Abstract
A 3,4-O-bisacetal 2,6-di-O-benzyl protected thioglucoside is converted to the corresponding glucosyl triflate with 1-benzenesulfinyl piperidine and trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride. The moderate to excellent β-selectivity exhibited with this glucosyl triflate with a range of alcohols is generally higher than that observed with the more electronically disarmed corresponding 3,4-O-carbonate, for which a possible reason is advanced.
Keywords: Glycosylation, bisacetal, glycosyl triflate, stereoselectivity, protecting group
1. Introduction
The use of cyclic protecting groups to restrict conformational mobility can have dramatic effects on the stereoselectivity of glycosylation reactions.1 This is illustrated by the glycosyl triflates 1, 2, 3, and 4, as generated from the corresponding thioglycosides with either 1-benzenesulfinyl piperidine (BSP) and triflic anhydride, or with benzenesulfinyl triflate, or from the corresponding sulfoxides with triflic anhydride, typically in the presence of a hindered base such as 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine or 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylpyrimidine (TTBP).2–5 With 1, β-mannosides are obtained in an highly selective manner,6–8 an observation that is attributed to the restriction of the C5–C6 bond to the most deactivating trans-gauche (tg) conformation, with the antiperiplanar C5–O5 and C6–O6 bonds,9,10 by the presence of the benzylidene acetal.11 This rationale is borne out by 2, which is highly α-selective under the same reactions conditions.12 Donor 3 is also highly α-selective,12 a fact that we attribute to the imposition of a half chair conformation on the pyranose ring by the cis-fused carbonate and which is sufficient to override the β-directing effect of the benzylidene acetal.12,13 The 3,4-di-O-carbonate 4 on the other hand, which was investigated in the L-6-deoxy-mannose (or L-rhamnose series) shows moderate β-selectivity.14
Different results are observed in the gluco-series wherein the benzylidene-protected system 5 is α-selective,15 the 2,3-di-O-carbonate 6 moderately β-selective,16 and the 3,4-di-O-carbonate 7 somewhat unselective.16 The 3-deoxy manno and gluco donors 8 and 10,17 as well as their 3-deoxy-3-fluoro counterparts 9 and 11,18 are all somewhat unselective prompting us to suggest that a key interaction in determining stereoselectivity in this series of glycosylation reactions is that between the C2–O2 and C2–O3 bonds.17,18
Here we describe our investigations into the influence of the bisacetal type protecting group on glycosylation stereoselectivity in the gluco series through the use of thioglycosides 12 and 14, and the corresponding triflates 13, and 15.
2. Results
Thioglycosides 12 and 14 were prepared as previously described16 and converted to the corresponding triflates 13 and 15 in the standard manner with BSP and trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride,19,20 in the presence of TTBP21 at −60 °C. Experiments conducted in deuteriochloroform in the NMR spectrometer revealed the formation of both triflates to be complete within minutes at −60 °C, with 13 characterized by an anomeric hydrogen resonating at δ 6.10, and 15 exhibiting the corresponding signal at δ 6.06. In variable temperature NMR experiments both 13 and 15 were found to undergo decomposition around −5 °C. Quenching of the 2,3-bisacetal protected triflate 15 with isopropanol gave the corresponding glucoside 16 in good yield, but with a disappointing anomeric selectivity of 3/1 in favor the β anomer (Table 1, entry 1). The 3,4-bisacetal protected triflate 13, on the other hand, gave the β-glucoside 17 exclusively and in excellent yield (Table 1, entry 2). On the basis of these results no further couplings were undertaken in the 2,3-bisacetal series, however, a series of glycosylations were carried out with the preformed 3,4-bisacetal protected triflate 13 (Table 1, entries 3–10).
Table 1.
Glycosylation of Thioglycosides 12 and 14
| Entry | Donor | Acceptor | Product | βα ratiob | Yield a % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
|
|
3:1 | 78 |
| 2 |
|
|
|
β only | 72 |
| 3 |
|
|
|
β only | 70 |
| 4 |
|
|
|
β only | 60 |
| 5 |
|
|
|
4:1 | 80 |
| 6 |
|
|
|
3:1 | 76 |
| 7 |
|
|
|
2:1 | 82 |
| 8 |
|
|
|
1:5:1 | 78 |
| 9 |
|
|
|
1:5:1 | 75 |
| 10 |
|
|
|
α onlyc | 70 |
Isolated yields;
Determined by the crude 1H NMR analysis;
Reaction was performed with NIS, TfOH activation.
With 3β-cholestanol 18 as acceptor the β-glucoside 19 was formed exclusively (Table 1, entry 3), and a comparable result was observed with 1-adamantanol (Table 1, entry 4). With the glucose 4-OH acceptor 22 a ratio of 4:1 in favor the β-glucoside 23 was observed (Table 1, entry 5). In view of this result, the poor ratio observed on coupling to the less hindered glucose 6-OH acceptor 24 was surprising (Table 1, entry 6). With the threonine derivative 26 the selectivity fell to 2:1 in favor of the β-anomer (Table 1, entry 7), and with either the L- or D-rhamnose 4-OH acceptors 28 and 30,22,23 respectively, the β:α selectivity was only 1.5:1 (Table 1, entries 8 and 9). In the β-mannosylation reactions conducted previously with donor 1, as well as in β-rhamnosylation reactions with 4, and, importantly, β-selective glucosylations with 6 and 7, the secondary glucosyl acceptor 22 performs less well than the L-rhamnosyl acceptor 28, and the primary glucosyl acceptor 24, perhaps suggesting that diastereoselective matching and/or mismatching plays a significant role in some of these glycosylation reactions.24–26 Finally, donor 12 was activated with the N-iodosuccinimide/trifluoromethanesulfonic acid combination27 in the presence of acceptor 30, when the disaccharide 31 was obtained with complete α-selectivity (Table 1, entry 10). The contrast in selectivity between entries 9 and 10 of Table 1 underlines the importance of the preformation of the glucosyl triflate 13 in the chemistry reported here. The change in selectivity on going from the BSP/trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride activation method to promotion with N-iodosuccinimide and trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, or its silver salt, parallels similar observations made with a range of other thioglycosides in our laboratory.28,29
To probe the influence of the methoxy groups in the bisacetal system on the stereoselectivity of glycosylations, thioglycoside 12 was treated with sodium cyanoborohydride and HCl in THF,30 when 32 was obtained in excellent yield, as a single diastereomer. The diequatorial disposition of the methyl groups in 32 follows from the mechanism of reduction and is supported by nuclear Overhauser measurements. The analogous stereoselectivity was previously observed in the mannose series when thioglycoside 33 was reduced cleanly to 34.12 Activation of 32 with BSP and triflic anhydride at −60 °C in dichloromethane, the standard conditions applied for glycosylation of 12, followed by addition of acceptor 22 gave disaccharide 35 as a 1:1 mixture of α- and β-anomers in 50% yield. The methoxy groups in the bisacetal protecting system of 12, therefore, play a significant role in determining the stereoselectivity of the glycosylation reaction.
3. Discussion
The β-selectivity observed with the 3,4-O-bisacetal-protected glucosyl triflate 13 is significant in so far as it contrasts with the α-selectivity observed earlier12 with the corresponding α-selective 3,4-O-bisacetal-protected mannosyl triflate 2. Even more significant, however, is the improved β-selectivity observed with triflate 13 over and above that seen previously16 with the corresponding 3,4-O-carbonate 7 as the more disarmed31,32 carbonate was expected to be the more β-selective donor. Applying our standard mechanistic hypothesis for these glycosyl triflate based glycosylations, which is based on the classical Lemieux mechanism,33 and for which we have provided substantial evidence,7,34,35 the explanation must be found in the effect of the protecting groups on the equilibria between the covalent α-triflates, a transient contact ion pair (CIP) comprised of the glycosyl oxacarbenium ions and the triflate counter ion, and related solvent separated ion pair (SSIP). In this hypothesis the covalent α-triflate serves as a reservoir for the transient CIP, which, with the triflate shielding the α-face from which it has just departed, is the source of the β-glycosides. In the SSIP the anomeric effect takes over, leading to the formation of the α-glycosides. β-Selectivity is the result of a protecting system that destabilizes the glycosyl oxacarbenium shifting the whole series of equilibria toward the covalent glycsoyl triflate and thereby decreasing the concentration of the SSIP. α-Selectivity is the result of a higher concentration of the SSIP arising from increased glycosyl cation stability. In the case of triflate 13 (Scheme 1) the covalent triflate collapses to the CIP with its glycosyl oxacarbenium ion in a conformation approximating to a 4H3 half-chair36,37 the C2–O2 bond necessarily rotates down below the nominal pyranose plane leading to an increased steric interaction with the methoxy group of the bisacetal. We argue that it is this increased steric interaction, which is absent in the corresponding mannosyl triflate 2, that destabilizes the glycosyl cation sufficiently to bring about the observed βselectivity. With the 2,3-O-bisacetal-protected triflate 15 this interaction is absent in the derived oxacarbenium ion, whether it adopts the 4H3 or the closely related, isoenergetic 3E conformer,36,37 and the chemistry reverts to the more normal pattern with the more highly disarmed 2,3-O-carbonate being more β-selective than the acetal.
Scheme 1.

Glycosylation Mechanism Illustrating the Influence of the 3,4-O-Bisacetal Group
Strong support for this hypothesis is provided by the loss of stereoselectivity on glycosylation of the des-methoxy system 32, when there is no longer a destabilizing steric interaction between the O2 protecting group and the cyclic protecting group spanning O3 and O4. Once again, it is appropriate to note the contrast with the mannose series wherein both the standard donor 33 and the des-methoxy analog 34 were α-selective.
4. Conclusion
Although several β-selective glucosylation reactions have been developed recently relying on the use of non-traditional methods of neighboring group participation,38–40 the chemistry described here, together with that of the 2,3-O-carbonate 6, provides a rare example of such a reaction that completely avoids such types of participation. The increased β-selectivity of 13, as compared to the more electronically disarmed 6, illustrates how subtle conformational effects and remote protecting groups can sometimes have major effects on reactivity.
5. Experimental
5.1. General Experimental
NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 solution, with chemicals shifts in parts per million downfield from tetramethylsilane at 500 and 125 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively. Specific rotations were measured in CHCl3 at room temperature. Mass spectra were recorded with electrospray ionization.
5.2. General Procedure for Glycosylation Using the BSP/TTBP/Tf2O System
To a stirred solution of phenyl 2,6-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside (1 equiv), BSP (1.1 equiv), TTBP (1.5 equiv) and 4Å molecular sieves in CH2Cl2 (0.05 M in substrate) at −60 °C under an Ar atmosphere, was added Tf2O (1.2 equiv). After stirring for 30 mins at the same temperature, a solution of glycosyl acceptor (1.5 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (0.02 M in acceptor) was added slowly at −60 °C. The reaction was further stirred for 3 h at the same temperature and then allowed to reach room temperature before dilution with dichloromethane, filtration, and washing with excess CH2Cl2. The organic layer was then washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, followed by saturated sodium chloride solution, then was dried over sodium sulfate, evaporated to dryness and purified by silica gel column chromatography using EtOAc/Hexanes as eluant to afford the corresponding β and α glucopyranosides.
5.2.1.1. Isopropyl 4,6-di-O-benzyl-2,3-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside (16β)
[α]17D – 103.0° (c, 1.0); 1H NMR δ:1.19 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.27 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 1.36 (s, 3H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.30 (s, 3H), 3.48–3.55 (m, 2H), 3.60 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 3.65–3.68 (m, 1H), 3.74 (d, J= 10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 3.95–3.98 (m, 1H), 4.53 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (s, 2H), 4.60 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.33 (m, 10H); 13C NMR δ: 17.7, 17.8, 22.3, 23.5, 47.8, 47.9, 69.4, 69.5, 72.5, 73.4, 74.0, 74.9, 75.0, 75.6, 99.3, 99.4, 99.5, 127.5, 127.6, 127.7, 128.0, 128.3, 128.4, 138.3, 138.4; HRMS Calcd for C29H40O8Na [M+Na] +: 539.2615, found 539.2610.
5.2.1.2. Isopropyl 4,6-di-O-benzyl-2,3-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-α-D-glucopyranoside (16α)
[α]17D + 10.0° (c, 1.0); 1H NMR δ:1.18 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.22 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 3.30 (s, 3H), 3.63 (d, J = 10.0, Hz, 1H), 3.75–3.79 (m, 3H), 3.85 (d, J= 9.5 Hz, 1H), 3.91–3.93 (m, 1H), 4.19 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.91 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H) 7.19–7.36 (m, 10H);13C NMR δ: 17.7, 18.1, 21.3, 23.1, 47.8, 47.9, 68.3, 68.5, 69.7, 70.5, 70.6, 73.4, 75.0, 75.3, 95.2, 99.3, 99.7, 127.6, 127.7, 127.9, 128.1, 128.3, 138.2, 138.5; HRMS Calcd for C29H40O8Na [M+Na] +: 539.2615, found 539.2610.
5.2.2. Isopropyl 2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside (17β)
White Solid, Mp 98 °C; [α]17D + 94.0° (c, 1.0); 1H NMR δ:1.23 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.29 (s, 3H), 1.31 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.30 (s, 3H), 3.41 (dd, J = 8.7,7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.61–3.68 (m, 3H), 3.77–3.81 (m, 2H), 3.98–4.00 (m, 1H), 4.46 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (q, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 4.77 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.35 (m, 6H), 7.39–7.40 (m, 2H);13C NMR δ: 17.7, 17.8, 22.3, 23.7, 47.9, 48.0, 66.4, 68.7, 72.5, 72.7, 73.5, 73.7, 74.7, 79.2, 99.5, 102.6, 127.4, 127.5, 127.7, 128.2, 128.3, 138.5, 139.0; HRMS Calcd for C29H40O8Na [M+Na] +: 539.2615, found 539.2618.
5.2.3. 3β-Cholestanyl 2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside (19β)
White Solid, Mp 128 °C; [α]17D + 84.0° (c, 0.75); 1H NMR δ:0.59–0.63 (m,1H), 0.65 (s, 3H), 0.83 (s, 3H), 0.86–1.39 (m, 36H), 1.47–1.57 (m, 4H), 1.64–1.73 (m, 2H), 1.80–1.81 (m, 1H), 1.96–1.98 (m, 2H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.30 (s, 3H), 3.40 (dd, J = 9.5,7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.61–3.67 (m, 4H), 3.78 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 4.50 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (q, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 4.77 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 7.24–7.33 (m, 8H), 7.39–7.41 (m, 2H);13C NMR δ: 12.1, 12.3, 17.7, 17.8, 18.7, 21.3, 22.6, 22.8, 23.8, 24.2, 28.0, 28.3, 28.8, 29.7, 32.1, 34.8, 35.5, 35.6, 35.8, 36.2, 37.1, 39.5, 40.1, 42.6, 44.8, 47.8, 47.9, 54.4, 56.3, 56.5, 66.5, 68.7, 72.5, 73.5, 73.7, 74.7, 79.4, 99.5, 102.4, 127.4, 127.5, 127.8, 128.2, 128.3, 138.5, 139.0; HRMS Calcd for C53H80O8Na [M+Na] +: 867.5751, found 867.5758.
5.2.4. 1-Adamantyl 2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside (21β)
[α]17D + 85.0° (c, 1.0);1H NMR δ: 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 1.59–1.62 (m, 6H), 1.81–1.84 (m, 3H), 1.91–1.93 (m, 3H), 2.14 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.39 (dd, J = 9.5,7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.59–3.63 (m, 3H), 3.78–3.80 (m, 2H), 4.59 (s, 2H), 4.69 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.24–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.34 (m, 6H), 7.39–7.41 (m, 2H); 13C NMR δ: 17.6, 17.8, 30.7, 36.3, 42.7, 47.9, 66.7, 69.0, 72.7, 73.3, 73.4, 74.7, 75.2, 79.2, 96.5, 99.5, 127.3, 127.4, 127.8, 128.1, 128.2, 138.5, 139.1; HRMS Calcd for C36H48O8Na [M+Na] +: 631.3241, found 631.3243.
5.2.5.1. Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-4-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-α-D-glucopyranoside (23β)
[α]17D + 72.0° (c, 1.0); 1H NMR δ:1.27 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 3.43–3.47 (m, 4H), 3.53–3.58 (m, 1H), 3.68–3.81 (m, 5H), 3.88–3.92 (m, 2H), 4.34 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 4.49–4.60 (m, 4H), 4.71–4.78 (m, 3H), 4.87 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.19 (m, 25H); 13C NMR δ:17.6, 17.8, 47.9, 48.0, 55.3, 66.2, 68.2, 68.4, 70.0, 73.1, 73.2, 73.4, 73.6, 74.1, 74.7, 75.3, 78.9, 79.6, 80.5, 98.4, 99.6, 102.8, 127.0, 127.2, 127.3, 127.4, 127.5, 127.6, 127.7, 127.8, 127.9, 128.1, 128.4, 138.0, 138.4, 138.7, 138.9, 139.7; HRMS Calcd for C54H64O13Na [M+Na] +: 943.4239, found 943.4260.
5.2.5.2. Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-4-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-α-D-glucopyranosyl]-α-D-glucopyranoside (23α)
[α]17D + 82.5° (c, 0.8); 1H NMR δ: 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 3.17 (s, 3H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 3.52 (dd, J = 9.5,3.5 Hz, 2H), 3.55–3.59 (m, 2H), 3.68 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.76–3.83 (m, 4H), 3.94 (t, J = 9.5Hz, 1H), 4.02 (t, J = 9.0Hz, 1H), 4.11 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.47–4.58 (m, 6H), 4.67 (d, J = 12.5Hz, 1H), 4.81–4.88 (m, 3H), 5.66 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.31 (m, 25H); 13C NMR δ: 17.7, 17.9, 47.9, 48.0, 55.2, 65.8, 67.8, 69.4, 69.6, 70.4, 73.3, 73.3, 73.5, 73.7, 74.1, 74.4, 76.3, 80.1, 81.8, 97.7, 98.1, 99.3, 99.4, 126.8, 126.9, 127.3, 127.4, 127.5, 127.6, 127.8, 128.1, 128.2, 128.2, 128.4, 138.0, 138.1, 138.3, 138.6, 139.2; HRMS Calcd for C54H64O13Na [M+Na] +: 943.4239, found 943.4258.
5.2.6.1. Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-6-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-α-D-glucopyranoside (25β)
[α]17D + 61.1° (c, 1.65); 1H NMR δ: 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 3.17 (s, 3H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 3.47–3.59 (m, 4H), 3.65–3.69 (m, 3H), 3.75–3.79 (m, 3H), 3.97 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 4.62 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.65–4.69 (m, 3H), 4.78 (dd, J = 12.5,4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (s, 2H), 4.96 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 7.13–7.36 (m, 25H); 13C NMR δ;13.8, 13.9, 44.0, 44.1, 51.3, 62.3, 64.7, 64.8, 66.0, 69.0, 69.5, 69.6, 70.1, 70.9, 71.0, 71.8, 73.9, 74.1, 74.8, 75.9, 78.2, 94.2, 95.7, 100.1, 123.4, 123.5, 123.6, 123.7, 123.8, 123.9, 124.0, 124.1, 124.3, 124.4, 124.5, 124.6, 134.4, 134.5, 134.6, 134.9, 135.1; HRMS Calcd for C54H64O13Na [M+Na] +: 943.4239, found 943.4208.
5.2.6.2. Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-6-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-di-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-α-D-glucopyranosyl]-α-D-glucopyranoside (25α)
[α]17D + 81.0° (c, 0.5); 1H NMR δ: 1.27 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 3.18 (s, 3H), 3.24 (s, 3H), 3.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 3.39 (dd, J = 10.0,4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.57–3.69 (m, 4H), 3.73–3.77 (m, 3H), 3.89–3.96 (m, 2H), 4.19 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.49–4.57 (m, 4H), 4.63–4.70 (m, 3H), 4.78–4.86 (m, 3H), 4.93 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.03 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.34 (m, 25H); 13C NMR δ: 17.7, 17.9, 47.8, 47.9, 54.9, 65.6, 66.2, 68.1, 68.9, 69.8, 70.5, 72.8, 73.3, 73.4, 75.0, 75.7, 76.6, 77.9, 80.2, 82.1, 97.8, 97.9, 99.4, 99.5, 127.2, 127.3, 127.4, 127.5, 127.6, 127.8, 127.9, 128.0, 128.2, 128.3, 128.4, 128.4, 138.2, 138.3, 138.5, 138.9, 139.0; HRMS Calcd for C54H64O13Na [M+Na] +: 943.4239, found 943.4227.
5.2.7.1. N-Benzyloxycarbonyl 2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl–L-threonine methyl ester (27β)
[α]17D + 66.9° (c, 1.3); 1H NMR δ: 1.28 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 3.18 (s, 3H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.34–3.37 (m, 1H), 3.50–3.51 (m, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 3.67–3.78 (m, 4H), 4.34 (dd, J = 9.0,3.5Hz, 1H), 4.38 (d, J = 7.5Hz, 1H), 4.41–4.43 (m, 1H), 4.50 (q, J = 12.0 Hz, 2H), 4.77 (s, 2H), 5.13 (dd, J = 17.5,12.5 Hz, 2H), 5.76 (d, J = 9.0Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.37 (m, 15H); 13C NMR δ: 17.7, 17.8, 47.9, 48.0, 52.4, 58.8, 65.6, 67.1, 68.2, 72.6, 73.6, 73.7, 74.8, 75.0, 78.6, 99.6, 101.8, 127.5, 127.6, 127.8, 128.1, 128.3, 128.5, 136.4, 138.2, 138.6, 156.8, 170.8; HRMS Calcd for C39H49NO12Na [M+Na] +: 746.3147, found 746.3166.
5.2.7.2. N-Benzyloxycarbonyl 2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-α-D-glucopyranosyl–L-threonine methyl ester (27α)
[α]17D +100.0° (c, 1.0); 1H NMR δ: 1.28 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 6H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 3.17 (s, 3H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 3.54 (s, 3H), 3.64 (dd, J = 11.0,2.0 Hz, 2H), 3.67–3.72 (m, 1H), 3.74 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.93–3.96 (m, 1H), 4.07 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.24–4.25 (m, 1H), 4.32–4.33 (m, 1H), 4.54 (dd, J = 12.0,6.5 Hz, 2H), 4.66 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.07–5.14 (m, 2H), 5.96 (d, J = 8.0Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.34 (m, 15H); 13C NMR δ: 17.6, 17.8, 19.2, 47.9, 52.3, 58.9, 65.9, 66.9, 67.9, 69.3, 70.2, 73.4, 73.5, 75.7, 76.2, 98.9, 99.5, 99.6, 1274, 127.5, 127.7, 127.9, 128.0, 128.2, 128.4, 136.4, 138.0, 138.5, 156.7, 171.0; HRMS Calcd for C39H49NO12Na [M+Na] +: 746.3147, found 746.3171.
5.2.8.1. Methyl 4-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-2,3-O-isopropylidene-α-L-rhamnopyranoside (29β)
[α]17D + 47.0° (c, 0.85); 1H NMR δ: 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.32 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 1.45 (s, 3H), 3.21 (s, 3H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.36 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 3.39 (s, 3H), 3.57–3.55 (m, 1H), 3.66–3.63 (m, 1H), 3.77–3.69 (m, 4H), 3.82 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.07 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.84 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 2H), 4.94 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.40–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.32 (m, 8H); 13C NMR δ: 17.6, 17.7, 17.8, 26.4, 27.8, 47.9, 48.0, 54.8, 64.3, 66.1, 68.2, 72.4, 73.5, 73.8, 74.3, 75.9, 77.9, 78.2, 79.1, 98.1, 99.6, 101.7, 109.2, 127.2, 127.4, 127.5, 128.0, 128.3, 138.5, 139.3; HRMS Calcd for C36H50O12Na [M+Na] +, 697.3194, found: 697.3176.
5.2.8.2. Methyl 4-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-dO-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-α-D-glucopyranosyl]-2,3-O-isopropylidene-α-L-rhamnopyranoside (29α)
[α]17D + 88.0° (c, 0.37); 1H NMR δ: 1.22 (s, 3H), 1.29 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 3.21 (s, 3H), 3.31 (s, 3H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 3.61–3.67 (m, 2H), 3.69–3.73 (m, 2H), 3.74–3.76 (m, 1H), 3.92 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.04 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.10–4.17 (m, 3H), 4.57 (s, 2H), 4.69 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (s, 1H), 4.90 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.35 (m, 10H); 13C NMR δ: 17.4, 17.8, 18.0, 26.3, 28.1, 48.0, 48.1, 54.6, 64.8, 65.7, 67.3, 68.8, 70.5, 73.6, 74.1, 75.9, 80.8, 97.9, 98.8, 99.5, 99.6, 108.8, 127.4, 127.5, 127.8, 128.2, 128.3, 138.2, 138.7; HRMS Calcd for C36H50O12Na [M+Na] +, 697.3194, found: 697.3183.
5.2.9.1. Methyl 4-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-2,3-O-isopropylidene-α-D-rhamnopyranoside (31β)
[α]17D +78.0° (c, 1.0); 1H NMR δ: 1.26 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.33 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 3.45–3.51 (m, 2H), 3.58–3.61 (m, 1H), 3.67–3.82 (m, 5H), 4.09 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.55–4.62 (m, 3H), 4.79 (s, 2H), 4.82 (s, 1H), 7.27–7.38 (m, 10H); 13C NMR δ: 17.6, 17.8, 17.9, 26.2, 28.0, 47.9, 48.0, 54.8, 64.6, 66.0, 68.4, 72.9, 73.4, 73.9, 74.8, 75.8, 79.3, 82.2, 98.2, 99.5,99.6, 103.3, 108.9, 127.4, 127.5, 127.6, 127.8, 128.2, 128.2, 138.4, 138.7; HRMS Calcd for C36H50O12Na [M+Na] +, 697.3194, found 697.3191.
5.2.9.2. Methyl 4-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2,3-dimethoxybutane-2,3-diyl)-α-D-glucopyranosyl]-2,3-O-isopropylidene-α-D-rhamnopyranoside (31α)
[α]17D + 132.0° (c, 1.0); 1H NMR δ: 1.29 (s, 3H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H), 1.53 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.32 (s, 3H), 3.34 (s, 3H), 3.55–3.65 (m, 3H), 3.69–3.78 (m, 3H), 3.91–3.92 (m, 1H), 4.04–4.08 (m, 2H), 4.33 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (q, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.84 (s, 1H), 4.77–4.81 (m, 2H),5.59 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.24–7.32 (m, 8H), 7.41–7.42 (m, 2H); 13C NMR δ: 17.7, 18.0, 18.5, 26.3, 28.0, 47.9, 48.1, 54.7, 63.7, 66.2, 67.9, 69.4, 69.8, 73.2, 73.6, 76.0, 76.4, 78.5, 78.6, 96.5, 98.1, 99.4, 99.6, 109.2, 127.4, 27.5, 127.6, 128.2, 128.3, 138.1, 138.9; HRMS Calcd for C36H50O12Na [M+Na] +, 697.3194, found 697.3198.
5.3. Activation of Donor 12 with N-Iodosuccinimide/Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid
To a stirred 0.05M solution of 12 and acceptor 30 (1.5 equiv) in dry dichloromethane under argon was added N-iodosuccinimide (1.2 equiv) at 0 °C, followed by trifuoromethanesulfonic acid (0.1 equiv). After stirring for 0.5h at 0 °C, the reaction mixture was then diluted with dichloromethane, and washed with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate. The combined organic portion was washed with aqueous sodium thiosulfate, then brine, dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated to dryness. Purification by silica gel chromatography gave 31α in 70% yield, with spectroscopic data identical to those described above.
5.4. Phenyl 2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(butane-2,3-diyl)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside (32)
Sodium cyanoborohydride (0.33 g, 15.0 mmol), was added to a stirred solution of donor 12 (0.2 g, 1.0 mmol) in THF (10.0 mL) under an inert atmosphere. The solution was cooled to 0 °C, and 2.0 M HCl in diethyl ether was added until the pH was 3–4. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h, maintaining the same pH, then was quenched by the addition of saturated NaHCO3 The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (50 mL), and the organic layer was washed with water then brine. After drying over sodium sulfate, the extracts were evaporated to dryness and purified by column chromatography using EtOAc/Hexanes as eluant to give 32 (0.13 g, 70%). [α]17D – 4.7° (c, 1.0); 1H NMR δ:1.10 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.17 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 3.30–3.39 (m, 3H), 3.43 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 3.54 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (dd, J = 11.0,4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.72 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 7.58–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.37 (m, 11H);13C NMR δ: 17.3, 17.4, 68.8, 73.4, 73.9, 75.1, 77.6, 77.7, 77.8, 82.9, 87.2, 127.4, 127.5, 127.6, 127.7, 128.2, 128.3, 128.8, 132.1, 133.7, 138.4, 138.5; HRMS Calcd for C30H34O5S: C30H34O5S [M+Na] +: 529.2019, found 529.2019
5.5. Glycosylation of Desmethoxy Donor 32
Activation of 32 according to the standard BSP protocol and treatment with acceptor 22 gave 35 (50%) as a 1:1 α/β mixture. Column Chromatography on silica gel eluting with EtOAc/Hexanes gave 35 β and 35 α.
5.5.1. Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-4-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(butane-2,3-diyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-α-D-glucopyranoside (35β)
[α]21D + 20.0° (c, 0.45); 1H NMR δ:1.07 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.15 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 3H), 3.29–3.33 (m, 4H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 3.39–3.46 (m, 4H), 3.58 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (d, J = 9.5, 1H), 3.69 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 3.91 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.37–4.49 (m, 5H), 4.55 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (dd, J = 11.0,7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 7.21–7.41 (m, 25H);13C NMR δ: 17.3, 17.4, 55.3, 68.2, 68.5, 69.9, 73.1, 73.3, 73.7, 74.2, 74.3, 74.5, 75.3, 77.5, 78.9, 79.6, 80.5, 80.9, 98.4, 102.6, 127.1, 127.2, 127.4, 127.5, 127.6, 127.7, 127.7, 127.8, 128.0,128.1, 128.2, 128.4, 138.0, 138.4, 138.8, 138.9, 139.6; HRMS Calcd for C52H60O11: C52H60O11 [M+Na] +: 883.4028, found 883.4021.
5.5.2. Methyl 2,3,6-tri-O-benzyl-4-O-[2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(butane-2,3-diyl)-α-D-glucopyranosyl]- α-D-glucopyranoside (35α)
[α]21D + 21.0° (c, 0.50); 1H NMR δ:1.06 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.13 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 3.27–3.45 (m, 4H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 3.49–3.55 (m, 2H), 3.64–3.74 (m, 3H), 3.76 (t, J = 9.5, 1H), 3.84–3.87 (m, 1H), 3.93 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (q, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 4.54–4.60 (m, 5H), 4.67 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 5.74 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 7.18–7.33 (m, 25H);13C NMR δ: 17.3, 17.5, 55.1, 67.3, 69.5, 69.8, 73.1, 73.2, 73.3, 73.4, 73.5, 73.7, 74.3, 75.9, 77.3, 77.9, 80.3, 82.0, 97.7, 97.9, 126.8, 127.0, 127.4, 127.4, 127.5, 127.5, 127.7, 127.9, 128.1,128.2, 128.3, 128.4, 138.0, 138.2, 138.3, 138.4, 139.1; HRMS Calcd for C52H60O11: C52H60O11 [M+Na] +: 883.4028, found 883.4027.

Acknowledgments
We thank the NIH (GM 62160) for support of this work, and Dr. Mitesh Patel for the synthesis of the D-rhamnopyranoside 30.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Review on the effect of cyclic protecting groups in glycosylation: Litjens REJN, van den Bos LJ, Codée JDC, Overkleeft HS, van der Marel G. Carbohydr Res. 2007;342:419–429. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2006.09.002.
- 2.Crich D, Lim LBL. Org React. 2004;64:115–251. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Crich D. Chemistry of Glycosyl Triflates: Synthesis of β-Mannopyranosides. In: Wang PG, Bertozzi CR, editors. Glycochemistry: Principles, Synthesis, and Applications. Dekker; New York: 2001. pp. 53–75. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Crich D. J Carbohydr Chem. 2002;21:663–686. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Review on bisacetal chemistry: Ley SV, Baeschlin DK, Dixon DJ, Foster AC, Ince SJ, Priepke HWM, Reynolds DJ. Chem Rev. 2001;101:53–80. doi: 10.1021/cr990101j.
- 6.Crich D, Sun S. J Org Chem. 1997;62:1198–1199. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Crich D, Sun S. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:11217–11223. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crich D, Sun S. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:8321–8348. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rao VSR, Qasba PK, Balaji PV, Chandrasekaran R. Conformation of Carbohydrates. Harwood Academic Publishers; Amsterdam: 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Grindley TB. Structure and Conformation of Carbohydrates. In: Fraser-Reid B, Tatsuta K, Thiem J, editors. Glycoscience: Chemistry and Chemical Biology. Vol. 1. Springer; Berlin: 2001. pp. 3–51. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jensen HH, Nordstrom M, Bols M. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:9205–9213. doi: 10.1021/ja047578j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Crich D, Cai W, Dai Z. J Org Chem. 2000;65:1291–1297. doi: 10.1021/jo9910482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Crich D, Vinod AU, Picione J, Wink DJ. ARKIVOC. 2005;vi:339–344. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crich D, Vinod AU, Picione J. J Org Chem. 2003;68:8453–8458. doi: 10.1021/jo035003j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Crich D, Cai W. J Org Chem. 1999;64:4926–4930. doi: 10.1021/jo990243d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Crich D, Jayalath P. J Org Chem. 2005;70:7252–7259. doi: 10.1021/jo0508999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Crich D, Vinogradova O. J Org Chem. 2006;71:8473–8480. doi: 10.1021/jo061417b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Crich D, Li L. J Org Chem. 2007;72:1681–1690. doi: 10.1021/jo062294y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crich D, Smith M. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:9015–9020. doi: 10.1021/ja0111481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Crich D, Banerjee A, Li W, Yao Q. J Carbohydr Chem. 2005;24:415–424. doi: 10.1081/CAR-200066978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Crich D, Smith M, Yao Q, Picione J. Synthesis. 2001:323–326. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martín A, Butters TD, Fleet GWJ. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1999;10:23443–22360. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nishio T, Miyake Y, Kubota K, Yamai M, Miki S, Ito T, Oku T. Carbohydr Res. 1996;280:357–363. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Paulsen H. Selectivity and reactivity in oligosaccharide synthesis. In: Bartmann W, Trost BM, editors. Selectivity a Goal for Synthetic Efficiency. Verlag Chemie; Weinheim: 1984. pp. 169–190. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Spijker NM, van Boeckel CAA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1991;30:180–183. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fraser-Reid B, López JC, Gómez AM, Uriel C. Eur J Org Chem. 2004:1387–1395. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Veeneman GH, van Leeuwen SH, van Boom JH. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:1331–1334. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Crich D, de la Mora M, Vinod AU. J Org Chem. 2003;68:8142–8148. doi: 10.1021/jo0349882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Crich D, Pedersen CM, Bowers AA, Wink DJ. J Org Chem. 2007;72:1553–1565. doi: 10.1021/jo061440x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Garegg PJ, Hultberg H, Wallin S. Carbohydr Res. 1982;108:97–101. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mootoo DR, Konradsson P, Udodong U, Fraser-Reid B. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:5583–5584. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Green LG, Ley SV. Protecting Groups: Effects on Reactivity, Glycosylation Stereoselectivity, and Coupling. In: Ernst B, Hart GW, Sinaÿ P, editors. Carbohydrates in Chemistry and Biology. Vol. 1. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2000. pp. 427–448. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lemieux RU, Hendriks KB, Stick RV, James K. J Am Chem Soc. 1975;97:4056–4062. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Crich D, Chandrasekera NS. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:5386–5389. doi: 10.1002/anie.200453688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Review on mechanisms of glycoside bond hydrolysis and formation: Horenstein NA. Adv Phys Org Chem. 2006;41:275–314.
- 36.Nukuda T, Bérces A, Wang L, Zgierski MZ, Whitfield DM. Carbohydr Res. 2005;340:841–852. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nukada T, Berces A, Whitfield DM. Carbohydr Res. 2002;337:765–774. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6215(02)00043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim JH, Yang H, Boons GJ. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:947–949. doi: 10.1002/anie.200461745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim JH, Yang H, Park J, Boons GJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:12090–12097. doi: 10.1021/ja052548h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Smoot JT, Pornsuriyasak P, Demchenko AV. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:7123–7126. doi: 10.1002/anie.200502694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

