Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 1996 Oct;70(10):6598–6606. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.10.6598-6606.1996

Persistent reovirus infections of L cells select mutations in viral attachment protein sigma1 that alter oligomer stability.

G J Wilson 1, J D Wetzel 1, W Puryear 1, R Bassel-Duby 1, T S Dermody 1
PMCID: PMC190700  PMID: 8794294

Abstract

During maintenance of L-cell cultures persistently infected with reovirus, mutations are selected in viruses and cells. Cells cured of persistent infection support growth of viruses isolated from persistently infected cultures (PI viruses) significantly better than that of wild-type (wt) viruses. In a previous study, the capacity of PI virus strain L/C to grow better than wt strain type 1 Lang (T1L) in cured cells was mapped genetically to the S1 gene (R. S. Kauffman, R. Ahmed, and B. N. Fields, Virology 131:79-87, 1983), which encodes viral attachment protein sigma1. To investigate mechanisms by which mutations in S1 confer growth of PI viruses in cured cells, we determined the S1 gene nucleotide sequences of L/C virus and six additional PI viruses isolated from independent persistently infected L-cell cultures. The S1 sequences of these viruses contained from one to three mutations, and with the exception of PI 2A1 mutations in each S1 gene resulted in changes in the deduced amino acid sequence of sigma1 protein. Using electrophoresis conditions that favor migration of sigma1 oligomers, we found that sigma1 proteins of L/C, PI 1A1, PI 3-1, and PI 5-1 migrated as monomers, whereas sigma1 proteins of wt reovirus and PI 2A1 migrated as oligomers. These findings suggest that mutations in sigma1 protein affecting stability of sigma1 oligomers are important for the capacity of PI viruses to infect mutant cells selected during persistent infection. Since no mutation was found in the deduced amino acid sequence of PI 2A1 sigma1 protein, we used T1L X PI 2A1 reassortant viruses to identify viral genes associated with the capacity of this PI virus to grow better than wt in cured cells. The capacity of PI 2A1 to grow better than T1L in cured cells was mapped to the S4 gene, which encodes outer-capsid protein sigma3. This finding suggests that in some cases, mutations in sigma3 protein in the absence of sigma1 mutations confer growth of PI viruses in mutant cells. To confirm the importance of the S1 gene in PI virus growth in cured cells, we used T1L X PI 3-1 reassortant viruses to genetically map the capacity of this PI virus to grow better than wt in cured cells. In contrast to our results using PI 2A1, we found that growth of PI 3-1 in cured cells was determined by the sigma1-encoding S1 gene. Given that the sigma1 and sigma3 proteins play important roles in reovirus disassembly, findings made in this study suggest that stability of the viral outer capsid is an important determinant of the capacity of reoviruses to adapt to host cells during persistent infection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (332.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahmed R., Canning W. M., Kauffman R. S., Sharpe A. H., Hallum J. V., Fields B. N. Role of the host cell in persistent viral infection: coevolution of L cells and reovoirus during persistent infection. Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):325–332. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed R., Fields B. N. Role of the S4 gene in the establishment of persistent reovirus infection in L cells. Cell. 1982 Mar;28(3):605–612. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90215-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed R., Graham A. F. Persistent infections in L cells with temperature-sensitive mutants of reovirus. J Virol. 1977 Aug;23(2):250–262. doi: 10.1128/jvi.23.2.250-262.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allison S. L., Schalich J., Stiasny K., Mandl C. W., Kunz C., Heinz F. X. Oligomeric rearrangement of tick-borne encephalitis virus envelope proteins induced by an acidic pH. J Virol. 1995 Feb;69(2):695–700. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.2.695-700.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Armstrong G. D., Paul R. W., Lee P. W. Studies on reovirus receptors of L cells: virus binding characteristics and comparison with reovirus receptors of erythrocytes. Virology. 1984 Oct 15;138(1):37–48. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90145-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Banerjea A. C., Brechling K. A., Ray C. A., Erikson H., Pickup D. J., Joklik W. K. High-level synthesis of biologically active reovirus protein sigma 1 in a mammalian expression vector system. Virology. 1988 Dec;167(2):601–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bassel-Duby R., Jayasuriya A., Chatterjee D., Sonenberg N., Maizel J. V., Jr, Fields B. N. Sequence of reovirus haemagglutinin predicts a coiled-coil structure. 1985 May 30-Jun 5Nature. 315(6018):421–423. doi: 10.1038/315421a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bassel-Duby R., Nibert M. L., Homcy C. J., Fields B. N., Sawutz D. G. Evidence that the sigma 1 protein of reovirus serotype 3 is a multimer. J Virol. 1987 Jun;61(6):1834–1841. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.6.1834-1841.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bassel-Duby R., Spriggs D. R., Tyler K. L., Fields B. N. Identification of attenuating mutations on the reovirus type 3 S1 double-stranded RNA segment with a rapid sequencing technique. J Virol. 1986 Oct;60(1):64–67. doi: 10.1128/jvi.60.1.64-67.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Borsa J., Copps T. P., Sargent M. D., Long D. G., Chapman J. D. New intermediate subviral particles in the in vitro uncoating of reovirus virions by chymotrypsin. J Virol. 1973 Apr;11(4):552–564. doi: 10.1128/jvi.11.4.552-564.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bullough P. A., Hughson F. M., Skehel J. J., Wiley D. C. Structure of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH of membrane fusion. Nature. 1994 Sep 1;371(6492):37–43. doi: 10.1038/371037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang C. T., Zweerink H. J. Fate of parental reovirus in infected cell. Virology. 1971 Dec;46(3):544–555. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(71)90058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dermody T. S., Chappell J. D., Hofler J. G., Kramp W., Tyler K. L. Eradication of persistent reovirus infection from a B-cell hybridoma. Virology. 1995 Sep 10;212(1):272–276. doi: 10.1006/viro.1995.1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dermody T. S., Nibert M. L., Bassel-Duby R., Fields B. N. A sigma 1 region important for hemagglutination by serotype 3 reovirus strains. J Virol. 1990 Oct;64(10):5173–5176. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.10.5173-5176.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dermody T. S., Nibert M. L., Bassel-Duby R., Fields B. N. Sequence diversity in S1 genes and S1 translation products of 11 serotype 3 reovirus strains. J Virol. 1990 Oct;64(10):4842–4850. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.10.4842-4850.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dermody T. S., Nibert M. L., Wetzel J. D., Tong X., Fields B. N. Cells and viruses with mutations affecting viral entry are selected during persistent infections of L cells with mammalian reoviruses. J Virol. 1993 Apr;67(4):2055–2063. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.4.2055-2063.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dryden K. A., Wang G., Yeager M., Nibert M. L., Coombs K. M., Furlong D. B., Fields B. N., Baker T. S. Early steps in reovirus infection are associated with dramatic changes in supramolecular structure and protein conformation: analysis of virions and subviral particles by cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction. J Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;122(5):1023–1041. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.5.1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Duncan R., Horne D., Cashdollar L. W., Joklik W. K., Lee P. W. Identification of conserved domains in the cell attachment proteins of the three serotypes of reovirus. Virology. 1990 Feb;174(2):399–409. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(90)90093-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Duncan R., Horne D., Strong J. E., Leone G., Pon R. T., Yeung M. C., Lee P. W. Conformational and functional analysis of the C-terminal globular head of the reovirus cell attachment protein. Virology. 1991 Jun;182(2):810–819. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90622-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ernst H., Shatkin A. J. Reovirus hemagglutinin mRNA codes for two polypeptides in overlapping reading frames. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(1):48–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.1.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fraser R. D., Furlong D. B., Trus B. L., Nibert M. L., Fields B. N., Steven A. C. Molecular structure of the cell-attachment protein of reovirus: correlation of computer-processed electron micrographs with sequence-based predictions. J Virol. 1990 Jun;64(6):2990–3000. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.6.2990-3000.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Furlong D. B., Nibert M. L., Fields B. N. Sigma 1 protein of mammalian reoviruses extends from the surfaces of viral particles. J Virol. 1988 Jan;62(1):246–256. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.1.246-256.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gallagher T. M., Escarmis C., Buchmeier M. J. Alteration of the pH dependence of coronavirus-induced cell fusion: effect of mutations in the spike glycoprotein. J Virol. 1991 Apr;65(4):1916–1928. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.4.1916-1928.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jacobs B. L., Samuel C. E. Biosynthesis of reovirus-specified polypeptides: the reovirus s1 mRNA encodes two primary translation products. Virology. 1985 May;143(1):63–74. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Joklik W. K. Studies on the effect of chymotrypsin on reovirions. Virology. 1972 Sep;49(3):700–715. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(72)90527-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kauffman R. S., Ahmed R., Fields B. N. Selection of a mutant S1 gene during reovirus persistent infection of L cells: role in maintenance of the persistent state. Virology. 1983 Nov;131(1):79–87. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(83)90535-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kielian M., Helenius A. pH-induced alterations in the fusogenic spike protein of Semliki Forest virus. J Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;101(6):2284–2291. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.6.2284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee P. W., Hayes E. C., Joklik W. K. Protein sigma 1 is the reovirus cell attachment protein. Virology. 1981 Jan 15;108(1):156–163. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(81)90535-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Leone G., Duncan R., Lee P. W. Trimerization of the reovirus cell attachment protein (sigma 1) induces conformational changes in sigma 1 necessary for its cell-binding function. Virology. 1991 Oct;184(2):758–761. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90447-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leone G., Duncan R., Mah D. C., Price A., Cashdollar L. W., Lee P. W. The N-terminal heptad repeat region of reovirus cell attachment protein sigma 1 is responsible for sigma 1 oligomer stability and possesses intrinsic oligomerization function. Virology. 1991 May;182(1):336–345. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90677-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Leone G., Mah D. C., Lee P. W. The incorporation of reovirus cell attachment protein sigma 1 into virions requires the N-terminal hydrophobic tail and the adjacent heptad repeat region. Virology. 1991 May;182(1):346–350. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90678-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Leone G., Maybaum L., Lee P. W. The reovirus cell attachment protein possesses two independently active trimerization domains: basis of dominant negative effects. Cell. 1992 Oct 30;71(3):479–488. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90516-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mah D. C., Leone G., Jankowski J. M., Lee P. W. The N-terminal quarter of reovirus cell attachment protein sigma 1 possesses intrinsic virion-anchoring function. Virology. 1990 Nov;179(1):95–103. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(90)90278-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McLachlan A. D., Stewart M. Tropomyosin coiled-coil interactions: evidence for an unstaggered structure. J Mol Biol. 1975 Oct 25;98(2):293–304. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80119-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nibert M. L., Chappell J. D., Dermody T. S. Infectious subvirion particles of reovirus type 3 Dearing exhibit a loss in infectivity and contain a cleaved sigma 1 protein. J Virol. 1995 Aug;69(8):5057–5067. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.8.5057-5067.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nibert M. L., Dermody T. S., Fields B. N. Structure of the reovirus cell-attachment protein: a model for the domain organization of sigma 1. J Virol. 1990 Jun;64(6):2976–2989. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.6.2976-2989.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nibert M. L., Fields B. N. A carboxy-terminal fragment of protein mu 1/mu 1C is present in infectious subvirion particles of mammalian reoviruses and is proposed to have a role in penetration. J Virol. 1992 Nov;66(11):6408–6418. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.11.6408-6418.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nibert M. L., Furlong D. B., Fields B. N. Mechanisms of viral pathogenesis. Distinct forms of reoviruses and their roles during replication in cells and host. J Clin Invest. 1991 Sep;88(3):727–734. doi: 10.1172/JCI115369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pacitti A. F., Gentsch J. R. Inhibition of reovirus type 3 binding to host cells by sialylated glycoproteins is mediated through the viral attachment protein. J Virol. 1987 May;61(5):1407–1415. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.5.1407-1415.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Paul R. W., Lee P. W. Glycophorin is the reovirus receptor on human erythrocytes. Virology. 1987 Jul;159(1):94–101. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90351-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rubin D. H., Wetzel J. D., Williams W. V., Cohen J. A., Dworkin C., Dermody T. S. Binding of type 3 reovirus by a domain of the sigma 1 protein important for hemagglutination leads to infection of murine erythroleukemia cells. J Clin Invest. 1992 Dec;90(6):2536–2542. doi: 10.1172/JCI116147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sarkar G., Pelletier J., Bassel-Duby R., Jayasuriya A., Fields B. N., Sonenberg N. Identification of a new polypeptide coded by reovirus gene S1. J Virol. 1985 Jun;54(3):720–725. doi: 10.1128/jvi.54.3.720-725.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shatkin A. J., LaFiandra A. J. Transcription by infectious subviral particles of reovirus. J Virol. 1972 Oct;10(4):698–706. doi: 10.1128/jvi.10.4.698-706.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sherry B., Fields B. N. The reovirus M1 gene, encoding a viral core protein, is associated with the myocarditic phenotype of a reovirus variant. J Virol. 1989 Nov;63(11):4850–4856. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.11.4850-4856.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Silverstein S. C., Astell C., Levin D. H., Schonberg M., Acs G. The mechanisms of reovirus uncoating and gene activation in vivo. Virology. 1972 Mar;47(3):797–806. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(72)90571-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Strong J. E., Leone G., Duncan R., Sharma R. K., Lee P. W. Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the reovirus cell attachment protein sigma 1: evidence that it is a homotrimer. Virology. 1991 Sep;184(1):23–32. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90818-V. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sturzenbecker L. J., Nibert M., Furlong D., Fields B. N. Intracellular digestion of reovirus particles requires a low pH and is an essential step in the viral infectious cycle. J Virol. 1987 Aug;61(8):2351–2361. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.8.2351-2361.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Turner D. L., Duncan R., Lee P. W. Site-directed mutagenesis of the C-terminal portion of reovirus protein sigma 1: evidence for a conformation-dependent receptor binding domain. Virology. 1992 Jan;186(1):219–227. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90076-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Virgin H. W., 4th, Bassel-Duby R., Fields B. N., Tyler K. L. Antibody protects against lethal infection with the neurally spreading reovirus type 3 (Dearing). J Virol. 1988 Dec;62(12):4594–4604. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.12.4594-4604.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wahlberg J. M., Bron R., Wilschut J., Garoff H. Membrane fusion of Semliki Forest virus involves homotrimers of the fusion protein. J Virol. 1992 Dec;66(12):7309–7318. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.12.7309-7318.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Weiner H. L., Ault K. A., Fields B. N. Interaction of reovirus with cell surface receptors. I. Murine and human lymphocytes have a receptor for the hemagglutinin of reovirus type 3. J Immunol. 1980 May;124(5):2143–2148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Weiner H. L., Fields B. N. Neutralization of reovirus: the gene responsible for the neutralization antigen. J Exp Med. 1977 Nov 1;146(5):1305–1310. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.5.1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Weiner H. L., Ramig R. F., Mustoe T. A., Fields B. N. Identification of the gene coding for the hemagglutinin of reovirus. Virology. 1978 May 15;86(2):581–584. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(78)90099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Williams W. V., Guy H. R., Rubin D. H., Robey F., Myers J. N., Kieber-Emmons T., Weiner D. B., Greene M. I. Sequences of the cell-attachment sites of reovirus type 3 and its anti-idiotypic/antireceptor antibody: modeling of their three-dimensional structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6488–6492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES