Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1994 Jun;54(6):1092–1103.

A sib-pair approach to interval mapping of quantitative trait loci.

D W Fulker 1, L R Cardon 1
PMCID: PMC1918198  PMID: 8198132

Abstract

An interval mapping procedure based on the sib-pair method of Haseman and Elston is developed, and simulation studies are carried out to explore its properties. The procedure is analogous to other interval mapping procedures used with experimental material, such as plants and animals, and yields very similar results in terms of the location and effect size of a quantitative trait locus (QTL). The procedure offers an advantage over the conventional Haseman and Elston approach, in terms of power, and provides useful information concerning the location of a QTL. Because of its simplicity, the method readily lends itself to the analysis of selected samples for increased power and the evaluation of multilocus models of complex phenotypes.

Full text

PDF
1092

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos C. I., Elston R. C. Robust methods for the detection of genetic linkage for quantitative data from pedigrees. Genet Epidemiol. 1989;6(2):349–360. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370060205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amos C. I., Elston R. C., Wilson A. F., Bailey-Wilson J. E. A more powerful robust sib-pair test of linkage for quantitative traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1989;6(3):435–449. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370060306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey G., Williamson J. Linkage analysis of quantitative traits: increased power by using selected samples. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Oct;49(4):786–796. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DeFries J. C., Fulker D. W. Multiple regression analysis of twin data: etiology of deviant scores versus individual differences. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1988;37(3-4):205–216. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000003810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldgar D. E. Multipoint analysis of human quantitative genetic variation. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Dec;47(6):957–967. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haley C. S., Knott S. A. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Oct;69(4):315–324. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haseman J. K., Elston R. C. The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet. 1972 Mar;2(1):3–19. doi: 10.1007/BF01066731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Risch N. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Feb;46(2):229–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robertson A. Linkage between marker loci and those affecting a quantitative trait. Behav Genet. 1973 Dec;3(4):389–391. doi: 10.1007/BF01070222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weeks D. E., Lange K. The affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Feb;42(2):315–326. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson A. F., Elston R. C., Tran L. D., Siervogel R. M. Use of the robust sib-pair method to screen for single-locus, multiple-locus, and pleiotropic effects: application to traits related to hypertension. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 May;48(5):862–872. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES