Skip to main content
Medscape General Medicine logoLink to Medscape General Medicine
letter
. 2007 Jan 4;9(1):3.

Reader's Response and Author's Reply to “A Survey of Neurologists on Bothersome Patient Behaviors”

Daly de Gagne 1
PMCID: PMC1925014  PMID: 17441294

Readers' Response

The data accumulated by the Evans on bothersome patient behaviors, and reported in their article,[1] are indeed valuable.

As a therapist with patients who experience relational issues with their physicians (and with me), I endorse the need for gathering these kinds of data. I offer one caution, however.

It is too easy to see the behaviors that are bothersome as a problem that may simply be mediated by a practice policy discussion. Undoubtedly that can help in some situations, but the issue is far too complex for that to be sufficient.

Concerns I have:

  • In the context of a neurology practice, to what extent are these bothersome behaviors related to the patients' presenting issues?

  • If patients have traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), one might well expect to see such behaviors. I believe that the psychiatric sequelae of TBIs have been well documented, including the rapid shifts in mood, the propensity for anger, substance abuse, and lack of compliance with treatment.

  • The preferred patient behaviors fall well within a middle-class paradigm for socially acceptable conduct (eg, if you make an appointment you keep it, arriving punctually, or advise of inability to attend). I work with many people from the inner city who, for reasons of social upbringing, culture, or mental health issues, are often unlikely to adhere to this paradigm. I have clients whose relationships with physicians have broken down around an apparent inability to meet the expectations for preferred patient behaviors. How do we, whether we are physicians or psychotherapists, develop ways to accommodate these patients?

The Evans have opened a significant area for professional reflection and discussion, one that not only impinges on our comfort levels as caregivers, but also, in some cases, on life and death issues for our patients.

Footnotes

Readers are encouraged to respond to George Lundberg, MD, Editor of MedGenMed, for the editor's eye only or for possible publication via email: glundberg@medscape.net

Reference

MedGenMed. 2007 Jan 4;9(1):3.

Author's Reply

Randolph W Evans 1

We appreciate therapist de Gagne's comments and interest in our survey.

Contrary to the assertion, we discuss the complexity of the issue and suggest practice policies as just one concrete suggestion for dealing with the problem.

de Gagne is concerned that some of the behaviors may reflect the patient's underlying disease, such as traumatic brain injury. The survey design does not provide specifics about the demographics and disorders of patients with bothersome behaviors. Traumatic brain injury accounts for a very small percentage of the typical neurologist's practice. In my experience, this population is not any more likely to have bothersome behaviors than any other.

Anecdotally, I have presented this material to a diverse group of physicians from many specialties in a grand rounds who observe the same bothersome behaviors in their patients, whether they have appointments for sore throats, pelvic pain, or rashes. Finally, the survey presented bothersome behaviors other than those that physicians fully accept: not being paid when patients have financial hardships, dealing with patients with psychopathology, anxiety about illness, multiple or complicated medical disorders, or medically unexplained disorders.

I concur that providing healthcare for patients with socioeconomic deprivation can be extremely difficult and have no ready solution. In specialties, such as neurology, walk-in appointments are not feasible, and no-shows for new patient appointments may leave a 30- to 60-minute gap in the schedule.


Articles from Medscape General Medicine are provided here courtesy of WebMD/Medscape Health Network

RESOURCES