Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1990 Nov;101(3):563–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1990.tb14121.x

Spinal effects of four injectable anaesthetics on nociceptive reflexes in rats: a comparison of electrophysiological and behavioural measurements.

N A Hartell 1, P M Headley 1
PMCID: PMC1917747  PMID: 2076476

Abstract

1. To assess the direct spinal contributions to the depression of reflexes caused by general anaesthetics, the intravenous potency of four injectable anaesthetics has been compared in two preparations: in decerebrate, spinalised rats, using a novel preparation requiring little surgical intervention, and in intact rats with chronically implanted i.v. cannulae. 2. Methohexitone (1-8 mg kg-1 i.v.), alphaxalone/alphadolone (0.5-8 mg kg-1 i.v.), alpha-chloralose (20-80 mg kg-1 i.v.) and ketamine (0.5-16 mg kg-1 i.v.) all produced a dose-dependent depression of single motor unit activity evoked by controlled noxious mechanical stimuli in decerebrate, spinalised animals. 3. The sedative and motor effects brought about by equivalent doses to those used in the electrophysiological experiments were assessed in intact rats. Methohexitone, alphaxalone/alphadolone and alpha-chloralose all caused similar levels of behavioural sedation at the doses that caused depression of spinal reflexes. Ketamine required relatively much higher doses to cause sedation. 4. To determine whether background anaesthesia modulated the potency with which these compounds affected spinal reflex activity, depressant effects in decerebrate, unanaesthetized rats were compared with those in animals maintained under anaesthesia with either alpha-chloralose or the steroid mixture of alphaxalone/alphadolone. The presence of either of these two agents as maintenance anaesthetics did not influence the effectiveness with which other compounds depressed nociceptive responses. However, additional doses of the maintenance anaesthetics were less effective than the same doses tested in decerebrate animals. 5. All the anaesthetics tested produced a significant depression of spinal reflex responses to noxious stimuli at doses well below those required for anaesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
563

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Collins J. G., Kawahara M., Homma E., Kitahata L. M. Alpha-chloralose suppression of neuronal activity. Life Sci. 1983 Jun 27;32(26):2995–2999. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(83)90651-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Heavner J. E. Jamming spinal sensory input: effects of anesthetic and analgesic drugs in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):239–255. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90041-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lodge D., Anis N. A. Effects of ketamine and three other anaesthetics on spinal reflexes and inhibitions in the cat. Br J Anaesth. 1984 Oct;56(10):1143–1151. doi: 10.1093/bja/56.10.1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lovick T. A. Analgesia and the cardiovascular changes evoked by stimulating neurones in the ventrolateral medulla in rats. Pain. 1986 May;25(2):259–268. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90101-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Parsons C. G., Headley P. M. Spinal antinociceptive actions of mu- and kappa-opioids: the importance of stimulus intensity in determining 'selectivity' between reflexes to different modalities of noxious stimulus. Br J Pharmacol. 1989 Oct;98(2):523–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb12626.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shimamura M., Yamauchi T., Aoki M. Effects of chloralose anesthesia on spinal reflexes. Jpn J Physiol. 1968 Dec 15;18(6):788–797. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.18.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES