Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2007 Jun 8;189(16):5803–5807. doi: 10.1128/JB.00667-07

Transcriptional Responses of Mycoplasma gallisepticum Strain R in Association with Eukaryotic Cells

Katharine R Cecchini 1,2, Timothy S Gorton 1,2, Steven J Geary 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC1952027  PMID: 17557819

Abstract

Mycoplasma gallisepticum is an etiologic agent of chronic respiratory disease in chickens and infectious sinusitis in turkeys. Other than proteins important for cytadherence, few M. gallisepticum factors or pathways contributing to host cell interactions have been identified. In this study, an oligonucleotide-based microarray was utilized to investigate transcriptional changes in M. gallisepticum strain Rlow upon exposure to eukaryotic cells. Fifty-eight genes were either up- or downregulated upon exposure to MRC-5 lung fibroblasts grown in vitro, including genes encoding transport-, metabolism-, and translation-associated proteins. Twenty of the 58 regulated genes have no assigned function. These results indicate that M. gallisepticum regulates gene expression upon exposure to eukaryotic cells, revealing genes and pathways likely to be important for host-bacterium interaction.


Mycoplasma gallisepticum represents a major threat to the poultry industry, acting as an important pathogen in chronic respiratory disease and resulting in reduced weight gain and egg production in infected birds. M. gallisepticum is also pathogenic in other species, causing infectious sinusitis in turkeys and conjunctivitis in house finches (4, 15). With the exception of attachment proteins GapA and CrmA (10), and to a lesser extent dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (Lpd) (3), little is known about factors responsible for survival or persistence in the host.

Mycoplasmas lack obvious homologues of conventional elements of transcriptional regulation, including sigma factors, signaling factors, and transcription factors. This absence has led to the supposition that differences in gene expression in mycoplasma species are due to population selection and heterogeneity rather than more traditional mechanisms. Although several basic investigations into transcriptional responses have shown differences due to heat shock (5, 17) and iron depletion (6), changes that are not attributable to population selection, no study has thus far examined the whole transcriptomic response of mycoplasmas upon exposure to eukaryotic cells.

The availability of the genome sequence of M. gallisepticum strain R (11) enables a method of screening for transcriptomic changes; namely, an oligonucleotide-based microarray has been developed representing all known open reading frames (ORFs) based on this sequence. Utilizing this microarray, we investigated transcriptional changes when M. gallisepticum was incubated with a cell culture monolayer of human lung fibroblasts. In the absence of an established chicken trachea epithelial cell line, MRC-5 human lung fibroblasts have been used in previous studies as an in vitro model for M. gallisepticum interaction with host cells (9, 10, 12). This approach identified 25 upregulated and 33 downregulated transcripts that were differentially expressed upon incubation with MRC-5 cells and thus provide evidence of their function, suggesting a potential role in the interaction of M. gallisepticum with host cells in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Microarray design.

An oligonucleotide-based microarray specific for M. gallisepticum strain Rlow was developed by MWG Biotech (Raleigh, NC). Oligonucleotides, each 50 nucleotides in length, were selected to represent each of the 756 putative ORFs. Thirty-six blank and eight Arabidopsis control features were included as negative controls. All features were spotted twice on glass slides, representing the genome in duplicate on each slide. Based on BLAST analysis (1), 21 features predicted to cross-hybridize with more than one genetic locus were excluded from further analysis.

Culture conditions and experimental design.

M. gallisepticum strain Rlow (passage 14) was cultured at 37°C in Hayflick's complete medium (2) until mid-log phase, as determined by color change and optical density. MRC-5 human lung fibroblasts (ATCC, Manassas, VA) were cultured to 95% confluence in 150-cm2 flasks (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) in minimal essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids at 37°C with 5% CO2. MRC-5 cell monolayers were washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline prior to exposure to mycoplasmas. Mid-log-phase Rlow cultures were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes, resuspended in 10 ml of Hayflick's complete medium, and incubated with washed MRC-5 cells for 1 hour at 37°C. Mid-log-phase Rlow cultures, incubated 1 hour at 37°C, were used as reference samples for microarray and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) analysis. Prior to RNA extraction, mycoplasma-fibroblast cocultures were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline.

RNA extraction.

Total RNA was extracted from pelleted broth-grown Rlow, mycoplasma-MRC-5 cocultures, and MRC-5 monolayers using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was treated with DNase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and purified using phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (Fisher Scientific), and concentration was determined based on absorbance at the 260-nm wavelength. Eukaryotic ribosomal and polyadenylated RNAs were removed from samples derived from infected monolayers using the MICROBEnrich kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Ambion, Austin, TX). RNA extracted from broth-grown Rlow cultures was also treated once according to the protocol of the MICROBEnrich kit as a control. Each RNA sample was viewed in a 0.8% agarose gel to confirm RNA integrity.

Microarray hybridization.

Fifty micrograms of total RNA from each condition was reverse transcribed using the Amino Allyl cDNA labeling kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were labeled with either Cy3 or Cy5 (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), excess dye was removed using the Nuc-Away spin columns provided in the Amino Allyl cDNA labeling kit, and labeled cDNA was resuspended in hybridization buffer (MWG Biotech). Microarray slides were blocked in blocking buffer (1% bovine serum albumin and 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate in 1× SSC [1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate]) for 1 hour at 42°C and washed three times in 0.1× SSC buffer prior to hybridization. Labeled cDNA was resuspended in hybridization buffer, heated briefly at 95°C, cooled on ice, hybridized to the blocked slide at 42°C for 18 hours, and then washed three times with decreasing concentrations of SSC buffer (2× SSC with 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1× SSC, and 0.1× SSC). Separate RNA extractions and hybridizations were repeated five times, switching sample dyes for two of the five experiments.

Data acquisition and analysis.

Microarray slides were scanned using a GenePix 4000B scanner (Axon Instruments, Sunnyvale, CA), and data were acquired with the GenePix 4.0 (Axon Instruments). Features were individually analyzed and normalized using the Bayesian Analysis of Gene Expression Level (BAGEL) model (8) (University of California, Berkeley, CA). Briefly, fluorescence levels for each feature in each data set are normalized, and then a relative expression level and a P value are determined across all data sets through the application of a specific algorithm by the BAGEL model. Up- or downregulated genes were selected by averaging values across duplicate features and filtering reproducible features that were significantly up- or downregulated more than 1.5-fold (P < 0.05). The relative expression level for each transcript was averaged across duplicate features.

Validation of microarray data.

Relative transcription levels of differentially regulated transcripts were investigated by RT-PCR. RNA was generated in three separate extractions from Rlow grown in broth culture and mycoplasma-MRC-5 cocultures as described above with the addition of RNALater (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All primers (MWG Biotech) were used at a final concentration of 400 nM and checked for cross-hybridization with MRC-5 RNA. Reactions were performed using 100 ng and 10 ng of RNA and the SuperScript RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen). Cycling conditions for RT-PCRs were as follows: 50°C reverse transcription for 25 min, 94°C denaturation for 2 minutes, amplification for 35 cycles using 94°C denaturation for 30 seconds, 50°C annealing for 30 seconds, and 72°C extension for 45 seconds, followed by a final 72°C extension for 10 min. Contaminating DNA was detected by replacing the SuperScript Platinum Taq in the reaction mix with AmpliTaq (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Reactions were run in a 0.8% agarose gel with 0.01% ethidium bromide. Pictures of each gel were taken under UV light and scanned at 300 dpi. Bands of the same dilution were densitometrically compared using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 by measuring mean pixel intensity, subtracting background, and averaging the triplicate results for each condition.

Microarray data accession number.

Microarray data were submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus database under the accession number GSE6717.

RESULTS

Transcriptional profiling of M. gallisepticum strain R interacting with host cells.

Transcriptomic comparisons of Rlow cultures grown in broth in relation to cultures incubated with MRC-5 cell monolayers were investigated by microarray analysis a total of five times. Duplicate features that reproducibly showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase or decrease in signal greater than 1.5-fold were included in the data set. A total of 25 upregulated (Table 1) and 33 downregulated (Table 2) transcripts met these criteria.

TABLE 1.

Transcripts upregulated when Rlow is exposed to MRC-5 cells

ORF product identity ORF Mean relative increase in expression SD of relative increase in expression P value Validation by RT-PCRa
Unique hypothetical MGA_122 1.81 0.19 0.023 ND
Unique hypothetical MGA_184 2.12 0.13 0.007 Yes
SrmB ATP-dependent helicase MGA_206 3.03 0.27 0.004 ND
OppD oligopeptide transport ATP-binding protein MGA_232 2.49 0.07 0.013 ND
RpsB ribosomal protein S2 MGA_242 2.08 0.02 0.048 ND
50S ribosomal protein I28 MGA_253 3.62 0.16 0.003 ND
RpsG ribosomal protein S7 MGA_261 1.78 0.04 0.022 ND
Unique hypothetical MGA_267 6.63 1.59 0.000 Yes
Unique hypothetical MGA_324 1.61 0.02 0.045 ND
Conserved hypothetical MGA_340 1.87 0.04 0.046 ND
Hypothetical macrophage-activating protein, p47 MGA_398 2.95 0.54 0.013 ND
RpsR ribosomal protein S18 MGA_421 1.89 0.02 0.024 ND
RpsP ribosomal protein S16 MGA_440 1.77 0.07 0.006 ND
RnpA RNase P protein component MGA_630 2.01 0.38 0.030 ND
RpsI ribosomal protein S10 MGA_705 2.06 0.04 0.027 ND
RpsT ribosomal protein S20 MGA_844 2.88 0.14 0.014 ND
RplJ ribosomal protein L10 MGA_872 1.86 0.10 0.025 Yes
Unique hypothetical MGA_875 3.80 0.31 0.008 ND
VlhA 4.01 pMGA family protein MGA_966 2.41 0.39 0.024 ND
Conserved hypothetical lipoprotein MGA_993 3.56 0.22 0.002 ND
Conserved hypothetical MGA_1107 3.63 0.33 0.008 Yes
ABC-type transport system, permease MGA_1140 3.08 0.87 0.034 ND
RplM ribosomal protein L13 MGA_1154 1.98 0.06 0.012 ND
RplU ribosomal protein L21 MGA_1290 2.63 0.19 0.016 ND
RpmA ribosomal protein L27 MGA_1292 3.21 0.08 0.003 ND
a

ND, not done.

TABLE 2.

Transcripts downregulated when Rlow is exposed to MRC-5 cells

ORF product identity ORF Mean relative decrease in expression SD of relative decrease in expression P value Validation by RT-PCRa
PepB leucyl aminopeptidase MGA_114 1.62 0.03 0.030 ND
Conserved hypothetical MGA_123 2.09 0.02 0.002 ND
GroEL heat shock protein MGA_152 1.67 0.08 0.040 ND
Lpd dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase MGA_161 2.28 0.27 0.005 Yes
AceF dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase MGA_162 2.22 0.10 0.024 Yes
Hypothetical methyltransferase MGA_249 1.93 0.08 0.011 ND
Hlp1 cytoskeletal protein (HMW1-like protein) MGA_306 2.21 0.18 0.005 Yes
CpsG phosphomannomutase MGA_358 1.64 0.07 0.031 ND
DeoD purine-nucleoside phosphorylase MGA_364 2.61 0.06 0.007 ND
GatB glutamyl/aspartyl tRNA amidotransferase MGA_412 1.52 0.02 0.045 ND
TopA DNA topoisomerase I MGA_454 1.74 0.07 0.037 ND
Rpe pentose-5-phosphate-3-epimerase MGA_455 2.41 0.43 0.020 ND
Unique hypothetical MGA_482 2.12 0.32 0.016 ND
Conserved hypothetical MGA_484 1.94 0.12 0.033 ND
Unique hypothetical MGA_487 2.14 0.13 0.024 ND
HsdS restriction endonuclease S subunit MGA_539 1.53 0.17 0.021 ND
Unique hypothetical MGA_573 2.56 0.18 0.000 ND
SerS seryl-tRNA synthetase MGA_608 3.33 0.31 0.001 ND
Dihydroxyacetone kinase MGA_661 3.44 0.26 0.002 Yes
Hypothetical nuclease MGA_676 1.92 0.32 0.027 Yes
ABC transporter ATP-binding protein MGA_677 2.36 0.22 0.010 ND
Mdh lactate dehydrogenase MGA_746 3.50 0.59 0.004 Yes
Unique hypothetical MGA_867 2.30 0.46 0.004 ND
Hlp3 cytoskeletal protein (HMW3-like protein) MGA_928 1.81 0.14 0.022 No
Conserved hypothetical MGA_1011 2.44 0.22 0.003 ND
Exo 5′-3′ exonuclease MGA_1052 1.84 0.24 0.026 ND
AtpB ATP synthase a subunit MGA_1164 3.38 1.14 0.015 Yes
AtpF ATP synthase b subunit MGA_1168 2.97 0.98 0.009 Yes
AtpG ATP synthase g subunit MGA_1174 3.93 2.32 0.012 ND
AtpD ATP synthase b subunit MGA_1177 3.03 0.72 0.011 Yes
PlpA fibronectin-binding protein MGA_1199 2.29 0.23 0.003 Yes
Unique hypothetical MGA_1224 2.90 1.20 0.037 No
GrpE heat shock protein MGA_1232 2.23 0.11 0.020 ND
a

ND, not done.

Validation of microarray data.

Sixteen transcripts identified as differentially regulated by the microarray were chosen randomly for validation by RT-PCR, representing 27% of the total data set. Specific primers were designed for each transcript (Table 3), and transcripts were compared between Rlow grown in broth culture and Rlow incubated with MRC-5 cells. Equal amounts of RNA were reverse transcribed, and band intensities of the resulting products were compared by measuring mean pixel intensity using Adobe Photoshop 6.0. This comparison was performed on three separate extractions of RNA for each condition. Fourteen of the 16 transcripts tested (88%) showed an upregulation or downregulation consistent with the microarray data. Figure 1 shows an example comparison of one replicate for both conditions at two different dilutions, displaying a clear downregulation of AtpB in Rlow associated with MRC-5 cells compared to the broth-grown culture. Densitometric analysis of the reaction shown indicated a 2.5-fold downregulation of this gene in Rlow incubated with MRC-5 cells compared with Rlow grown in broth culture. RT-PCR was performed on 23S rRNA and dnaK as housekeeping genes, as these genes would not be expected to be differentially regulated and were not predicted to be differentially regulated by the microarray results. These genes did not show any difference by RT-PCR (data not shown).

TABLE 3.

Primers used in RT-PCR

Gene Forward primer (5′-3′) Reverse primer (5′-3′)
23S rRNA AGTCAAACCGTGAGGATTGG CAAATCCGATAATGGGGATG
DnaK GACCTTGGTGGTACGTT CCACGTAATACCCCACCTTG
MGA_184 TGAACTCATCAAGGGTTGGTT CCAGCGCGACAATTCATAA
MGA_267 CGGTTCTGCACAAGCTAACA CTTTCATGCACCAGAAAGCA
RplJ AGCTGGCATTGATGGATTTG ACTGGAGCTTGAAGCACTGA
MGA_1107 CTATTGCGCAGCAAAATGAA CGTTGGTAGTTATGCCTTCG
Lpd GGGTGAATTGCTTGTTCT GTGGTTTCTAAGATGCCA
AceF CCAGTTGCGACTCCTTTAGC GCTGGAATTTCTTCGTGAGC
Hlp1 TCGAAGTAACCAGTTCAAACTCA AGGCACGGAATTTATTGTGG
MGA_661 GGGGATTTTGTTGATTCA CTGCCATTAACTCTTGAG
MGA_676 CCAGCTGATAGCAAACCGTT GCTGCAATCCCAATTGGTCTA
Mdh TGTGACGTAATGGCTGGTGT TAACTTCCATCCGTGCTTGC
Hlp3 TGATTACTACCCACCAGCTTATGA CTTCGCACTCTTGGTTGTTG
AtpB TTCCGACTGCTCATGTCTTG TTTTCTCGCCCAATAGATCG
AtpF CAAGCACGCGAGATTATCAA ACATCAACGATCCGACCTTC
AtpD CAACCGTTCTTTGTTGCTGA CTTCATCGATCGAACCAACA
PlpA AAAGAAGAGATCGACAGCTTGC TAACGGTTATTGTAAGGGTC
MGA_1224 GGGAATAGTCGATGGATA CGACTTGGGGTTCTTCTAGG

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

RT-PCR amplification of AtpB transcript from M. gallisepticum Rlow grown in broth culture and attached to MRC-5 cells. RT-PCR was performed on serially diluted RNA extracted from Rlow grown in broth and from Rlow exposed to MRC-5 cells. A representative one of three replicates is shown here including the following serial dilutions: lane 1, 100 ng; lane 2, 10 ng; lane 3, control for DNA contamination. Downregulation of AtpB, 1 of the 16 transcripts tested, in the presence of MRC-5 cells is shown here.

DISCUSSION

This study presents, for the first time, evidence of transcriptional regulation in M. gallisepticum in response to environmental conditions and substantiates existing reports of transcriptional regulation in mycoplasmas (5, 6, 17). The 1-hour incubation time in these experiments was specifically chosen to be shorter than a generation time (approximately 2 hours) to eliminate the influence of population selection or outgrowth. Criteria, specifically a P of <0.05 and at least a 1.5-fold change, were selected in order to include genes that were significantly and clearly differentially regulated upon exposure to lung fibroblasts in culture. These genes included 25 upregulated and 33 downregulated transcripts, representing approximately 8% of the predicted M. gallisepticum transcriptome. When 16 of these transcripts were examined by RT-PCR, 14 (88%) demonstrated relative transcriptional differences that were consistent with the microarray results.

These experiments verified the upregulated expression of 10 ORFs annotated as being hypothetical, supporting their role as functional genes. Six of these ORFs are unique to M. gallisepticum, and three are conserved among other mycoplasmas. Additionally, one hypothetical protein (p47) was identified by Markham et al. as having sequence homology to a macrophage-activating lipoprotein but was determined to have no role in pathogenicity or colonization based on the behavior of an isogenic mutant in a tracheal explant model (7). Similarly, 10 hypothetical transcripts were downregulated, 5 of which are conserved primarily among other mycoplasmas and other related bacterial species. Two conserved hypothetical transcripts were further described to contain predicted functional domains based on BLAST analysis: MGA_676 contains a predicted nuclease domain, while MGA_249 contains a predicted methylase domain. This annotation does not assign specific functions to these transcripts, however.

Genes encoding ribosomal or translation-associated proteins were upregulated in the mycoplasmas associated with MRC-5 cells. These proteins included 10 ribosomal proteins as well as an RNA helicase (SrmB), which is involved in ribosome assembly, and RNase P (RnpA), which completes the development of tRNAs. A similar pattern was observed in Campylobacter jejuni cultured in rabbit ileal loops: the majority of ribosomal proteins were upregulated when attached to the intestinal epithelium (16). A number of ribosomal transcripts were previously found to be upregulated in Mycoplasma pneumoniae following heat shock (17), indicating that this response may be due to environmental stress; however, a similar response was not observed in a heat shock study on another mycoplasma species, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (5). Whether in response to the host cell specifically or a general stress response, this pattern may simply reflect a global increase in translation.

Eleven metabolism-associated transcripts are downregulated upon exposure to MRC-5 cells, including four of the eight ATP synthase subunits and two of the four components of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. One of these components, Lpd, had been shown previously to be a virulence-related determinant by virtue of the attenuation of an isogenic mutant (3). The observed downregulation in these experiments is not necessarily contradictory to the previous report, however, as the Lpd mutant is introduced to the host with this pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency, affecting its survival. Wild-type Rlow, conversely, will have a normal level of activity upon introduction to the host and may downregulate the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex subsequently, corresponding to the decrease observed here. Additional metabolism-related enzymes that are downregulated include a hypothetical protein possessing a dihydroxyacetone kinase domain (MGA_661), phosphomannomutase (CpsG), pentose-5-phosphate-3-epimerase (Rpe), purine-nucleoside phosphorylase (DeoD), and malate/lactate dehydrogenase (Mdh). With the exception of Rpe, all of these enzymes are in pathways involved in the metabolism of substrates other than glucose. Specifically, dihydroxyacetone kinase is involved in glycerol metabolism, DeoD is involved in nucleotide metabolism, and CpsG is involved in GDP-mannose metabolism (14). This pattern suggests that when M. gallisepticum is in association with the host cell, glucose may be available as a primary energy source, allowing alternative pathways to be downregulated.

As mentioned above, four of the eight ATP synthase subunits were downregulated when M. gallisepticum was in contact with host cells. In the majority of prokaryotes, the ATP synthase complex maintains a proton gradient through catabolism and hydrolysis of ATP; however, since mycoplasmas lack an electron transport chain necessary for further generation of ATP, the complex is believed to function primarily to maintain the electrochemical gradient. Published reports also suggest that the “reverse” ATP-generating function of this complex is active in mycoplasmas; namely, ATP may be generated by electron transfer to flavoproteins using oxygen as an intermediate rather than a terminator (flavin-terminated respiration) (13), and the b subunit of the complex, shown to be downregulated in this study, is likely surface exposed and thus potentially able to act in reverse (18). The observed transcriptional decrease of ATP synthase genes could, alternatively, reflect uptake of metabolic precursors from the host cell.

The data presented here are the first assessment of transcriptional responses of M. gallisepticum associated with a eukaryotic cell. The specific roles of the identified transcripts in vivo will have to be further investigated. In particular, the transcriptional responses presented here are specifically a result of an interaction with the host cell, but whether the attachment mechanism, the invasion of the host cells (19), or another component of the host cell is responsible remains to be determined. The downregulation of metabolism-associated genes when mycoplasmas are in contact with a host cell could be described as a shift to parasitism with the uptake of substrates from the host cell compared to the noncompetitive environment of a nutrient-rich growth medium. This change is particularly supported by the streamlining of metabolic pathways to possibly focus on a greater availability of glucose (or more directly, ATP) in association with the eukaryotic cell. The hypothetical ORFs upregulated in the presence of eukaryotic cells may be involved in colonization of the host. These data provide insight into the responses of M. gallisepticum to interaction with the host cell and provide candidates for further investigation into their roles in M. gallisepticum-host interaction.

Acknowledgments

We thank Theresa Smith, of the University of Connecticut Biotechnology/Bioservices Center, Animal Cell Culture Facility, for cell culture services and Edan Tulman for helpful discussions.

This work was supported by USDA grant 58-1940-0-007.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 8 June 2007.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hayflick, L. 1965. Tissue cultures and mycoplasmas. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 23(Suppl. 1):285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hudson, P., T. S. Gorton, L. Papazisi, K. Cecchini, S. Frasca, Jr., and S. J. Geary. 2006. Identification of a virulence-associated determinant, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (lpd), in Mycoplasma gallisepticum through in vivo screening of transposon mutants. Infect. Immun. 74:931-939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ley, D. H., J. E. Berkhoff, and J. M. McLaren. 1996. Mycoplasma gallisepticum isolated from house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) with conjunctivitis. Avian Dis. 40:480-483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Madsen, M. L., D. Nettleton, E. L. Thacker, R. Edwards, and F. C. Minion. 2006. Transcriptional profiling of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae during heat shock using microarrays. Infect. Immun. 74:160-166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Madsen, M. L., D. Nettleton, E. L. Thacker, and F. C. Minion. 2006. Transcriptional profiling of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae during iron depletion using microarrays. Microbiology 152:937-944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Markham, P. F., A. Kanci, G. Czifra, B. Sundquist, P. Hains, and G. F. Browning. 2003. Homologue of macrophage-activating lipoprotein in Mycoplasma gallisepticum is not essential for growth and pathogenicity in tracheal organ cultures. J. Bacteriol. 185:2538-2547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Meiklejohn, C. D., and J. P. Townsend. 2005. A Bayesian method for analysing spotted microarray data. Brief. Bioinform. 6:318-330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mudahi-Orenstein, S., S. Levisohn, S. J. Geary, and D. Yogev. 2003. Cytadherence-deficient mutants of Mycoplasma gallisepticum generated by transposon mutagenesis. Infect. Immun. 71:3812-3820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Papazisi, L., S. Frasca, Jr., M. Gladd, X. Liao, D. Yogev, and S. J. Geary. 2002. GapA and CrmA coexpression is essential for Mycoplasma gallisepticum cytadherence and virulence. Infect. Immun. 70:6839-6845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Papazisi, L., T. S. Gorton, G. Kutish, P. F. Markham, G. F. Browning, D. K. Nguyen, S. Swartzell, A. Madan, G. Mahairas, and S. J. Geary. 2003. The complete genome sequence of the avian pathogen Mycoplasma gallisepticum strain R(low). Microbiology 149:2307-2316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Papazisi, L., K. E. Troy, T. S. Gorton, X. Liao, and S. J. Geary. 2000. Analysis of cytadherence-deficient, GapA-negative Mycoplasma gallisepticum strain R. Infect. Immun. 68:6643-6649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pollack, J. D. 1992. Carbohydrate metabolism and energy conservation, p. 181-200. In J. Maniloff (ed.), Mycoplasmas: molecular biology and pathogenesis. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  • 14.Pollack, J. D. 1997. Mycoplasma genes: a case for reflective annotation. Trends Microbiol. 5:413-419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Razin, S., D. Yogev, and Y. Naot. 1998. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:1094-1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stintzi, A., D. Marlow, K. Palyada, H. Naikare, R. Panciera, L. Whitworth, and C. Clarke. 2005. Use of genome-wide expression profiling and mutagenesis to study the intestinal lifestyle of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect. Immun. 73:1797-1810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weiner, J., III, C. U. Zimmerman, H. W. Gohlmann, and R. Herrmann. 2003. Transcription profiles of the bacterium Mycoplasma pneumoniae grown at different temperatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:6306-6320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Weislander, A., and M. Rosen. 2002. The cell membrane and transport, p. 131-162. In S. Razin and R. Herrmann (ed.), Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.
  • 19.Winner, F., R. Rosengarten, and C. Citti. 2000. In vitro cell invasion of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Infect. Immun. 68:4238-4244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES