Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1992 Jan;105(1):97–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb14217.x

Binding properties of nine 4-diphenyl-acetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine (4-DAMP) analogues to M1, M2, M3 and putative M4 muscarinic receptor subtypes.

M Waelbroeck 1, J Camus 1, M Tastenoy 1, J Christophe 1
PMCID: PMC1908626  PMID: 1596694

Abstract

1. We compared the binding properties of 4-diphenyl-acetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine methiodide (4-DAMP) and nine analogues of this compound on muscarinic receptors of human neuroblastoma NB-OK1 cells (M1 subtype), rat heart (M2 subtype), rat pancreas (M3 subtype) and to the putative M4 subtype in striatum. 2. The requirements for high affinity binding were somewhat different for the four receptor subtypes. In general, the requirements of M3 receptors were more stringent than for M1, M2 or putative M4 receptors. 3. The abilities of the compounds to discriminate muscarinic receptor subtypes were not correlated with their affinities at any subtype. 4. The temperature-dependence of binding of 4-DAMP analogues to M2 receptors varied with the drug structure. In particular, the increased affinity of the alpha-methyl derivative of 4-DAMP could be ascribed to van der Waals interactions. 5. The affinities of most 4-DAMP analogues for M2 and M3 receptors were similar to their pharmacological potencies on atrial and ileum preparations, respectively. 6. At concentrations above 1 microM, all 4-DAMP analogues as well as atropine, reduced the [3H]-N-methyl scopolamine ([3H]-NMS) dissociation rate from cardiac muscarinic receptors, with no obvious structure-activity relationship.

Full text

PDF
97

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow R. B., Berry K. J., Glenton P. A., Nilolaou N. M., Soh K. S. A comparison of affinity constants for muscarine-sensitive acetylcholine receptors in guinea-pig atrial pacemaker cells at 29 degrees C and in ileum at 29 degrees C and 37 degrees C. Br J Pharmacol. 1976 Dec;58(4):613–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1976.tb08631.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow R. B., Shepherd M. K. A further search for selective antagonists at M2-muscarinic receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1986 Dec;89(4):837–843. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb11189.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barlow R. B., Shepherd M. K. A search for selective antagonists at M2 muscarinic receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1985 Jun;85(2):427–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1985.tb08878.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown D. A., Forward A., Marsh S. Antagonist discrimination between ganglionic and ileal muscarinic receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1980;71(2):362–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb10948.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng Y., Prusoff W. H. Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol. 1973 Dec 1;22(23):3099–3108. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doods H. N., Mathy M. J., Davidesko D., van Charldorp K. J., de Jonge A., van Zwieten P. A. Selectivity of muscarinic antagonists in radioligand and in vivo experiments for the putative M1, M2 and M3 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Jul;242(1):257–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dörje F., Wess J., Lambrecht G., Tacke R., Mutschler E., Brann M. R. Antagonist binding profiles of five cloned human muscarinic receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991 Feb;256(2):727–733. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Giachetti A., Micheletti R., Montagna E. Cardioselective profile of AF-DX 116, a muscarine M2 receptor antagonist. Life Sci. 1986 May 5;38(18):1663–1672. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(86)90410-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Giraldo E., Micheletti R., Montagna E., Giachetti A., Viganò M. A., Ladinsky H., Melchiorre C. Binding and functional characterization of the cardioselective muscarinic antagonist methoctramine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988 Mar;244(3):1016–1020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hammer R., Berrie C. P., Birdsall N. J., Burgen A. S., Hulme E. C. Pirenzepine distinguishes between different subclasses of muscarinic receptors. Nature. 1980 Jan 3;283(5742):90–92. doi: 10.1038/283090a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hammer R., Giraldo E., Schiavi G. B., Monferini E., Ladinsky H. Binding profile of a novel cardioselective muscarine receptor antagonist, AF-DX 116, to membranes of peripheral tissues and brain in the rat. Life Sci. 1986 May 5;38(18):1653–1662. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(86)90409-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lazareno S., Buckley N. J., Roberts F. F. Characterization of muscarinic M4 binding sites in rabbit lung, chicken heart, and NG108-15 cells. Mol Pharmacol. 1990 Dec;38(6):805–815. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ross P. D., Subramanian S. Thermodynamics of protein association reactions: forces contributing to stability. Biochemistry. 1981 May 26;20(11):3096–3102. doi: 10.1021/bi00514a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Waelbroeck M., Camus J., Tastenoy M., Christophe J. 80% of muscarinic receptors expressed by the NB-OK 1 human neuroblastoma cell line show high affinity for pirenzepine and are comparable to rat hippocampus M1 receptors. FEBS Lett. 1988 Jan 4;226(2):287–290. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81441-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Waelbroeck M., Camus J., Winand J., Christophe J. Different antagonist binding properties of rat pancreatic and cardiac muscarinic receptors. Life Sci. 1987 Nov 9;41(19):2235–2240. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(87)90521-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Waelbroeck M., Gillard M., Robberecht P., Christophe J. Muscarinic receptor heterogeneity in rat central nervous system. I. Binding of four selective antagonists to three muscarinic receptor subclasses: a comparison with M2 cardiac muscarinic receptors of the C type. Mol Pharmacol. 1987 Jul;32(1):91–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Waelbroeck M., Tastenoy M., Camus J., Christophe J. Binding of selective antagonists to four muscarinic receptors (M1 to M4) in rat forebrain. Mol Pharmacol. 1990 Aug;38(2):267–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES