect monoclonal populations comprising less than 5% of cells in the tissues we analyzed. However, we did not seek to definitively establish the presence or absence of monoclonal populations in lymphoid tissues from patients with IM, but rather to establish what the typical result would be in paraffin-embedded lymphoid tissues from patients with IM when routine clinical assays are used.

Previous reports on small numbers of lymphoid tissue specimens from IM patients have had varying results, as seen in Table 3 . 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 These seven studies were done on biopsied tissues from a small number of EBV-infected patients. Some patients had chronic EBV infection or IM complicated by hemophagocytic syndrome. Variable results with regard to clonality were described, with some monoclonal TCR gene rearrangements identified. Clonality assays performed on circulating lymphocytes in IM patients have also yielded varying results, including polyclonal, oligoclonal, and monoclonal T cell populations (Table 4) . 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 These studies used several methodologic approaches, including flow cytometry using antibodies against a selection of TCR-β chains, Southern blot and PCR directed at TCR-β and/or -γ chains, and sequencing of PCR products. Some of these studies were designed to elucidate the immunological response to acute EBV infection and the results may not necessarily be pertinent to diagnostic hematopathology. 24, 25, 27, 28 The methods used in some of these studies were laborious and not suitable for routine clinical laboratory use. Only two of the referenced studies described PCR assays designed for routine clinical laboratory use. The study by Krafft et al 12 found T cell clones in 2 of 3 lymphoid tissue specimens from IM patients. The study by Short et al 26 found monoclonal T cells in 4 of 14 peripheral blood specimens from IM patients.

Table 3.

Published Studies of T and B Cell Clonality in Lymphoid Tissues from Patients with IM and Variants

Reference no. No. cases Diagnosis Tissue(s) studied Molecular method(s) Result(s) of lymphoid clonality assay(s)
17 1 IM with virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome Lymph node SB: TCR-β,TCR-γ; IgH Cμ Polyclonal
18 1 Fatal EBV infection Lymph node and spleen SB: TCR Cβ; IgH JH Polyclonal
14 1 Chronic IM, abnormal T cell proliferation and hemophagocytic syndrome Lymph node and lung SB: TCR Cβ & Jγ Monoclonal during primary infection by TCRβ and TCRγ assays
19 1 Atypical IM (lacked blood lymphocytosis) Tonsil SB: TCR Cβ & Jβ2 Monoclonal
20 1 Chronic active EBV infection Bone marrow SB: TCR Cβ1, Jβ1, Jβ2, Cγ; IgH, κ, λ Monoclonal in TCR Cβ, Jβ2 and Cγ
21 7 IM 3 nodes, 4 tonsils, 1 nasopharynx PCR: IgH Framework 3 Polyclonal IgH in 7/7 cases
12 3 IM Sites not specified PCR: TCR β, TCR-γ 1 case polyclonal, 1 case monoclonal for TCR γ only, 1 case monoclonal in TCR-β and TCR-γ

SB, Southern blot.

Table 4.

Published Studies of T and B Cell Clonality in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes from Patients with IM

Reference no. No. cases Diagnosis Blood cells studied Method(s) Result(s)
22 8 IM Lymphocytes SB: TCR Jβ 1+2, Jγ; Ig JH, Cκ, λ probes TCR-β: oligoclonal TCR-γ: polyclonal Ig: polyclonal
23 4 IM/chronic EBV infection Mononuclear cells SB: TCR Cβ; Ig JH, Jκ probes 2 cases polyclonal, 2 cases monoclonal, Probes not specified
24 8 IM CD8+ T cells Quantitative rT–PCR using 22 TCR Vβ primers. Also SB in 4 cases, probes not specified rT–PCR: all 8 cases overexpressed TCR Vβ6.1-3 & Vβ7 TCR. SB: 4 polyclonal
25 32 IM CD8+ T cells Flow cytometry using 18 Vβ-specific monoclonal antibodies. PCR and sequencing of TCR-β CDR3 region Flow cytometry: 29/32 cases with particular Vβ expansions. Sequencing: some cases monoclonal or oligoclonal
26 14 IM Lymphocytes PCR for TCR-γ chain 4 monoclonal 10 polyclonal
27 1 IM Epitope-specific CD8+ T cells rT-PCR and sequencing of TCR-β gene, semi-quantitative PCR Polyclonal
28 6 IM CD4+, CD8+ lymphocytes Flow cytometry; PCR of TCR-β V1-24 with heteroduplex analysis Oligoclonal CD8+ T cells

SB, Southern blot.

It has been suggested that the development of monoclonal or oligoclonal expansions of CD8 positive lymphocytes in the peripheral blood may be part of the normal response to acute EBV infection. 25 The blood of patients with IM has yielded evidence of oligoclonal and monoclonal populations of T lymphocytes in some studies. 22, 23, 25, 26, 28 We did not test blood in our patients, only biopsy tissues. But, if monoclonal expansions of T lymphocytes do circulate during IM, it seems reasonable to assume that tissues heavily infiltrated by lymphocytes might yield an oligoclonal or monoclonal result. This may explain the oligoclonal T cells found in our spleen specimen (case 15). Our study suggests that these circulating T cell clones do not home to lymph nodes in significant numbers during IM or do not survive in significant numbers in lymph nodes.

In summary, our study showed that all 18 IM tissues examined harbored neither monoclonal B nor T cell populations when assayed by routine PCR testing for IgH and TCR-γ genes. The information gained from this study may be helpful in interpreting difficult cases in which the differential diagnosis includes both IM and lymphoma. While clonality does not necessarily signify malignancy, our results indicate that the identification of a monoclonal B or T cell population by PCR assays on paraffin-embedded tissues is unusual in patients with IM and may herald a more serious process.

Address reprint requests to Margaret L. Gulley, M.D., Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Drive, Brink-hous-Bullitt Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525. E-mail: margaret_gulley@med.unc.edu.

Footnotes

The opinions and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and are not intended to represent the official position of the Department of Defense, U.S. Air Force, or any other government agency.

References

  • 1.d’Amore F, Johansen P, Houmand A, Weisenburger DD, Mortensen LS: Epstein-Barr virus genome in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas occurring in immunocompetent patients: highest prevalence in non-lymphoblastic T-cell lymphoma and correlation with a poor prognosis. Blood 1996, 87:1045-1055 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hummel M, Anagnostopoulos I, Korbjuhn P, Stein H: Epstein-Barr virus in B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: unexpected infection patterns and different infection incidence in low- and high-grade types. J Pathol 1995, 175:263-271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shibata D, Weiss LM, Hernandez AM, Nathwani BN, Bernstein L, Levine AM: Epstein-Barr virus-associated non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Blood 1993, 81:2102-2109 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chadburn A, Cesarman E, Knowles DM: Molecular pathology of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders. Semin Diagn Pathol 1997, 14:15-26 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Knowles DM: Molecular pathology of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Semin Diagn Pathol 1997, 14:67-82 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Korbjuhn P, Anagnostopoulos I, Hummel M, Tiemann M, Dallenbach F, Parwaresch MR, Stein H: Frequent latent Epstein-Barr virus infection of neoplastic T cells and bystander B cells in human immunodeficiency virus-negative European peripheral pleomorphic T-cell lymphomas. Blood 1993, 82:217-223 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gulley ML, Eagan PA, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Picado AL, Smir BN, Childs C, Dunn CD, Craig FE, Williams JW, Banks PM: Epstein-Barr virus DNA is abundant and monoclonal in the Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin’s disease: association with mixed cellularity subtype and Hispanic-American ethnicity. Blood 1994, 83:1595-1602 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Childs CC, Parham DM, Berard CW: Infectious mononucleosis: the spectrum of morphologic changes simulating lymphoma in lymph nodes and tonsils. Am J Surg Pathol 1987, 11:122-132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reynolds DJ, Banks PM, Gulley ML: New characterization of infectious mononucleosis and a phenotypic comparison with Hodgkin’s disease. Am J Pathol 1995, 146:379-388 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fan H, Gulley ML: In situ hybridization to EBER transcripts. Molecular Pathology Protocols. Edited by A Killeen. Totowa, NJ, Humana Press, 2001, pp 301–311
  • 11.Segal GH, Jorgensen T, Masih AS, Braylan RC: Optimal primer selection for clonality assessment by polymerase chain reaction analysis: low grade B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders of nonfollicular center cell type. Hum Pathol 1994, 25:1269-1275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krafft AE, Taubenberger JK, Sheng ZM, Bijwaard KE, Abbondanzo SL, Aguilera NSI, Lichy JH: Enhanced sensitivity with a novel TCR gamma PCR assay for clonality studies in 569 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cases. Mol Diagn 1999, 4:119-133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu J, Johnson RM, Traweek ST: Rearrangement of the BCL-2 gene in follicular lymphoma: detection by PCR in both fresh and fixed tissue samples. Diagn Mol Pathol 1993, 2:241-247 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gaillard F, Mechinaud-Lacroix F, Papin S, Moreau A, Mollat C, Fiche M, Peltier S, DeFaucal PJ, Rousselet MC, Praloran V, Harousseau J-L: Primary Epstein-Barr virus infection with clonal T cell lymphoproliferation. Am J Clin Pathol 1992, 98:324-333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Craig FE, Clare NC, Sklar JL, Banks PM: T-cell lymphoma and the virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome. Am J Clin Pathol 1992, 97:189-194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Greisser H: Gene rearrangements and chromosomal translocations in T cell lymphoma: diagnostic applications and their limits. Virchows Arch 1995, 426:323-338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Christensson B, Braconier JH, Winqvist I, Relander T, Dictor M: Fulminant course of infectious mononucleosis with virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome. Scand J Infect Dis 1987, 19:373-379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kornstein MJ, Weber J, Luck JB, Massey GV, Strom S, McWilliams NB: Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disorder: applications of immunoperoxidase and molecular biologic techniques. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989, 113:481-484 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Malik UR, Oleksowicz L, Dutcher JP, Ratech H, Borowitz MJ, Wiernik PH: Atypical clonal T cell proliferation in infectious mononucleosis. Med Oncol 1996, 13:207-213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sakai Y, Ohga S, Tonewaga Y, Takada H, Nakao F, Nakayama H, Aoki T, Yamamori S, Hara T: Interferon-alpha therapy for chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection: potential effect on the development of T-lymphoproliferative disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1998, 20:342-346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Setsuda J, Tervya-Feldstein J, Harris NL, Ferry JA, Sorbara L, Gupta G, Jaffe ES, Tosato G: Interleukin-18, interferon-γ, IP-10, and Mig expression in Epstein-Barr virus-induced infectious mononucleosis and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Am J Pathol 1999, 155:257-265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Strickler JG, Movehad LA, Gajl-Peczalska KJ, Horwitz CA, Brunning RD, Weiss LM: Oligoclonal T cell receptor gene rearrangements in blood lymphocytes of patients with acute Epstein-Barr virus-induced infectious mononucleosis. J Clin Invest 1990, 86:1358-1363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cossman J, Zehnbauer B, Garrett CT, Smith LJ, Williams M, Jaffe ES, Hanson LO, Love J: Gene rearrangement in the diagnosis of lymphoma/leukemia: guidelines for use based on a multi-institutional study. Am J Clin Pathol 1991, 95:347-354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smith TJ, Terada N, Robinson CC, Gelfand EW: Acute infectious mononucleosis stimulates the selective expression/expansion of Vβ6.1–3 and Vβ7 T cells. Blood 1993, 81:1521-1526 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Callan MF, Steven N, Krausa P, Wilson JDK, Moss PAH, Bell JI, Rickinson AB, McMichael AJ: Large clonal expansions of CD8+ T cell in acute infectious mononucleosis. Nat Med 1996, 2:906-911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Short MA, Evans PAS, Shiach CR, Jack A, Richards S, Morgan GJ: 32P-incorporation PCR for the detection of rearrangements at the TCR-γ locus. Diagn Mol Pathol 1996, 5:26-32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Silins SL, Cross SM, Elliott SL, Pye SJ, Burrows SR, Burrows JM, Moss DJ, Argaet VP, Misko IS: Development of Epstein-Barr virus-specific memory T cell receptor clonotypes in acute infectious mononucleosis. J Exp Med 1996, 184:1815-1824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maini MK, Gudgeon N, Wedderburn LR, Rickinson AB, Beverley PCL: Clonal expansions in acute EBV infection are detectable in the CD8 and not the CD4 subset and persist with a variable CD45 phenotype. J Immunol 2000, 165:5729-5737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES