Much is still unknown about the aetiopathogenesis of Behçet’s disease, although genetic, infectious, and autoimmune components are all believed to be involved.
The distribution and wide variation in relative risk of HLA-B51 is well documented and appears to support the presence of other, non-genetic risk factors for Behçet’s disease.1 The contribution of HLA-B51 to the overall genetic susceptibility to Behçet’s disease is estimated to be less than 20%.2 It is not certain if HLA-B51 has a direct role in the pathogenesis of Behçet’s disease, or whether this association reflects linkage disequilibrium with a closely located gene. The association of the *009 and A6 MHC class 1 related gene A (MIC-A) alleles with Behçet’s disease is due to linkage with HLA B51 and implies that HLA B51 itself is associated with the disease.3 Analysis of the segment between the TNF and HLA-B loci revealed a strong, perhaps primary,4 association of Behçet’s disease with MIC-A, which is expressed in fibroblast, monocytes, epithelial, and endothelial cells.5,6 This gene codes for a non-classic HLA class I protein induced by stress which probably has an important role in the destruction of cells targeted by γδT cells.7 Bacterial infection upregulates MIC-A expression on cell surfaces, enhancing TCR dependent activation of Vγ2Vδ2 T cells by non-peptide antigens.8
Genetic susceptibility may lead to a primed, antigen driven immune response, which in an unbalanced state manifests itself as Behçet’s disease.9,10
Infection has long been thought to be a contributory factor in the aetiology of Behçet’s disease; some candidate antigens include those derived from streptococci,11 staphylococci,12 mycobacteria,13 and herpes simplex virus.14,15 A common denominator in the form of microbial heat shock protein (HSP), which shows significant homology with human mitochondrial HSP has been suggested.16 HSP derived peptides which specifically stimulate T cell responses in Behçet’s disease, have been used to induce uveitis in animal models.17,18 γδT cells are essential for the maintenance of mucosal immunity. They are involved in the early response to microbial and autologous antigen and can become Th1 and Th2 type cells; they are stimulated by Behçet’s disease specific HSPs and increased in active Behçet’s disease.9,19 It is suggested that the T cells taken from the Behçet’s disease patients were primed to respond to bacterial antigen.9,10 High levels of γδT cells have been detected in the intraocular fluids of Behçet’s disease patients with uveitis.20
Lehner has postulated that microbial infection induced stress upregulates HSP 65 and MIC-A gene products which stimulate γδ and αβT cell receptor positive cells to generate effector and suppressor T cells, leading to pathological changes consistent with Behçet’s disease in HLA-B51 or related subjects.21
Th1 cells secrete IL-2 and IFN-γ, activate macrophages, and elicit delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Th2 cells produce IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 and suppress cell mediated immunity. These cytokines perform a cross regulatory function between the Th1 and Th2 subsets. This cross regulation and the Th1/Th2 balance is thought to be important in the regulation of autoimmune diseases such as Behçet’s.22,23 Th1 cells are autopathogenic factors, whereas Th2 cells with the same antigen specificity oppose the development and progression of disease.23,24 A strong Th1 immune response occurs in active Behçet’s disease (a useful marker of Behçet’s disease activity), where IL-12 prevents spontaneous and Fas induced cell death, leading to the abnormal growth of autoreactive Th1 cells and the prolongation of the inflammatory autoimmune condition of Behçet’s disease.22
It is interesting to note that statins may be useful in Th1 mediated autoimmune diseases. Atorvastatin was found to promote a Th2 bias in CNS autoimmune disease25 and, more recently, simvastatin was demonstrated to suppress Th1 cellular and immune responses in an inflammatory arthritis model.26
T-bet is a specific T-box transcription factor that initiates Th1 development from naive Th cells by activating Th1 genetic programmes and repressing opposing Th2 programmes; additionally T-bet can reprogramme a committed population of fully polarised Th2 cells into the Th1 phenotype.27
Th1 cell development involves IFN-γ signalling through signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) and IL-12 signalling through STAT4. T-bet is induced by IFN-γ and STAT1 signalling during T cell activation; in addition T-bet mediates STAT1 dependent processes of Th1 development including the induction of IL12Rβ2,28 and is required for the optimal production of IFN-γ and antigen specific T cell activation by dendritic cells.29
In this issue of the BJO (p 000), Li et al have reported that Behçet’s disease is associated with an upregulation of T-bet; the presence of this transcription factor is significant in autoimmune disease. T-bet may be an immunomodulatory target at which to aim, in order to rebalance an aberrant immune system such as that found in Behçet’s disease.
REFERENCES
- 1.Verity DH, Marr JE, Ohno S. Behçet’s disease, the Silk Road and HLA-B51: historical and geographical perspectives. Tissue Antigens 1999;54:213–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gül A, Hajeer AH, Worthington J, et al. Evidence for linkage of the HLA-B locus in Behçet’s disease, obtained using the transmission disequilibrium test. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:239–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wallace GR, Verity DH, Delamaine LJ, et al. MIC-A allele profiles and HLA class I associations in Behçet’s disease. Immunogenetics 1999;49:613–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mizuki N, Ota M, Kimura M, et al. Triplet repeat polymorphism in the transmembrane region of the MICA gene: a strong association of six GCT repetitions with Behçet’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:1298–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zwirner N, Fernández-Viňa MA, Sastny P. MICA, a new polymorphic HLA-related antigen, is expressed mainly by keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and monocytes. Immunogenetics 1998;47:139–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gül A. Behcet’s disease: an update on the pathogenesis. [Editorial] Clin Exp Rheumatol 2001;19(Suppl 24):S6–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hue-Lemoine S, Amoura Z, Wechsler B, et al. Ann Med Int (Paris) 1999;150:499–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Das H, Groh V, Kuiji C, et al. MICA engagement by human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells enhances their antigen-dependent effector function. Immunity 2001;15:83–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bank I, Duvdevani M, Livneh A. Expansion of γδT-cells in Behçet’s disease: role of disease activity and microbial flora in oral ulcers. J Lab Clin Med 2003;141:33–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fortune F. Can you catch Behçet’s disease? J Lab Clin Med 2003;141:5–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Narikawa S, Suzuki Y, Takahashi M, et al. Streptococcus oralis previously identified as uncommon ‘Streptococcus sanguis’ in Behçet’s disease. Arch Oral Biol 1995;40:685–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hirohata S, Hasimoto T. Abnormal T cell responses to bacterial superantigens in Behçet’s disease (Behçet’s disease). Clin Exp Immunol 1998;112:317–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Direskeneli H, Eksioglu-Demiralp E, Yavuz S, et al. T cell responses to 60/65 kDA heat shock protein derived peptides in Turkish patients with Behçet’s disease. J Rheumatol 2000;27:708–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Studd M, McCance DJ, Lehner T. Detection of HSV-1 DNA in patients with Behçet’s syndrome and in patients with recurrent oral ulcers by the polymerase chain reaction. J Med Microbiol 1991;34:39–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sohn S, Lee E, Kwon HJ, et al. Expression of Th2 cytokines decreases the development of and improves Behçet’s disease-like symptoms induced by herpes simplex virus in mice. J Infect Dis 2001;183:1180–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lehner T. The role of heat shock protein, microbial and autoimmune agents in the aetiology of Behçet’s disease. Int Rev Immunol, 14:21–32. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17.Uchio E, Stanford M, Hasan A, et al. HSP derived peptides inducing uveitis and IgG and IgA antibodies. Exp Eye Res 1998;67:719–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hu W, Hasan A, Wilson A, et al. Experimental mucosal induction of uveitis with the 60-kDa heat shock protein-derived peptide 336–351. Eur J Immunol 1998;28:2444–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hassan A, Fortune F, Wilson A, et al. Role of γδ T cells in pathogenesis and diagnosis of Behçet’s disease. Lancet 1996;347:789–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Verjans GM, van Hagen PM, van der koi A, et al. V gamma9Vdelta2 T cells recovered from eyes of patients with Behçet’s disease recognize non-peptide prenyl pyrophosphate antigens. J Neuroimmunol 2002;130:46–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lehner T. Immunopathogenesis of Behçet’s disease. Ann Med Int (Paris) 1999;150:483–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Frassanito MA, Dammaco R, Cafforio P, et al. Th1 polarization of the immune response in Behçet’s disease: a putative pathogenic role of Interleukin-12. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:1967–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Raziuddin S, Al-Dahlaan A, Bahabri S, et al. Divergent cytokine production profile in Behçet’s disease. Altered Th1/Th2 cell cytokine pattern. J Rheumatol 1998;25:329–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nicholson LB, Kuchroo VK. Manipulation of the Th1/Th2 balance in autoimmune disease. Curr Opin Immunol 1996;8:837–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Youssef S, Stüve O, Patarroyo JC, et al. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, promotes a Th2 bias and reverses paralysis in central nervous system autoimmune disease. Nature 2002;420:78–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leung BP, Sattar N, Crilly A, et al. A novel anti-inflammatory role for simvasatin in inflammatory arthritis. J Immunol 2003;170:1524–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Szabo SJ, Kim ST, Costa GL, et al. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell 2000;100:655–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Afkarian M, Sedy JR, Yang J, et al. T-bet is a STAT1-induced regulator of IL-12R expression in naïve CD4+ T cells. Nat Immunol 2002;3:506–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lugo-Villarino G, Maldonaldo-López, Possemato R, et al. T-bet is required for optimal production of IFN-γ and antigen-specific T cell activation by dendritic cells. PNAS 2003;100:7749–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]