Skip to main content
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 2007 Jun 13;405(Pt 1):107–113. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061572

Expression and glycogenic effect of glycogen-targeting protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit GL in cultured human muscle

Marta Montori-Grau *, Maria Guitart *, Carles Lerin *,1, Antonio L Andreu , Christopher B Newgard , Cèlia García-Martínez *, Anna M Gómez-Foix *,2
PMCID: PMC1925244  PMID: 17555403

Abstract

Glycogen-targeting PP1 (protein phosphatase 1) subunit GL (coded for by the PPP1R3B gene) is expressed in human, but not rodent, skeletal muscle. Its effects on muscle glycogen metabolism are unknown. We show that GL mRNA levels in primary cultured human myotubes are similar to those in freshly excised muscle, unlike subunits GM (gene PPP1R3A) or PTG (protein targeting to glycogen; gene PPP1R3C), which decrease strikingly. In cultured myotubes, expression of the genes coding for GL, GM and PTG is not regulated by glucose or insulin. Overexpression of GL activates myotube GS (glycogen synthase), glycogenesis in glucose-replete and -depleted cells and glycogen accumulation. Compared with overexpressed GM, GL has a more potent activating effect on glycogenesis, while marked enhancement of their combined action is only observed in glucose-replete cells. GL does not affect GP (glycogen phosphorylase) activity, while co-overexpression with muscle GP impairs GL activation of GS in glucose-replete cells. GL enhances long-term glycogenesis additively to glucose depletion and insulin, although GL does not change the phosphorylation of GSK3 (GS kinase 3) on Ser9 or its upstream regulator kinase Akt/protein kinase B on Ser473, nor its response to insulin. In conclusion, in cultured human myotubes, the GL gene is expressed as in muscle tissue and is unresponsive to glucose or insulin, as are GM and PTG genes. GL activates GS regardless of glucose, does not regulate GP and stimulates glycogenesis in combination with insulin and glucose depletion.

Keywords: protein phosphatase 1 subunit GL (PPP1R3B gene product), protein phosphatase 1 subunit GM (PPP1R3A gene product), protein phosphatase 1 subunit PTG (PPP1R3C gene product), human myotube, glycogen synthase, glycogen phosphorylase

Abbreviations: Ad-, adenovirus; Ad-GFP, a non-replicating adenovirus encoding GFP (green fluorescent protein); Ct, threshold cycle; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; GP, glycogen phosphorylase; GRS, glycogen targeting regulatory subunit; GS, glycogen synthase; GSK3, glycogen synthase kinase 3; MGP, muscle GP; PDK1, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKB, protein kinase B (Akt); PP1, protein phosphatase 1; PPP1R3B, PPP1R3A, PPP1R3C, PPP1R3D and PPP1R3E, genes coding for PP1 subunits GL, GM, PTG (protein targeting to glycogen), R6 and R3E respectively; SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum

INTRODUCTION

Muscle glycogen synthesis is considered to be enhanced by recruitment/activation of phosphatases, primarily PP1 (protein phosphatase 1), and by phosphorylation-inactivation of kinases, mainly GSK3 (glycogen synthase kinase 3) [1,2], acting on the rate-liming enzyme GS (glycogen synthase). PP1, which activates GS and inactivates GP (glycogen phosphorylase), is recruited into glycogen particles and regulated by GRSs (glycogen-targeting regulatory subunits) [1]. In muscle tissue, several PP1 GRSs are expressed and their specific regulatory roles are undergoing investigation. In the human muscle these are: the muscle-specific subunit GM (gene PPP1R3A), which is largely expressed in both rodent and human tissues [3,4]; PTG (protein targeting to glycogen; gene PPP1R3C), which is robustly expressed in skeletal and cardiac muscle and liver in humans [5,6]; and the GL subunit (gene PPP1R3B), which is expressed in muscle and liver in humans at comparable levels [4], whereas in rodents and rabbits it is not present in skeletal muscle [4,7]; the ubiquitous isoform R6 (PPP1R3D) [6] that is also found in muscle; and R3E (PPP1R3E) [8], which is expressed in liver and heart in rodents, but is most abundant in skeletal muscle in humans.

GL has been shown to modulate the activity of PP1 on glycogen-metabolizing enzymes, either purified or in the context of hepatic cells. Moreover, the human PPP1R3B gene has been examined as a candidate gene for the Type 2 diabetes and MODY (maturity onset diabetes of the young) loci on chromosome 8p23 [9]. Purified GL enhances the muscle GS phosphatase activity of PP1, whereas it decreases muscle GP phosphatase activity [7]. Effects of GL on PP1 GS phosphatase activity are inhibited by addition to the assay of GP a (phosphorylated active form), and the GP counteraction is suppressed by AMP [7]. The GL regulatory binding site for GP a comprises the 16 amino acids at the C-terminus [10]. This mechanism is effective in liver [11], and it has been proposed to contribute to the stimulation of glycogen synthesis by insulin and high glucose [12]. GL regulatory effects in liver glycogen metabolism have been described as occurring when the gene is delivered to primary cultured rat hepatocytes [13,14] or rat liver [15]. When overexpressed in hepatocytes, GL was found to have the highest glycogenic and GS-activating capacity when compared with PTG or GM. Likewise, GP was strongly inactivated by GL expression [13], and glycogenolysis in response to glucose depletion was prevented [14]. Delivery of GL to the liver in rats fed on a high-fat diet increased glycogen content in the fed and fasted condition and reduced plasma triacylglycerols in fed animals as well as reducing lactate after fasting [15].

The metabolic-control role of GL in muscle has not been examined. Only the glycogenic effectiveness of GM and PTG in muscle has been previously explored. Overexpressed GM [16] activates GS in glycogen-depleted cultured human myotubes more than in glycogen-replete cells and has an equivalent reverse action on GP. Consequently, overexpressed GM shows a modest glycogen-accumulating effect and impairs glycogenolysis. Specific overexpression of GM in muscle of transgenic mice [17] is also characterized by an enhanced GS activity ratio and a moderate increase in glycogen content. However, disruption of the PPP1R3A gene in mice lowers GS activity and glycogen in muscle and causes muscle insulin resistance with aging [17,18]. Overexpression of PTG in cultured human myotubes [19] markedly activates GS in both glucose-deprived and glucose-treated cells and causes a huge accumulation of glycogen, whereas it does not significantly modify GP activity. Mice with a heterozygous deletion of the PTG gene [20] show reduced accumulation of glycogen in muscle, as well as in liver and adipose tissue, and muscle insulin resistance with aging.

In summary, the regulation of the human GL gene and its metabolic control role in muscle cells is unknown. To address these issues, we studied the expression of the GL gene in primary cultured human myotubes and its response to glucose and insulin. Moreover, we overexpressed GL, by means of adenovirus, in these cultured cells, and studied its effects on glycogen-metabolizing enzymes and glycogen metabolism. We also sought to study whether GP modulated the regulatory action of GL on GS within the muscle cell and the combined effects of GL with GM, glucose or insulin stimulation.

EXPERIMENTAL

Muscle samples and culture

Biopsies, from gastrocnemius and peronæus muscles, were obtained during surgery from four donors devoid of muscle disease. The biopsies were obtained with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Vall d’Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain, and with the informed consent of the subjects concerned. Myoblast cell populations were isolated from the muscle biopsies by the explant culture technique [21]. Myoblasts were grown in DMEM (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium)/M-199 medium (3:1, v/v), with 10% (v/v) FBS (fetal bovine serum), 10 μg/ml insulin, 4 mM glutamine, 25 ng/ml fibroblast growth factor and 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor. Immediately after myoblast fusion, the medium was replaced by DMEM/M-199 devoid of growth factors and glutamine and with 10% FBS.

RNA extraction, reverse transcription and real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from tissue and cell samples following the instructions of the RNeasy Minikit (Qiagen,Valencia, CA, U.S.A). Extracts were homogenized with a Polytron (Kynematica Polytron, Westbury, NY, U.S.A.). A 0.5 μg portion of total RNA was retrotranscribed with TaqMan reverse-transcription reagents from Applied Biosystems (Branchburg, NJ, U.S.A.) using random hexamers. Real-time PCR was performed in the ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detection system with the TaqMan universal PCR master mix and probes for human PPP1R3A, PPP1R3B and PPP1R3C genes and PPP1R3B rat and PPP1R3A rabbit genes from Applied Biosystems. β2-Microglobulin was used as the endogenous control to normalize the threshold cycle (Ct) for each probe assay as stated. Relative gene expression was estimated as 2−ΔCt and gene fold change was estimated by the 2−ΔΔCt method [22].

Transduction with recombinant adenoviruses

10-day-old myotubes were transduced with adenoviruses at an MOI (multiplicity of infection) of 20 for 4 h. Under these conditions, transduction efficiency was about 90% (results not shown). At 48 h before the metabolic experiments, cells were depleted of insulin and, 24 h before the metabolic experiments, depleted of FBS. An adenovirus expressing the EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) under the control of the CMV (cytomegalovirus) promoter Ad-GFP [a non-replicating adenovirus encoding GFP (green fluorescent protein)] was used as a control. Construction of Ad-GL, encoding rat GL, and Ad-GM, encoding rabbit GM, are described in [13]; Ad-MGP encoding rabbit MGP (muscle GP) is described in [23].

Enzyme activity and metabolite assays

To measure GS and GP activities, 100 μl of homogenization buffer consisting of 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.0, 150 mM KF, 15 mM EDTA, 600 mM sucrose, 15 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 17 μg/l leupeptin, 1 mM benzamidine and 1 mM PMSF was used in order to scrape the cell monolayers off the frozen plates prior to sonication. The resulting homogenates were used for the determination of enzyme activities. GP activity was determined by the incorporation of [U-14C]glucose 1-phosphate into glycogen in the absence or presence of the allosteric activator AMP (1 mM) [24]. GS activity was measured in the absence or presence of 10 mM glucose 6-phosphate as described in [25].

To assess glycogen synthesis, cells were incubated with 10 mM [U-14C]glucose (0.05 μCi/μmol). To measure glycogen, cell monolayers were scraped into 100 μl of 30% (w/v) KOH and homogenates boiled for 15 min. An aliquot of the homogenates was used for the measurement of protein concentration. Homogenates were spotted on to Whatman 3MM paper, and glycogen was precipitated by immersing the papers in ice-cold 66% (v/v) ethanol. Radioactivity in dried papers was counted in a β-radiation counter or papers were incubated in 0.4 M acetate buffer, pH 4.8, with 25 units/ml α-amyloglucosidase (Sigma) for 120 min at 37 °C. Glucose released was measured enzymatically with a glucose kit from Biosystems (Barcelona, Spain). Glucose transport was assessed by 2-deoxy-D-[3H]glucose uptake in cells grown in 24-well plates as described previously [26].

Western blotting

Extracts were prepared by scraping cell monolayers from 6-cm-diameter dishes into 120 μl of homogenization buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, 2 μg/μl leupeptin, 2 μg/ml aprotinin, 1% (v/v) Nonidet P40 and 1 mM dithiothreitol. Lysates were then rocked gently for 60 min at 4 °C. The resulting homogenates were centrifuged at 13000 g for 5 min at 4 °C and the supernatants were collected. An aliquot of the cell extracts was used for the measurement of protein concentration. A 20 μg portion of protein was resolved by SDS/10%-(w/v)-PAGE, and immunoblotting was performed with antibodies against the Ser473 phosphorylation site on Akt1 and equivalent sites in Akt2/3, protein Akt1, Akt2 and Akt3 (Cell Signaling), actin (Sigma), α-actinin (Chemicon) or GSK3-α and -β (Upstate) and GSK-α and -β in which Ser21 and Ser9 are respectively phosphorylated (Cell Signaling). Protein bands were revealed and quantified with a LAS-3000 luminescent image analyser (FujiFilm). Results are the ratios, in arbitrary units, between the Akt and actin signals or between GSK3 and the α-actinin signal and are expressed as percentages with respect to Ad-GFP-treated cells incubated with glucose and without insulin.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as means±S.E.M., and the significance of the difference was analysed by Student's t test. Values were considered significant at P< 0.05. Results for gene expression (fold change from the real-time PCR analysis) were examined using REST (Relative Expression Software Tool) [27].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Relative expression of glycogen-targeting PP1 regulatory subunits, GL, GM and PTG genes in human muscle: effect of glucose and insulin

Since GL is only expressed in human muscle, mRNA levels of PPP1R3B (coding for GL), in comparison with those of PPP1R3A (coding for GM) and PPP1R3C (coding for PTG), and potential regulation of these genes by glucose and insulin, was analysed in primary cultured human myotubes.

In muscle biopsies, relative PPP1R3C and PPP1R3A mRNA levels were both comparable with those of the reference gene coding for β2-microglobulin, whereas expression of PPP1R3B was about 100-fold lower than the reference gene (Table 1). In primary cultured myotubes, relative levels of PPP1R3B expression were steady compared with the muscle biopsies. PPP1R3C expression was about 14-fold lower, whereas PPP1R3A was reduced by about 3400-fold in cultured myotubes compared with muscle tissue. The relative abundances of the targeting subunit isoforms changed from PPP1R3A=PPP1R3C>>PPP1R3B to PPP1R3C>PPP1R3B>>PPP1R3A. Therefore these data suggest weaker expression of the GL PP1 regulatory subunit compared with GM or PTG in human muscle tissue. However, GL (PPP1R3B) expression in cultured myotubes is preserved, unlike the muscle-specific PP1 GRS, GM (PPP1R3A), which plunges after culture, and the non-muscle-specific PTG (PPP1R3C) subunit, which is decreased.

Table 1. Expression of GL, PTG and GM genes in human muscle biopsies and cultured human myotubes.

The relative expression of GL (PPP1R3B), PTG (PPP1R3C) and GM (PPP1R3A) genes was analysed in muscle biopsies and cultured myotubes from four subjects by reverse-transcription PCR. The Ct values for the reference probe β2-microglobulin were subtracted from each probe CtCt). Expression relative to that of β2-microglobulin was calculated using the ΔCt method. Mean values of 2−ΔCt or 1/2−ΔCt±S.E.M. are shown. The former are shown by ‘+’ and the latter by ‘−’. To determine changes due to culture handling, the ΔCt values for muscle were subtracted from the ΔCt values of cells cultured with glucose. To determine regulation of gene expression by glucose and insulin, cultured cells were incubated for 18 h with or without 25 mM glucose and then further incubated with 100 nM insulin for 4 h where stated. The ΔCt values for cells treated without glucose and without insulin were subtracted from each treatment. Data are expressed as mean values of 2−ΔΔCt for up-regulated genes and 1/2−ΔΔCt for down-regulated ones. The former are shown by ’+’ and the latter by ‘−’. The significance of the difference between tissue and cultured muscle, as assessed with REST was *P<0.01.

Effect of treatment
Relative expression Cultured myotubes
Gene Muscle biopsy Cultured myotubes Biopsy/myotubes Glucose Insulin Glucose+insulin
PPP1R3B −117±47 −87±10 +1.15 −1.19 −1.63 −1.10
PPP1R3C +1.92±0.47 −8.70±0.72 −14.7* +1.14 +1.10 +1.20
PPP1R3A −2.67±0.31 −12612±4325 −3408* −1.32 −1.27 +1.63

In cultured muscle cells [28,29] and muscle in vivo [30,31], glucose depletion or insulin are positive signals for the GS activity ratio [32]. There are several hypotheses about the mechanisms of these adaptations, which are still not completely elucidated [2,32]. We reasoned that one possible contributing factor could be the up-regulation of a PP1 GRS subunit. Thus we examined whether glucose or insulin regulated the expression of PPP1R3B (GL), PPP1R3A (GM) and PPP1R3C (PTG) genes in cultured myotubes. We found no effects of glucose or insulin alone or of glucose plus insulin on their respective mRNA levels (Table 1). Previous studies showed that GM expression is not modified in the muscle [33] of streptozotocin-type 1 diabetic rats. On the other hand, in liver extracts of insulin-dependent diabetic and adrenalectomized starved rats, GL expression is reduced, an effect which is reverted by insulin administration [34]. Nevertheless, unlike the human gene, the rat GL gene is not expressed in muscle tissue.

Effect of GL overexpression on GS and GP activities in cultured human myotubes (combined effect with GM; response to glucose, muscle GP and insulin)

We studied the impact of rat GL overexpression on glycogen-metabolizing enzymes in cultured muscle cells alone or combined with delivered GM, since, as shown above, this muscle-specific subunit is highly down-regulated in these cells. Rat GL protein is 89% identical with human GL [4]. Moreover, the 16-amino-acid region in the C-terminal region that binds GP a in vitro is identical in the human and rat proteins [10].

To overexpress GL, cultured human myotubes were treated with an adenovirus (Ad-GL) containing the full-length rat GL cDNA. Cells were harvested 24 or 48 h after transduction, and the expression of the rat GL mRNA was analysed by reverse-transcription PCR relative to β2-microglobulin. Cells exposed to Ad-GL showed levels of GL (expressed as 1/2−ΔCt±S.E.M.) of −3.68±0.03 at 24 h and −1.50±0.08 at 48 h, whereas, in cells treated with the control virus (Ad-GFP), values of −2424±571 were assessed. Under equivalent conditions, cells were exposed to Ad-GM, leading to a relative mRNA level of rabbit GM of −18.0±1.9 at 24 h; the value in Ad-GFP cells was −10615±2503 (minus signs indicate that expression was lower than that of the control gene).

Delivery of GL increased (between 2- and 3-fold) the activity ratio of GS, irrespective of whether cells had been incubated with or without glucose (Table 2) during the period of overexpression. Total GS activity was similar in controls (glucose-replete, 11.3±1.1 munits/mg of protein; glucose-depleted, 15.3±2.1 munits/mg of protein) and GL overexpressers (glucose-replete, 12.8±0.9 munits/mg of protein; glucose-depleted, 13.2±0.7 munits/mg of protein). As shown previously [16], GM activated GS more in glucose-depleted (85%) than in glucose-replete (35%) cells (Figure 1A), whereas GM did not modify total GS activity levels (results not shown). Indeed, high glucose/glycogen exerts a negative effect on GS (Table 2) and GM [16], through mechanisms that are not yet clearly established [2831], Therefore the GS-activating effect of GL is comparable with that of GM in glucose-depleted cells and higher in glucose-replete cells [16], but weaker than that shown for PTG [19] in muscle cells, unlike in liver cells, where GL shows the highest GS-activating capacity compared with PTG or GM [13,14]. When overexpressed together in myotubes, GL and GM did not significantly further activate GS compared with GL alone (Figure 1A).

Table 2. Effect of GL overexpression on GS and GP activity ratios in glucose-replete and -depleted cells.

Muscle cells were transduced with Ad-GFP, Ad-GL and/or Ad-MGP and incubated without or with 25 mM glucose for 18 h. Then, where indicated, 100 nM insulin was added for 30 min. GS and GP activity ratios were measured in cell extracts. Data are means±S.E.M. for four independent experiments performed in duplicate. Significances of differences are: *P<0.01 and **P<0.001 versus controls (Ad-GFP) and †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.005 versus Ad-GL, under the same incubation conditions; ¶P<0.05 no glucose versus glucose without insulin in controls; and §P<0.05 insulin versus no insulin in GL overexpressers without glucose. ND, means not determined.

GS GP
Glucose … + +
Treatment Insulin… + + + +
Ad-GFP 0.050±0.006 0.057±0.004 0.081±0.016¶ 0.058±0.003 0.65±0.08 0.78±0.03 0.74±0.03 0.88±0.07
Ad-GL 0.170±0.020** 0.154±0.025** 0.196±0.001** 0.126±0.013**§ 0.55±0.03 0.65±0.05 0.66±0.10 0.79±0.04
Ad-MGP 0.055±0.005 ND 0.111±0.007* ND 0.25±0.07** ND 0.37±0.02* ND
Ad-GL+Ad-MGP 0.127±0.008† ND 0.193±0.008 ND 0.30±0.04‡ ND 0.35±0.02‡ ND

Figure 1. Combined effect of GL and GM on GS (A) and GP (B) activity ratios and glycogen synthesis (C).

Figure 1

Muscle cells were transduced with Ad-GFP, Ad-GL or Ad-GM and incubated with (white columns) or without (black columns) 25 mM glucose for 18 h. (A) GS and (B) GP activity ratios were measured in cell extracts. (C) Cells were further incubated with 10 mM [U-14C]glucose for 8 h. Data are means±S.E.M. from three (A, B) and two (C) experiments performed in triplicate. Significance of differences: versus cells treated with Ad-GFP under the same incubation conditions, *P<0.05 and **P<0.001; cells without glucose versus with glucose for any viral treatment, †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.001; and (C) versus cells treated with Ad-GLP<0.005) or Ad-GMP<0.005) under the same incubation conditions.

GL overexpression caused no statistically significant change in the GP activity ratio, and glucose had no further effect on these values (Table 2). By contrast, GM inactivated GP in cells incubated with glucose (Figure 1B) [16], irrespective of GL overexpression. A possible explanation for this lack of effect in muscle cells is that GP is located preferentially in glycogen particles that accumulate close to the SR (sarcoplasmic reticulum) in a protein complex including phosphorylase kinase [35] and, presumably, GM. Neither GL nor PTG [19], which are not targeted to the SR, regulate this enzyme. By contrast, GM, which includes an SR-binding motif, does inactivate GP, whereas a truncated GM protein lacking the regulatory-subunit-binding motif does not [16].

Since GL effects on PP1 GS phosphatase activity are inhibited by GP a (dephosphorylated, active form) in vitro [7], we examined the joint effect of GL and muscle GP overexpression on GS activation. Transduction with the Ad-MGP virus increased total GP activity (456±97 and 311±38 munits/mg of protein in glucose-replete and -depleted cells respectively) by more than 3-fold compared with controls (100±8 and 86.4±8.0 munits/mg of protein in glucose-replete and -depleted cells respectively). The levels of the active form of GP (GP a) were increased by about 2-fold (114±14 and 113±12 munits/mg of protein in GP overexpressers with or without glucose compared with 64.2±9.0 and 64.8±7.8 in glucose-replete and -depleted control cells respectively). Higher levels of GP did not modify the GS activity ratio in cells incubated with glucose, whereas they did cause an additional increase when cells were deprived of glucose (Table 2), as we have previously shown [29]. Concomitant overexpression of GL and GP did not modify GP activity ratio (Table 2) compared with GP overexpression alone, irrespective of whether glucose was present or not. GP inhibited the effect of GL on GS activation by 25% in glucose-replete cells, whereas the inhibition was not significant in glucose-depleted cells. These results support the concept that GP a is an allosteric inactivator of GL in muscle cells, as has been shown in liver cells [11] and in vitro [7]. The lack of inhibition in glucose-depleted cells may be due to the suppression of GP action on GL by AMP [7] or other inhibitory metabolites. On the other hand, it has to be taken into account that, in glucose-depleted cells, muscle GP has a stimulatory effect by itself, which opposes the allosteric inhibition of GL.

Since insulin is a key physiological regulator of glycogen metabolism, we examined the effects of GL under insulin stimulation. Activation of muscle GS may be mediated, besides enhancement of phosphatases, by inactivation of kinases phosphorylating GS, mainly GSK3, which is a target of insulin [36,32]. Insulin metabolic effects in muscle are triggered by the phosphorylation of the insulin receptor substrate 1 and subsequent activation of PI3K (phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase) [37,38]. Activated PI3K produces Ptd(3,4,5)P3, which recruits proteins with a pleckstrin homology domain, such as PDK1 (3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase) and Akt/PKB (protein kinase B) [38]. The activated phospho-Akt then inactivates GSK3 by phosphorylation of N-terminal Ser21 on GSK3-α and Ser9 on GSK3-β, which is involved in GS regulation [32,36]. We found that insulin had no significant effect on GS activity ratio (Table 2) in control cells or GL overexpressers incubated with glucose, whereas GS activity ratios showed a tendency to decrease in cells depleted of glucose and treated with insulin, which reached statistical significance in GL overexpressers. Insulin did not change GS total activity under any studied conditions (results not shown). The lack of activation of GS by insulin is a consistent observation in cultured myotubes [29], in comparison with the observations by others in cultured human myoblasts, where insulin doubles the GS activity ratio [39]. However, we found that, in myotubes cultured with glucose, short-term treatment with insulin stimulates Akt phosphorylation on Ser473 and GSK3-β phosphorylation on Ser9, as expected. Treatment of Ad-GFP-transduced cells incubated with glucose with 100 nM insulin for 10 min stimulated Akt/PKB phosphorylation on Ser473 compared with Ad-GFP cells (136±9%, P<0.005) and slightly increased total Akt protein (120±9%; P<0.05). By contrast, in GL overexpressers, no significant changes were observed in Akt phosphorylation (104±8%) or protein content (108±13%) compared with Ad-GFP cells. Insulin had equivalent stimulatory effects on Akt phosphorylation (141±19%; P<0.05) and did not change total Akt levels (94±10%) in GL overexpressers relative to Ad-GFP. Regarding GSK3, the major phosphorylated band was GSK3-β (results not shown). Phosphorylation of GSK3-β on Ser9 was increased by insulin (148±19%; P<0.05) relative to Ad-GFP glucose-replete cells, while expression of the GSK3 β-isoform was not modified by insulin (102±15%). In cells overexpressing GL, GSK3-β phosphorylation (93±13%) exhibited no changes compared wih Ad-GFP cells, nor was there change in the total protein content (105±9%). Insulin enhancement of GSK3-β phosphorylation in GL overexpressers (150±27%, P<0.05) was still observed as in controls, while no differences were found in total GSK3-β expression levels (112±26%). A possible reason for the discrepancy between the insulin effect on transducing kinases and lack of GS activation in myotubes is the regulation of different intracellular pools of kinases. For instance, it has been suggested that there are at least two distinct pools of GSK3-β and that the one responsive to cyclic AMP is not directly involved in the phosphorylation-inactivation of GS in isolated soleus muscles [40]. It is also possible that, besides inactivation of GSK3, insulin exerts other effects in human myotubes, which counteract the activation of GS. Regarding GL, the rat and human proteins have a theoretical PDK1-binding motif (Ser192 and Ser193 respectively) according to [41]; however, our data indicate that no interaction between PDK1 and GL takes place that affects regulation of the phosphorylation of Akt or GSK3 or its response to insulin.

Effect of GL overexpression on glycogen synthesis in cultured human myotubes: response to insulin and glucose

The ability of GL to stimulate glycogen synthesis was examined. First, a time-course study was performed in cells incubated with or without glucose (Figure 2). In glucose-replete cells (Figure 2A), GL stimulated glucose incorporation into glycogen at all time points tested between 1 and 48 h. At the early time points, increments were about 2.5-fold and a maximal 5-fold stimulation was observed at 8 h. In glucose-depleted cells (Figure 2B), where glucose incorporation was higher compared with that in cells preincubated with glucose, no stimulatory effect of GL on early glycogen resynthesis was observed, findings similar to those we obtained with GM [16], whereas persistent increments of about 3-fold were detected between 8 and 48 h. Next, we examined the effect of GL on glycogen synthesis as a function of glucose concentration (Figure 3A). In cells preincubated without glucose, GL overexpression enhanced glycogen synthesis at every glucose concentration tested from 0.5 to 10 mM, indicating that stimulation is not a function of glucose concentration in the range tested. We also assessed (Figure 1C) the combined effects of GL and GM, which had a fainter (about 3-fold lower) glycogenic capacity than did GL. Glycogen synthesis was further enhanced (about 2-fold) by the co-overexpression of both PP1 GRSs in glucose-replete cells, whereas in glucose-depleted cells no extra stimulation was accomplished. Next the combined effect on glycogen synthesis of GL and insulin was examined (Figure 3B). Insulin exerted a stimulatory effect on glycogen synthesis, of about 2-fold in cells preincubated with glucose and of 1.4-fold in cells preincubated without glucose. In GL overexpressers, incubated with or without glucose, insulin had a further stimulatory effect, with values 1.4- and 1.6-fold higher respectively. Thus, despite the fact that insulin has no activating effect on GS, it stimulates glycogen synthesis and combines its effects with GL and glucose depletion. Moreover, glucose depletion and GL, both of which activate GS, have an additive stimulatory effect on glycogen synthesis.

Figure 2. Time-dependent synthesis of glycogen in glucose-replete (A) and -depleted (B) cells.

Figure 2

Muscle cells were transduced with Ad-GFP (□) or Ad-GL (■) and incubated with 25 mM glucose (A), or switched to glucose-deprived medium (B), for 18 h. Then, cells were incubated with 10 mM [U-14C]glucose for the times indicated. Data are means±S.E.M. for three experiments performed in triplicate. Significance of differences versus cells treated with Ad-GFP: *P<0.01 and **P<0.001.

Figure 3. Glycogen synthesis: (A) glucose-concentration-dependence and (B) combined effect of GL and insulin.

Figure 3

Muscle cells were transduced with Ad-GFP (A, □) or Ad-GL (A, ■) and (A) incubated without glucose or (B) with or without 25 mM glucose as stated, for 18 h. Then, cells were incubated with [U-14C]glucose at (A) the indicated concentrations or at (B) 10 mM with or without 100 nM insulin, for 8 h. Data are means±S.E.M. for three experiments performed in triplicate. Significance of differences: (A) versus cells treated with Ad-GFP: *P<0.01 and **P<0.001 at equivalent glucose concentration; (B) in every group of treatments; *P<0.01 and **P<0.001 in cells incubated with insulin versus without insulin, within controls and GL overexpressers; ¶P<0.001 in cells incubated without glucose and without insulin versus with glucose and without insulin; and ‡P<0.001 in GL overexpressers versus controls incubated with glucose and without insulin.

Finally the effects of overexpression of GL in glycogen accumulation were assessed (Figure 4). In cells transduced with the control virus, glycogen content was steady over the time studied, whereas in cells transduced with Ad-GL, glycogen levels were 2-fold higher 18 h after GL delivery and progressively increased throughout the ensuing 48 h. Then, GL causes a time-dependent increase in glycogen content.

Figure 4. Time-course of glycogen accumulation.

Figure 4

Muscle cells were transduced with Ad-GFP (□) or Ad-GL (■) and incubated with 25 mM glucose for 18 h (time zero) or further incubated for the indicated times and then harvested to assess glycogen content. Data are means±S.E.M. for three experiments performed in triplicate. Significance of differences versus cells treated with Ad-GFP: *P<0.05, **P<0.005; and versus GL overexpressers at time zero: †P<0.05 and ‡P<0.01.

In summary, GL gene expression in human muscle tissue is relatively lower than that of PTG or GM; moreover, it is preserved in cultured human myotubes, where, like the expression of GM or PTG genes, it is not regulated by insulin or glucose. In cultured myotubes, overexpression of GL activates GS irrespective of glucose, without affecting the phosphorylation of the regulatory kinase GSK3 and does not modulate GP. GL exerts a greater glycogenic effect than GM, although weaker than that shown in liver cells, where GL powerfully activates GS and inactivates GP. GL stimulation of glycogenesis in myotubes combines additively to the glycogenic effects of insulin and glucose depletion.

Acknowledgments

C. G. M. was a recipient of a Ramon y Cajal fellowship from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain. M. M. G. was a recipient of a fellowship from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. This work was supported by grants SAF-2003-04223 and SAF-2006-07228 from the MCyT (Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología) and a grant [REDIMET (Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas) RD06/0015/0018] from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain. We thank Ms Ana Orozco for technical assistance.

References

  • 1.Newgard C. B., Brady M. J., O'Doherty R. M., Saltiel A. R. Organizing glucose disposal: emerging roles of the glycogen targeting subunits of protein phosphatase-1. Diabetes. 2000;49:1967–1977. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nielsen J. N., Wojtaszewski J. F. Regulation of glycogen synthase activity and phosphorylation by exercise. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2004;63:233–237. doi: 10.1079/PNS2004348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tang P. M., Bondor J. A., Swiderek K. M., DePaoli-Roach A. A. Molecular cloning and expression of the regulatory (RGL) subunit of glycogen-associated protein phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 1991;266:15782–15789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Munro S., Cuthbertson D. J., Cunningham J., Sales M., Cohen P. T. Human skeletal muscle expresses a glycogen targeting subunit of PP1 that is identical to the insulin sensitive glycogen targeting subunit GL of liver. Diabetes. 2002;51:591–598. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.3.591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Printen J. A., Brady M. J., Saltiel A. R. PTG, a protein phosphatase 1-binding protein with a role in glycogen metabolism. Science. 1997;275:1475–1478. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5305.1475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Armstrong C. G., Browne G. J., Cohen P., Cohen P. T. PPP1R6, a novel member of the family of glycogen-targetting subunits of protein phosphatase 1. FEBS Lett. 1997;418:210–214. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01385-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Doherty M. J., Moorhead G., Morrice N., Cohen P., Cohen P. T. Amino acid sequence and expression of the hepatic glycogen-binding (GL)-subunit of protein phosphatase-1. FEBS Lett. 1995;375:294–298. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01184-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Munro S., Ceulemans H., Bollen M., Diplexcito J., Cohen P. T. A novel glycogen-targeting subunit of protein phosphatase 1 that is regulated by insulin and shows differential tissue distribution in humans and rodents. FEBS J. 2005;272:1478–1489. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04585.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dunn J. S., Mlynarski W. M., Pezzolesi M. G., Borowiec M., Powers C., Krolewski A. S., Doria A. Examination of PPP1R3B as a candidate gene for the type 2 diabetes and MODY loci on chromosome 8p23. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2006;70:587–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2005.00248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Armstrong C. G., Doherty M. J., Cohen P. T. Identification of the separate domains in the hepatic glycogen-targeting subunit of protein phosphatase 1 that interact with phosphorylase a, glycogen and protein phosphatase 1. Biochem. J. 1998;336:699–704. doi: 10.1042/bj3360699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aiston S., Hampson L., Gomez-Foix A. M., Guinovart J. J., Agius L. Hepatic glycogen synthesis is highly sensitive to phosphorylase activity: evidence from metabolic control analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:23858–23866. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101454200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bollen M., Stalmans W. The structure, role, and regulation of type 1 protein phosphatases. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1992;27:227–281. doi: 10.3109/10409239209082564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gasa R., Jensen P. B., Berman H. K., Brady M. J., DePaoli-Roach A. A., Newgard C. B. Distinctive regulatory and metabolic properties of glycogen-targeting subunits of protein phosphatase-1 (PTG, GL, GM/RGl) expressed in hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:26396–26403. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002427200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang R., Cao L., Gasa R., Brady M. J., Sherry A. D., Newgard C. B. Glycogen-targeting subunits and glucokinase differently affect pathways of glycogen metabolism and their regulation in hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:1514–1523. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107001200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gasa R., Clark C., Yang R., DePaoli-Roach A. A., Newgard C. B. Reversal of diet-induced glucose intolerance by hepatic expression of a variant glycogen-targeting subunit of protein phosphatase-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:1524–1530. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107744200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lerin C., Montell E., Nolasco T., Clark C., Brady M. J., Newgard C. B., Gomez-Foix A. M. Regulation and function of the muscle glycogen-targeting subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (GM) in human muscle cells depends on the COOH-terminal region and glycogen content. Diabetes. 2003;52:2221–2226. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.9.2221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aschenbach W. G., Suzuki Y., Breeden K., Prats C., Hirshman M. F., Dufresne S. D., Sakamoto K., Vilardo P. G., Steele M., Kim J. H., et al. The muscle-specific protein phosphatase PP1G/RGL (GM) is essential for activation of glycogen synthase by exercise. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:39959–39967. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105518200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Delibegovic M., Armstrong C. G., Dobbie L., Watt P. W., Smith A. J., Cohen P. T. Disruption of the striated muscle glycogen targeting subunit PPP1R3A of protein phosphatase 1 leads to increased weight gain, fat deposition, and development of insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2003;52:596–604. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.3.596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lerin C., Montell E., Berman H. K., Newgard C. B., Gomez-Foix A. M. Overexpression of protein targeting to glycogen in cultured human muscle cells stimulates glycogen synthesis independent of glycogen and glucose 6-phosphate levels. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:39991–39995. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006251200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Crosson S. M., Khan A., Printen J., Pessin J. E., Saltiel A. R. PTG gene deletion causes impaired glycogen synthesis and developmental insulin resistance. J. Clin. Invest. 2003;111:1423–1432. doi: 10.1172/JCI17975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Askanas V., Gallez-Hawkins G. Synergistic influence of polypeptide growth factors on cultured human muscle. Arch. Neurol. 1985;42:749–752. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04210090013004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gomez-Foix A. M., Coats W. S., Baque S., Alam T., Gerard R. D., Newgard C. B. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of the muscle glycogen phosphorylase gene into hepatocytes confers altered regulation of glycogen metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:25129–25134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gilboe D. P., Larson K. L., Nuttall F. Q. Radioactive method for the assay of glycogen phosphorylases. Anal. Biochem. 1972;47:20–27. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thomas J. A., Schlender K. K., Larner J. A rapid filter paper assay for UDP-glucose-glycogen glucosyltransferase, including an improved biosynthesis of UDP-14C-glucose. Anal. Biochem. 1968;25:486–499. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(68)90127-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Montell E., Turini M., Marotta M., Roberts M., Noe V., Ciudad C. J., Mace K., Gomez-Foix A. M. DAG accumulation from saturated fatty acids desensitizes insulin stimulation of glucose uptake in muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001;280:E229–E237. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.2.E229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pfaffl M. W., Horgan G. W., Dempfle L. Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e36. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.9.e36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Halse R., Bonavaud S. M., Armstrong J. L., McCormack J. G., Yeaman S. J. Control of glycogen synthesis by glucose, glycogen, and insulin in cultured human muscle cells. Diabetes. 2001;50:720–726. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.4.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Montell E., Arias A., Gómez-Foix A. M. Glycogen depletion rather than glucose 6-P increments controls early glycogen recovery in human cultured muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 1999;45:R1489–R1495. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.276.5.R1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bloch G., Chase J. R., Meyer D. B., Avison M. J., Shulman G. I., Shulman R. G. In vivo regulation of rat muscle glycogen resynthesis after an intense exercise. Am. J. Physiol. 1994;266:E85–E91. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1994.266.1.E85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Danforth W. H. Glycogen synthetase activity in skeletal muscle interconversion of two forms and control of glycogen synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1965;240:588–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yeaman S. J., Armstrong J. L., Bonavaud S. M., Poinasamy D., Pickersgill L., Halse R. Regulation of glycogen synthesis in human muscle cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2001;29:537–541. doi: 10.1042/bst0290537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lanner C., Suzuki Y., Bi C., Zhang H., Cooper L. D., Bowker-Kinley M. M., DePaoli-Roach A. A. Gene structure and expression of the targeting subunit, RGL, of the muscle-specific glycogen-associated type 1 protein phosphatase, PP1G. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001;388:135–145. doi: 10.1006/abbi.2001.2283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Doherty M. J., Cadefau J., Stalmans W., Bollen M., Cohen P. T. Loss of the hepatic glycogen-binding subunit (GL) of protein phosphatase 1 underlies deficient glycogen synthesis in insulin-dependent diabetic rats and in adrenalectomized starved rats. Biochem. J. 1998;333:253–257. doi: 10.1042/bj3330253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cuenda A., Nogues M., Henao F., Gutierrez-Merino C. Interaction between glycogen phosphorylase and sarcoplasmic reticulum membranes and its functional implications. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:11998–12004. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.20.11998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.McManus E. J., Sakamoto K., Armit L. J., Ronaldson L., Shpiro N., Marquez R., Alessi D. R. Role that phosphorylation of GSK3 plays in insulin and Wnt signalling defined by knockin analysis. EMBO J. 2005;24:1571–1583. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bjornholm M., Zierath J. R. Insulin signal transduction in human skeletal muscle: identifying the defects in Type II diabetes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005;33:354–357. doi: 10.1042/BST0330354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dong L. Q., Liu F. PDK2: the missing piece in the receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathway puzzle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005;289:E187–E196. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00011.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Halse R., Rochford J. J., McCormack J. G., Vandenheede J. R., Hemmings B. A., Yeaman S. J. Control of glycogen synthesis in cultured human muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:776–780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.2.776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jensen J., Brennesvik E. O., Lai Y. C., Shepherd P. R. GSK-3β regulation in skeletal muscles by adrenaline and insulin: evidence that PKA and PKB regulate different pools of GSK-3. Cell. Signalling. 2007;19:204–210. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Obenauer J. C., Cantley L. C., Yaffe M. B. Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3635–3641. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES