Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: Maturitas. 2006 Dec 21;57(2):120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.11.009

Genetic Polymorphisms, Hormone Levels, and Hot Flashes in Midlife Women

Chrissy Schilling a, Lisa Gallicchio b, Susan R Miller c, Patricia Langenberg a, Howard Zacur c, Jodi A Flaws a,d
PMCID: PMC1949021  NIHMSID: NIHMS25298  PMID: 17187946

Abstract

Objective

Hot flashes disrupt the lives of millions of women each year. Although hot flashes are a public health concern, little is known about risk factors that predispose women to hot flashes. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine whether sex steroid hormone levels and genetic polymorphisms in hormone biosynthesis and degradation enzymes are associated with the risk of hot flashes.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study design, midlife women aged 45 to 54 years (n=639) were recruited from Baltimore and its surrounding counties. Participants completed a questionnaire and donated a blood sample for steroid hormone analysis and genotyping. The associations between genetic polymorphisms and hormone levels, as well as the associations between genetic polymorphisms, hormone levels, and hot flashes were examined using statistical models.

Results

A polymorphism in CYP1B1 was associated with lower dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEA-S) and progesterone levels, while a polymorphism in CYP19 (aromatase) was associated with higher testosterone and DHEA-S levels. Lower progesterone and sex hormone binding globulin levels, lower free estradiol index, and a higher ratio of total androgens to total estrogens were associated with the experiencing of hot flashes. A polymorphism in CYP1B1 and a polymorphism in 3βHSD were both associated with hot flashes.

Conclusion

Some genetic polymorphisms may be associated with altered levels of hormones in midlife women. Further, selected genetic polymorphisms and altered hormone levels may be associated with the risk of hot flashes in midlife women.

Keywords: Hot flashes, genetic polymorphisms, sex hormones

Introduction

Hot flashes, generally defined as periods of intense heat in the upper torso, neck, and face, can seriously disrupt a woman's quality of life [1]. Many women feel tired as a result of poor sleep quality resulting from being awakened during the night by their hot flashes [2,3]. For these reasons, hot flashes are a major reason that women seek medical care during the menopausal transition [3]. Even though more than 40 million women experience hot flashes each year [3], little is known about the factors that predispose women to hot flashes.

Previous studies indicate that some sex steroid hormones, but not all, may be associated with the risk of hot flashes [4-7]. For example, studies have shown that low endogenous total (bound and free) estradiol and estrone levels are associated with hot flashes [4,5], while other studies suggest that total androgen levels may not be associated with hot flashes [6,7]. In contrast, limited information is available on the association between free (amount unbound by sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and therefore thought to be biologically active) estrogen, free androgen, and progesterone levels and the risk of hot flashes. Thus, one purpose of this study was to examine the relation between free estrogen, free androgen, and progesterone levels and hot flashes.

Genetic polymorphisms may also be associated with the risk of hot flashes. For example, polymorphisms in estrogen receptor-α (ERα) have been associated with low response of tissues to estrogen, as well as the risk of hot flashes [8]. In addition, a polymorphism in an estrogen metabolizing enzyme, cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1), was found to be associated with the severity, frequency, and duration of hot flashes [5]. Polymorphisms in other estrogen synthesizing and metabolizing enzymes, CYPc17α and CYP1A1, however, have not been found to be associated with hot flashes [5]. To our knowledge, studies have not examined in detail the associations between other genetic polymorphisms and hot flashes. Therefore, the second purpose of this study was to examine the relation between genetic polymorphisms in other genes that encode estrogen synthesis and metabolizing enzymes and the risk of hot flashes.

The mechanism by which genetic polymorphisms may be associated with hot flashes is unclear, but it is likely that some genetic polymorphisms are associated with altered hormone levels. In turn, these altered hormone levels may be associated with the risk of hot flashes. While no studies have directly tested this association, a few studies have shown that polymorphisms in certain genes that encode estrogen synthesis and metabolizing enzymes are associated with altered hormone levels [9-15]. Specifically, a polymorphism in CYPc17α has been associated with higher estradiol and progesterone levels [9], higher estradiol only in women of low body mass index (BMI) [15], higher estrone levels [14], and higher SHBG levels [13]. A polymorphism in CYP19 (aromatase) has been associated with lower estradiol [10,11] and estrone levels [10]. In contrast, polymorphisms in CYPc17α or CYP19 have not been associated with estradiol levels [12], and a polymorphism in catechol-o-methyl transferase (COMT) has not been associated with estradiol or estrone levels [16]. Since no studies have examined the associations among genetic polymorphisms, sex steroid levels, and hot flashes in a single study, the third purpose of this study was to determine if polymorphisms in selected genes that encode estrogen synthesis and metabolizing enzymes are associated with altered sex steroid hormone levels and the risk of hot flashes.

Materials and Methods

Study population and design

Sample methods have been previously described in detail elsewhere [17-20]. Briefly, women aged 45 to 54 years were mailed an invitation to participate in a cross-sectional study of midlife health. Interested participants contacted the clinic, and if the staff determined they were eligible to participate, a visit was scheduled. All clinic visits were scheduled in the morning and the women were instructed to fast overnight prior to the visit. At the clinic visit, participants were weighed, measured, and had their blood drawn for hormone assays and genotyping. Each woman was eligible for study participation if she was between 45 and 54 years of age and had intact ovaries and uterus. To ensure that women enrolled in the study were not post-menopausal, women were eligible only if they reported having at least 3 menstrual periods in the last 12 months. Women were excluded if they were pregnant, were taking hormone replacement therapy or hormonal contraception, or had a history of cancer. All participants in this study gave written informed consent according to procedures approved by the University of Maryland School of Medicine and Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Boards.

The participants also completed the study survey, which included questions regarding demographic information, reproductive history, menstrual cycle characteristics, hormonal contraceptive use, menopausal symptoms, hormone replacement therapy use, medical and family history, and health behaviors (smoking, vitamin use, and eating habits). Women were considered pre-menopausal if they reported experiencing their last menstrual period in the previous 3 months and 11 or more periods within the previous year. Women were considered peri-menopausal if they reported their last menstrual period was within the previous year, but not within the previous 3 months, or their last menstrual period was within the previous 3 months, but they experienced 10 or fewer periods in the previous year. Women were considered post-menopausal, and excluded from the study, if they had not had a period in the previous 12 months.

Hormone assays

Serum concentrations of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), estradiol, estrone, testosterone, androstenedione, progesterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). ELISA kits for estradiol, testosterone, androstenedione, and DHEA-S were obtained from Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. (Webster, TX). ELISA kits for estrone, progesterone, and SHBG were obtained from American Laboratory Products Company (Windham, NH). The assays were run using the manufacturers' instructions [18]. All assays were conducted in the same laboratory by a single investigator. All samples were run in duplicate and mean values for each participant were used in the analysis. The laboratory personnel were blind with respect to any information concerning study subjects. For quality control purposes, samples from both women with hot flashes and women without hot flashes were run within the same laboratory batches. In addition, positive controls containing known amounts of estradiol, estrone, testosterone, androstenedione, progesterone, DHEA-S, or SHBG were included in each batch. Further, some samples were run in multiple assays to ensure that the assay values did not dramatically shift over time.

The minimum detection limits and intra-assay coefficients of variation were as follows: estradiol 7pg/ml, 3.3 ± 0.17%; estrone 10pg/ml, 4.8 ± 0.25%; testosterone 0.04ng/ml, 2.2 ± 0.56%; androstenedione 0.03ng/ml, 2.5 ± 0.60%; DHEA-S 15ng/ml, 1.9 ± 0.63%; progesterone 0.1ng/ml, 2.1 ± 0.65%; and SHBG 0.1nmol/L, 2.4 ± 0.67%. No estradiol, estrone, testosterone, androstenedione, DHEA-S, or SHBG samples were below the limit of detection. For progesterone samples that were below the limit of detection (n=66), the value was set at the limit of detection (0.1ng/ml). The average inter-assay coefficient of variation for all assays was less than 5%.

To estimate the amount of estradiol unbound by SHBG (free estradiol index, FEI), and therefore thought to be biologically active, a ratio of total estradiol to SHBG was calculated using a conversion factor to change pg/ml of estradiol to nmol/L: 100 × (total estradiol × 0.003671) / SHBG [21]. The free testosterone index (FTI) was also estimated using a conversion factor to change ng/ml of testosterone to nmol/L: 100 × (total testosterone × 3.467) / SHBG [21]. Other hormones measured do not bind appreciably to SHBG [22,23]; therefore free index calculations were not performed. The ratio of total androgens (androstenedione plus testosterone) to total estrogens (estradiol plus estrone) was also calculated as a measure of the degree of aromatization.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the GenElute Blood Genomic DNA kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). All enzymes were obtained from New England BioLabs (Ipswich, MA). All primers were synthesized by the Biopolymer Lab at the University of Maryland (Baltimore, MD). Detection of the CYPc17α polymorphism was carried out using published methods and primers used were: forward 5′-CATTCGCACCTCTGGAGTC-3′, reverse 5′-GGCTCTTGG GGTACTTG-3′. One band at 459 base pairs (bp) indicated the subject was homozygous for the wild-type allele (+/+). One band at 459 bp, one band at 335 bp, and one band at 124 bp indicated heterozygosity (+/−). Bands located at 335 bp and 124 bp indicated homozygosity for the mutant allele (−/−) [5,24]. Detection of the CYP1B1 polymorphism was carried out using published methods and primers used were: forward 5′-CTGCCA ACACCTCTGTC TTG-3′, reverse 5′-CTGAAATCGCACTGGTGAGC-3′. One band at 271 bp indicated the subject was homozygous for the wild-type allele (+/+). One band at 271 bp, one band at 166 bp, and one band at 105 bp indicated heterozygosity (+/−). Bands located at 166 bp and 105 bp indicated homozygosity for the mutant allele (−/−) [5,25-27]. Detection of the CYP1A1 polymorphism was carried out using published methods and primers used were: forward 5′-CAGTGAAGAGGTGTAGCCGCT-3′, reverse 5′-TAGGAGTCTTGTCTCATGCCT-3′. One band at 340 bp indicated the subject was homozygous for the wild-type allele (+/+). One band at 340 bp, one band at 200 bp, and one band at 140 bp indicated heterozygosity (+/−). Bands located at 200 bp and 140 bp indicated homozygosity for the mutant allele (−/−) [5,28,29]. Detection of the COMT polymorphism was carried out using published methods and primers used were: forward 5′-TACTGTGGCTACTCAGCTGTGC-3′, reverse 5′-GTGA ACGTGGTGTGAACACC-3′. One band at 114 bp indicated the subject was homozygous for the wild-type allele (+/+). One band at 114 bp and one band at 96 bp indicated heterozygosity (+/−). One band located at 96 bp indicated homozygosity for the mutant allele (−/−) [16,30,31]. Detection of the 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3βHSD) polymorphism was carried out using published methods and primers used were: forward 5′-AAGTGTTGGAAAGT TCTCCACTGTT-3′, reverse 5′-GTGCCCTT GTCACTTTCTGTATGAG-3′. One band at 575 bp indicated the subject was homozygous for the wild-type allele (+/+). One band at 575 bp, one band at 371 bp, and one band at 204 bp indicated heterozygosity (+/−). Bands located at 371 bp and 204 bp indicated homozygosity for the mutant allele (−/−) [32,33]. Detection of the CYP19 polymorphism was carried out using published methods and primers used were: forward 5′-AGTAACACAGA ACAGTTGCA-3′, reverse 5′-TCCAGACTCG CATGAATTCTCCGTA-3′. One band at 188 bp indicated the subject was homozygous for the wild-type allele (+/+). One band at 188 bp and one band at 164 bp indicated heterozygosity (+/−). One band located at 164 bp indicated homozygosity for the mutant allele (−/−) [11].

In all genotyping assays, laboratory personnel were blinded to hot flash status and the polymorphic status of each sample was determined by at least two investigators. In approximately 98% of the readings, there was complete agreement between the two investigators. In the rare instances that there was not agreement, the samples were rerun and agreement was reached between the investigators. Each gel contained samples from women with hot flashes and women without hot flashes as well as samples without DNA (negative controls) and samples with known polymorphisms (positive controls).

Statistical analyses

Characteristics of women with hot flashes and women without hot flashes were compared using chi-square analyses.

Associations between hormone levels and genotype, and associations between hormone levels and hot flash variables, were examined using general linear models. In addition, associations between free estradiol index (FEI), free testosterone index (FTI), the ratio of total androgen to total estrogen, and hot flash variables were examined using general linear models. In adjusted analyses, factors were considered to be potential confounders if they were associated (p<0.1) with genotype, FEI, FTI, or hormone levels. Variables used in the final confounder-adjusted model were age, race, smoking status, BMI, and number of days since last menstrual period.

Polymorphisms were categorized as wild type (+/+), heterozygous (+/−), or homozygous (−/−). The +/+ group served as the reference group for the homozygous or heterozygous variants. The analyses were completed treating each group separately as well as combining the homozygous and heterozygous variants. Risk ratios (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using modified Poisson models [34] to assess the association between specific CYP450 polymorphisms and the occurrence, severity, frequency, and duration of hot flashes controlling for potential confounders. Categories for the hot flash variables were created based on distributions among participants and clinical relevance. Each outcome was assessed using a separate model, and analyses were adjusted for race. In addition, hormones that were determined to be associated with hot flashes were added to the polymorphism and hot flash model. To examine dose-response associations with multiple polymorphisms, a trend test was performed across all levels of exposure in a logistic regression model.

In all analyses, hormone variables, BMI, and number of days since last menstrual period were log transformed, as none were normally distributed. Analyses were performed using SPSS Version 11.0 (Chicago, IL) and SAS Version 9.1 (Cary, NC). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of women with hot flashes and women without hot flashes are presented in Table 1. Women with hot flashes were more likely to be older, of black race, current or former smokers, and have a higher body mass index compared to women without hot flashes. Although women with hot flashes were more likely to be of black race, the association between black race and hot flashes was not due to racial differences in socioeconomic status between black and white women in our study population (data not shown) [19]. The percentage of women with individual genetic polymorphisms was not significantly different between women with and without hot flashes.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Study Sample

Variable Women with hot flashes Women without hot flashes p-value

n %* n %*
Sample Size 372 58.2 267 41.8
Participant Characteristics
Age (years)
 45 to 49 219 58.9 194 72.7 0.001
 50 to 54 153 41.1 73 27.3
Race
 White 302 81.2 230 86.1 0.006
 Black 66 17.7 28 10.5
 Other 3 0.8 8 2.9
Smoking Status
 Current 42 11.3 16 6.0 0.006
 Former 153 41.1 94 35.2
 Never 176 47.3 157 58.8
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
 ≤24.9 146 39.2 127 47.6 0.002
 25.0 to 29.9 94 25.3 81 30.3
 ≥30.0 131 35.2 59 22.1
Genotype
CYPc17α
  +/+ 134 36.0 96 36.0 1.0
  +/− 193 51.9 137 51.3
  −/− 45 12.1 34 12.7
3βHSD
  +/+ 53 14.2 54 20.2 0.06
  +/− 161 43.3 122 45.7
  −/− 150 40.3 88 33.0
CYP19
  +/+ 118 31.7 81 30.3 0.6
  +/− 181 48.7 125 46.8
  −/− 69 18.5 59 22.1
CYP1A1
  +/+ 291 78.2 209 78.3 1.0
  +/− 75 20.2 54 20.2
  −/− 6 1.6 4 1.5
CYP1B1
  +/+ 87 23.4 77 28.8 0.3
  +/− 180 48.4 122 45.7
  −/− 103 27.7 67 25.1
COMT
  +/+ 98 26.3 67 25.1 0.1
  +/− 205 55.1 131 49.1
  −/− 69 18.5 68 25.5
*

Due to missing information, some columns do not add up to the total n listed, and percentages do not add up to 100.

The association between genetic polymorphisms and sex steroid hormone levels is presented in Table 2. Polymorphisms in CYPc17α, CYP1A1, COMT, or 3βHSD were not associated with any of the selected hormones. In contrast, a polymorphism in CYP1B1 was associated with lower levels of DHEA-S and progesterone, although the associations were of borderline significance. A polymorphism in CYP19 was associated with a higher DHEA-S level (p=0.006) and a higher testosterone level (p=0.06).

Table 2.

Association between genotype and sex steroid hormone levels

Testosterone Androstenedione DHEA-S Estradiol Estrone Progesterone

Genotype n Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value
 CYP1B1
  +/+ 161 0.499 (0.454, 0.548) 0.1 2.109 (1.948, 2.280) 0.2 403.83 (369.08, 441.86) 0.08 99.98 (88.41, 112.96) 0.7 135.64 (122.12, 150.51) 0.6 0.960 (0.766, 1.202) 0.07
  +/− or −/− 461 0.457 (0.433, 0.483) 1.986 (1.896, 2.077) 367.23 (348.63, 386.84) 97.13 (90.56, 104.27) 131.24 (123.59, 139.49) 0.752 (0.660, 0.857)
  Missing 3
 CYPc17α
  +/+ 224 0.472 (0.437, 0.511) 0.8 2.090 (1.960, 2.230) 0.2 382.22 (354.96, 411.58) 0.6 104.17 (94.16, 115.12) 0.1 134.42 (123.35, 146.50) 0.7 0.807 (0.670, 0.972) 1.0
  +/− or −/− 401 0.467 (0.440, 0.495) 1.982 (1.890, 2.081) 373.53 (353.19, 394.65) 94.54 (87.71, 101.90) 131.63 (123.47, 140.33) 0.803 (0.698, 0.922)
 CYP1A1
  +/+ 487 0.471 (0.447, 0.497) 0.7 2.004 (1.917, 2.094) 0.4 378.80 (359.96, 398.22) 0.7 98.49 (91.93, 105.43) 0.7 133.09 (125.59, 141.17) 0.8 0.819 (0.722, 0.929) 0.5
  +/− or −/− 138 0.460 (0.416, 0.508) 2.079 (1.913, 2.259) 369.44 (335.96, 406.26) 95.87 (84.27, 109.07) 130.97 (117.33, 146.20) 0.754 (0.594, 0.956)
 CYP19
  +/+ 193 0.437 (0.401, 0.476) 0.06 1.960 (1.824, 2.104) 0.3 342.41 (315.77, 371.67) 0.006 94.73 (84.86, 105.74) 0.4 127.74 (116.16, 140.47) 0.3 0.796 (0.648, 0.979) 0.9
  +/− or −/− 426 0.483 (0.457, 0.512) 2.052 (1.958, 2.153) 393.86 (373.16, 415.72) 100.38 (93.32, 107.99) 135.64 (127.36, 144.46) 0.812 (0.708, 0.931)
  Missing 6
 COMT
  +/+ 160 0.468 (0.427, 0.514) 1.0 2.050 (1.898, 2.217) 0.7 382.99 (350.72, 418.64) 0.7 99.78 (88.23, 112.84) 0.7 128.51 (115.82, 142.59) 0.5 0.786 (0.629, 0.982) 0.8
  +/− or −/− 464 0.469 (0.444, 0.495) 2.012 (1.923, 2.104) 374.28 (355.31, 394.26) 97.22 (90.47, 104.48) 134.02 (126.09, 142.45) 0.807 (0.709, 0.919)
  Missing 1
 βHSD
  +/+ 104 0.460 (0.409, 0.513) 0.7 1.964 (1.784, 2.164) 0.6 375.40 (336.30, 419.47) 0.9 105.32 (90.38, 122.73) 0.4 138.38 (121.63, 157.43) 0.6 0.942 (0.715, 1.242) 0.2
  +/− or −/− 510 0.468 (0.444, 0.492) 2.018 (1.933, 2.106) 373.90 (356.02, 392.68) 97.51 (91.10, 104.38) 133.09 (125.71, 141.03) 0.775 (0.685, 0.876)
  Missing 11
*

adjusted for age, race, smoking status, BMI, days since last menstrual period

Sex steroid hormone levels and their association with hot flash variables are shown in Table 3. Testosterone, androstenedione, and DHEA-S levels were not associated with recent hot flashes, severity of hot flashes, frequency of hot flashes, or duration of hot flashes. Progesterone levels were significantly lower in women with hot flashes in the past 30 days (p=0.001), moderate or severe hot flashes (p=0.003), hot flashes that occur at least weekly (p=0.001), and hot flashes that occurred for less than one year (p=0.002), compared to women who never had hot flashes. To determine if the association between higher progesterone levels and never experiencing hot flashes was due to a corresponding increase in estrogen levels, estradiol, estrone, and the ratio of total androgen to total estrogen were independently added to the progesterone and hot flashes model. Adding estradiol, estrone, or the ratio of total androgen to total estrogen to the progesterone and hot flashes model did not change the associations reported (data not shown). SHBG levels were significantly lower in women with hot flashes in the past 30 days (p=0.03) and in women with hot flashes that occur at least weekly (p=0.003), compared to women who have never had hot flashes. SHBG levels were not associated with moderate or severe hot flashes or duration of hot flash occurrence. Similar to our previous study, lower total estradiol and estrone levels were associated with hot flashes (data not shown) [5].

Table 3.

Association between sex steroid hormone levels and hot flash variables

Testosterone Androstenedione DHEA-S Progesterone SHBG
Variable n Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value
Hot Flashes in the past 30 days
 Never 265 0.465 (0.433, 0.501) 0.9 2.026 (1.906, 2.155) 1.0 384.52 (358.17, 412.40) 0.8 1.017 (0.855, 1.210) 0.001 59.15 (55.48, 63.05) 0.03
 No (with ever hot flashes) 115 0.463 (0.415, 0.516) 2.040 (1.863, 2.234) 374.28 (337.31, 415.30) 0.858 (0.663, 1.110) 62.18 (56.54, 68.37)
 Yes 242 0.475 (0.439, 0.513) 2.012 (1.885, 2.147) 369.81 (343.44, 398.62) 0.603 (0.501, 0.725) 53.62 (50.10, 57.40)
Severity of Hot Flashes
 Never 265 0.465 (0.433, 0.501) 1.0 2.024 (1.904, 2.151) 0.9 384.14 (358.17, 411.99) 0.7 1.007 (0.846, 1.198) 0.003 58.97 (55.31, 62.93) 0.5
 Mild 132 0.470 (0.425, 0.521) 1.980 (1.818, 2.155) 376.15 (341.38, 414.88) 0.718 (0.564, 0.914) 56.04 (51.21, 61.31)
 Moderate/Severe 227 0.467 (0.432, 0.505) 2.034 (1.904, 2.171) 366.87 (340.36, 395.44) 0.652 (0.541, 0.785) 56.20 (52.46, 60.28)
Frequency of Hot Flashes
 Never 265 0.466 (0.433, 0.501) 0.5 2.030 (1.910, 2.158) 0.3 385.68 (359.60, 413.64) 0.6 1.020 (0.857, 1.213) 0.001 59.15 (55.48, 63.05) 0.003
 Monthly 158 0.483 (0.440, 0.529) 2.083 (1.929, 2.252) 376.91 (344.81, 411.99) 0.791 (0.634, 1.015) 63.05 (58.15, 68.37)
 At least weekly 178 0.447 (0.408, 0.489) 1.919 (1.777, 2.071) 363.58 (332.95, 396.63) 0.574 (0.462, 0.712) 51.78 (47.85, 56.04)
Duration of Hot Flashes
 Never 265 0.465 (0.432, 0.500) 0.9 2.026 (1.906, 2.153) 1.0 384.52 (358.53, 412.40) 0.2 1.005 (0.845, 1.196) 0.002 58.97 (55.32, 62.87) 0.2
 ≥ 1 year 233 0.463 (0.429, 0.501) 2.006 (1.879, 2.140) 359.24 (333.62, 386.84) 0.735 (0.611, 0.883) 57.69 (53.89, 61.74)
 < 1 year 117 0.480 (0.430, 0.534) 2.014 (1.839, 2.203) 400.61 (361.04, 444.08) 0.586 (0.453, 0.757) 53.20 (48.38, 58.44)
*

adjusted for age, race, smoking status, BMI, days since last menstrual period

The association between the free estrogen index (FEI), the free testosterone index (FTI), and the total androgen to total estrogen ratio and hot flashes is shown in Table 4. The FTI was not associated with hot flashes in the past 30 days, or the severity, frequency, or duration of hot flashes. The FEI, however, was significantly lower in women who experienced hot flashes within the past 30 days (p=0.04), women with moderate or severe hot flashes (p=0.04), women who experienced hot flashes at least weekly (p=0.02), and women who have experienced hot flashes for less than one year (p=0.04), compared to women who have never experienced hot flashes. Conversely, the ratio of total androgens to total estrogens was higher in women who had hot flashes in the past 30 days (p=0.002), had severe hot flashes (p=0.007), had frequent hot flashes (p=0.001), or had experienced hot flashes for less than one year (p=0.002), compared to women who had not experienced hot flashes.

Table 4.

Association between FEI, FTI, androgen to estrogen ratio, and hot flash variables

Free Estradiol Index (FEI) Free Testosterone Index (FTI) Ratio of total androgens to total estrogens

Variable n Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value Geometric Mean* (95% CI) p-value
Hot Flashes in the past 30 days
 Never 265 0.703 (0.628, 0.788) 0.04 2.729 (2.465, 3.019) 0.1 9.337 (8.611, 10.115) 0.002
 No (with ever hot flashes) 115 0.574 (0.485, 0.680) 2.581 (2.219, 2.998) 10.268 (9.116, 11.565)
 Yes 242 0.577 (0.511, 0.652) 3.071 (2.757, 3.421) 11.658 (10.708, 12.692)
Severity of Hot Flashes
 Never 265 0.702 (0.626, 0.787) 0.04 2.735 (2.472, 3.025) 0.7 9.365 (8.637, 10.145) 0.007
 Mild 132 0.600 (0.512, 0.704) 2.912 (2.529, 3.353) 10.957 (9.796, 12.256)
 Moderate/Severe 227 0.564 (0.499, 0.637) 2.881 (2.583, 3.209) 11.257 (10.329, 12.268)
Frequency of Hot Flashes
 Never 265 0.703 (0.627, 0.788) 0.02 2.729 (2.469, 3.019) 0.4 9.346 (8.619, 10.125) 0.001
 Monthly 158 0.572 (0.495, 0.662) 2.656 (2.337, 3.016) 10.486 (9.459, 11.612)
 At least weekly 178 0.548 (0.476, 0.632) 2.989 (2.638, 3.387) 12.061 (10.903, 13.330)
Duration of Hot Flashes
 Never 265 0.702 (0.626, 0.787) 0.04 2.732 (2.469, 3.022) 0.3 9.356 (8.645, 10.135) 0.002
 ≥ 1 year 233 0.594 (0.527, 0.670) 2.787 (2.504, 3.099) 10.633 (9.777, 11.565)
 < 1 year 117 0.551 (0.466, 0.652) 3.127 (2.694, 3.629) 11.989 (10.665, 13.491)
*

adjusted for age, race, smoking status, BMI, days since last menstrual period

total androgens = androstenedione plus testosterone, total estrogens = estradiol plus estrone

The risk ratios (RR) of experiencing hot flashes by 3βHSD, CYP19, and COMT genotype are shown in Table 5. Polymorphisms in CYP19 and COMT were not significantly associated with any of the hot flash variables examined. In contrast, having a polymorphism in 3βHSD was associated with a significantly higher risk of experiencing moderate or severe hot flashes compared to not having the polymorphism (RR: 1.38, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 1.00, 1.90). A polymorphism in 3βHSD was also associated with a higher risk of experiencing hot flashes for a year or more compared to not having the polymorphism, although the RR was of borderline statistical significance (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.86). In agreement with our previous report, a polymorphism in CYP1B1 was associated with a significantly higher risk of experiencing any hot flashes (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.40), moderate or severe hot flashes (RR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.71), hot flashes that occur at least weekly (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.84), and hot flashes that occur for a year or more (RR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.69), compared to not having the polymorphism [5].

Table 5.

Risk ratios of experiencing hot flashes by genotype

Women without hot flashes Women with hot flashes Any hot flashes RR* (95% CI) Women with hot flashes Moderate or severe hot flashes RR* (95% CI) Women with hot flashes At least weekly hot flashes RR* (95% CI) Women with hot flashes Hot flashes for ≥1 year RR* (95% CI)
3βHSD n n n n n
 +/+ 54 53 1.00 28 1.00 25 1.00 30 1.00
 +/− or −/− 210 311 1.18 (0.96, 1.46) 203 1.38 (1.00, 1.90) 158 1.29 (0.91, 1.83) 208 1.36 (0.99, 1.86)
 Missing 3 8 5 5 4
CYP19
 +/+ 81 118 1.00 73 1.00 54 1.00 79 1.00
 +/− or −/− 184 250 1.00 (0.86, 1.17) 162 1.03 (0.83, 1.28) 130 1.10 (0.85, 1.43) 161 0.99 (0.81, 1.22)
 Missing 2 4 1 4 2
COMT
 +/+ 67 98 1.00 56 1.00 52 1.00 62 1.00
 +/− or −/− 199 274 0.98 (0.84, 1.14) 180 1.06 (0.84, 1.34) 137 0.94 (0.73, 1.21) 180 1.00 (0.81, 1.25)
 Missing 1 0 0 0 0
CYP1B1
 +/+ 77 87 1.00 50 1.00 39 1.00 53 1.00
 +/− or −/− 189 283 1.18 (1.00, 1.40) 185 1.33 (1.04, 1.71) 148 1.37 (1.02, 1.84) 189 1.33 (1.05, 1.69)
 Missing 1 2 1 1 2
3βHSD, CYP1B1
 +/+, +/+ 14 10 1.00 6 1.00 4 1.00 3 1.00
 +/+ and +/− or −/−, or +/− or −/− and +/+ 100 119 1.23 (0.75, 2.01) 66 1.22 (0.60, 2.45) 56 1.50 (0.61, 3.67) 77 2.24 (0.79, 6.35)
 +/− or −/− and +/− or −/− 149 233 1.42 (0.88, 2.30) 158 1.63 (0.82, 3.21) 122 1.91 (0.80, 4.60) 158 2.77 (0.99, 7.80)
 Missing 4 10 6 6 4
  p-for-trend 0.02 0.006 0.02 0.003
*

adjusted for race

A model was generated to determine if women who carry a polymorphism in both genes related to hot flashes (3βHSD and CYP1B1) would have a higher risk of experiencing hot flashes than women who do not carry a polymorphism or only carry one polymorphism (Table 5). Women who carried a polymorphism in both 3βHSD and CYP1B1 had a higher risk of experiencing hot flashes that occur for a year or more (RR: 2.77, 95% CI: 0.99, 7.80) compared to women who did not carry either of the polymorphisms. In addition, there was a statistically significant trend for a higher risk of hot flashes with the number of polymorphisms carried. Women who carried polymorphisms in both 3βHSD and CYP1B1 had a higher risk of experiencing any hot flashes (p-for-trend=0.02), moderate or severe hot flashes (p-for-trend=0.006), or hot flashes that occur at least weekly (p-for-trend=0.02) compared to women who do not carry the polymorphisms.

In addition, the hormones that were associated with hot flashes (progesterone and SHBG) were independently added to the polymorphism and hot flashes models. The RRs for hot flashes did not change when SHBG was added to any of the models (data not shown). When progesterone was added to the model examining the association between a polymorphism in CYP1B1 and moderate or severe hot flashes, the point estimate decreased slightly and became non-significant (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.37), indicating progesterone may explain a small part of the association. RRs for the other models examining the role of progesterone in the association between polymorphisms and hot flashes did not change.

Discussion

Collectively, the data from this study indicate that some sex steroid hormones (progesterone, FEI, ratio of total androgens to total estrogens, and SHBG) and certain polymorphisms in genes that encode estrogen synthesis and metabolizing enzymes (3βHSD and CYP1B1) are associated with an increased risk of hot flashes in midlife women. In addition, we have shown that women who carry polymorphisms in both genes related to hot flashes (3βHSD and CYP1B1) have a higher risk of experiencing hot flashes compared to women who do not carry a polymorphism in either gene, or only carry a polymorphism in one gene. Further, some genetic polymorphisms in estrogen synthesis and metabolizing enzymes (CYP1B1 and CYP19) may be associated with altered hormone levels (progesterone, DHEA-S, and testosterone).

Consistent with other reports, we observed no difference in the levels of testosterone or its precursors, androstenedione and DHEA-S, between women with hot flashes and women without hot flashes [6,7]. Although our study suggests that SHBG levels are lower in women with hot flashes than in women who have never experienced hot flashes, this is different from two previously published studies that reported no change in SHBG levels with hot flashes [4,7]. These conflicting observations may be due to differences in study sample, data analysis, or categorization of hot flash variables. The FEI and FTI data in our study, however, which are estimated by using SHBG levels, are consistent with previous reports of lower FEI levels [4,7] and no change in FTI levels [7] in women with hot flashes compared to women without hot flashes. The ratio of total androgens (androstenedione plus testosterone) to total estrogens (estradiol plus estrone) was significantly higher in women with hot flashes compared to women without hot flashes. This association has not been examined previously, but the result was somewhat expected, as women with hot flashes have been reported to have lower estrogen levels than women without hot flashes [4-7,17,18].

This is the first study we are aware of to examine the association between progesterone levels and the risk of hot flashes. The mean progesterone levels in this study were between 0.5 and 1.0ng/ml, which is consistent with the levels expected for women in the age range examined in the study [35]. Although the progesterone levels were low overall, there were significantly lower levels in women experiencing recent, severe, frequent, and shorter duration hot flashes, compared to women who have not experienced hot flashes. Progestins and estrogens are thought to interact with several neurotransmitter pathways in the hypothalamus responsible for central thermoregulation [36]. Therefore, this association between progesterone levels and hot flashes may be an important one. Previous studies have shown that women given progesterone for treatment of hot flashes experience significantly fewer hot flashes compared to women given placebo [reviewed in 36,37]. Our data support this finding and suggest that low doses of progesterone may be enough to reduce vasomotor symptoms. However, this hypothesis needs to be tested directly.

An area of emerging interest is the association between genetic polymorphisms and hot flashes. A previous study showed an association of polymorphisms in ERα with hot flashes [8]. Our previous study showed an association between a polymorphism in CYP1B1 and hot flashes [5], although two subsequent studies did not observe this association in other populations [38,39]. The link between polymorphisms and hot flashes may be due to the polymorphism altering sex steroid hormone levels. Current data regarding the effects of genotype on hormone levels, however, are limited. Consistent with previous reports, we showed no difference in estradiol levels with a polymorphism in CYPc17α [12] and no difference in estradiol or estrone levels with a polymorphism in COMT [16,40], CYP19 [40], or CYP1B1 [40]. Other studies, however, have shown lower estradiol [10,11] and estrone [10] levels with a polymorphism in CYP19. We observed higher hormone levels with a polymorphism in CYP19, but only the higher testosterone and DHEA-S levels were statistically significant. Differences in findings may be due to our study consisting of pre- and peri-menopausal Caucasian and African-American women, while the Dunning et al [10] and Somner et al [11] studies consisted of post-menopausal Caucasian women only. We also showed that progesterone levels may explain a small part of the association between a polymorphism in CYP1B1 and the risk of moderate or severe hot flashes. This indicates that some of these polymorphisms may have functional significance.

The presented results must be taken in context of their limitations. The study design does not allow us to determine the temporality of the association between hormone levels and hot flashes, or the prevalence of hot flashes in the population. Blood samples were not collected during the same day of the menstrual cycle for pre-menopausal women and samples were obtained only once. Further, the assays used to measure hormone levels may not be as sensitive and specific as newly developed assays such as sequential mass spectrometry [41]. To attempt to minimize the daily and monthly variability of hormone levels, samples were collected between 8 and 10 AM after an overnight fast, and statistical analyses were adjusted for body mass index and number of days since the beginning of the last menstrual period. Despite these limitations, there were several strengths to this study. Hot flash status was assigned at the clinic visit based on information provided on the questionnaire. Genotyping and hormone assays were performed by a single investigator. Also, to our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to examine the relation of genotype to hot flashes, in addition to the association with hormone levels in midlife women.

In this study, women were more likely to experience recent, severe, frequent, and a shorter duration of hot flashes if they had low progesterone levels. Women who carried a polymorphism in the estrogen metabolizing enzyme CYP1B1 had lower progesterone levels and were also more likely to experience any, severe, frequent, and shorter duration hot flashes than women who did not carry a polymorphism. Further, progesterone levels explained part of the association between a polymorphism in CYP1B1 and the risk of moderate or severe hot flashes. This suggests that progesterone levels may be an important indicator of the risk of hot flashes and that in addition to low hormone levels (progesterone and estrogen), genetic polymorphisms may be involved in the mechanism of hot flashes. Future longitudinal and mechanistic studies need to be performed to understand the functional significance of the CYP1B1 polymorphism and low progesterone levels on hot flashes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH AG18400, NIEHS/NIH Training Grant T32 ES07263, and the Women's Health Research Group at the University of Maryland. The authors thank Dr. Christina Borgeest, Ms. Lynn Lewis, and Ms. Janice K. Babus for their contributions to this work.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Kronenberg F, Downey JA. Thermoregulatory physiology of menopausal hot flashes: a review. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1987;65:1312–24. doi: 10.1139/y87-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hollander L, Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Berlin JA, Grisso JA, Battistini M. Sleep quality, estradiol levels, and behavioral factors in late reproductive age women. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:391–7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01485-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kronenberg F. Hot flashes: epidemiology and physiology. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1990;592:52–86. 123–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb30316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Erlik Y, Meldrum DR, Judd HL. Estrogen levels in postmenopausal women with hot flashes. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:403–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Visvanathan K, Gallicchio L, Schilling C, et al. Cytochrome gene polymorphisms, serum estrogens, and hot flushes in midlife women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1372–81. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000187308.67021.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Overlie I, Moen MH, Holte A, Finset A. Androgens and estrogens in relation to hot flashes during the menopausal transition. Maturitas. 2002;41:69–77. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(01)00256-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Randolph JF, Jr, Sowers MF, Bondarenko I, et al. The relationship of longitudinal change in reproductive hormones and vasomotor symptoms during the menopausal transition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:6106–12. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Malacara JM, Perez-Luque EL, Martinez-Garza S, Sanchez-Marin FJ. The relationship of estrogen receptor-α polymorphism with symptoms and other characteristics in post-menopausal women. Maturitas. 2004;49:163–9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Feigelson HS, Shames LS, Pike MC, Coetzee GA, Stanczyk FZ, Henderson BE. Cytochrome P450c17α gene (CYP17) polymorphism is associated with serum estrogen and progestrone concentrations. Cancer Research. 1998;58:585–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dunning AM, Dowsett M, Healey CS, et al. Polymorphisms associated with circulating sex hormone levels in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:936–45. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Somner J, McLellan S, Cheung J, et al. Polymorphisms in the P450c17 (17-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase) and P450c19 (aromatase) genes: association with serum sex steroid concentrations and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:344–51. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Travis RC, Churchman M, Edwards SA, et al. No association of polymorphisms in CYP17, CYP19, and HSD17-B1 with plasma estradiol concentrations in 1,090 British women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:2282–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tworoger SS, Chubak J, Aiello EJ, et al. Association of CYP17, CYP19, CYP1B1, and COMT polymorphisms with serum and urinary sex hormone concentrations in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:94–101. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-03-0026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Haiman CA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, et al. The relationship between a polymorphism in CYP17 with plasma hormone levels and breast cancer. Cancer Research. 1999;59:1015–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Small CM, Marcus M, Sherman SL, Sullivan AK, Manatunga AK, Feigelson HS. CYP17 genotype predicts serum hormone levels among pre-menopausal women. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2162–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Worda C, Sator MO, Schneeberger C, Jantschev T, Ferlitsch K, Huber JC. Influence of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) codon 158 polymorphism on estrogen levels in women. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:262–6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gallicchio L, Miller SR, Visvanathan K, et al. Cigarette smoking, estrogen levels, and hot flashes in midlife women. Maturitas. 2005;53:133–43. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gallicchio L, Visvanathan K, Miller SR, et al. Body mass, estrogen levels, and hot flashes in midlife women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1353–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miller SR, Gallicchio LM, Lewis LM, et al. Association between race and hot flashes in midlife women. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schilling C, Gallicchio L, Miller SR, et al. Current alcohol use is associated with a reduced risk of hot flashes in midlife women. Alcohol Alcohol. 2005;40:563–8. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vankrieken L. Testosterone and the free androgen index. Diagnostic Products Corporation; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cunningham SK, Loughlin T, Culliton M, McKenna TJ. The relationship between sex steroids and sex-hormone-binding globulin in plasma in physiological and pathological conditions. Ann Clin Biochem. 1985;22:489–97. doi: 10.1177/000456328502200504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cunningham GR, Tindall DJ, Lobl TJ, Campbell JA, Means AR. Steroid structural requirements for high affinity binding to human sex steroid binding protein (SBP) Steroids. 1981;38:243–62. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(81)90061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Feigelson HS, Coetzee GA, Kolonel LN, Ross RK, Henderson BE. A polymorphism in the CYP17 gene increases the risk of breast cancer. Cancer Research. 1997;57:1063–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fukatsu T, Hirokawa Y, Araki T, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of hormone-related genes and prostate cancer risk in the Japanese population. Anticancer Research. 2004;24:2431–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tang YM, Green BL, Chen GF, et al. Human CYP1B1 Leu432Val gene polymorphism: ethnic distribution in African-Americans, Caucasians and Chinese; oestradiol hydroxylase activity; and distribution in prostate cancer cases and controls. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10:761–6. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200012000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thyagarajan B, Brott M, Mink P, et al. CYP1B1 and CYP19 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer incidence: no association in the ARIC study. Cancer Lett. 2004;207:183–9. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Taioli E, Trachman J, Chen X, Toniolo P, Garte SJ. A CYP1A1 restriction fragment length polymorphism is associated with breast cancer in African-American women. Cancer Research. 1995;55:3757–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fontana X, Peyrottes I, Rossi C, et al. Study of the frequencies of CYP1A1 gene polymorphisms and glutathione S-transferase mu1 gene in primary breast cancers: an update with an additional 114 cases. Mutation Research. 1998;403:45–53. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(98)00025-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lavigne JA, Helzlsouer KJ, Huang HY, et al. An association between the allele coding for a low activity variant of catechol-O-methyltransferase and the risk for breast cancer. Cancer Research. 1997;57:5493–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Goodman JE, Lavigne JA, Hengstler JG, Tanner B, Helzlsouer KJ, Yager JD. Catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism is not associated with ovarian cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:1373–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rosmond R, Chagnon M, Bouchard C, Bjorntorp P. Polymorphism in exon 4 of the human 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I gene (HSD3B1) and blood pressure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;293:629–32. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00234-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chang B, Zheng SL, Hawkins GA, et al. Joint effect of HSD3B1 and HSD3B2 genes is associated with hereditary and sporadic prostate cancer susceptibility. Cancer Research. 2002;62:1784–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:702–6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Trevoux R, De Brux J, Castanier M, Nahoul K, Soule JP, Scholler R. Endometrium and plasma hormone profile in the peri-menopause and post-menopause. Maturitas. 1986;8:309–26. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(86)90039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Berendsen HH. The role of serotonin in hot flushes. Maturitas. 2000;36:155–64. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(00)00151-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lucero MA, McCloskey WW. Alternatives to estrogen for the treatment of hot flashes. Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31:915–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Crandall CJ, Crawford SL, Gold EB. Vasomotor symptom prevalence is associated with polymorphisms in sex steroid-metabolizing enzymes and receptors. Am J Med. 2006;119:S52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Woods NF, Mitchell ES, Tao Y, Viernes HM, Stapleton PL, Farin FM. Polymorphisms in the estrogen synthesis and metabolism pathways and symptoms during the menopausal transition: observations from the Seattle Midlife Women's Health Study. Menopause. 2006 Sept 12; doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000227058.70903.9f. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lurie G, Maskarinec G, Kaaks R, Stanczyk FZ, Le Marchand L. Association of genetic polymorphisms with serum estrogens measured multiple times during a 2-year period in premenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1521–7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wierman ME, Basson R, Davis SR, Khosla S, Miller KK, Rosner W, Santoro N. Androgen therapy in women: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:3697–3710. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES