Abstract
Otx1 belongs to the paired class of homeobox genes and plays a pivotal role in brain development. Here, we show that Otx1 is expressed in hematopoietic pluripotent and erythroid progenitor cells. Moreover, bone marrow cells from mice lacking Otx1 exhibit a cell-autonomous impairment of the erythroid compartment. In agreement with these results, molecular analysis revealed decreased levels of erythroid genes that include the SCL and GATA-1 transcription factors. Accordingly, a gain of function of SCL rescues the erythroid deficiency in Otx1-/- mice. Taken together, our findings indicate a function for Otx1 in the regulation of blood cell production.
There is growing evidence suggesting that common cellular and molecular mechanisms orchestrate differentiation in various tissues (1-3). Homeobox-containing genes seem to be strong candidate genes to regulate a number of developmental processes, including neurogenesis and hematopoiesis (4-8).
Members of the Otx family (Otx1, Otx2, Otx3, and Crx) are the vertebrate homologues of the Drosophila head gap gene orthodenticle and encode transcription factors containing a bicoid-like homeodomain (9, 10). They are temporally and spatially regulated during development and seem to be required for proper head and sense organ patterning. Otx1, Otx2, and Otx3 show partially overlapping, but distinct expression patterns, and Otx2, the first to be activated during development, plays a major role in gastrulation and in the early specification of the anterior neural plate. In contrast, Otx1 shows a later onset and is involved in corticogenesis, sense organ development, and pituitary function (9). Mice bearing targeted deletion of Otx1 are affected by a permanent epileptic phenotype and show multiple brain abnormalities and morphological defects of the acoustic and visual sense organs (11). In addition, at the prepubescent stage, they exhibit transient dwarfism and hypogonadism because of low levels of pituitary hormones (12). In the present study, we have investigated whether Otx1 also plays a role in blood cell production, as several homeobox genes of different families are involved in normal and/or malignant hematopoiesis (13-16).
Materials and Methods
Mice. Otx1-/- (C57BL/6) mice (11) were kept according to institutional regulations. SCL transgenic (C57BL/6) mice in which the SCL transgene encoding the p22 isoform was placed under the Sil promoter have been described (17). Mice were genotyped by PCR as described (11, 18). These mice were interbred to generate Otx1-/-SCLtg mice.
RT-PCR. RNA was prepared from hematopoietic tissues. Where indicated, SCL, Otx1, and GAPDH were analyzed by RT-PCR as reported (18). Primer sequences are shown separately. The identity of the amplified product was confirmed through hybridization with an internal oligonucleotide. For colony cells, as cell number was limiting, cDNA was first globally amplified with a method described in detail (19, 20), then subjected to a second run of targeted amplification with specific primers.
Slot blots from globally amplified cDNAs from adult hematopoietic progenitors have been described (19, 20). Probes used were designed to cover the 3′ UTR sequences. The sequence for the murine Otx1 transcript available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (accession no. AF424700) lacked a polyadenylation signal. It was extended in silico to a poly(A) signal 1,475 bases downstream by using ESTs in the corresponding Unigene cluster Mm.129663 and genomic sequence. The extent and validity of the extension is supported by mouse ESTs and orthologous human and rat data. The additional information is accessible now in RefSeq NM·011023. A probe spanning positions 2289-2476 was prepared by PCR. Ribosomal L32 was a murine genomic 1.6-kb SacI fragment encompassing the final exon (21). Hybridization signals on x-ray films were quantified by scanning densitometry.
Blood Parameters. Heparinized blood was collected immediately after the mice died. Blood cell counts were performed with a cell counter (model H10, SEAC, Calenzano, Italy).
In Vitro Colony Assays. The culture conditions have been described (22). Briefly, bone marrow cells were flushed from femurs and tibias in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM) with 2% FCS and cultured at a maximum density of 105 per ml in IMDM containing α-thioglycerol, methyl cellulose, BSA, 5% FCS, iron-saturated transferrin, lecithin, oleic acid, cholesterol, 2 units/ml human recombinant erythropoietin, 10 ng/ml murine stem cell factor, and 10 ng/ml murine IL-3. Cultures were scored at 2, 7, and 12 days with an inverted microscope by using standard criteria.
Bone Marrow Transplantation. C57BL/6 female recipient mice, 8-12 weeks old, were lethally irradiated with 800 rads (x-ray source). Two hours after irradiation, they were i.v. injected with 106 bone marrow cells, derived from male donors, and resuspended in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium. Controls were injected with cell-free suspending medium. Engrafted animals were killed and analyzed 4-6 months after transplantation.
Results and Discussion
As a first step, we analyzed Otx1 expression in different hematopoietic tissues, using RT-PCR. Results, illustrated in Fig. 1a, show that Otx1 mRNA is present in the bone marrow and spleen of adult mice and in the fetal liver at 12 days of development. In contrast, Otx1 signal was not detected in the thymus and lymph nodes. Fetal brain represents a positive control, as it is known that Otx1 is highly expressed during brain morphogenesis (9). Because of the heterogeneity of bone marrow cells, we aimed at identifying the cell populations that express Otx1. Subsequently, we tested Otx1 expression by RT-PCR in cells isolated from individual colonies grown in methyl cellulose medium after 4-7 days of culture. As illustrated in Fig. 1b, Otx1 is expressed in erythroid cells (BFU-E-derived colony) and cells isolated from a colony containing multiple cell types (CFU-MIX-derived colony). In contrast, Otx1 is undetectable in macrophage colonies. We next investigated Otx1 expression in hematopoietic precursors, defined by their developmental potentials, i.e., their capacities to give rise to colonies containing distinct cell types. To this end, we used an experimental strategy based on sib analysis, involving single-cell RT-PCR and in vitro clonogenic assays of siblings that were separated at the initiation of culture (19, 20). Results shown in Fig. 1c indicate that Otx1 expression is detectable at low levels in pluripotent precursors and persists in the bipotential progenitors of the erythroid-megakaryocytic and granulocytic-macrophage lineages. Furthermore, it is present in erythroid precursors and can still be detected in mature cells of the erythroid and megakaryocytic pathway.
Fig. 1.
Expression of Otx1 in hematopoietic cells. (a) Otx1 expression in hematopoietic tissues: bone marrow (BM), spleen (Spl), thymus (Thy), lymph nodes (LN), fetal liver (FL), and fetal brain (FB). RT- represents the negative control. (b) Analysis of hematopoietic colonies in vitro from mouse bone marrow cultures: mixed (Mix), erythroid (Ery), and macrophage (Mac) colonies. Six colonies of each type, derived from three different mice, have been tested. (c) Slot blot of amplified cDNAs from adult hematopoietic pluripotent precursors (CFU-GEMMMa, CFU-GEMM, and CFU-EMM); bipotential precursors of erythroid-megakaryocytic (CFU-EMeg) and myelo-monocytic lineages (CFU-GM); erythroid early (BFU-E) and late (CFU-E) precursors, monocytic (CFU-M), granulocytic (CFU-G), and megakaryocytic (CFU-Meg) precursors; and terminally differentiated erythroid (E), myelo-monocytic (Neut, Mast, Mac), megakaryocytic (Meg), and lymphoid (B, T) cells. None, NIH 3T3, 95/1.7, and S17 represent control lanes containing primer elongation products and three fibroblastic cell lines. Respective sample arrangements are detailed in ref 20. (d) Slot blot of amplified cDNAs from embryonic stem cells induced into hematopoiesis: transitional colonies (TC), EB-derived primitive erythroid colonies (Eryp), EB-derived definitive erythroid colonies (Eryd), and EB-derived mixed colonies (MIX). Otx1 was analyzed by RT-PCR with specific primers in a and b and by hybridization of globally amplified cDNA with a 3′ UTR Otx1 probe. GAPDH (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) and L32 probes were analyzed to normalize for the relative amount of cDNA present in each sample.
During development, erythropoiesis first takes place in the yolk sac to produce a wave of primitive erythropoiesis, then moves to in the fetal liver, starting at embryonic day 12.5, where definitive erythropoiesis is initiated (23). At this point, the fetal liver contains both primitive and definitive erythroid cells. These two waves are recapitulated in culture, in differentiating embryonic stem cells. In addition, distinct steps of embryonic stem cell in vitro differentiation have been characterized, providing a model of the early events occurring in vivo. The initial stages involve the formation of embryoid bodies (EB), formed by progenitor cells of different tissues, followed by the appearance of transitional colonies containing hematopoietic and endothelial precursors (24). Finally, primitive erythroid precursors and subsequently definitive erythroid cells are produced. As illustrated in Fig. 1d, Otx1 transcripts can be already detected in EB and transitional colonies. Furthermore, Otx1 mRNA is present, apparently at even higher levels, in primitive and definitive erythroid progenitors and in pluripotent cells. These results indicate that the Otx1 locus is transcriptionally active in various hematopoietic sites and is differentially expressed in bone marrow cells, especially in cells of the erythroid lineage.
To gain insights into the functional importance of Otx1 in blood cell production in vivo, we studied the effects of loss of Otx1 function in the hematopoietic system of Otx1 null mice in which the gene has been disrupted by homologous recombination (11). Mature and progenitor cells of WT, Otx1+/-, and Otx1-/- adult mice have been analyzed by using peripheral blood cell counts and in vitro clonogenic assays, respectively. Otx1-deficient mice show a decreased number of red blood cells, as compared with heterozygous and WT animals, and they exhibit a marked reduction of early (BFU-E) and late (CFU-E) erythroid progenitors (Fig. 2a Left). In contrast, we did not observe significant variations in the number of circulating leukocytes and myelo-monocytic precursors (Fig. 2b Left).
Fig. 2.
Peripheral blood and bone marrow progenitors in WT (▪),
Otx1+/- (
), and Otx1-/- (□)
mice (Untreated, Left) and in animals transplanted with WT (▪),
Otx1+/- (
), and Otx1-/- (□)
bone marrow cells (Reconstituted, Right). Hematopoietic progenitors
were evaluated by using clonogenic assays in methyl cellulose medium in the
presence of stem cell factor, IL-3, and erythropoietin. Results show the
average of duplicate determinations per bone marrow sample and are
representative of a minimum of 10 mice for each group. Asterisks indicate
significant variations from WT animals: *, P ≤ 0.05;
**, P ≤ 0.005; ***, P ≤ 0.001.
Decreased erythropoiesis could be caused by an intrinsic defect of Otx1-/- progenitors or an impaired microenvironment. Alternatively, erythropoiesis could also be defective as a consequence of endocrine dysregulation caused by the lack of Otx1. To distinguish between these possibilities, we compared the long-term reconstitution ability of Otx1+/+, +/-, and -/- bone marrow cells after transplantation into lethally irradiated recipients (25). Grafted mice were killed 4-6 months later and tested for circulating blood cells and bone marrow progenitors. Results, summarized in Fig. 2 Right, show that the animals reconstituted with Otx1-deficient cells exhibit a significantly lower number of red blood cells, as compared with mice that received WT marrow. Moreover, the number of CFU-E and BFU-E is reduced by 4- to 5-fold in the Otx1-/- reconstituted mice, as compared with control animals. In contrast, no significant difference among the three groups of mice was detected in the number of mature or progenitor cells of the myelo-monocytic lineage, as previously observed in untreated animals (Fig. 2b). Interestingly, mice grafted with null cells displayed a more severe anemic phenotype than the untreated homozygous mutants, in which compensatory mechanisms possibly account for the limited reduction of erythrocytes as compared with the more significant drop of erythroid progenitors (Fig. 2a). Such mechanisms may not be sufficient to compensate the robust differentiation demand in the transplanted animals. Taken together, these data indicate that loss of Otx1 function is associated with impaired erythropoiesis, and the defect is cell autonomous.
The pattern of expression of Otx1 is reminiscent of that of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor SCL/TAL1 (26), which is also present in transitional colonies (24) and multipotent progenitors (19). Furthermore, SCL expression is highest in erythroid progenitors (BFU-E, CFU-E), and functional studies indicate that SCL is essential for erythroid cell differentiation (26, 27). Hence, we compared SCL expression in bone marrow cells derived from WT, heterozygous, and null mutant mice by semiquantitative RT-PCR. Fig. 3a shows that Otx1-/- bone marrow cells express low levels of SCL as compared with their normal counterparts. Quantitation of SCL expression levels by densitometry revealed a 2-fold reduction in Otx1-deficient cells, whereas SCL levels in cells harboring one functional Otx1 allele were unaffected. Although densitometry provides a nonlinear quantitation of transcript levels, this molecular analysis is consistent with cellular analysis indicating a 2- or 3-fold decrease in CFU-E and BFU-E, as shown in Fig. 2. Because the erythroid cell impairment observed in Otx1-deficient mice was more severe in animals grafted with null cells, we next compared SCL expression in hematopoietic cells of mice transplanted with Otx1+/- or Otx1-/- cells. Results, shown in Fig. 3 b and c, indicate that SCL is expressed at significantly lower levels in bone marrow cells of mice reconstituted with homozygous mutant cells. Reduced SCL levels could be a direct consequence of the lack of Otx1 or an indirect effect of an imbalance in cell populations in the bone marrow. We took two approaches to address this question. First, SCL expression was measured in marrow populations containing comparable numbers of erythroid cells, as evaluated by β major globin expression (Fig. 3b). Moreover, a similar analysis was carried out in erythroid colonies generated in vitro by Otx1+/- or Otx1-/- reconstituted marrows (data not shown). In both cases, SCL was reduced in the erythroid populations of mice grafted with null cells, consistent with the view that loss of Otx1 function is associated with a down-regulation of SCL in erythroid cells.
Fig. 3.
Expression of SCL in bone marrow cells of untreated (wt, Otx1+/-, and Otx1-/-) and reconstituted mice (with Otx1+/- and Otx1-/- bone marrow cells). (a) Otx1, SCL, and GAPDH mRNAs were analyzed in wt, Otx1+/-, and Otx1-/- bone marrow cells by RT-PCR with specific primers (18). (b) Expression of SCL and β major globin (24) in bone marrow cells of mice transplanted with Otx1+/- and Otx1-/- bone marrow cells; data are typical of three mice for each genotype. (c) Amplification kinetics of cDNA from bone marrow cells of Otx1+/- and Otx1-/- reconstituted animals. Hybridization of the PCR products shows a constant decrease of SCL expression in Otx1-/- reconstituted mice.
Second, because SCL drives erythroid differentiation, we asked the question whether the hematopoietic phenotype of Otx1 null mice could be functionally rescued by in vivo overexpression of SCL. Heterozygous mice for Otx1 were crossed with transgenic mice that constitutively express SCL under the control of the Sil (SCL interrupting locus) promoter (17). These mice were interbred to generate Otx1-deficient mice that constitutively express SCL (Otx1-/-SCLtg). At 1 month of age, littermates of the different genotypes were compared, using clonogenic assays. The rationale for using very young animals was that Otx1-deficient mice at the prepubescent stage display a more severe hematopoietic phenotype than older animals. Indeed, prepubescent null mice exhibit also more frequent and severe epileptic seizures and reduced size and weight (11, 12). It is possible that the low levels of pituitary hormones observed in young mutants may affect multiple tissues, including the hematopoietic system and/or that compensatory mechanisms may be activated at later stages. As shown in Fig. 4, 1-month-old Otx1-/- mice exhibit severe erythroid deficiency, with significant reductions of red blood cells, hemoglobin, and hematocrit, as well as a 3-fold decrease in CFU-E and BFU-E when compared with WT littermates. However, no differences were observed in red cell shape and size. Furthermore, preliminary evidence indicates that the number of platelets is also diminished (20%) in the homozygous mutants (data not shown). Strikingly, the hematological values and the number of erythroid progenitors were restored to normal levels by the SCL transgene (Fig. 4 a and b). In comparison with erythroid progenitors, there was some degree of fluctuations in myelo-monocytic progenitors, which were not highly significant. Moreover, bone marrow cells of the three groups of animals were analyzed for the expression of two erythroid genes, SCL and GATA-1 (28, 29), as well as for expression of a myeloid gene, encoding the receptor for the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF-R) (30). Consistent with the restoration of erythropoiesis, high levels of SCL and GATA1 were detected in SCL transgenic animals, as opposed to low levels observed in null mutants (Fig. 4c). In contrast, G-CSF-R is present at high levels in Otx1-/- mice and normal levels in the double transgenics. Therefore, forced expression of SCL in Otx1-/- mutants can fully rescue the hematopoietic phenotype of Otx1 null mice.
Fig. 4.
Genetic complementation of erythroid deficiency in
Otx1-/- mice by SCL. One-month-old mice of the
different genotypes were analyzed: WT (▪), Otx1-/-
(
), and Otx1-/-SCLtg (□).
(a) Hematological values: red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb),
hematocrit (Hct), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV). (b) Number of
early (BFU-E) and late (CFU-E) erythroid progenitors, pluripotent (CFU-MIX)
and myelo-monocytic precursors, as determined by clonogenic assays.
(c) Expression of SCL, GATA-1, and G-CSF-R in bone
marrow cells from the same groups of mice. (d) Comparison of bone
marrow progenitors in SCLtg (
) versus WT (▪)
mice. A minimum of 10 mice were studied in each group. Asterisks indicate
significant variations from WT animals: *, P ≤ 0.05;
**, P ≤ 0.005; ***, P ≤ 0.001.
The rescue of erythroid progenitors by the SCL transgene in Otx1-deficient cells could be caused by a restoration of an Otx1-dependent pathway or complementation by an independent pathway. We therefore assessed the effect of the SCL transgene in WT mice, in which Otx1 function is normal. As shown in Fig. 4d, the SCL transgene did not affect the overall number of CFU-Es per femur. Other types of progenitors were also assessed and did not significantly differ among the various genotypes (Fig. 4d). Therefore, SCL rescues the erythroid deficiency caused by loss of Otx1 function without affecting this lineage when Otx1 is operational. Combined, our results are consistent with the view that SCL and Otx1 may operate within the same pathway to specify erythroid differentiation.
In hematopoietic progenitors, SCL has a similar expression pattern as Otx1 and plays a critical role in erythroid differentiation (26, 31, 32). Our study raises the possibility that Otx1 might be required to maintain normal levels of SCL gene expression and, consequently, normal numbers of erythroid cells. It remains to be determined whether SCL may be a direct Otx1 molecular target. Strikingly, SCL and SCL-related genes, as well as GATA factors, are also expressed in the developing brain (33, 34), the major site of Otx1 expression, and it is known that transcription factors form multimeric complexes that may undergo changes in composition and thus acquire new functions (35). These observations further support the view that a small group of regulators may control different cell lineages or even diverse cell systems.
A number of paired genes of different subfamilies have been implicated in hematopoiesis, such as Mix1, involved in the initial phases of blood development (36), and members of the Pax family playing pivotal roles in lymphoid development and differentiation (37, 38). Our findings provide evidence that the Otx subclass of homeobox genes contributes to the regulation of blood cell production and suggest that Otx1 is important in erythropoiesis. There is evidence that >15 homeobox genes, including multiple members of the HOX family, the distal-less homolog DLX7 and the LIM Lhx2 gene, are expressed within the erythroid lineage; however, their mutual relations and specific functions have not yet been defined (8, 39). Our results indicate that Otx1 is not redundant with these factors, as Otx1 null mice develop anemia. It is possible, however, that ablation of more than one of these regulators is needed to completely block the erythroid lineage.
An intriguing observation is that transcription factors of the Ptx and Otx subfamilies recognize similar DNA sequences, are expressed in the brain, in the pituitary gland, and in hematopoietic progenitors, and, in Xenopus laevis, are involved in the control of cement gland formation (40-42). Although their relation is yet unknown, these bicoid-related genes might act as cofactors or within a genetic hierarchy. Furthermore, it noteworthy that Pitx2, expressed in primitive hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (43), has been hypothesized to play a role in leukemogenesis as a target of ALL1, the human homolog of Drosophila trithorax that frequently undergoes chromosomal translocations in human acute leukemias (44). Moreover, multiple homeobox genes of different classes are involved in the pathogenesis of leukemias and lymphomas (13-15), and Otx genes have recently been indicated as molecular markers for specific types of neural tumors. These observations raise the possibility that dysregulation of Otx1 might also be associated with hematological diseases.
In conclusion, our findings indicate that Otx1, which plays crucial role in brain morphogenesis, is also involved in the control of blood cell production, and our findings provide further support that common molecular mechanisms orchestrate differentiation of various tissues.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. S. Boriani for the generous gift of cytokines, S. Demi for peripheral blood tests, and S. Ottolenghi for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research, the Versilia Association for Stem Cell Research, and the Italian Ministry of Health (Progetto Ricerca Finalizzata 2001, Grant 99, to M.C.M.), a grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (to T.H.), a studentship from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (to R.M.), and Medical Research Council Program Grant G9900955 (to A.S.).
Abbreviation: EB, embryoid bodies.
Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession no. NM_011023).
References
- 1.Magli, M. C., Levantini, E. & Giorgetti, A. (2000) J. Hematother. Stem Cell Res. 9, 961-969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Orkin, S. H. (2000) Nat. Rev. Genet. 1, 57-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Orkin, S. H. & Zon, L. I. (2002) Nat. Immunol. 3, 323-328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gehring, W. J. & Hiromi, Y. (1986) Annu. Rev. Genet. 20, 147-173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Magli, M. C., Barba, P., Celetti, A., De Vita, G., Cillo, C. & Boncinelli, E. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 6348-6352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Krumlauf, R. (1994) Cell 78, 191-201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vollmer, J. Y. & Clerc, R. G. (1998) J. Neurochem. 71, 1-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Magli, M. C. (1998) Biotherapy 10, 279-294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Acampora, D. & Simeone, A. (1999) Trends Neurosci. 22, 116-122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang, Y., Miki, T., Iwanaga, T., Koseki, Y., Okuno, M., Sunaga, Y., Ozaki, N., Yano, H., Koseki, H. & Seino, S. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 28065-28069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Acampora, D., Mazan, S., Avantaggiato, V., Barone, P., Tuorto, F., Lallemand, Y., Brulet, P. & Simeone, A. (1996) Nat. Genet. 14, 218-222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Acampora, D., Mazan, S., Tuorto, F., Avantaggiato, V., Tremblay, J. J., Lazzaro, D., di Carlo, A., Mariano, A., Macchia, P. E., Corte, G., et al. (1998) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 125, 1229-1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van Oostveen, J., Bijl, J., Raaphorst, F., Walboomers, J. & Meijer, C. (1999) Leukemia 13, 1675-1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lawrence, H. J., Rozenfeld, S., Cruz, C., Matsukuma, K., Kwong, A., Komuves, L., Buchberg, A. M. & Largman, C. (1999) Leukemia 13, 1993-1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buske, C. & Humphries, R. K. (2000) Int. J. Hematol. 71, 301-308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pineault, N., Helgason, C. D., Lawrence, H. J. & Humphries, R. K. (2002) Exp. Hematol. 30, 49-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aplan, P. D., Jones, C. A., Chervinsky, D. S., Zhao, X., Ellsworth, M., Wu, C., McGuire, E. A. & Gross, K. W. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 2408-2419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Herblot, S., Steff, A. M., Hugo, P., Aplan, P. D. & Hoang, T. (2000) Nat. Immunol. 1, 138-144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brady, G., Billia, F., Knox, J., Hoang, T., Kirsch, I. R., Voura, E. B., Hawley, R. G., Cumming, R., Buchwald, M. & Siminovitch, K. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 909-922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Billia, F., Barbara, M., McEwen, J., Trevisan, M. & Iscove, N. N. (2001) Blood 97, 2257-2268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dudov, K. P. & Perry, R. P. (1984) Cell 37, 457-468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Magli, M. C., Iscove, N. N. & Odartchenko, N. (1982) Nature 295, 527-529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Keller, G., Lacaud, G. & Robertson, S. (1999) Exp. Hematol. 27, 777-787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Robertson, S. M., Kennedy, M., Shannon, J. M. & Keller, G. (2000) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 127, 2447-2459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Harrison, D. E. (1983) J. Exp. Med. 157, 1496-1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Begley, C. G. & Green, A. R. (1999) Blood 93, 2760-2770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hoang, T., Paradis, E., Brady, G., Billia, F., Nakahara, K., Iscove, N. N. & Kirsch, I. R. (1996) Blood 87, 102-111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mouthon, M. A., Bernard, O., Mitjavila, M. T., Romeo, P. H., Vainchenker, W. & Mathieu-Mahul, D. (1993) Blood 81, 647-655. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shivdasani, R. A. & Orkin, S. H. (1996) Blood 87, 4025-4039. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fukunaga, R., Ishizaka-Ikeda, E. & Nagata, S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14008-14015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hall, M. A., Curtis, D. J., Metcalf, D., Elefanty, A. G., Sourris, K., Robb, L., Gothert, J. R., Jane, S. M. & Begley, C. G. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 992-997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mikkola, H. K., Klintman, J., Yang, H., Hock, H., Schlaeger, T. M., Fujiwara, Y. & Orkin, S. H. (2003) Nature 421, 547-551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Begley, C. G., Lipkowitz, S., Gobel, V., Mahon, K. A., Bertness, V., Green, A. R., Gough, N. M. & Kirsch, I. R. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 38-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nardelli, J., Thiesson, D., Fujiwara, Y., Tsai, F. Y. & Orkin, S. H. (1999) Dev. Biol. 210, 305-321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sieweke, M. H. & Graf, T. (1998) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 545-551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Davidson, A. J. & Zon, L. I. (2000) Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 50, 45-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wallin, J., Eibel, H., Neubuser, A., Wilting, J., Koseki, H. & Balling, R. (1996) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 122, 23-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Busslinger, M., Nutt, S. L. & Rolink, A. G. (2000) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12, 151-158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Magli, M. C., Largman, C. & Lawrence, H. J. (1997) J. Cell Physiol. 173, 168-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lanctot, C., Lamolet, B. & Drouin, J. (1997) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 124, 2807-2817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Szeto, D. P., Rodriguez-Esteban, C., Ryan, A. K., O'Connell, S. M., Liu, F., Kioussi, C., Gleiberman, A. S., Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C. & Rosenfeld, M. G. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 484-494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schweickert, A., Deissler, K., Blum, M. & Steinbeisser, H. (2001) Genesis 30, 144-148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Degar, B. A., Baskaran, N., Hulspas, R., Quesenberry, P. J., Weissman, S. M. & Forget, B. G. (2001) Exp. Hematol. 29, 894-902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Arakawa, H., Nakamura, T., Zhadanov, A. B., Fidanza, V., Yano, T., Bullrich, F., Shimizu, M., Blechman, J., Mazo, A., Canaani, E., et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4573-4578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




