Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2003 Sep;41(9):4415–4417. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4415-4417.2003

Confirmation of Nontypeable Streptococcus pneumoniae-Like Organisms Isolated from Outbreaks of Epidemic Conjunctivitis as Streptococcus pneumoniae

Maria Gloria S Carvalho 1,2, Arnold G Steigerwalt 1, Terry Thompson 1, Delois Jackson 1, Richard R Facklam 1,*
PMCID: PMC193841  PMID: 12958280

Abstract

Eleven isolates representing five distinct outbreaks of pneumococcal conjunctivitis were examined for phenotypic and genetic characteristics. None of the strains possessed capsules, and all strains were susceptible to optochin, bile soluble, and Gen-Probe AccuProbe test positive. All 11 isolates were confirmed as Streptococcus pneumoniae by DNA-DNA reassociation experiments.


There is no “gold standard” for the identification of alpha-hemolytic streptococci as Streptococcus pneumoniae in the clinical laboratory. Most clinical laboratories use the optochin susceptibility test or the bile solubility test for presumptive identification (5, 15). Confirmation of alpha-hemolytic streptococci as S. pneumoniae requires demonstrating that the culture has a polysaccharide capsule, preferably by the Quellung reaction with a type-specific antiserum (5). While optochin susceptibility and bile solubility tests are in most instances very useful for presumptive identification of S. pneumoniae, there are exceptions, such as instances when optochin-susceptible viridans group streptococci and bile-insoluble S. pneumoniae are being tested (12, 13). The AccuProbe pneumococcus test (Gen-Probe, San Diego, Calif.), which is based on the rRNA gene sequence, is also used to identify refractory strains suspected of being S. pneumoniae. Several studies, including some of our own unpublished data, indicate that the AccuProbe test is reasonably accurate in identifying S. pneumoniae (5, 8, 12). However, only small differences of less than 1% between the 16S rRNA genes of Streptococcus mitis (11 bp) and Streptococcus oralis (14 bp) and that of S. pneumoniae may raise the question of its true specificity. Our findings, which are based on the examination of thousands of sterile-site pneumococcal isolates, indicate that atypical results with optochin susceptibility, bile solubility, and AccuProbe tests and the absence of capsules are very rare (5, 10). Approximately 0.5% of more than 25,000 sterile-site isolates failed to react with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) pneumococcus typing antisera. On the other hand, when working with nonsterile-site isolates, sputum, oral pharyngeal isolates, or nasopharyngeal isolates, it is not uncommon to find that 10% of the isolates fail to react with pneumococcus typing antisera. Isolates that are optochin susceptible, bile soluble, and Gen-Probe positive appear to be nontypeable (NT) S. pneumoniae. It is intriguing that these NT S. pneumoniae isolates are frequently isolated from nonsterile sites but are isolated very rarely, if at all, from sterile sites (5, 10). The identification of NT S. pneumoniae isolates from very large, explosive outbreaks of conjunctivitis and the nature of the spread of these unusual strains led us to question whether or not these organisms were truly S. pneumoniae (3, 10, 16). Encapsulated S. pneumoniae isolates are found in epidemic situations but do not spread like the NT S. pneumoniae isolates identified during the large, rapidly spreading epidemics of conjunctivitis. Investigators have used a variety of molecular techniques to include these NT S. pneumoniae isolates in the taxon S. pneumoniae, including 16S ribosomal DNA gene sequencing (10) and PCR for the pneumolysin gene (9). The objective of this study was to confirm the true identity of these bacteria by DNA-DNA reassociation experiments, which is the only molecular technique with set standards for establishing bacterial species (17, 19).

All isolates used in this study were taken from the culture collection of the CDC Streptococcus Laboratory. The representative isolates used were from five different conjunctivitis outbreaks caused by NT S. pneumoniae-like organisms in the following states: New York (two strains, 1980), California (three strains, 1981), Illinois (two strains, 1981), New Hampshire (two strains, 2002), and New Jersey (two strains, 2002). The isolates from 1980 and 1981 were stored at −70°C in defibrinated blood. Isolates from recent outbreaks were stored in serum-tryptone-glucose-glycerol medium for 1 year. Serotyping was performed with the Quellung test as previously described (6). Tests were performed according to the instructions described in the 8th edition of the Manual of Clinical Microbiology (15). AccuProbe S. pneumoniae tests were purchased from Gen-Probe, Inc., and were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Isolates were examined for capsules by the colloidal carbon wet-mount capsule-staining procedure (4). Harvesting and lysis of the bacterial cells were performed as previously described (18). Extraction and purification of DNA and the determination of DNA relatedness by the hydroxyapatite hybridization method were done as described by Brenner et al. (2). DNA hybridization experiments were performed at 55°C for optimal DNA reassociation and at the stringent DNA reassociation temperature of 70°C. The levels of divergence within related sequences were determined by assuming that each degree of heteroduplex instability was caused by approximately 1% of unpaired bases. Divergence, expressed by the change in melting temperature, is the decrease in thermal stability (°C) of the heterologous DNA duplex relative to that of the homologous duplexes. Divergence was calculated to the nearest 0.5%.

All conjunctivitis isolates from epidemics investigated in the early 1980s as well as those investigated within the last 12 months were susceptible to optochin, were bile soluble, and reacted positively in the AccuProbe pneumococcus test. None of the isolates had capsules based on examination with CDC pneumococcus typing antisera or the colloidal carbon wet-mount procedure (Table 1). The results of the DNA-DNA reassociation studies, shown in Table 1, indicate that all NT S. pneumoniae conjunctivitis isolates belong to the taxon S. pneumoniae. All strains were more than 70% homologous under optimal reassociation conditions (55°C), and only two strains were less than 70% homologous to the type strain of S. pneumoniae under stringent reassociation conditions (70°C). The divergence in related sequences of all strains was less than 4%. The two isolates from the Illinois conjunctivitis outbreak were somewhat more divergent than the others, but according to the criteria established by the ad hoc committee on bacterial systematics, they belong to the S. pneumoniae taxon (17, 19).

TABLE 1.

Phenotypic and genetic characteristics of conjunctivitis isolates of S. pneumoniae

Strain Sample no. Source or place of isolationa Type Optochin susceptibilityb Bile solubilityb AccuProbe reaction (RLU)c Capsule productionb DNA-DNA reassociation
55°C (%) ΔTmd (°C) 70°C (%)
S. pneumoniae ATCC 33400T ATCC 35A + + 616,924 + 82 74
S. mitis NCTC12261T 1303 NCTC 1,152 64 48
1138-80 165 NY NT + + 427,409 85 84
1139-80 166 NY NT + + 257,364 83 81
61-81 168 CA NT + + 439,684 81 79
62-81 169 CA NT + + 505,025 82 78
63-81 170 CA NT + + 504,810 70 0.5 70
1718-81 171 IL NT + + 312,508 71 4.0 65
1721-81 172 IL NT + + 371,492 72 4.0 62
1852-02 245 NH NT + + 112,030 73 1.0 75
1853-02 246 NH NT + + 176,795 84 80
2136-02 247 NJ NT + + 160,890 82 79
2137-02 248 NJ NT + + 140,421 84 81
a

ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; NCTC, National Collection of Type Cultures; NY, New York; CA, California; IL, Illinois; NH, New Hampshire; NJ, New Jersey.

b

+, positive; −, negative.

c

Relative light unit (RLU) values higher than 50,000 are considered a positive result.

d

Tm, melting temperature.

NT S. pneumoniae isolates have been reported for many years. It is interesting that Finland and Barnes reported that isolates from eye swabs are less likely to be typeable than isolates from any other source (99% for cerebral spinal fluid, 96% for pleural fluid, 93% for otitic fluid, and 78% for eye cultures) during the years 1935 to 1974 (7). NT pneumococcal isolates are not limited to the United States; Medeiros et al. reported that more than 51% of epidemic conjunctivitis isolates from patients living in Brazil were NT (11). Investigators have reported sporadic cases of conjunctivitis as well (1, 14, 20). Identification of these unusual isolates is controversial. Some investigators have assumed the Gen-Probe AccuProbe pneumococcus test to be the gold standard for their studies (8, 12). This assumption has led to the inclusion of optochin susceptibility and bile solubility variants into the taxon S. pneumoniae. At least one other investigator has reported that the AccuProbe test should not be used as a gold standard (9). These investigators concluded that neither the AccuProbe nor a probe developed to identify the pneumolysin gene was useful in the final identification of atypical pneumococci. The heterogeneity of S. pneumoniae, S. mitis, and S. oralis was elegantly shown in the multilocus sequence typing data published by Whatmore et al. (20). These investigators showed that multiple isolates of each of the three species clustered after neighbor-joining analysis. In fact, the S. pneumoniae cluster was more homologous than that of either S. mitis or S. oralis. Also, there were several isolates of alpha-hemolytic streptococci included in the study that did not join any of the three clusters but that were closely allied to the S. pneumoniae cluster. None of these strains possessed capsules, and results of the tests for optochin susceptibility and bile solubility and of the AccuProbe reactions varied. This leads to the conclusion that there are isolates that are similar to S. pneumoniae with similar phenotypic characteristics that cannot be included in the taxon S. pneumoniae. Nevertheless, the data presented in this study clearly show by DNA-DNA reassociation that the isolates from several large outbreaks of conjunctivitis are S. pneumoniae, a finding which confirms the results obtained by optochin susceptibility, bile solubility, and AccuProbe tests. We cannot comment on the true identity of isolates from sporadic outbreaks of conjunctivitis or from sterile sites or nonsterile sites (nasopharyngeal or oral pharyngeal). DNA-DNA reassociation is the only method that can be confirmatory for inclusion of an isolate into any taxon (17, 19), but these results suggest that for identification of NT S. pneumoniae isolates involved in conjunctivitis outbreaks, clinical laboratories can rely upon the conventional physiological tests. The absence of atypical results for optochin susceptibility, bile solubility, or AccuProbe tests for these isolates can be explained in part by the fact that the majority of the isolates belong to a clonal group (10). As staff members of a reference laboratory, we will be using this method in the future to expand this study to include isolates other than those from outbreaks of conjunctivitis that are NT.

Acknowledgments

M. G. S. Carvalho was supported by a “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq” postdoctoral fellowship.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Barker, J. H., D. M. Musher, R. Silberman, H. M. Phan, and D. A. Watson. 1999. Genetic relatedness among nontypeable pneumococci implicated in sporadic cases of conjunctivitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:4039-4041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brenner, D. J., A. C. McWhorter, J. K. L. Knutson, and A. G. Steigerwalt. 1982. Escherichia vulneris: a new species of Enterobacteriaceae associated with human wounds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15:1133-1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003. Pneumococcal conjunctivitis at an elementary school—Maine, September 20-December 6, 2002. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 52:64-66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chapin, K. 1995. Clinical microscopy, p. 33-51, In P. R. Murray, E. J. Barron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.). Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 5.Facklam, R., and N. Pigott. 1994. Description of phenotypic characteristics to aid in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae, p. 415-417. In A. Totollian (ed.), Pathogenic streptococci: present and future. Lancer Publications, St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • 6.Facklam, R. R., and J. A. Washington II. 1991. Streptococcus and related catalase-negative gram-positive cocci, p. 238-257. In A. Balows, W. J. Hausler, Jr., K. L. Herrmann, H. D. Isenberg, and H. J. Shadomy (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 5th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 7.Finland, M., and M. W. Barnes. 1977. Changes in occurrence of capsular serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae at Boston City Hospital during selected years between 1935 and 1974. J. Clin. Microbiol. 5:154-166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Geslin, P., A. Fremaux, C. Spicq, G. Sissa, and S. Georges. 1997. Use of a DNA probe test for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae nontypeable strains. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 418:383-385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kaijalainen, T., S. Rintamaki, E. Herva, and M. Leionen. 2002. Evaluation of gene-technological and conventional methods in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Microbiol. Methods 51:111-118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martin, M., J. H. Turco, M. E. Zegans, R. R. Facklam, S. Sodha, J. A. Elliott, J. H. Pryor, B. Beall, D. D. Erdman, Y. Y. Baumgartner, P. A. Sanchez, J. D. Schwartzman, J. Montero, A. Schuchat, and C. G. Whitney. 2003. An outbreak of conjunctivitis due to atypical Streptococcus pneumoniae. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:1112-1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Medeiros, M. I., P. da Silva, J. O. Silva, A. M. M. Carneiro, M. C. Carloni, and M. C. C. Brandileone. 1998. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae as etiological agents of conjunctivitis outbreaks in the region of Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 40:7-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mundy, L. S., E. N. Janoff, K. E. Schwebvke, C. J. Shanholtzer, and K. E. Willard. 1998. Ambiguity in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae optochin, bile solubility, Quellung, and the AccuProbe DNA probe tests. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 109:55-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Munoz, R., A. Fenoll, D. Vicioso, and J. Casal. 1990. Optochin-resistant variants of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:63-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pease, A. A., C. W. I. Douglas, and R. C. Spencer. 1986. Identification of non-capsulate strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from eyes. J. Clin. Pathol. 39:871-875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ruoff, K. L., R. A. Whiley, and D. Beighton. 2003. Streptococcus, p. 405-421. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Barron, M. A. Pfaller, J. H. Jorgensen, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 16.Shayegani, M., L. M. Parsons, W. E. Gibbons, Jr., and D. Campbell. 1982. Characterization of nontypable Streptococcus pneumoniae-like organisms isolated from outbreaks of conjunctivitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 16:8-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stackebrandt, E., W. Frederiksen, G. M. Garrity, P. A. D. Grimont, P. Kampfer, M. C. J. Maiden. X. Nesme, R. Rossella-Mora, J. Swings, H. G. Truper, L. Vauterin, A. C. Ward, and W. B. Whitman. 2002. Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. E vol. Microbiol. 52:1043-1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Teixeira, L. M., R. R. Facklam, A. G. Steigerwalt, N. E. Pigott, V. L. C. Merquior, and D. J. Brenner. 1995. Correlation between phenotypic characteristics and DNA relatedness within Enterococcus faecium strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1520-1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wayne, L. G., D. J. Brenner, R. R. Colwell, P. A. D. Grimont, O. Kandler, M. I. Krichevsky, L. H. Moore, W. E. C. Moore, R. G. E. Murray, E. Stackebrandt, M. P. Starr, and H. G. Trüper. 1987. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:463-464. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Whatmore, A. M., A. Efstratiou, A. P. Pickerill, K. Broughton, G. Woodard, D. Sturgeon, R. George, and C. G. Dowson. 2000. Genetic relationships between clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus oralis, and Streptococcus mitis: characterization of “atypical” pneumococci and organisms allied to S. mitis harboring S. pneumoniae virulence factor-encoding genes. Infect. Immun. 68:1374-1382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES