Skip to main content
Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1969 Nov 29;101(11):58–60.

Urinary Tract Infections in the Newborn

Diagnosis from Mid-stream Urine Specimens

D S Lirenman
PMCID: PMC1946360  PMID: 4901003

Abstract

Mid-stream urines can be obtained for culture in the majority of neonates with a minimum of effort. Urines collected in plastic bags for cultures showed more than 10,000 organisms per ml. in over 50% of the specimens so obtained from healthy neonates. The use of bags or similar collecting devices should be discouraged. The use of skin disinfectants before obtaining the urine did not decrease the number of contaminants. A good mid-stream urine is more important in avoiding contamination than is the cleansing of the external genitals. Suprapubic aspiration or catheterization should be reserved for those infants in whom (a) repeat mid-stream urine cultures yield equivocal results and (b) the clinical situation does not allow time for repetition of a mid-stream urine culture.

Full text

PDF
58

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BEESON P. B. The case against the catheter. Am J Med. 1958 Jan;24(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(58)90356-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cruickshank G., Edmond E. "Clean catch" urines in the newborn--bacteriology and cell excretion patterns in first week of life. Br Med J. 1967 Dec 23;4(5581):705–707. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5581.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Friedrich S. A Simple, Rapid Method of Recovering Urine from a Baby or Small Child. Can Med Assoc J. 1960 Oct 15;83(16):870–870. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. NELSON J. D., PETERS P. C. SUPRAPUBIC ASPIRATION OF URINE IN PREMATURE AND TERM INFANTS. Pediatrics. 1965 Jul;36:132–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PRYLES C. V., ATKIN M. D., MORSE T. S., WELCH K. J. Comparative bacteriologic study of urine obtained from children by percutaneous suprapubic aspiration of the bladder and by catheter. Pediatrics. 1959 Dec;24:983–991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SMELLIE J. M., HODSON C. J., EDWARDS D., NORMAND I. C. CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF URINARY INFECTION IN CHILDHOOD. Br Med J. 1964 Nov 14;2(5419):1222–1226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5419.1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. STEELE R. E., Jr, LEADBETTER G. W., Jr, CRAWFORD J. D. PROGNOSIS OF CHILDHOOD URINARY-TRACT INFECTION. THE CURRENT STATUS OF PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED BETWEEN 1940 AND 1950. N Engl J Med. 1963 Oct 24;269:883–889. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196310242691702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Weathers W. T., Wenzl J. E. Suprapubic aspiration of the bladder. Perforation of a viscus other than the bladder. Am J Dis Child. 1969 May;117(5):590–592. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1969.02100030592018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES