Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2007 Apr 16;51(7):2359–2365. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01395-06

Biochemical Characterization of PER-2 and Genetic Environment of blaPER-2

Pablo Power 1, José Di Conza 2, María Margarita Rodríguez 1, Bárbara Ghiglione 1, Juan A Ayala 3, José María Casellas 4, Marcela Radice 1, Gabriel Gutkind 1,*
PMCID: PMC1913245  PMID: 17438050

Abstract

PER-2 was the first detected and the second most prevalent extended-spectrum β-lactamase in clinical pathogens isolated in Argentina and was also reported only in other South American countries. Citrobacter freundii 33587 was isolated in 1999 in Buenos Aires and was resistant to all tested β-lactams except cephamycins and carbapenems. The strain produced both plasmid-borne TEM-1 and PER-2 (pI 5.4), which could be transferred by conjugation. By PCR screening, thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR, and DNA sequencing, we detected an ISPa12/IS1387a insertion sequence upstream of blaPER-2, previously reported as also being associated with blaPER-1. The presence of similar structures upstream of blaPER-1 and blaPER-2 suggests a common origin and mobilization. Compared to blaPER-1 genes, an additional putative promoter for blaPER-2 was found. PER-2 kinetic analysis showed its high hydrolysis efficiencies toward both CTX and CAZ (kcat/Km, 0.76 and 0.43 μM−1·s−1, respectively).


Up to 10% of Escherichia coli and 35 to 45% of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Argentina are resistant to oxyimino-cephalosporins (Sistema Informático de la Resistencia [SIR], SADEBAC, AAM, http://www.aam.org.ar). Even if CTX-M-2 (and related enzymes) is the most frequently detected extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) in Argentina (26-28), accounting for the ESBL-producing profiles in 77% of E. coli, 60% of K. pneumoniae, and more than 90% of Proteus mirabilis isolates, a significant number of isolates are PER- and SHV-derived ESBL producers (26). For unknown reasons, TEM-derived ESBLs have not been reported, as was the case for most other countries (4).

Among the members of the PER family, PER-1 (first identified in 1991) (16) has been responsible for the ESBL profiles in clinically important enterobacteria and nonfermenter gram-negative bacilli isolated in different locations around the world: France (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Providencia stuartii) (12, 16, 22, 23), Italy (P. aeruginosa, Alcaligenes faecalis, and P. mirabilis) (17, 18, 20), Turkey (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, A. baumanii, and P. aeruginosa) (34-37), Belgium (P. aeruginosa) (7), and Korea (A. baumannii) (10, 39).

Recently, the genetic environment of the blaPER-1 gene has been elucidated for different species. In some strains, it is part of composite transposons bracketed by different arrangements of insertion sequences (IS), depending on whether it is chromosome or plasmid borne (13, 22). Although there is clear redundancy in the nomenclature for the same IS elements bracketing blaPER-1, which should be clarified in the future, we will retain both throughout the paper, as their descriptions were almost simultaneous.

Biochemical analysis and the crystal structure of PER-1 have also been reported (3, 16, 20, 33).

On the other hand, although PER-2 was first identified in 1996 from a Salmonella serovar Typhimurium isolate (1), there is evidence for its presence as early as 1989, from P. mirabilis isolated in Argentina, although a different name (ARG-1) was proposed for the enzyme at that time (30a). PER-2, sharing 86% amino acid sequence with PER-1, accounts for 10% and 5% of the oxyimino-cephalosporin-resistant K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates (26). Since its first report, it has been found in Argentina in other species, such as K. pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Vibrio cholerae (14, 19, 21, 26), and in a few locations around the world (6, 29).

PER-2 was circulating as early as 1991 in community-acquired enteropathogenic E. coli isolates coproducing TEM-116 even before being responsible for nosocomial outbreaks in Montevideo (38).

The aim of this study was to determine the biochemical properties of PER-2, including a kinetic characterization, and to analyze the regulation and genetic structures associated with the plasmid-borne blaPER-2.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids.

Citrobacter freundii 33587 was isolated in 1999 in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The strain was identified using standard biochemical criteria and commercial systems (API 20E; BioMérieux, France). E. coli CAG12177 (Tetr Nalr; E. coli Genetic Stock Center) was used as a recipient cell for mating experiments; E. coli Top10 F′ (Invitrogen) and E. coli BL21(DE3) (kindly provided by Bernard Joris, Liège, Belgium) were hosts for transformation experiments.

Plasmid DNA from C. freundii 33587 (pCf587) was extracted by the Hansen-Olsen methodology (9). Plasmid vectors pCR2.1-TOPO (TOPO TA Cloning, Invitrogen) and kanamycin-resistant pET28a(+) (Novagen, Germany) were used for routine cloning experiments and as production vectors.

Antimicrobial susceptibility.

MICs were determined by the agar dilution method, following CLSI guidelines (15), using a Steers’ multipoint inoculator. Detection of ESBLs was performed by a double-disk synergy test, using ampicillin/clavulanate disks (10 plus 10 μg) placed between 30-μg cefotaxime and ceftazidime disks. All the disks were from Britania, Argentina.

Analytical isoelectric focusing.

Crude extracts were obtained from overnight cultures in LB supplemented with 100 μg/ml ampicillin and resolved by isoelectric focusing as described previously (30).

PCR screening of the blaPER-2 gene and insertion sequences.

The PER-2-encoding gene was amplified using PER-2A and PER-2B primers, and blaPER-1-associated IS elements were screened using specific primers (Table 1). All PCRs were performed using pCf587 (50 ng) as a template, and PCR amplicons were resolved in 1% agarose gels, using commercial standards (1-kb DNA Ladder; MBI-Fermentas, Lithuania).

TABLE 1.

Oligonucleotide primers used in this study

Primer name Nucleotide sequence (5′→3′) Target DNA Purpose or use Source
PER-2A ATGAATGTCATCACAAAATGTGT blaPER-2 Screening of blaPER-2 and DNA sequencing This study
PER-2B TCAATCCGGACTCACTGCAG blaPER-2 This study
PER2-FSa AATAACGAGCTCAGTCGTATGAAT blaPER-2 Cloning in pET28a(+) for PER-2 production This study
PER2-RXb CAGATCATGACTCGAGTTTATACC blaPER-2 This study
ISPa12A ACAATCGCTGATATACATCG tnpA of ISPa12/IS1387a PCR mapping and sequencing 22
ISPa12B GATCTCGCTTTACATTTACC tnpA of ISPa12/IS1387a PCR mapping and sequencing 22
ISPa13A TAACCATATGCACTCAACGG tnpA of ISPa13/IS1387b PCR screening 22
ISPa13B GGTATCCACCACATATGGGC tnpA of ISPa13/IS1387b PCR screening 22
ISPa14A AATCAAATGTCCAACCTGCC tnpA of ISPa14/IS1012R PCR screening 22
ISPa14B GCCTAATTCGATGCCTTAT tnpA of ISPa14/IS1012R PCR screening 22
ISPrst1A ATTTCTGGAACTTTAACGAC tnpA of ISPrst1 PCR screening 22
ISPrst1B GACAGTCATTTTTTCAAGGC tnpA of ISPrst1 PCR screening 22
PerP1 ATCGCCCTGATGATCTTT blaPER-2 5′-RACE cDNA synthesis This study
PerP2 GGCGACCAGGTATTTTGTAA blaPER-2 Target cDNA amplification This study
PER2-UP1 CATCATTGGCGACCAGGT blaPER-2 TAIL-PCR and sequencing This study
PER2-UP2 CCCACACTGCTACACCTACA blaPER-2 TAIL-PCR and sequencing Nested amplification This study
PER2-UP3 ATCAGCAGAGCAGAAGCGG blaPER-2 TAIL-PCR and sequencing Nested amplification This study
PER2-DN1 CCACAGGACCACAGCGGT blaPER-2 TAIL-PCR and sequencing This study
PER2-DN2 AACTGCGGCGACTAATGATGC blaPER-2 TAIL-PCR and sequencing This study
PER2-DN3 ACTCTCTGCAGTGAGTCCGG blaPER-2 TAIL-PCR and sequencing This study
AD1 NGTCGASWGANAWGAA Arbitrary random target TAIL-PCR 11
AD3 AGWGNAGWANCAWAGG Arbitrary random target TAIL-PCR 11
AD6 WGTGNAGWANCANAGA Arbitrary random target TAIL-PCR 11
OPA-2 TGCCGAGCTG Arbitrary random target TAIL-PCR 11
AAP GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACGGGIIGGGIIGGGIIG blaPER-2 Target cDNA amplification This study
AUAP GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC blaPER-2 Nested amplification This study
a

Includes a SacI restriction site (underlined).

b

Includes an XhoI restriction site (underlined).

Conjugative transfer of pCf587.

Conjugative mobilization of pCf587 was attempted by agar medium mating to recipient E. coli CAG12177 cells. Briefly, equivalent volumes of log-phase cultures of C. freundii 33587 and E. coli recipient cells were deposited on nitrocellulose membranes lying on Mueller-Hinton agar plates. After 4 h of incubation at 37°C, the mating mixture was spread on LB agar plates supplemented with 5 μg/ml ceftriaxone, 10 μg/ml tetracycline, and 30 μg/ml nalidixic acid.

Determination of blaPER-2 flanking sequences.

Two strategies were used for studying the blaPER-2 flanking regions. A PCR mapping approach was attempted by combining specific primers for blaPER-2 and the IS, which were detected by PCR screening, in order to assess the gene arrangement. When the blaPER-2 surroundings could not be detected by PCR mapping, a thermal asymmetric interlaced (TAIL)-PCR strategy was followed as described previously (11). TAIL-PCR consisted of three consecutive amplifications using nested primers complementary to blaPER-2, named PER2-DN1, PER2-DN2, and PER2-DN3, and each of the arbitrary degenerate primers (in separate reactions) AD1, AD3, AD6, and OPA-2, which randomly hybridize to adjacent sequences (Table 1). The resulting fragments were resolved in 1% agarose gels, and those above 1 kb were cloned in a pCR2.1-TOPO vector and sequenced, starting with universal primers.

Recombinant DNA methodology.

Basic recombinant DNA procedures were carried out as described by Sambrook et al. (31). For cloning blaPER-2, a PCR was performed with pCf587, using 3 U Pfu polymerase (Promega) and 1 μM PER2-FS and PER2-RX primers (Table 1), and the purified amplicon was ligated in a pCR2.1-TOPO vector. The identity of the blaPER-2 gene, as well as the absence of aberrant nucleotides, was checked by double-strand sequencing of the insert using the same primers. The resulting recombinant plasmid (pT2P-C5) was digested with SacI and XhoI, and the released insert was cloned in a pET28a(+) vector. The ligation mixture was used to first transform competent E. coli Top10 F′ cells, and after selection of recombinant clones, a second transformation was performed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells in LB agar plates supplemented with 30 μg/ml kanamycin. Positive recombinant clones were screened by PCR with blaPER-2-specific primers, and the E. coli BLEP281-1 clone (harboring the pEPC281 plasmid) was used for the PER-2 production experiments.

Determination of transcription initiation sites.

C. freundii 33587 total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Midi kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. 5′ Rapid amplification of cDNA ends reactions were performed with 3.5 μg total RNA and a 5′-RACE system kit (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's guidelines. cDNA synthesis was primed with PerP1-specific primer; dC-tailing at the cDNA 3′ end was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification of target cDNA was performed with tailed cDNA as templates using PerP2 and AAP primers. A nested amplification was carried out using PER2-UP2 or PER2-UP3 and AUAP primers.

DNA sequencing and sequence analyses.

DNA sequences were determined in both strands by the automated dideoxy chain termination method of Sanger et al. (32) in an automated sequencer (ABI 3100; Applied Bio-System, Spain). Nucleotide and amino acid sequence analyses were performed with NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/) analysis tools.

Production and purification of PER-2.

Overnight cultures of recombinant E. coli BLEP281-1 (containing the blaPER-2 gene) were diluted (1/50) in 400 ml LB containing 30 μg/ml kanamycin and grown at 37°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.8. In order to induce β-lactamase expression, 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) was added, and cultures were grown at 37°C for 3 h. Crude extracts were obtained by freeze-thawing using a dry-ice-ethanol mixture. After centrifugation, clear supernatants containing PER-2 were dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.6, and loaded onto a Q-Sepharose column (XK 16/10; Pharmacia), connected to an ÁKTA-purifier (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with the same buffer. The column was extensively washed to remove unbound proteins, and β-lactamases were eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl (0 to 1 M) in the same buffer. β-Lactamase active fractions (detected by an iodometric system using 500 μg/ml ampicillin as a substrate) were pooled and loaded onto a Sephadex G-100 column (2.0 by 20 cm; Pharmacia-LKB, Sweden) equilibrated with 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5. Elution was performed with the same buffer, and active fractions were collected. After purification, samples were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using 12% polyacrylamide gels, in order to assess the degree of purification.

Determination of β-lactamase activity.

β-Lactamase activity was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the hydrolysis of 100 μM nitrocefin as a substrate. One unit of β-lactamase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme, determined by the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad), that hydrolyzes 1 μmol of substrate per min (in 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) at 30°C.

Mass spectrometry.

The molecular mass of PER-2 was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, using a C4 Vydac column (30 by 1.0 mm) in an LCQ Duo ESI-Ion Trap (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. [formerly Finnigan], Waltham, MA).

Determination of kinetic parameters.

Hydrolysis of β-lactam antibiotics by purified PER-2 was monitored by following the absorbance variation, using a Shimadzu UV-2101 spectrophotometer equipped with thermostatically controlled cells. Reactions were performed in a total volume of 500 μl at 30°C. For good substrates, the steady-state kinetic parameters (Km and kcat) were determined under initial-rate conditions as described previously (2). In cases of low Km values, or for poor substrates and inactivators, apparent Km values were determined as competitive inhibitor constants (Ki) by monitoring the residual activity of the enzyme in the presence of the drug and 100 μM nitrocefin as a reporter substrate, while the kcat for poor substrates was determined by analyzing the complete hydrolysis time courses (8). Tested drugs, along with the wavelengths and extinction coefficients used, were the same as those described previously (24).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

Sequence data were deposited in the GenBank/EMBL nucleotide databases under the accession number AM409516.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Antimicrobial susceptibility and preliminary biochemical analysis.

C. freundii 33587 was resistant to all tested β-lactams, except cephamycins and carbapenems. The isolate was also resistant to kanamycin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Table 2). By double-disk tests, clavulanate was able to substantially increase cefotaxime and ceftazidime inhibition zones, suggesting the presence of at least one ESBL.

TABLE 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities

Antibiotic MIC (μg/ml)
C. freundii 33587 E. coli 33587-TC9 E. coli CAG12177
Ampicillin >512 >512 0.25
Ampicillin/clavulanate 4 4 0.125
Piperacillin 256 256 0.063
Cephalothin 512 >512 0.5
Cefoxitin 1 0.125 ≤0.063
Cefotaxime 64 64 ≤0.063
Cefotaxime/clavulanate 0.063 0.063 ≤0.063
Ceftazidime 128 >128 ≤0.063
Ceftazidime/clavulanate 1 2 ≤0.063
Cefepime 16 8 ≤0.063
Aztreonam 256 256 ≤0.016
Imipenem 0.063 0.125 ≤0.063
Gentamicin 2 2 ≤0.25
Kanamycin >128 >128 ≤0.25
Tetracycline 0.5 32 32
Nalidixic acid 2 >128 >128
Chloramphenicol >32 >32 2
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole >8/152 >8/152 ≤1/19

Analytical isoelectric focusing showed a single band of pI 5.4, which hydrolyzed both ampicillin and ceftriaxone when they were used as revealing substrates (data not shown). This result, supported by the MICs, suggested the presence of at least one enzyme with extended-spectrum activity, compatible with PER β-lactamases or extended-spectrum TEM variants.

The absence of additional bands compatible with AmpC enzymes (basic pI), even when extracts were obtained under induction conditions, is consistent with the unusual behavior of the isolate toward cefoxitin, which could be due to malfunctions in the ampC regulatory system.

PCR screening, sequencing of bla genes and IS elements, and genetic location.

An ∼900-bp amplicon was obtained by PCR screening with blaPER-2-specific primers from DNA extracts that yielded a large-molecular-size plasmid (pCf587), which was estimated as >54 kb, compared to plasmids of known size (25). DNA sequencing yielded a 927-bp fragment with 100% nucleotide identity with the blaPER-2 gene. By PCR, we were also able to detect a blaTEM gene from the same preparation (data not shown).

After attempting the detection of specific IS elements usually associated with blaPER-1, we obtained compatible amplicons only when ISPa12/IS1387a tnpA (transposase) gene-specific primers were used, suggesting that the other described blaPER-1-associated IS elements are absent in PER-2-producing strains.

We succeeded in transferring pCf587 by conjugation to E. coli CAG12177 host cells. The antimicrobial susceptibility of a selected transconjugant clone (E. coli 33587-TC9) is shown in Table 2. It is noteworthy that β-lactam resistance was cotransferred along with kanamycin, chloramphenicol, and TMS resistance, suggesting that these markers are harbored by the same plasmid.

Plasmid extraction on a transconjugant clone showed the presence of a plasmid having the same electrophoretic mobility as pCf587 from the donor C. freundii isolate. By PCR on a plasmid obtained from the E. coli 33587-TC9 clone, we were able to detect the presence of blaPER-2, as well as associated elements, such as the ISPa12/IS1387a tnpA gene.

These results confirm the plasmid location of both blaPER-2 and associated structures, as well as the ability to be transferred by conjugation, along with other resistance determinants.

blaPER-2 is associated with ISPa12/IS1387a.

By a combination of PCR-mapping and TAIL-PCR strategies, we were able to analyze the genetic environment of the blaPER-2 gene.

Figure 1 shows the architecture of the PER-2-encoding gene and neighboring sequences, covering 3,294 bp. The structure is homologous to those associated with plasmid-borne blaPER-1 in Salmonella serovar Typhimurium and A. baumannii isolates (5, 22, 23).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Schematic representation of the blaPER-2 gene and neighboring sequences compared to those for blaPER-1 genes. (A) C. freundii 33587 (plasmid borne). (B) Salmonella serovar Typhimurium and A. baumannii (plasmid borne). (C) P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii (chromosome encoded), and A. faecalis (plasmid borne). (D) P. stuartii (chromosome encoded). The patterns represent different genetic backgrounds. *, alternative names given in different references; nt, nucleotide.

Upstream of blaPER-2, we found a 1.4-kb sequence including part of the ISPa12 tnpA gene, also known as IS1387a tnpA1. This genetic element has also been found associated with all of the blaPER-1-harboring structures analyzed so far in either chromosomal or plasmid locations (13, 22). The C. freundii ISPa12/IS1387a transposase shares 99.8% amino acid sequence with that of the blaPER-1-harboring microorganisms, suggesting a relatively recent association of this IS with both blaPER genes. Homologous left inverted repeats (IR) were found upstream of all tnpA genes, with the consensus sequence AAGATCATACGTATGAG in the blaPER-2-associated structure compared to AAGATCATACGTATGAA (the single mutation is in boldface) in blaPER-1-producing P. aeruginosa and A. faecalis isolates (12, 13); in another blaPER-1-producing P. aeruginosa isolate, the homologous IR consensus sequence was proposed to include only 11 bp (CATACGTATGA) (22), but it is nevertheless within the hypothetical 17-bp consensus sequence of the other structures. The left IR, representing the boundary of ISPa12/IS1387a, is located at different positions upstream of blaPER genes (Fig. 1), the farthest in our case (128 bp). As others have suggested, this could be evidence that different sites directed the ISPa12/IS1387a insertion (22) and could also be related to differences in blaPER expression (see below).

Seventy-three nucleotides downstream of blaPER-2 lies a 576-bp open reading frame, gst-like, encoding a hypothetical protein having 51% amino acid identity to a putative glutathione S-transferase from the water microorganisms Alteromonas macleodii and Marinobacter aquaeloei. This gst-like gene is also present in the plasmid-borne blaPER-1 from Salmonella serovar Typhimurium and A. baumannii (22).

A second open reading frame, abct, is located downstream of the gst-like gene in both C. freundii 33587 and some isolates producing plasmid-borne PER-1 (Fig. 1). The deduced amino acid sequence possesses 87% identity with a putative ABC transporter from Shewanella oneidensis. Whether the abct gene is also present in the blaPER-1-harboring structures is not known, due to lack of sequence information far beyond the database entries.

Two transcripts may be involved in blaPER-2 expression.

An initial +1 transcription start site was located 227 bp upstream from the blaPER-2 start codon (Fig. 2), embedded within ISPa12/IS1387a. We deduced a −35 consensus sequence (TTCAAA) separated by 17 bp from a −10 box (TAATTT), constituting the blaPER-2 PCf1 promoter (Fig. 2). These elements are homologous to that described for blaPER-1 in different P. aeruginosa isolates (12, 22), differing only in the +1 start site location (112 bp upstream from the blaPER-1 ATG) and the −10 consensus sequence (TAATCT).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Comparison of the upstream sequences of blaPER-2 from C. freundii 33587 and blaPER-1 from P. aeruginosa RNL-1 (AY779402), comprising the respective promoter regions. The +1 transcription initiation sites are indicated in large boldface letters, respective −10 and −35 boxes are in light-gray boxes, and entire promoters are marked with horizontal brackets. The IR of ISPa12/IS1387a is indicated in boldface letters in a shaded box, and the inverted black triangle indicates the ISPa12/IS1387a boundary.

The +1 transcription start site of a second putative promoter, named PCf2, could be located 63 bp upstream from the blaPER-2 start codon. Only a putative −10 box could be deduced (TATGAA), whereas a clear −35 consensus sequence could not be inferred (Fig. 2). This promoter would not belong to the ISPa12/IS1387a backbone but to an additional 127-bp sequence (between the blaPER-2 start codon and the IS IR) that is absent in the P. aeruginosa blaPER-1 upstream region (Fig. 2).

It was previously suggested that ISPa12/IS1387a could drive expression of plasmid-borne blaPER-1 genes in Salmonella serovar Typhimurium and P. aeruginosa strains, provided the respective PSt and PPa promoters are part of the insertion sequence (22). Therefore, although speculative, a putative second promoter (PCf2) could enhance blaPER-2 expression independently of ISPa12/IS1387a.

Kinetic analysis of PER-2 revealed high oxyimino-cephalosporinase activity.

A total of 9.7 mg (498.5 mU) of highly pure PER-2 β-lactamase was obtained by fast-protein liquid chromatography-based chromatography, with a final yield of 31%. The experimental molecular mass of PER-2 obtained by mass spectrometry was 30,780 Da, in good agreement with the theoretical mass (30,769 Da), and the predicted signal peptide was 26 amino acids long.

The main kinetic parameters of PER-2 are shown in Table 3. According to its extended-spectrum activity, PER-2 showed high catalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km) toward most of the tested antibiotics, generally characterized by low Km and high kcat values. Notably, the hydrolytic behavior with both tested oxyimino-cephalosporins was characterized by a sevenfold-higher affinity toward cefotaxime, which is nevertheless contrasted by a turnover constant (kcat) fourfold higher for ceftazidime, resulting in similar catalytic efficiencies and therefore phenotypic high-level resistance to both antibiotics.

TABLE 3.

Main kinetic parameters of PER-2 β-lactamase

Substrate Km (μM) kcat (s−1) kcat/Km (μM−1·s−1) Relative kcat/Km (%)b
Benzylpenicillin 16 ± 4 2 ± 0.08 0.12 ± 0.03 18
Ampicillin 38 ± 4 12 ± 0.7 0.33 ± 0.05 49
Piperacillina 0.2 ± 0.012 0.04 ± 0.002 0.2 ± 0.02 30
Nitrocefin 32 ± 6 48 ± 4 1.5 ± 0.4 224
Cephalothin 9 ± 1.8 6 ± 0.2 0.67 ± 0.16 100
Cefoxitina 0.14 ± 0.005 <0.001
Cefuroxime 21 ± 2 6 ± 0.12 0.3 ± 0.03 45
Cefotaxime 46 ± 8 34 ± 3 0.76 ± 0.19 113
Ceftazidime 320 ± 50 140 ± 17 0.43 ± 0.12 64
Cefoperazone 5 ± 0.9 0.5 ± 0.02 0.10 ± 0.02 15
Cefepime 16 ± 4 0.39 ± 0.02 0.02 ± 0.006 3
Aztreonama 2 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.008 18
Imipenema 0.06 ± 0.001 <0.001
a

Km determined as Ki.

b

Relative to cephalothin.

Some differences arose when the kinetic behavior of PER-2 was compared to the available data for PER-1 (3, 20). The most remarkable difference was the overall behavior toward oxyimino-cephalosporins. According to Bouthors et al. (3), kcat/Km values for both cephalosporins are 1 order of magnitude lower (0.093 and 0.026 μM−1·s−1 for cefotaxime and ceftazidime, respectively), due to a 10-fold-higher Km. On the other hand, kinetic data for the A. faecalis PER-1 is more similar to that for the C. freundii PER-2, with the most important difference being a 10-fold-lower catalytic efficiency for ceftazidime (0.03 μM−1·s−1), due to a higher Km value (806 μM) (20).

The most poorly hydrolyzed antibiotics were cefoxitin, cefepime, and imipenem. On the other hand, PER-2 was strongly inhibited by lithium clavulanate and tazobactam, displaying 50% inhibitory concentrations of 0.068 and 0.096 μM, respectively.

Conclusions.

Considering the amino acid identity (82%), it is noteworthy that the highly conserved conformational structures of both PER-1 and PER-2 are observed in three-dimensional models (data not shown). It was demonstrated that PER-1 and other related β-lactamases possess a new fold in the Ω loop and an insertion of four residues at strand S3 compared to other class A enzymes, which generate a broader cavity and allow the accommodation of the bulky substituents of oxyimino-cephalosporins and a more efficient hydrolysis of these drugs (33). In addition, a modification at position 242 in PER-1, which represents the counterpart of the Glu240 residue in TEM or SHV β-lactamases, does not seem to result in changes in its kinetic properties, as does occur in TEM/SHV (3). On the other hand, PER-2 displays an amino acid shift at position 242 (Lys242Arg), and we observed some discrepancies in kinetic behavior between PER-2 and PER-1 (see above). If the above hypothesis is correct, then we can assume that other amino acid modifications are probably responsible for the differences in their kinetic properties.

The presence of similar structures upstream of blaPER genes suggests a common history of recruitment and mobilization. However, differences in the lengths of tnpA-blaPER intergenic regions are probably evidence of the presence of diverse target sequences used for the insertion of ISPa12/IS1387a.

Transcription of the blaPER-2 gene seems to be directed at least by a promoter embedded in the ISPa12/IS1387a upstream element. A second putative transcription site origin outside the IS backbone could probably also be implicated in the expression of blaPER-2, although the real biological role of this promoter is not known.

The presence of blaPER-2 in a conjugative plasmid explains the prevalence of PER-2 in Argentina and neighboring countries (26, 38). It is noteworthy that only PER-1 has been found outside South America. At least two opposing alternatives can account for these results, the first being that primers used for detection of PER-related enzymes are usually based on blaPER-1, explaining the possibilities for being underestimated; the second would be to consider that blaPER-1 association with ISPa13/IS1387b (absent in our case) or different plasmid backgrounds could be driving its dissemination. The coincidence of the isoelectric points (pI 5.4) could have made it difficult to differentiate it from most TEM-derived ESBLs.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from UBACyT, ANPCyT, and Beca “Carrillo Oñativia” (Ministerio de Salud) to G.G. and the FP6 project LSHM-CT-503335 of the European Union to J.A.A. Institutional help of the “Fundación Areces” to the CBMSO is also thankfully acknowledged. P.P. and G.G. are members of “Carrera del Investigador Científico” CONICET.

We thank A. Ferrari from the Cátedra de Inmunología, FFyB-UBA, and G. Ferraro from the Cátedra de Farmacognosia, FFyB-UBA, for their collaboration in PER-2 purification and utilization of the spectrophotometer, respectively.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 16 April 2007.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bauernfeind, A., I. Stemplinger, R. Jungwirth, P. Mangold, S. Amann, E. Akalin, Ö. Ang, C. Bal, and J. M. Casellas. 1996. Characterization of β-lactamase gene blaPER-2 which encodes an extended-spectrum class A β-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40616-620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bauvois, C., A. S. Ibuka, A. Celso, J. Alba, Y. Ishii, J.-M. Frère, and M. Galleni. 2005. Kinetic properties of four plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 494240-4246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bouthors, A.-T., J. Delettre, P. Mugnier, V. Jarlier, and W. Sougakoff. 1999. Site-directed mutagenesis of residues 164, 170, 171, 179, 220, 237 and 242 in PER-1 β-lactamase hydrolysing expanded-spectrum cephalosporins. Protein Eng. 12313-318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bradford, P. A. 2001. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14933-951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Casin, I., B. Hanau-Bercot, I. Popglajen, H. Vahaboglü, and E. Collatz. 2003. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium blaPER-1-carrying plasmid pST11 encodes an extended-spectrum aminoglycoside 6′-N-acetyltransferase of type Ib. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47697-703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Celenza, G., C. Pellegrini, M. Caccamo, B. Segatore, G. Amicosante, and M. Perilli. 2006. Spread of blaCTX-M-type and blaPER-2 β-lactamase genes in clinical isolates from Bolivian hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57975-978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Claeys, G., G. Verschraegen, T. de Baere, and M. Vaneechoutte. 2000. PER-1 β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an intensive care unit. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45924-925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Meester, F., B. Joris, G. Reckinger, C. Bellefroid-Bourguignon, J. M. Frère, and S. G. Waley. 1987. Automated analysis of enzyme inactivation phenomena. Application to β-lactamases and DD-peptidases. Biochem. Pharmacol. 362393-2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hansen, J. B., and R. H. Olsen. 1978. Isolation of large bacterial plasmids and characterization of the P2 incompatibility group plasmids pMG1 and pMG5. J. Bacteriol. 135227-238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jeong, S. H., I. K. Bae, S. B. Kwon, K. Lee, D. Yong, G. J. Woo, J. H. Lee, H. I. Jung, S. J. Jang, K. H. Sung, and S. H. Lee. 2005. Investigation of a nosocomial outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii producing PER-1 extended-spectrum β-lactamase in an intensive care unit. J. Hosp. Infect. 59242-248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu, Y.-G., and R. F. Whittier. 1995. Thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR: automatable amplification and sequencing of insert end fragments from P1 and YAC clones for chromosome walking. Genomics 25674-681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Llanes, C., C. Neuwirth, F. E. Garch, D. Hocquet, and P. Plesiat. 2006. Genetic analysis of a multiresistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing PER-1 β-lactamase. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12270-278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mantegoli, E., and G. M. Rossolini. 2005. Tn5393d, a complex Tn5393 derivative carrying the PER-1 extended-spectrum β-lactamase gene and other resistance determinants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 493289-3296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Melano, R., A. Corso, A. Petroni, D. Centron, B. Orman, A. Pereyra, N. Moreno, and M. Galas. 2003. Multiple antibiotic-resistance mechanisms including a novel combination of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in a Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical strain isolated in Argentina. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 5236-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2004. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 6th ed. M7-A6, 14th informational supplement, 6th ed., vol. 24. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
  • 16.Nordmann, P., E. Ronco, T. Naas, C. Duport, Y. Michel-Briand, and R. Labia. 1993. Characterization of a novel extended-spectrum β-lactamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37962-969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pagani, L., E. Mantengoli, R. Migliavacca, E. Nucleo, S. Pollini, M. Spalla, R. Daturi, E. Romero, and G. M. Rossolini. 2004. Multifocal detection of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing the PER-1 extended-spectrum β-lactamase in northern Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 422523-2529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pagani, L., R. Migliavacca, L. Pallecchi, C. Matti, E. Giacobone, G. Amicosante, E. Romero, and G. M. Rossolini. 2002. Emerging extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Proteus mirabilis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 401549-1552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pasterán, F., M. Rapoport, A. Petroni, D. Faccone, A. Corso, M. Galas, A. Vázquez, A. Procopio, M. Tokumoto, and V. Cagnoni. 2006. Emergence of PER-2 and VEB-1a in Acinetobacter baumannii strains in the Americas. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 503222-3224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pereira, M., M. Perilli, E. Mantengoli, F. Luzzaro, A. Toniolo, G. M. Rossolini, and G. Amicosante. 2000. PER-1 extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in an Alcaligenes faecalis clinical isolate resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and monobactams from a hospital in Northern Italy. Microb. Drug Resist. 685-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Petroni, A., A. Corso, R. Melano, M. L. Cacace, A. M. Bru, A. Rossi, and M. Galas. 2002. Plasmidic extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor isolates in Argentina. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 461462-1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Poirel, L., L. Cabanne, H. Vahaboglu, and P. Nordmann. 2005. Genetic environment and expression of the extended-spectrum β-lactamase blaPER-1 gene in gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 491708-1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Poirel, L., A. Karim, A. Mercat, I. L. Thomas, H. Vahaboglü, C. Richard, and P. Nordmann. 1999. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strain of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from a patient in France. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43157-158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Power, P., M. Galleni, J. A. Ayala, and G. Gutkind. 2006. Biochemical and molecular characterization of three new variants of AmpC β-lactamases from Morganella morganii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50962-967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Power, P., M. Galleni, J. D. Conza, J. A. Ayala, and G. Gutkind. 2005. Description of In116, the first blaCTX-M-2-containing complex class 1 integron found in Morganella morganii isolates from Buenos Aires, Argentina. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55461-465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Quinteros, M., M. Radice, N. Gardella, M. M. Rodríguez, N. Costa, D. Korbenfeld, E. Couto, G. Gutkind, et al. 2003. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae in Buenos Aires, Argentina, public hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 472864-2869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Radice, M., C. Gonzalez, P. Power, M. C. Vidal, and G. Gutkind. 2001. Third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Shigella sonnei, Argentina. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7442-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Radice, M., P. Power, J. D. Conza, and G. Gutkind. 2002. Early dissemination of CTX-M-derived enzymes in South America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46602-604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Revathi, G., K. P. Shannon, P. D. Stapleton, B. K. Jain, and G. L. French. 1998. An outbreak of extended-spectrum, β-lactamase-producing Salmonella senftenberg in a burns ward. J. Hosp. Infect. 40295-302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rossi, A., H. Lopardo, M. Woloj, A. M. Picandet, M. Mariño, M. Galas, M. Radice, and G. Gutkind. 1995. Non-typhoid Salmonella spp. resistant to cefotaxime. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36697-702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30a.Rossi, M. A., G. Gutkind, M. Quinteros, et al. 1991. Abstr. 31st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 939.
  • 31.Sambrook, J., E. F. Fristch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  • 32.Sanger, I., S. Nicklen, and A. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 745463-5467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tranier, S., A.-T. Bouthors, L. Maveyraud, V. Guillet, W. Sougakoff, and J.-P. Samama. 2000. The high resolution crystal structure for class A β-lactamase PER-1 reveals the bases for its increase in breadth of activity. J. Biol. Chem. 27528075-28082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vahaboglü, H., F. Coskunkan, O. Tansel, R. Ozturk, N. Sahin, I. Koskal, B. Kocazeybek, M. Tatman-Otkun, H. Leblebicioglu, M. A. Ozinel, H. Akalin, S. Kocagoz, and V. Korten. 2001. Clinical importance of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (PER-1-type)-producing Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Antimicrob. Agents Resist. 50642-645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vahaboglü, H., S. Dodanli, C. Eroglu, R. Ozturk, G. Soyletir, I. Yildirim, and V. Avkan. 1996. Characterization of multiple-antibiotic-resistant Salmonella typhimurium strains: molecular epidemiology of PER-1-producing isolates and evidence for nosocomial plasmid exchange by a clone. J. Clin. Microbiol. 342942-2946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vahaboglü, H., L. M. Hall, L. Mulazimoglu, S. Dodanli, I. Yildirim, and D. M. Livermore. 1995. Resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, caused by PER-1 β-lactamase, in Salmonella typhimurium from Istanbul, Turkey. J. Med. Microbiol. 43294-299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vahaboglü, H., R. Ozturk, H. Akbal, F. Coskunkan, A. Yaman, A. Kaygusuz, H. Lecblebicioglu, I. Balik, K. Aydin, and M. Oktun. 1997. Widespread detection of PER-1-type extended-spectrum β-lactamase among nosocomial Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Turkey: a nationwide multicenter study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 412265-2269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vignoli, R., G. Varela, M. I. Mota, N. F. Cordeiro, P. Power, E. Ingold, P. Gadea, A. Sirok, F. Schelotto, J. A. Ayala, and G. Gutkind. 2005. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains carrying genes encoding the PER-2 and TEM-116 extended-spectrum β-lactamases isolated from children with diarrhea in Uruguay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 432940-2943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yong, D., J. H. Shin, S. Kim, Y. Lim, J. H. Yum, K. Lee, Y. Chong, and A. Bauernfeind. 2003. High prevalence of PER-1 extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Acinetobacter spp. in Korea. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 471749-1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES