Abstract
Variable-number tandem repeats (VNTRs) have been identified in populations of Pasteuria ramosa, a castrating endobacterium of Daphnia species. The allelic polymorphisms at 14 loci in laboratory and geographically diverse soil samples showed that VNTRs may serve as biomarkers for the genetic characterization of P. ramosa isolates.
Pasteuria spp. are endospore-forming bacteria that are obligate parasites of cladoceran crustaceans and nematodes that develop through a water- or a soilborne stage (18). Their coevolution with their respective hosts has provided an opportunity to explore the genetic basis of host-parasite relationships in aquatic and soil environments. The type species for the genus is Pasteuria ramosa, which is found in Europe and North America and is related to Bacillus spp. by 16S rRNA gene homology (7). It is an endoparasite of Daphnia species, planktonic crustaceans that play an important role in the food chains of ponds. A single waterborne endospore may infect, geminate, and proliferate in the body cavity of its host to generate up to 80 million endospores. Transmission occurs horizontally with the infection of new hosts by mature spores released from dead infected hosts. The cost of infection is high, since hosts are completely castrated (8). Infective spores can survive for extended periods in soils, where they form long-lasting spore banks (9).
The infectivity of a spore, i.e., the ability of a spore to infect and propagate within a particular specimen of a Daphnia species, is dependent on the lineage of the parasite and the host (4, 6, 14). Until now, studies of the population genetics, evolution, and epidemiology of P. ramosa have been limited by the lack of genetic markers to distinguish among isolates. Sequence information from Pasteuria species is limited primarily to Pasteuria penetrans, a bacterium infecting phytopathogenic nematodes (5, 16, 19, 20). Identification of individual strains of P. ramosa is difficult because molecular methods used for genotype analyses, such as PCR of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA or restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, are adversely affected by contamination with the DNA of their hosts. Here we have identified genetic markers based on short tandem repeats that may be used to distinguish isolates and to address the evolution of genetic variants in different environments.
Variable-number tandem repeats (VNTRs) comprised of short sequence repeats (SSRs) constitute a rich source of polymorphism and have been used extensively as markers for discrimination between strains within prokaryotic DNAs (12, 21). VNTR loci have even been found in genetically highly homogenous pathogens, such as Bacillus anthracis (1, 10, 13).
In this study, we describe nine VNTRs in noncoding and putative coding regions of the P. ramosa genome. Two laboratory isolates and bacteria from 11 soil samples collected in the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Russia (Table 1) were typed using these markers to assess the extent of polymorphism at these loci.
TABLE 1.
P. ramosa isolates used in this study
Isolate | Origin | Geographic region, site of isolationa | Year of isolation |
---|---|---|---|
P1 | Lab strain | Gaarzerfeld, Germany | 1997 |
P3 | Lab strain | Tvärminne, Finland | 2002 |
Moscow Zoo 97 | Sediment | Moscow, Russia, zoological garden | 1997 |
Moscow NJK 97 | Sediment | Moscow, Russia, Novodevichiy Monastery | 1997 |
Moscow V 97 | Sediment | Moscow, Russia, Vorantzovsky Park | 1997 |
Oxford Pond 8 96 | Sediment | Oxford, United Kingdom, pond 8 | 1996 |
Oxford Pond 8 97 | Sediment | Oxford, United Kingdom, pond 8 | 1997 |
Oxford Pond 11 97 | Sediment | Oxford, United Kingdom, pond 11 | 1997 |
Oxford Pond 12 97 | Sediment | Oxford, United Kingdom, pond 12 | 1997 |
Oxford Pond 17 97 | Sediment | Oxford, United Kingdom, pond 17 | 1997 |
Belgium OM1 | Sediment | Heverlee, Belgium, pond OM1 | 2006 |
Belgium OM3 | Sediment | Heverlee, Belgium, pond OM3 | 2006 |
Belgium Neeryse | Sediment | Neerijse, Belgium | 2006 |
In Russia, samples were collected from three places in Moscow, namely, the zoological garden, the Vorantzovsky Park of the German Embassy (7 km south of the zoo), and a pond close to the Novodevichiy Monastery (4 km south of the zoo). UK samples were collected from four ponds located within 1 to 2 km of each other, 25 km south of Oxford. Belgium samples came from two adjacent ponds in Heverlee and one pond in Neerijse, a village close to Heverlee.
A cosmid library containing 25- to 40-kb inserts was generated using high-molecular-weight DNAs isolated from vegetative cells of the laboratory isolate P1 of Pasteuria ramosa. Screening for marker genes for P. ramosa and Daphnia by PCR indicated that approximately 90% of the DNA was P. ramosa DNA. This library was subjected to pyrosequencing (15) and provided contigs representing 3.6 Mb (the predicted genome size is 4 to 4.5 Mb). We searched for repetitive DNA in these contigs by using Tandem Repeats Finder software (2; http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html). Short SSRs (repeat units of 3 to 6 nucleotides) were in a minority (6%) compared to repeats harboring 7 to 14 nucleotides (60%) or repeats of >15 nucleotides per unit (34%), which is rather uncommon for the relative abundance of prokaryotic SSRs (21). For DNA polymorphism analysis, we selected 14 SSRs harboring the largest number of repetitions in P1 (Table 2). Eight of these SSRs (indicated with asterisks in Table 2) were located within putative open reading frames (AMIGene Viewer [3; http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/agc/tools/amigene/Form/form.php]), but no significant similarities were found compared to the corresponding amino acid sequences in the protein sequence databases at the National Center of Biotechnology Information database (Bethesda, MD).
TABLE 2.
Primer sequences and repeat motif attributes of 14 P. ramosa SSRs
Primer name | Primer sequence | SSR namec | SSR motif | Repeat size (nt) | No. of repetitions in isolate P1 | Smallest-largest no. of repetitions | Size range of replicons (nt) | No. of alleles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pr1 fwd | ACCTAAAGAACAGGAATATCTGGA | Pr SSR1 | AAACTAACA | 9 | 7 | 3-9 | 195-249 | 5 |
Pr1 rev | GCATGGAATGATTTTTGCTG | |||||||
Pr2 fwda | CTGCTGGATGGATGGACTACGTGA | Pr SSR2.1* | CCTGGTAAA | 9 | 4 | 3-4 | 259-304 | 3 |
Pr2 rev | ACCGGTCCCGTAGGTATAGG | Pr SSR2.2* | CATCCTGGTGGTCCTTGG | 18 | 3 | 2-4 | ||
Pr3 fwd | GGACCAATCGAACCAGGTAT | Pr SSR3* | GG(A/G)CCGATGb | 9 | 7 | 5-8 | 356-383 | 3 |
Pr3 rev | AACGGTTTCTTCGCTTGTTG | |||||||
Pr4 fwd | GGTAACCCTGGATGTCCTGA | Pr SSR4 | TT(A/G)CTTTAb | 8 | 16 | 10-19 | 329-393 | 8 |
Pr4 rev | ATCCCGTTACAAATGGGACA | |||||||
Pr5 fwda | CCCTAAAGGAGACCCAGGAG | Pr SSR5.1* | TGGAGCACC | 9 | 3 | 1 | ||
Pr5 rev | TGAATCGCACTATTACTTGGAAA | Pr SSR5.2* | AAAGGCGAT | 9 | 17 | |||
Pr6 fwd | AACATAAGGGATTAAGGAATGTC | Pr SSR6 | TTTTTCTTTTCT | 12 | 6 | 1-6 | 235-295 | 4 |
Pr6 rev | TGGAAAAGAAAAGGCATTAGC | |||||||
Pr7 fwd | AACGTACTGACAAACCAAACCA | Pr SSR7 | AACAACC(T/C)Cb | 9 | 11 | 4-11 | 109-172 | 7 |
Pr7 rev | AATTTTTCTTAGATTGCTAGGTTGA | |||||||
Pr8 fwd | GCATCAAATACAAAAACAAATGAAG | Pr SSR8 | AGAATATGAAGAAGATGC | 18 | 4 | 4-8 | 386-458 | 5 |
Pr8 rev | TGTTTCTCTCGCGTTTCCTT | |||||||
Pr9 fwd | ATACGACGAACGGAAcAAGA | Pr SSR9 | AGCAACAAC | 9 | 5 | 2-8 | 151-205 | 6 |
Pr9 rev | AACCAAAGAATTAACGCCATT | |||||||
Pr10 fwda | CATTACTGATTAAGCCGGAATCTA | Pr SSR10.1* | GTTGCTCCG | 9 | 4 | 1 | ||
Pr10 rev | TCGCAAGCTAATATACCAGGAA | Pr SSR10.2* | ACAGGACCATTTATACCC | 18 | 2 | |||
Pr SSR10.3* | GTAGGACCTGTACGTCCA | 18 | 2 |
Primers that amplify more than one closely located repeat motif.
Imperfect repeats. The nucleotide at the left in parentheses can be replaced by the one at the right.
*, located within putative coding region. SSRs in bold were found to be polymorphic.
Ten primer sets were designed to amplify these 14 SSRs (Table 2) by using Primer3 software (17; http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi). Bacterial DNA extraction from infected Daphnia cells was carried out with an EZNA tissue DNA kit (Peqlab) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For pond sediment samples, successful detection of microbial DNA requires adequate purification from the coextracted contaminants that inhibit PCR, such as humic and fulvic acids (22); therefore, we used a SoilMaster DNA extraction kit (Epicentre). Endospores of P. ramosa in pond sediments were subjected to mechanical disruption before extracting the DNA. Bead mill homogenization was carried out with a high-speed (5,000 rpm) bead beater (BioSpec Products, Inc.) after suspending 200 mg of soil samples in 250 μl of soil DNA extraction buffer and 2 μl of proteinase K (50 μg/μl) in tubes containing glass beads (0.5-, 0.1-, and 1-mm diameter). Tubes were subjected to bead beating at 5,000 rpm for one cycle of 10 s, one cycle of 20 s, and three cycles of 30 s successively and then centrifuged at 4,500 rpm for 15 min at 10°C. DNAs were extracted from the supernatant following the kit procedure. PCR amplifications were performed in 25-μl volumes containing 1× PCR buffer [Tris-HCl, pH 8.7, KCl, (NH4)2SO4, 15 mM MgCl2], a 200 μM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, a 200 nM concentration of each primer, 0.5 U of HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (QIAGEN GmbH), and 2 μl of template DNA. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 15 min at 94°C; 42 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 50°C (primer-specific annealing temperature), and 1 min at 72°C; and a final elongation step for 10 min at 72°C.
Polymorphism was checked for each of the 14 SSRs in the two laboratory isolates by sequencing the PCR products (Fasteris SA, Inc.). Five SSRs, all situated within putative coding regions, did not show variation in the number of repeats, an observation which has been confirmed with four other laboratory isolates (originating from the United States, United Kingdom, Russia, and Belgium). The nine other SSRs (shown in bold in Table 2) showed polymorphisms and were chosen to study diversity in field samples. For genotyping, forward primers were fluorescently labeled. Allele sizes were determined by separation of the PCR products in an ABI PRISM 310 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Fragment lengths were assigned by Genemapper, using a GeneScan-500 (6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine) size standard. The results are presented in Table 3. In some samples, more than one allele was found for a given primer set. The allele numbers ranged from three for Pr SSR3 to eight for Pr SSR4. We did not find any correlation between the repeat copy number and the allelic variability (Spearman rank test; rho = −0.42; P = 0.26). For some loci, e.g., Pr SSR3, distinct alleles were found for each of the three geographical locations studied. Others showed polymorphism within a studied location (Pr SSR4) or between two samples collected from the same pond during successive years (Pr SSR6, Oxford, pond 8).
TABLE 3.
Amplicon sizes of fragments containing SSRs found in P. ramosa isolates
Strain | Amplicon size (nt) with primer
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pr1 | Pr2 | Pr3 | Pr4 | Pr6 | Pr7 | Pr8 | Pr9 | |
Lab P1 | 213 | 286 | 374 | 369 | 295 | 172 | 386 | 178 |
231 | ||||||||
Lab P3 | 222 | 304 | 383 | 393 | 283 | 145 | 422 | 169 |
249 | ||||||||
Moscow Zoo 97 | 195 | 259 | 374 | 329 | 271 | 109 | 404 | 169 |
249 | 286 | 383 | 369 | 118 | ||||
377 | 163 | |||||||
172 | ||||||||
Moscow NJK 97 | 195 | 259 | 374 | 361 | 271 | 109 | 404 | 169 |
369 | 145 | 422 | ||||||
163 | ||||||||
172 | ||||||||
Moscow V 97 | 249 | 286 | 374 | 369 | 271 | 109 | 458 | 169 |
304 | 145 | |||||||
154 | ||||||||
163 | ||||||||
172 | ||||||||
Oxford Pond 8 96 | 195 | 259 | 374 | 369 | 271 | 109 | 440 | 169 |
286 | 283 | 145 | ||||||
154 | ||||||||
163 | ||||||||
Oxford Pond 8 97 | 195 | 286 | 374 | 369 | 235 | 109 | 440 | 169 |
271 | 145 | |||||||
154 | ||||||||
163 | ||||||||
Oxford Pond 11 97 | 195 | 286 | 383 | 369 | 235 | 109 | 440 | 169 |
271 | 145 | 458 | ||||||
154 | ||||||||
163 | ||||||||
Oxford Pond 12 97 | 195 | 286 | 374 | 369 | 271 | 109 | 440 | 151 |
304 | 383 | 145 | 169 | |||||
163 | ||||||||
172 | ||||||||
Oxford Pond 17 97 | 195 | 259 | 374 | 369 | 271 | 109 | 440 | 169 |
383 | 377 | 145 | ||||||
154 | ||||||||
163 | ||||||||
Belgium OM1 | 231 | 286 | 356 | 321 | 271 | 109 | 404 | 187 |
136 | 196 | |||||||
145 | 205 | |||||||
154 | ||||||||
163 | ||||||||
Belgium OM3 | 231 | 259 | 356 | 321 | 271 | 109 | 404 | 187 |
286 | 353 | 145 | 196 | |||||
154 | ||||||||
163 | ||||||||
Belgium Neeryse | 231 | 304 | 356 | 321 | 271 | 109 | 404 | 178 |
345 | 145 | |||||||
154 | ||||||||
163 |
For the sequence amplified by the primer set Pr2, which was located within an open reading frame, length variation did not change the reading frame for the putative encoded protein. However, it is known that VNTRs have the potential to affect metabolic regulation, antigenic variation, or environmental adaptation (11). Moreover, extragenic VNTRs can have pronounced effects on adjacent gene expression (21). The biological significance of P. ramosa VNTRs is unknown, but the identification of VNTRs can be a starting point for such research.
These VNTRs are the first molecular markers reported that have allowed the differentiation of populations of Pasteuria spp. as a function of environmental distribution. Moreover, the use of VNTRs for analyzing P. ramosa spore diversity in sediment samples raises the possibility of in situ analysis without isolating bacteria. This approach will facilitate epidemiological, genetic, and ecological studies of this nonculturable bacterium and will be valuable in determining the basis for host preference and virulence of Pasteuria spp. as parasites of phytopathogenic nematodes.
Acknowledgments
We thank Isabelle Colson and Louis Du Pasquier for helpful advice and Tom Little, Ellen Decaestecker, and Lev Yampolsky for providing samples.
This work was supported by the Swiss Nationalfonds and the Freiwilige Akademische Geselschaft, Basel, Switzerland, and by USDA/CSREES project 50554, USDA/CSREES multistate project NE1019, and the University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station under CRIS projects FLA-MCS-04353 and FLA-MCS-04080.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 30 March 2007.
REFERENCES
- 1.Andersen, G. L., J. M. Simchock, and K. H. Wilson. 1996. Identification of a region of genetic variability among Bacillus anthracis strains and related species. J. Bacteriol. 178:377-384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Benson, G. 1999. Tandem Repeats Finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:573-580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bocs, S., S. Cruveiller, D. Vallenet, G. Nuel, and C. Médigue. 2003. AMIGENE: annotation of microbial genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 13:3723-3726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carius, H. J., T. Little, and D. Ebert. 2001. Genetic variation in a host-parasite association: potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 55:1146-1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Charles, L., I. Carbone, K. G. Davies, D. Bird, M. Burke, B. R. Kerry, and C. H. Opperman. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of Pasteuria penetrans by use of multiple genetic loci. J. Bacteriol. 187:5700-5708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Decaestecker, E., A. Vergote, D. Ebert, and L. De Meester. 2003. Evidence for strong host-clone-parasite interactions in the Daphnia microparasite system. Evolution 57:784-792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Duncan, A. B., S. E. Mitchell, and T. J. Little. 2006. Parasite-mediated selection and the role of sex and diapause in Daphnia. J. Evol. Biol. 19:1183-1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ebert, D. 2005. Ecology, epidemiology, and evolution of parasitism in Daphnia. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD.
- 9.Ebert, D., P. Rainey, T. M. Embley, and D. Scholz. 1996. Development, life cycle, ultrastructure and phylogenetic position of Pasteuria ramosa Metchnikoff 1888: rediscovery of an obligate endoparasite of Daphnia magna Straus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351:1689-1701. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jackson, P. J., E. A. Walthers, A. S. Kalif, K. L. Richmond, D. M. Adair, K. K. Hill, C. R. Kuske, G. L. Andersen, K. H. Wilson, M. Hugh-Jones, and P. Keim. 1997. Characterization of the variable-number tandem repeats in vrrA from different Bacillus anthracis isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1400-1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li, Y.-C., A. B. Korol, T. Fahima, and E. Nevo. 2004. Microsatellites within genes: structure, function, and evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:991-1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lindstedt, B. A. 2005. Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeats analysis for genetic fingerprinting of pathogenic bacteria. Electrophoresis 26:2567-2582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lista, F., G. Faggioni, S. Valjevac, A. Ciammaruconi, J. Vaissaire, C. le Doujet, O. Gorge, R. De Santis, A. Carattoli, A. Ciervo, A. Fasanella, F. Orsini, R. D'Amelio, C. Pourcel, A. Cassone, and G. Vergnaud. 2006. Genotyping of Bacillus anthracis strains based on automated capillary 25-loci multiple locus variable-number tandem repeats analysis. BMC Microbiol. 6:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Little, T. J., K. Watt, and D. Ebert. 2006. Parasite-host specificity: experimental studies on the basis of parasite adaptation. Evolution 60:31-38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Margulies, M., M. Egholm, W. E. Altman, S. Attiya, J. S. Bader, L. A. Bemben, J. Berka, M. S. Braverman, Y.-J. Chen, Z. Chen, S. B. Dewell, L. Du, J. M. Fierro, X. V. Gomes, B. C. Godwin, W. He, S. Helgesen, C. H. Ho, G. P. Irzyk, S. C. Jando, M. L. I. Alenquer, T. P. Jarvie, K. B. Jirage, J.-B. Kim, J. R. Knight, J. R. Lanza, J. H. Leamon, S. M. Lefkowitz, M. Lei, J. Li, K. L. Lohman, H. Lu, V. B. Makhijani, K. E. McDade, M. P. McKenna, E. W. Myers, E. Nickerson, J. R. Nobile, R. Plant, B. P. Puc, M. T. Ronan, G. T. Roth, G. J. Sarkis, J. F. Simons, J. W. Simpson, M. Srinivasan, K. R. Tartaro, A. Tomasz, K. A. Vogt, G. A. Volkmer, S. H. Wang, Y. Wang, M. P. Weiner, P. Yu, R. F. Begley, and M. Rothberg. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376-380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Preston, J. F., J. E. Maruniak, G. Nong, J. A. Brito, L. M. Schmidt, and R. M. Giblin-Davis. 2003. Pasteuria spp.: systematics and phylogeny of these bacterial parasites of phytopathogenic nematodes. J. Nematol. 35:198-207. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rozen, S., and H. J. Skaletsky. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol. Biol. 132:365-386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sayre, R. M. 1993. Pasteuria, Metchnikoff, 1888, p. 101-112. In J. A. Hoch and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria: biochemistry, physiology, and molecular genetics. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
- 19.Sturhan, D., T. S. Shutova, V. N. Akimov, and S. A. Subbotin. 2005. Occurrence, hosts, morphology, and molecular characterisation of Pasteuria bacteria parasitic in nematodes of the family Plectidae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 88:17-26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Trotter, J. R., and A. H. Bishop. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis and confirmation of the endospore-forming nature of Pasteuria penetrans based on the spo0A gene. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 225:249-256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van Belkum, A., S. Scherer, L. van Alphen, and H. Verbrugh. 1998. Short-sequence DNA repeats in prokaryotic genomes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:275-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wilson, I. G. 1997. Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3741-3751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]