Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2007 Jun 29;189(17):6093–6100. doi: 10.1128/JB.00612-07

Recent Advances in the Expression, Evolution, and Dynamics of Prokaryotic Genomes

Cecilia M Arraiano 1, Jaana Bamford 2, Harald Brüssow 3,*, Agamemnon J Carpousis 4,*, Vladimir Pelicic 5, Katharina Pflüger 6, Patrice Polard 7, Jörg Vogel 8
PMCID: PMC1951890  PMID: 17601780

Work on the molecular and cellular biology of prokaryotic microorganisms and their phage continues to be at the cutting edge in many areas of fundamental research in the life sciences. An important stimulus has been the large number of complete bacterial and archaeal genome sequences that have appeared over the past decade and that now are being produced at a rate of several hundred per year. This information is the foundation for all of the “-omics” leading to a global evaluation of the state of the cell under various conditions of growth or stress. An overview of the sequenced prokaryotic genomes has also greatly influenced our thinking about the evolution of life on earth. The EMBO Conference on Molecular Microbiology was the third in a series of meetings aimed at bolstering interest and support for fundamental research on prokaryotes (EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany, 19 to 23 October 2006). More than 140 participants from around the world contributed to an intensive 4-day series of talks and poster sessions. The topics included noncoding regulatory RNA in bacteria, introduced for the first time at this meeting, as well as pathogenicity, evolution, signal transduction, and chromosome dynamics. With about 60 talks and 70 poster presentations, nearly of all of the participants contributed to the scientific discussion, generating many lively exchanges. The only significant complaint about the organization of the meeting was that some participants felt that there was not enough time to visit the historic old city of Heidelberg. One interesting comment from several participants was that they very much enjoyed attending a relatively broad-based meeting allowing them to learn about recent developments in areas with potential connections to their own research, an opportunity lacking in more highly specialized meetings. In this review, we highlight the talks, mention some of the discussion that they generated, and cite a selection of recent research articles and reviews by the speakers.

NONCODING REGULATORY RNA

S. Gottesman (Bethesda, MD), who has greatly contributed to developing the study of noncoding regulatory RNA in Escherichia coli, opened the meeting with the keynote address, giving an overview of this exciting new field. She outlined strategies for identifying and characterizing small RNA (sRNA) and described several sRNAs that act in bacterial stress responses (44, 48, 66). For example, the DsrA and RprA sRNAs positively regulate the general stress sigma factor, RpoS, and the Fur-dependent sRNA, RyhB, responds to iron starvation by downregulating a large number of genes that encode nonessential iron storage proteins. These regulatory RNAs act posttranscriptionally, permitting a rapid response to changes in the environment. G. Wagner (Uppsala, Sweden) talked about the SOS-induced IstR sRNA of Escherichia coli, which functions to repress the synthesis of a toxic peptide, TisB, upon DNA damage. IstR can repress the translation of the tisAB mRNA by binding ∼100 nucleotides (nt) upstream of the tisB ribosome-binding site. Wagner proposed a radically new concept of small RNA-mediated translation repression in which the sRNA does not mask the ribosome-binding site but instead prevents ribosome loading at an upstream “ribosome standby site” (30). H. Aiba (Nagoya, Japan) talked about the phosphosugar-stress induced sRNA, SgrS, of E. coli that represses the translation of ptsG mRNA (71, 72). He presented data on complexes of SgrS with RNase E and Hfq and also demonstrated that SgrS primarily acts to prevent PtsG protein synthesis upon phosphosugar stress; ptsG mRNA degradation is believed to be a consequence of the repression of translation. Aiba then presented work on in vitro RNA silencing of the ptsG mRNA in a reconstituted system using purified components. P. Bouloc (Orsay, France) talked about the identification of a new sRNA, RseX, a suppressor of extracytoplasmic stress mediated by the alternative sigma factor, RpoE (34). RseX represses the expression of two abundant E. coli outer membrane proteins (OMPs), OmpA and OmpC, and is a new member of a rapidly growing list of sRNAs that target mRNAs encoding OMPs.

J. Vogel (Berlin, Germany) described the first systematic study of sRNA regulation in Salmonella, a model pathogen. His talk reinforced the idea that there is an important link between regulation by sRNAs and the expression of OMPs. In particular, the RpoE-controlled sRNA, RybB, plays a central in this process since it can repress all major omp mRNAs of Salmonella (75). Vogel also presented the identification and characterization of more than 25 Salmonella sRNAs and their targets. This work, using pulse expression of the sRNA and DNA microarray analysis of mRNA levels, suggests that several hundred Salmonella mRNAs are regulated by sRNA. F. Narberhaus (Bochum, Germany) talked about cis-regulatory elements in mRNA, which are located primarily in the 5′ untranslated regions of heat shock protein genes, which repress translation at normal growth temperature (ROSE elements). He presented a recently solved nuclear magnetic resonance structure of a ROSE element showing an unexpected network of noncanonical base pairs ensuring that the ribosome-binding site is inaccessible at normal growth temperature (20). P. Romby (Strasbourg, France) described the function of the Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII. Approximately 500 nt in length, this molecule is one of the longest bacterial regulatory RNAs known to date. RNAIII is a bifunctional molecule: it acts as an antisense regulator of Staphylococcus virulence genes and functions as an mRNA encoding a virulence protein (51). Romby presented new results showing that RNAIII also regulates the rot mRNA, which encodes a master regulator of virulence gene expression, placing RNAIII at the top of a cascade that orchestrates virulence gene expression in this important human pathogen.

R. Schroeder (Vienna, Austria) presented work in which proteins that bind E. coli sRNA were purified by affinity chromatography. Hfq, ribosomal protein S1, and the RNA polymerase beta subunit were the most abundant proteins detected in this analysis. Genomic SELEX, i.e., genomic systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment, was performed to identify RNAs that tightly bind Hfq or RNA polymerase (64). A large number of antisense RNAs, novel intergenic transcripts, and mRNAs were identified. Genomic SELEX appears to be a useful tool for identifying low-abundance transcripts that are difficult to detect in total RNA preparations. In the archaea and the eukarya, noncoding RNAs are part of ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) that modify rRNA at specific sites. The box C/D RNAs, a name that refers to their conserved C and D sequence motifs, are part of RNPs that methylate rRNA. Specificity is due to an antisense “guide” sequence in the box C/D RNA that base pairs with the target rRNA sequence. E. S. Maxwell (Raleigh, NC) presented recent work on the assembly and function of the Methanococcus jannaschii sR8 box C/D RNA into an RNP. The spacing between box C/D RNA sequence elements is highly conserved and critical for methylation. Different sRNPs assemble following different RNA folding pathways. The formation of an RNA duplex between the sRNP and the rRNA target, and the interaction of the rRNA with the nearby sRNP core proteins is required for efficient methylation (43, 90, 101).

RNases AND GENE EXPRESSION

U. Bläsi (Vienna, Austria) presented work on the mechanism of the DsrA and RyhB action in E. coli (2, 94) and asked whether the double-strand specific endonuclease RNase III affects the posttranscriptional control mediated by these sRNAs. This question generated a lively discussion regarding the relative importance of RNase III versus RNase E, which is a single-strand specific endonuclease. The consensus was that RNase E appears to be the major player in the degradation of the sRNAs, as well as their mRNA targets. Interesting new biochemical and structural work on bacterial and archaeal RNases was presented. C. M. Arraiano (Lisbon, Portugal) presented an analysis of E. coli RNase II, the founding member of a superfamily of exonucleases present in all three domains of life (4, 5, 42). Atomic structures of RNase II alone or complexed with RNA were presented. Together with biochemical data, this work gives new insight into the mechanisms of catalysis, translocation and processivity of this important RNA processing and degrading enzyme. The archaeal and eukaryotic exosomes, the bacterial RNase PH, and the bacterial PNPase form a superfamily of structurally conserved phosphate-dependent RNA-degrading enzymes. E. Lorentzen (Heidelberg, Germany) presented new structural data on the archaeal exosome complexed with an RNA substrate (61-63). Six RNase PH-like subunits form a hexamer organized around a central channel. One face of this hexamer is capped by a trimeric ring of S1 and KH RNA-binding domains, forming a continuous channel. The RNA-binding cleft of the active site recognizes 3′ ends mainly by interactions with phosphate groups, thus explaining at least in part the lack of nucleotide specificity in the degradation of RNA.

G. de La Cueva-Mendez (Cambridge, United Kingdom) showed that the Kid toxin encoded by plasmid R1 is an endonuclease that cleaves mRNA. Kid RNase activity is repressed by the Kis antitoxin. A model was proposed in which Kid/Kis is part of a presegregational copy number control system (32, 77). H. Putzer (Paris, France) described the recent identification and characterization of two novel RNases from Bacillus subtilis, RNase J1 and J2, which are paralogues (36). These enzymes, which belong to the metallolactamase family of enzymes, are functional analogues of the RNase E of E. coli but not homologues. That is, there is no conservation of protein sequence or structure. However, like RNase E, RNase J1/J2 is an endonuclease whose activity is sensitive to the phosphorylation state of the 5′ end of an RNA substrate. Since the genomes of B. subtilis and related gram-positive bacteria do not encode authentic RNase E homologues, RNase J might substitute for RNase E in RNA processing and degradation. C. Condon (Paris, France) presented new results on the maturation of the 5′ end of the B. subtilis 16S rRNA, which was shown to be a two-step process, with the mature 5′ end being generated by RNase J1. Mutation of the predicted catalytic site of RNase J1 abolished both 16S rRNA processing and cell viability. In vitro results suggest that RNase J1 processes the precursor 16S rRNA after it is assembled into 70S ribosomes (12). (See also more recent work from this speaker on RNase J, which was not covered in the meeting [68].)

M. Ehrenberg (Uppsala, Sweden) presented results clarifying the role and the interplay of IF1, IF2, and IF3 in the initiation of translation in bacteria. He demonstrated that IF3 has an important role in the selection of mRNA with an AUG initiation codon. IF1, ribosomal recycling factor RRF and elongation factor EF-G contribute to the step preceding the initiation of protein synthesis (6). W. McAllister (Stratford, NJ) described a novel mechanism of nucleotide misincorporation during transcription by T7 RNA polymerase (52, 79). Misincorporation occurs when the same base in the DNA template is used during two consecutive cycles of nucleotide addition. McAllister suggested that this type of misincorporation may be universal for all RNA polymerases and that, in contrast to DNA replication, halted transcription complexes may be more deleterious to the cell than the occasional misincorporation of a nucleotide.

GENOMICS, EVOLUTION, AND BACTERIOPHAGE

There was an interesting encounter of three different philosophies in talks on bacterial genomics. T. Dagan (Düsseldorf, Germany) from W. Martin's group presented an analysis of the phylogenetic tree of the prokaryotes with special attention to its early branching, demonstrating a closer relationship between bacterial and human proteins than between bacterial and archaeal proteins (27, 28). This diagnosis contrasts with the highly resolved tree of life presented by P. Bork (Heidelberg, Germany), who sees eukaryotes closer to the archaea using 30 informational genes (what T. Dagan called “the tree of 1%”). The principal interest of P. Bork is bioinformatics, and hence his talk focused on a new tool, called STRING, which combines experimental, in silico, and semantic information to find interacting genes and proteins (98). Another aspect of Bork's talk was how to make sense of metagenomics, illustrated with data from different environmental niches (97). Although such data are typically very incomplete, they are at the same time information-rich, documenting the metabolic capacity of an entire microbial community. Finally, J. Parkhill (Cambridge, United Kingdom) represented a third genomics philosophy. As one of the most experienced practitioners of complete genome sequencing, he was somewhat wary of metagenomics and stressed the value of sequencing different clones from the same species or even bacteria from the same clone grown from individual colonies. He illustrated this concept with data from Bacteroides, revealing extensive reshuffling in genes encoding surface components and DNA restriction systems (17). These variations were attributed to mechanisms involved in avoiding phage infection in the gut where this bacterium lives commensally. Interestingly, the reshuffling in genes encoding surface components could be an evolutionary precursor to the antigenic variability of animal pathogens trying to avoid the immune system.

J. Bamford (Jyväskyä, Finland) presented work on the Tectiviridae, bacteriophage containing a lipid membrane, identified in the infection of the gram-negative bacterium, E. coli, and the gram-positive bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (1, 80). The crystal structure of coliphage PRD1 shares structural elements with adenoviruses. Their common coat protein fold has also been found in viruses infecting insects, algae, mammals, and amoebae. The structural biology data thus point to a common ancestor for a large virus family with origins in the distant evolutionary past. Comparative genomics by H. Krisch (Toulouse, France) traced the evolution of T4-like phage that infect Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria (25, 38, 39). The chromosomes of these phage contain highly conserved structural and DNA replication genes interspersed with a large number of novel genes. This work demonstrates a remarkable plasticity in genome content and explains much of the genome size variation in this phage family. N. Mann (Warwick, United Kingdom) demonstrated in a marine cyanobacterium a possible ecological role for novel T4-like phage genes that encode S-layer proteins and key components of the photosynthetic apparatus (22, 23, 70). Intriguingly, the nonsystematic distribution of photosynthetic capacities in bacteria might be explained by the horizontal transfer of photosynthesis genes through phages. In Synechococcus spp., the transcription of the phage-encoded genes ensures unabated photosynthetic capacity in the phage-infected cell. M. Smith (Aberdeen, United Kingdom) reported on a novel serine recombinase from the Streptomyces phage phiC31 (86, 87). Although DNA excision is normally believed to require helper proteins, gain-of-function mutants were isolated that can perform both integration and excision in their absence. The mutations were mapped to the C-terminal noncatalytic domain of the recombinase, which is believed to be involved in synapse formation. C. Lambert (Nottingham, United Kingdom) presented Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus, a bacterial predator with a phage-like life cycle, as a potential alternative to phage therapy (58, 59). The role of the multiple flagellum genes for motility and prey hunting, as well as numerous hydrolytic enzymes expressed during the intracellular phase of the life cycle B. bacteriovorus, was investigated by genetic analysis.

SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION, PROTEIN INTERACTIONS, AND NETWORKS

The regulation of complex bacterial promoters was the topic of an agile and comprehensive presentation by S. Busby (Birmingham, United Kingdom). He introduced the pnir promoter, in which two transcription factors (NarL and FNR) and three global DNA-binding proteins (Fis, IHF, and H-NS) intervene (13, 45). These five proteins form an intricate regulation system that controls transcriptional activity in response to environmental conditions. Busby furthermore presented a genomewide analysis of the distribution of transcription factors by chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA microarray analysis (ChIP on Chip) (46, 47). The use of antibodies to FNR, H-NS, Fis, and IHF permitted the identification of many target sequences, with 60% of them falling into intergenic regions. Of these targets, 67 are shared by H-NS and Fis. RNA polymerase was often found to be associated, suggesting that H-NS and Fis might help to bind the RNA polymerase. The interplay of chromatin topology and transcription in E. coli was discussed by G. Muskhelishvili (Bremen, Germany), who addressed the question how global transcription is coordinated in the genome. He showed that alterations in the chromatin architecture lead to changes in transcription patterns, suggesting a homeostatic mechanism in which chromosomal supercoiling coordinates growth phase-dependent transcription (11). K. Pflüger (Madrid, Spain) from V. de Lorenzo's group described a novel electrophoretic method to separate phosphorylated proteins directly from intact cells. The procedure was instrumental in monitoring the flow of high-energy phosphate through the abridged phosphoenolpyruvate-carbohydrate phosphotransferase system of Pseudomonas putida (76). This work suggests that the phosphoenolpyruvate-carbohydrate phosphotransferase system in this bacterium is not connected to sugar transport but rather serves as a sensor of the metabolic state of the cell.

J. Schumacher (London, United Kingdom) discussed transcriptional activation by AAA+ enhancer binding proteins in an informative presentation using PspF (named for phage shock protein F) of E. coli as an example. PspF drives the transition of the sigma54-RNA polymerase-promoter complex from a closed conformation to a transcriptionally active open conformation in a reaction requiring ATP hydrolysis (82, 83). The AAA+ enhancer binding proteins are part of a larger family of AAA+ proteins involved in diverse cellular activities. K. Turgay (Berlin, Germany) talked about another AAA+ protein, ClpC, which is a component of the ClpCP protease in B. subtilis. In addition to removing misfolded proteins, ClpC is involved in the proteolysis of several regulatory proteins controlling steps in sporulation. The take-home message of the talk was that ClpC requires adaptor proteins that target the protease to specific substrates and regulate its activity (55, 56).

P. Aldridge (Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom) introduced his talk with an impressive animation explaining the steps of flagellum assembly in bacteria. In Salmonella enterica, one major checkpoint, dictated by the length of the intermediate hook-basal body structure, is the substrate specificity switch of the flagellar type III secretion apparatus (3). Flagellar gene expression is regulated by a cascade of type III secretion chaperones and their substrates. Chaperone antagonism was the topic of an informative talk by P. Genevaux (Geneva, Switzerland), who highlighted the role of SecB, trigger factor (TF), and DnaK/DnaJ in protein folding and secretion (91). A deletion of the secB gene results in a cold-sensitive phenotype that can be relieved by knocking out the gene encoding TF (tig). The antagonistic effect of TF is due to its activity as a chaperone and is independent of its peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase activity. Furthermore, he showed that in a tig-null mutant more SecA protein and ribosomes are associated to the inner membrane, suggesting that TF is involved directly or indirectly in targeting proteins cotranslationally to the sec translocon.

J. Greenblatt (Toronto, Canada) gave a comprehensive talk on the identification and analysis of protein complexes. His presentation was divided into two parts. In the first part he described the systematic identification of protein complexes in E. coli by affinity purification using SPA (sequential peptide affinity) tags inserted into the chromosome (15). The SPA tag permits efficient purification of protein complexes containing the tagged gene product using a relatively simple procedure. Chromosomal tagging avoids overproduction of the target protein, thus allowing the purification and identification of protein complexes from cells that are physiologically equivalent to their wild-type parent. In the second part, Greenblatt introduced the so-called synthetic genetic array technology that allows the generation of genetic-interaction maps (E-MAP [epistatic miniarray profile]) (24). This procedure permits the detection of functional interactions between gene products, thus providing complementary information to the physical interaction map of gene products. As examples, he presented the E-MAP of the yeast early secretory pathway and gave insights into genetic interactions in E. coli.

PATHOGENICITY, VIRULENCE, AND ENDOSYMBIOSIS

A central subject of the session on pathogenicity, virulence, and endosymbiosis was how bacteria send signals to target cells. Molecular syringes of different kinds were a popular topic. G. Cornelis (Basel, Switzerland) charmed the audience with beautiful pictures of the Yersinia injectisome. This type III secretion system is evolutionarily related to bacterial flagella and functionally related to bacteriophage tails (26, 88). In contrast to phage, which inject DNA into their host bacteria, bacterial pathogens inject proteins to manipulate their eukaryotic hosts. Despite the difference in cargo and target cell, there are surprising similarities between both injection devices; the tail and syringe employ an analogous length determination mechanism involving a “tape measure” protein. H. Shuman (New York, NY) analyzed the proteins transported by another molecular syringe, the type IV secretion system. The broad host range of Legionella, which replicates intracellularly in both amoebae and human phagocytes, was exploited to identify gene products that perturb organelle trafficking in yeast (84). These effectors from Legionella not only act on basic eukaryotic functions, they appear to be encoded by genes that were acquired from eukaryotes by horizontal transfer (31). B. Uhlin (Umea, Sweden) described another player in the bacterial secretion game, namely, a type I transport system from pathogenic gram-negative bacteria. It not only secretes virulence factors into the medium, it also packages them in outer membrane vesicles for delivery to the target tissue (8). Uropathogenic E. coli and Vibrio cholerae transport toxins using these membrane vesicles. V. Pelicic (London, United Kingdom) described a bacterial surface structure mediating adhesion to the host cell, the type IV pilus of Neisseria. Genetic analysis divided its morphogenesis into four stages: assembly of the fibers in the periplasm, functional maturation, a peculiar retraction-counter-retraction step, and emergence of the pili on the cell surface (16).

Not all virulence is based on secreted factors. For example, lipids play an important role in mycobacterial pathogenicity, where they act as a protective barrier and as an immunomodulator. C. Guilhot (Toulouse, France) reported on polyketide synthases involved in the biosynthesis of mycobacterium-specific lipids (18). Two transferases are needed to activate these biosynthetic enzymes, making them attractive targets for drug treatment. Y. Av-Gay (Vancouver, Canada) presented results concerning the functions of 11 eukaryotic-like protein kinases (Pkn) found in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which are also attractive potential drug targets. A systematic analysis similar to the one described by C. Guilhot, combining the strengths of biochemistry, genetics, and proteomics, was used to characterize these kinases. Several examples were presented, including the PknH protein that was found to be important for the downregulation of intracellular growth, thus playing a role in the establishment of the well-known chronic infection by M. tuberculosis (74).

A relatively consistent observation with pathogenic bacteria is that virulence factors are frequently encoded on mobile DNA elements and that virulence genes are actively transcribed during infection but mostly silent during growth in laboratory cultures. M. Rhen (Stockholm, Sweden) presented a transcriptome analysis of Salmonella both during infection and in culture. Using mutational analysis, a phosphate-dependent RNA degrading enzyme, PNPase, was identified as a negative regulator of virulence gene expression in laboratory cultures (100). The virulence genes under the control of PNPase are clustered in two “islands of pathogenicity.” J. Casadesus (Seville, Spain) talked about the regulation of virulence factors in Salmonella by DNA adenine methylation (Dam) (7, 99). The mechanisms of regulation are diverse. In the fimbrial operon, adenine methylation prevents transcriptional repression at the promoter by the nucleoid protein H-NS. On the other hand, methylation of a control sequence upstream of traJ prevents binding of the transcriptional activator Lrp. M. Van der Woude (York, United Kingdom) described the epigenetic regulation in E. coli of the reversible switching of gene expression, known as phase variation, which is dependent on Dam (89, 93). Switching of expression of the OMP, Ag43, involves interplay between the OxyR transcription repressor and methylation of its binding site. A mechanism for the inheritance of the methylation state was proposed.

CHROMOSOME DYNAMICS

The session on chromosome dynamic covered talks on the different steps in the bacterial cell cycle involving chromosome replication, chromosome partition, and cell division. B. Michel (Gif-sur-Yvette, France) reviewed multiple pathways characterized in E. coli permitting the reinitiation of DNA synthesis at a stalled replication fork. The rescue of stalled forks is a critical function since chromosome replication in bacteria involves the continuous synthesis of several million base pairs of DNA. Despite the high processivity of the DNA replication machinery, stalling probably occurs multiple times during a single round of replication. The failure to reinitiate a stalled fork can lead to chromosome instability and cell death. Michel then described recent work on the role of the DNA helicase UvrD in reinitiating DNA replication at stalled forks (10, 40, 41). UvrD works in concert with homologous recombination at the stalled replication fork in a pathway that is independent of the role of UvrD in mismatch and excision DNA repair. P. Polard (Jouy-en-Josas, France) talked about PriA, a DNA helicase involved in replication restart at stalled forks in B. subtilis (14, 96). Recent results show that PriA localizes with the B. subtilis DNA replication “factory” and that a protein-protein interaction between PriA and SSB, the major single-stranded DNA-binding protein, is necessary to recruit PriA to stalled forks.

F. Boccard (Gif-sur-Yvette, France) described recent work showing that the E. coli chromosome is organized into four macrodomains and two nonstructured regions (35, 92). Each macrodomain is localized to a specific region in the cell and follows a characteristic choreography during chromosome replication and cell division. R. Dame (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) reported single-molecule studies on the “bridging” of duplex DNA by H-NS, a nucleoid protein involved in the compaction of the bacterial chromosome (29). Chromosome “unzipping” involves the stepwise breaking of individual H-NS bridges and requires relatively little force. These results suggest an explanation for how H-NS can compact the chromosome without interfering with processes such as transcription and DNA replication.

J. Errington (Oxford, United Kingdom) talked about the formation of the septum during cell division in B. subtilis, presenting recent results on the genes involved in this process, on the composition and structure of the septum, and on the dynamics of the closure of the septum (50, 78, 81). J. Lowe (Cambridge, England) presented structural and functional data on FtsK, a DNA translocase involved in the partition of the replicated chromosome into daughter cells. The translocase domain of FtsK forms a hexameric ring structure encircling double-stranded DNA and recognizes a specific signal, the KOPS sequence, involved in controlling the partition of the replicated chromosomes (67, 85). J. Alonso (Madrid, Spain) presented genetic and structural work on systems controlling segregation of the low-copy-number plasmid pSM19035, a broad-host-range plasmid in the gram-positive bacterium Streptococcus pyogenes (33, 60). A “random walk” model for segregation, driven by the binding of the segregation proteins to the plasmid, was proposed.

COMPETENCE, DNA UPTAKE, AND MULTICELLULAR BEHAVIOR

Competence is the physiological state in which a bacterium is capable of importing exogenous DNA. Transformation is the process in which the imported DNA is integrated into the genome. B. Maier (Münster, Germany) reported single-molecule experiments on DNA import using live B. subtilis (65). Exogenous DNA enters at the pole of the elongated bacillus. Force measurements indicate that a powerful molecular motor feeds DNA into the cell in a continuous process. D. Dubnau (Newark, NJ) presented his latest molecular model for the DNA uptake machinery in B. subtilis (19, 49, 57). This protein complex consists of a type IV-like pseudopilus that fixes exogenous double-stranded DNA to the cell wall and mediates contact with a DNA receptor protein associated with the membrane channel complex. Retraction of the pseudopilus is powered by the proton motive force across the membrane creating a movement that drags the DNA molecule through the channel. The DNA strands are separated upon internalization; an unidentified nuclease digests one strand of the DNA as the other strand translocates into the cytoplasm. In support of this model Dubnau presented work showing that a DNA helicase and an ssDNA-binding protein involved in transformation colocalize with the DNA as it enters the cytoplasm.

P. Graumann (Freiburg, Germany) presented work on the function and cellular localization of the DNA-binding proteins RecA, RecN, and Smf during transformation in B. subtilis (53, 54). J.-P. Claverys (Toulouse, France) reported on the interaction between two ssDNA binding proteins in the cytoplasm during the transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae (9, 21, 73). DprA binds cooperatively and protects the ssDNA against nucleases as it enters the cytoplasm. The recombination protein RecA is then loaded by a protein-protein interaction with DprA forming a complex that mediates exchange of the ssDNA with the recipient chromosome. An alternative outcome of the internalization of the exogenous DNA is degradation. DNA uptake, thus, could have a second role: the supply of deoxyribonucleotides for chromosome replication.

A link between competence and nutrition was described by M. Blokesch working in G. Schoolnik's group (Stanford, CA). Environmental strains of Vibrio cholerae become competent upon exposure to chitin (69), which they meet when forming biofilms on the exoskeletons and molds of copepods, tiny crustaceans that are important elements of marine food webs. Chitin induces the expression of genes involved in the extracellular degradation and uptake of this polysaccharide, as well as the expression of genes encoding the pseudopilus that mediates the import of exogenous DNA. Transformation during chitin-induced competence could explain much of the mosaic structure of the V. cholerae genome.

G. Velicer (Tübingen, Germany) capped the last session of the meeting with a particularly fascinating story on the social life of bacteria. The main character is a common soil proteobacterium, Myxococcus xanthus, with uncommon characteristics. It has behavior that ranges from social motility to cooperative predation and the development of collective spore-bearing fruiting bodies as a reaction to starvation. Under conditions of ample food, an obligate cheater arose, which exploited the social instinct of its comrades. When starvation cycles resumed, the dominant cheater population crashed, but a social phoenix ascended from the ashes. The 9-Mb genome of the mutant was sequenced revealing a single point mutation, which distinguishes it from its cheater ancestor, in an uncharacterized acetyltransferase gene (37, 95).

CONCLUSION

The meeting bought together researchers working on a broad range of topics in the molecular and cellular microbiology of prokaryotic organisms. Certain talks, including those by J. Parkhill, N. Mann, and G. Velicer, demonstrated that current methodologies can be used to link a complex phenotype to a genotype. Informal discussions about the organization of future conferences led to the decision to introduce more ecologically oriented microbiology into the next meeting since the panoply of “-omics” developed over the past decade should begin to permit the analysis at the molecular and cellular level of complex behavior within microbial communities.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 29 June 2007.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abrescia, N. G., J. J. Cockburn, J. M. Grimes, G. C. Sutton, J. M. Diprose, S. J. Butcher, S. D. Fuller, C. San Martin, R. M. Burnett, D. I. Stuart, D. H. Bamford, and J. K. Bamford. 2004. Insights into assembly from structural analysis of bacteriophage PRD1. Nature 432:68-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Afonyushkin, T., B. Vecerek, I. Moll, U. Blasi, and V. R. Kaberdin. 2005. Both RNase E and RNase III control the stability of sodB mRNA upon translational inhibition by the small regulatory RNA RyhB. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:1678-1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aldridge, P. D., J. E. Karlinsey, C. Aldridge, C. Birchall, D. Thompson, J. Yagasaki, and K. T. Hughes. 2006. The flagellar-specific transcription factor, sigma28, is the type III secretion chaperone for the flagellar-specific anti-sigma28 factor FlgM. Genes Dev. 20:2315-2326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Amblar, M., A. Barbas, A. M. Fialho, and C. M. Arraiano. 2006. Characterization of the functional domains of Escherichia coli RNase II. J. Mol. Biol. 360:921-933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Amblar, M., A. Barbas, P. Gomez-Puertas, and C. M. Arraiano. 2007. The role of the S1 domain in exoribonucleolytic activity: substrate specificity and multimerization. RNA. 13:317-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Antoun, A., M. Y. Pavlov, M. Lovmar, and M. Ehrenberg. 2006. How initiation factors tune the rate of initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria. EMBO J. 25:2539-2550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Balbontin, R., G. Rowley, M. G. Pucciarelli, J. Lopez-Garrido, Y. Wormstone, S. Lucchini, F. Garcia-Del Portillo, J. C. Hinton, and J. Casadesus. 2006. DNA adenine methylation regulates virulence gene expression in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 188:8160-8168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Balsalobre, C., J. M. Silvan, S. Berglund, Y. Mizunoe, B. E. Uhlin, and S. N. Wai. 2006. Release of the type I secreted alpha-haemolysin via outer membrane vesicles from Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 59:99-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Berge, M., I. Mortier-Barriere, B. Martin, and J. P. Claverys. 2003. Transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae relies on DprA- and RecA-dependent protection of incoming DNA single strands. Mol. Microbiol. 50:527-536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bidnenko, V., R. Lestini, and B. Michel. 2006. The Escherichia coli UvrD helicase is essential for Tus removal during recombination-dependent replication restart from Ter sites. Mol. Microbiol. 62:382-396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blot, N., R. Mavathur, M. Geertz, A. Travers, and G. Muskhelishvili. 2006. Homeostatic regulation of supercoiling sensitivity coordinates transcription of the bacterial genome. EMBO Rep. 7:710-715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Britton, R. A., T. Wen, L. Schaefer, O. Pellegrini, W. C. Uicker, N. Mathy, C. Tobin, R. Daou, J. Szyk, and C. Condon. 2007. Maturation of the 5′ end of Bacillus subtilis 16S rRNA by the essential ribonuclease YkqC/RNase J1. Mol. Microbiol. 63:127-138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Browning, D. F., D. J. Lee, A. J. Wolfe, J. A. Cole, and S. J. Busby. 2006. The Escherichia coli K-12 NarL and NarP proteins insulate the nrf promoter from the effects of integration host factor. J. Bacteriol. 188:7449-7456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bruand, C., M. Velten, S. McGovern, S. Marsin, C. Serena, S. D. Ehrlich, and P. Polard. 2005. Functional interplay between the Bacillus subtilis DnaD and DnaB proteins essential for initiation and re-initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Microbiol. 55:1138-1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Butland, G., J. M. Peregrin-Alvarez, J. Li, W. Yang, X. Yang, V. Canadien, A. Starostine, D. Richards, B. Beattie, N. Krogan, M. Davey, J. Parkinson, J. Greenblatt, and A. Emili. 2005. Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature 433:531-537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carbonnelle, E., S. Helaine, X. Nassif, and V. Pelicic. 2006. A systematic genetic analysis in Neisseria meningitidis defines the Pil proteins required for assembly, functionality, stabilization, and export of type IV pili. Mol. Microbiol. 61:1510-1522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cerdeno-Tarraga, A. M., S. Patrick, L. C. Crossman, G. Blakely, V. Abratt, N. Lennard, I. Poxton, B. Duerden, B. Harris, M. A. Quail, A. Barron, L. Clark, C. Corton, J. Doggett, M. T. Holden, N. Larke, A. Line, A. Lord, H. Norbertczak, D. Ormond, C. Price, E. Rabbinowitsch, J. Woodward, B. Barrell, and J. Parkhill. 2005. Extensive DNA inversions in the Bacteroides fragilis genome control variable gene expression. Science 307:1463-1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chalut, C., L. Botella, C. de Sousa-D'Auria, C. Houssin, and C. Guilhot. 2006. The nonredundant roles of two 4′-phosphopantetheinyl transferases in vital processes of Mycobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:8511-8516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen, I., P. J. Christie, and D. Dubnau. 2005. The ins and outs of DNA transfer in bacteria. Science 310:1456-1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chowdhury, S., C. Maris, F. H. Allain, and F. Narberhaus. 2006. Molecular basis for temperature sensing by an RNA thermometer. EMBO J. 25:2487-2497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Claverys, J. P., M. Prudhomme, and B. Martin. 2006. Induction of competence regulons as a general response to stress in gram-positive bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 60:451-475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Clokie, M. R., and N. H. Mann. 2006. Marine cyanophages and light. Environ. Microbiol. 8:2074-2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Clokie, M. R., J. Shan, S. Bailey, Y. Jia, H. M. Krisch, S. West, and N. H. Mann. 2006. Transcription of a “photosynthetic” T4-type phage during infection of a marine cyanobacterium. Environ. Microbiol. 8:827-835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Collins, S. R., K. M. Miller, N. L. Maas, A. Roguev, J. Fillingham, C. S. Chu, M. Schuldiner, M. Gebbia, J. Recht, M. Shales, H. Ding, H. Xu, J. Han, K. Ingvarsdottir, B. Cheng, B. Andrews, C. Boone, S. L. Berger, P. Hieter, Z. Zhang, G. W. Brown, C. J. Ingles, A. Emili, C. D. Allis, D. P. Toczyski, J. S. Weissman, J. F. Greenblatt, and N. J. Krogan. 2007. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446:806-810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Comeau, A. M., C. Bertrand, A. Letarov, F. Tetart, and H. M. Krisch. 2007. Modular architecture of the T4 phage superfamily: a conserved core genome and a plastic periphery. Virology 362:384-396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cornelis, G. R. 2006. The type III secretion injectisome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:811-825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dagan, T., and W. Martin. 2007. Ancestral genome sizes specify the minimum rate of lateral gene transfer during prokaryote evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:870-875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dagan, T., and W. Martin. 2006. The tree of one percent. Genome Biol. 7:118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dame, R. T., M. C. Noom, and G. J. Wuite. 2006. Bacterial chromatin organization by H-NS protein unravelled using dual DNA manipulation. Nature 444:387-390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Darfeuille, F., C. Unoson, J. Vogel, and E. G. Wagner. 2007. An antisense RNA inhibits translation by competing with standby ribosomes. Mol. Cell 26:381-392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.de Felipe, K. S., S. Pampou, O. S. Jovanovic, C. D. Pericone, S. F. Ye, S. Kalachikov, and H. A. Shuman. 2005. Evidence for acquisition of Legionella type IV secretion substrates via interdomain horizontal gene transfer. J. Bacteriol. 187:7716-7726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.de la Cueva-Mendez, G., and B. Pimentel. 2007. Gene and cell survival: lessons from prokaryotic plasmid R1. EMBO Rep. 8:458-464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.de la Hoz, A. B., F. Pratto, R. Misselwitz, C. Speck, W. Weihofen, K. Welfle, W. Saenger, H. Welfle, and J. C. Alonso. 2004. Recognition of DNA by omega protein from the broad-host range Streptococcus pyogenes plasmid pSM19035: analysis of binding to operator DNA with one to four heptad repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:3136-3147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Douchin, V., C. Bohn, and P. Bouloc. 2006. Down-regulation of porins by a small RNA bypasses the essentiality of the regulated intramembrane proteolysis protease RseP in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 281:12253-12259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Espeli, O., and F. Boccard. 2006. Organization of the Escherichia coli chromosome into macrodomains and its possible functional implications. J. Struct. Biol. 156:304-310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Even, S., O. Pellegrini, L. Zig, V. Labas, J. Vinh, D. Brechemmier-Baey, and H. Putzer. 2005. Ribonucleases J1 and J2: two novel endoribonucleases in Bacillus subtilis with functional homology to Escherichia coli RNase E. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:2141-2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fiegna, F., Y. T. Yu, S. V. Kadam, and G. J. Velicer. 2006. Evolution of an obligate social cheater to a superior cooperator. Nature 441:310-314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Filee, J., E. Bapteste, E. Susko, and H. M. Krisch. 2006. A selective barrier to horizontal gene transfer in the T4-type bacteriophages that has preserved a core genome with the viral replication and structural genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:1688-1696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Filee, J., F. Tetart, C. A. Suttle, and H. M. Krisch. 2005. Marine T4-type bacteriophages, a ubiquitous component of the dark matter of the biosphere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:12471-12476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Flores, M. J., V. Bidnenko, and B. Michel. 2004. The DNA repair helicase UvrD is essential for replication fork reversal in replication mutants. EMBO Rep. 5:983-988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Flores, M. J., N. Sanchez, and B. Michel. 2005. A fork-clearing role for UvrD. Mol. Microbiol. 57:1664-1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Frazao, C., C. E. McVey, M. Amblar, A. Barbas, C. Vonrhein, C. M. Arraiano, and M. A. Carrondo. 2006. Unravelling the dynamics of RNA degradation by ribonuclease II and its RNA-bound complex. Nature 443:110-114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gagnon, K. T., X. Zhang, P. F. Agris, and E. S. Maxwell. 2006. Assembly of the archaeal box C/D sRNP can occur via alternative pathways and requires temperature-facilitated sRNA remodeling. J. Mol. Biol. 362:1025-1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gottesman, S. 2004. The small RNA regulators of Escherichia coli: roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 58:303-328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Grainger, D. C., H. Aiba, D. Hurd, D. F. Browning, and S. J. Busby. 2007. Transcription factor distribution in Escherichia coli: studies with FNR protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:269-278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Grainger, D. C., D. Hurd, M. D. Goldberg, and S. J. Busby. 2006. Association of nucleoid proteins with coding and non-coding segments of the Escherichia coli genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:4642-4652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Grainger, D. C., D. Hurd, M. Harrison, J. Holdstock, and S. J. Busby. 2005. Studies of the distribution of Escherichia coli cAMP-receptor protein and RNA polymerase along the E. coli chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:17693-17698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Guillier, M., and S. Gottesman. 2006. Remodeling of the Escherichia coli outer membrane by two small regulatory RNAs. Mol. Microbiol. 59:231-247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hahn, J., B. Maier, B. J. Haijema, M. Sheetz, and D. Dubnau. 2005. Transformation proteins and DNA uptake localize to the cell poles in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 122:59-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hamoen, L. W., J. C. Meile, W. de Jong, P. Noirot, and J. Errington. 2006. SepF, a novel FtsZ-interacting protein required for a late step in cell division. Mol. Microbiol. 59:989-999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Huntzinger, E., S. Boisset, C. Saveanu, Y. Benito, T. Geissmann, A. Namane, G. Lina, J. Etienne, B. Ehresmann, C. Ehresmann, A. Jacquier, F. Vandenesch, and P. Romby. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII and the endoribonuclease III coordinately regulate spa gene expression. EMBO J. 24:824-835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kashkina, E., M. Anikin, F. Brueckner, R. T. Pomerantz, W. T. McAllister, P. Cramer, and D. Temiakov. 2006. Template misalignment in multisubunit RNA polymerases and transcription fidelity. Mol. Cell 24:257-266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kidane, D., and P. L. Graumann. 2005. Dynamic formation of RecA filaments at DNA double strand break repair centers in live cells. J. Cell Biol. 170:357-366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kidane, D., and P. L. Graumann. 2005. Intracellular protein and DNA dynamics in competent Bacillus subtilis cells. Cell 122:73-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kirstein, J., D. A. Dougan, U. Gerth, M. Hecker, and K. Turgay. 2007. The tyrosine kinase McsB is a regulated adaptor protein for ClpCP. EMBO J. 26:2061-2070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kirstein, J., T. Schlothauer, D. A. Dougan, H. Lilie, G. Tischendorf, A. Mogk, B. Bukau, and K. Turgay. 2006. Adaptor protein controlled oligomerization activates the AAA+ protein ClpC. EMBO J. 25:1481-1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kramer, N., J. Hahn, and D. Dubnau. Multiple interactions among the competence proteins of Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 65:454-464. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 58.Lambert, C., K. J. Evans, R. Till, L. Hobley, M. Capeness, S. Rendulic, S. C. Schuster, S. Aizawa, and R. E. Sockett. 2006. Characterizing the flagellar filament and the role of motility in bacterial prey-penetration by Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. Mol. Microbiol. 60:274-286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lambert, C., K. A. Morehouse, C. Y. Chang, and R. E. Sockett. 2006. Bdellovibrio: growth and development during the predatory cycle. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9:639-644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lioy, V. S., M. T. Martin, A. G. Camacho, R. Lurz, H. Antelmann, M. Hecker, E. Hitchin, Y. Ridge, J. M. Wells, and J. C. Alonso. 2006. pSM19035-encoded zeta toxin induces stasis followed by death in a subpopulation of cells. Microbiology 152:2365-2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lorentzen, E., and E. Conti. 2006. The exosome and the proteasome: nano-compartments for degradation. Cell 125:651-654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lorentzen, E., and E. Conti. 2005. Structural basis of 3′ end RNA recognition and exoribonucleolytic cleavage by an exosome RNase PH core. Mol. Cell 20:473-481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lorentzen, E., A. Dziembowski, D. Lindner, B. Seraphin, and E. Conti. 2007. RNA channelling by the archaeal exosome. EMBO Rep. 8:470-476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lorenz, C., F. von Pelchrzim, and R. Schroeder. 2006. Genomic systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (Genomic SELEX) for the identification of protein-binding RNAs independent of their expression levels. Nat. Protoc. 1:2204-2212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Maier, B., I. Chen, D. Dubnau, and M. P. Sheetz. 2004. DNA transport into Bacillus subtilis requires proton motive force to generate large molecular forces. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:643-649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Masse, E., C. K. Vanderpool, and S. Gottesman. 2005. Effect of RyhB small RNA on global iron use in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 187:6962-6971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Massey, T. H., C. P. Mercogliano, J. Yates, D. J. Sherratt, and J. Lowe. 2006. Double-stranded DNA translocation: structure and mechanism of hexameric FtsK. Mol. Cell 23:457-469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mathy, N., L. Benard, O. Pellegrini, R. Daou, T. Wen, and C. Condon. 2007. 5′-to-3′ exoribonuclease activity in bacteria: role of RNase J1 in rRNA maturation and 5′ stability of mRNA. Cell 129:681-692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Meibom, K. L., M. Blokesch, N. A. Dolganov, C. Y. Wu, and G. K. Schoolnik. 2005. Chitin induces natural competence in Vibrio cholerae. Science 310:1824-1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Millard, A., M. R. Clokie, D. A. Shub, and N. H. Mann. 2004. Genetic organization of the psbAD region in phages infecting marine Synechococcus strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:11007-11012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Morita, T., K. Maki, and H. Aiba. 2005. RNase E-based ribonucleoprotein complexes: mechanical basis of mRNA destabilization mediated by bacterial noncoding RNAs. Genes Dev. 19:2176-2186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Morita, T., Y. Mochizuki, and H. Aiba. 2006. Translational repression is sufficient for gene silencing by bacterial small noncoding RNAs in the absence of mRNA destruction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:4858-4863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mortier-Barrière, I., M. Velten, P. Dupaigne, N. Mirouze, O. Piétrement, S. McGovern, G. Fichant, B. Martin, P. Noirot, E. Le Cam, P. Polard, and J.-P. Claverys. A key presynaptic role in transformation for a widespread bacterial protein: DprA conveys incoming ssDNA to RecA. Cell, in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 74.Papavinasasundaram, K. G., B. Chan, J. H. Chung, M. J. Colston, E. O. Davis, and Y. Av-Gay. 2005. Deletion of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis pknH gene confers a higher bacillary load during the chronic phase of infection in BALB/c mice. J. Bacteriol. 187:5751-5760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Papenfort, K., V. Pfeiffer, F. Mika, S. Lucchini, J. C. Hinton, and J. Vogel. 2006. SigmaE-dependent small RNAs of Salmonella respond to membrane stress by accelerating global omp mRNA decay. Mol. Microbiol. 62:1674-1688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Pfluger, K., and V. de Lorenzo. 2007. Growth-dependent phosphorylation of the PtsN (EIINtr) protein of Pseudomonas putida. J. Biol. Chem. [Epub ahead of print.] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 77.Pimentel, B., M. A. Madine, and G. de la Cueva-Mendez. 2005. Kid cleaves specific mRNAs at UUACU sites to rescue the copy number of plasmid R1. EMBO J. 24:3459-3469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pinho, M. G., and J. Errington. 2005. Recruitment of penicillin-binding protein PBP2 to the division site of Staphylococcus aureus is dependent on its transpeptidation substrates. Mol. Microbiol. 55:799-807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pomerantz, R. T., D. Temiakov, M. Anikin, D. G. Vassylyev, and W. T. McAllister. 2006. A mechanism of nucleotide misincorporation during transcription due to template-strand misalignment. Mol. Cell 24:245-255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Saren, A. M., J. J. Ravantti, S. D. Benson, R. M. Burnett, L. Paulin, D. H. Bamford, and J. K. Bamford. 2005. A snapshot of viral evolution from genome analysis of the Tectiviridae family. J. Mol. Biol. 350:427-440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Scheffers, D. J., and J. Errington. 2004. PBP1 is a component of the Bacillus subtilis cell division machinery. J. Bacteriol. 186:5153-5156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Schumacher, J., N. Joly, M. Rappas, D. Bradley, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, X. Zhang, and M. Buck. 2007. Sensor I threonine of the AAA+ ATPase transcriptional activator PspF is involved in coupling nucleotide triphosphate hydrolysis to the restructuring of sigma 54-RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 282:9825-9833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Schumacher, J., N. Joly, M. Rappas, X. Zhang, and M. Buck. 2006. Structures and organisation of AAA+ enhancer binding proteins in transcriptional activation. J. Struct. Biol. 156:190-199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Shohdy, N., J. A. Efe, S. D. Emr, and H. A. Shuman. 2005. Pathogen effector protein screening in yeast identifies Legionella factors that interfere with membrane trafficking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:4866-4871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sivanathan, V., M. D. Allen, C. de Bekker, R. Baker, L. K. Arciszewska, S. M. Freund, M. Bycroft, J. Lowe, and D. J. Sherratt. 2006. The FtsK gamma domain directs oriented DNA translocation by interacting with KOPS. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:965-972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Smith, M. C., C. D. Thomas, and M. C. Smith. 2004. An accessory protein is required for relaxosome formation by small staphylococcal plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 186:3363-3373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Smith, M. C., R. Till, and M. C. Smith. 2004. Switching the polarity of a bacteriophage integration system. Mol. Microbiol. 51:1719-1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sorg, I., S. Wagner, M. Amstutz, S. A. Muller, P. Broz, Y. Lussi, A. Engel, and G. R. Cornelis. 2007. YscU recognizes translocators as export substrates of the Yersinia injectisome. EMBO J. [Epub ahead of print.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 89.Torres-Cruz, J., and M. W. van der Woude. 2003. Slipped-strand mispairing can function as a phase variation mechanism in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 185:6990-6994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Tran, E., J. Brown, and E. S. Maxwell. 2004. Evolutionary origins of the RNA-guided nucleotide-modification complexes: from the primitive translation apparatus? Trends Biochem. Sci. 29:343-350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ullers, R. S., D. Ang, F. Schwager, C. Georgopoulos, and P. Genevaux. 2007. Trigger factor can antagonize both SecB and DnaK/DnaJ chaperone functions in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:3101-3106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Valens, M., S. Penaud, M. Rossignol, F. Cornet, and F. Boccard. 2004. Macrodomain organization of the Escherichia coli chromosome. EMBO J. 23:4330-4341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.van der Woude, M. W. 2006. Re-examining the role and random nature of phase variation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 254:190-197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Vecerek, B., I. Moll, and U. Blasi. 2007. Control of Fur synthesis by the non-coding RNA RyhB and iron-responsive decoding. EMBO J. 26:965-975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Velicer, G. J., G. Raddatz, H. Keller, S. Deiss, C. Lanz, I. Dinkelacker, and S. C. Schuster. 2006. Comprehensive mutation identification in an evolved bacterial cooperator and its cheating ancestor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:8107-8112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Velten, M., S. McGovern, S. Marsin, S. D. Ehrlich, P. Noirot, and P. Polard. 2003. A two-protein strategy for the functional loading of a cellular replicative DNA helicase. Mol. Cell 11:1009-1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.von Mering, C., P. Hugenholtz, J. Raes, S. G. Tringe, T. Doerks, L. J. Jensen, N. Ward, and P. Bork. 2007. Quantitative phylogenetic assessment of microbial communities in diverse environments. Science 315:1126-1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.von Mering, C., L. J. Jensen, M. Kuhn, S. Chaffron, T. Doerks, B. Kruger, B. Snel, and P. Bork. 2007. STRING 7-recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D358-D362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Wion, D., and J. Casadesus. 2006. N6-methyl-adenine: an epigenetic signal for DNA-protein interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:183-192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ygberg, S. E., M. O. Clements, A. Rytkonen, A. Thompson, D. W. Holden, J. C. Hinton, and M. Rhen. 2006. Polynucleotide phosphorylase negatively controls spv virulence gene expression in Salmonella enterica. Infect. Immun. 74:1243-1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zhang, X., E. A. Champion, E. J. Tran, B. A. Brown II, S. J. Baserga, and E. S. Maxwell. 2006. The coiled-coil domain of the Nop56/58 core protein is dispensable for sRNP assembly but is critical for archaeal box C/D sRNP-guided nucleotide methylation. RNA 12:1092-1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES