Abstract
The Grb10 adapter protein is capable of interacting with a variety of receptor tyrosine kinases, including, notably, the insulin receptor. Biochemical and cell culture experiments have indicated that Grb10 might act as an inhibitor of insulin signaling. We have used mice with a disruption of the Grb10 gene (Grb10Δ2-4 mice) to assess whether Grb10 might influence insulin signaling and glucose homeostasis in vivo. Adult Grb10Δ2-4 mice were found to have improved whole-body glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, as well as increased muscle mass and reduced adiposity. Tissue-specific changes in insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation were consistent with a model in which Grb10, like the closely related Grb14 adapter protein, prevents specific protein tyrosine phosphatases from accessing phosphorylated tyrosines within the kinase activation loop. Furthermore, insulin-induced IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was enhanced in Grb10Δ2-4 mutant animals, supporting a role for Grb10 in attenuation of signal transmission from the insulin receptor to IRS-1. We have previously shown that Grb10 strongly influences growth of the fetus and placenta. Thus, Grb10 forms a link between fetal growth and glucose-regulated metabolism in postnatal life and is a candidate for involvement in the process of fetal programming of adult metabolic health.
Insulin controls glucose homeostasis by regulating protein, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism. Cellular responses to insulin in target tissues, such as skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and liver, are mediated via the insulin receptor (Insr) (reviewed in reference 51). Activation of the Insr results in tyrosine phosphorylation of intracellular docking proteins such as Shc and IRS-1 through IRS-4, which then bind specific Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing enzymes and adapters, leading to the activation of downstream signaling cascades. A critical event mediating insulin regulation of metabolic endpoints is the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K). This stimulates the synthesis of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate, which induces plasma membrane recruitment and subsequent phosphorylation of protein kinase B (also known as Akt), a key player in the regulation of glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis. Activation of the Insr and downstream signaling results in increased glucose uptake, utilization, and storage in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, while decreased gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis and increased glycogen synthesis occur in the liver (reviewed in reference 51). Resistance to these effects of insulin is a defining feature of type 2 diabetes, a polygenic disease afflicting over 110 million people worldwide. Impaired insulin action is also a feature of obesity and predisposes people to arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases, facts which highlight its importance in human health. The fundamental role of the Insr in insulin action was demonstrated following targeted disruption of the receptor (1, 29). To dissect the contribution of individual tissues to glucose homeostasis, and to overcome the lethal phenotype of Insr knockout (KO), tissue-specific Insr KO mutants have been generated. These experiments have uncovered novel functions of the Insr in tissues such as brain and pancreatic β cells (reviewed in reference 31).
Grb10 belongs to a family of related signaling adaptor proteins that also includes Grb7 and Grb14 (24, 27). These Grb7 family proteins each have an N-terminal region harboring a conserved proline-rich motif, a central region containing a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain and a C-terminal SH2 domain. A novel domain has also been identified in these proteins, termed the BPS (between PH and SH2) domain, which can contribute to receptor interactions (17, 25, 30). Originally identified through its ability to bind to the epidermal growth factor receptor, Grb10 has been shown to bind both the Insr and the related type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R), as well as a number of other receptor tyrosine kinases (27). The functional role of Grb10 in insulin signaling is controversial, with some studies demonstrating stimulatory effects on biological endpoints while the majority indicate an inhibitory role. Grb10 exhibited ligand-inducible association with the activated Insr in vitro, by virtue of its BPS and SH2 domains (25, 57). Furthermore, overexpression of Grb10 in CHO cells overexpressing the human INSR inhibited insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of downstream signal transducing proteins such as IRS-1, leading to inhibition of subsequent association with PI3K (38). Recent studies have suggested a Grb10-mediated inhibition of insulin signaling resulting from a physical disruption of IRS association with phosphorylated residues of the Insr (63). In addition, GRB10 overexpression in rat hepatocytes resulted in inhibition of insulin-stimulated glycogen synthase via a proposed novel pathway (44). While some experiments have shown Grb10 to be a positive regulator of both insulin and IGF1 action (16, 60), the consensus view is that Grb10 may function to inhibit insulin signaling or to redirect the Insr signaling pathway (reviewed in reference 27).
While the role of Grb7 in insulin signaling is largely unexplored, Grb14 has also been strongly implicated in insulin signaling in a number of studies (reviewed in reference 27). For example, overexpression of Grb14 in CHO-IR cells was shown to inhibit insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 while repressing insulin-stimulated mitogenesis and glycogen synthesis (30). Consistent with a role for Grb14 as an inhibitor of insulin signaling, microinjection of Grb14 resulted in inhibition of insulin-induced Xenopus oocyte maturation (10). The most compelling evidence for the physiological role of Grb14 has come from gene KO studies of mice. Disruption of Grb14 in mice resulted in hypoinsulinemia and improved glucose tolerance indicative of enhanced insulin sensitivity (15). Following in vivo insulin stimulation, livers and muscles of Grb14 KO mice exhibited enhanced insulin signaling via IRS-1 and Akt and increased incorporation of glucose into glycogen, while effects on insulin action were not detected in adipose tissue of the same mice. These observations establish Grb14 as a tissue-specific inhibitor of insulin signaling. A recent structural study provides a mechanistic explanation for these observations, revealing that the Grb14 BPS domain functions as a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of the Insr kinase (17). Interestingly, an additional role for Grb14 is to protect the Insr activation loop from dephosphorylation by specific protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), while indirectly promoting dephosphorylation of Y972 and thereby reducing recruitment of IRS-1 (15, 46).
Grb10 is an imprinted gene, setting it apart from the other Grb7 family members (43). Expression of Grb10 occurs predominantly, though not exclusively, from the maternal allele, and we have shown previously that disruption of the maternal Grb10 allele in mice results in significant embryonic and placental overgrowth (12). Several imprinted genes are known to influence fetal and postnatal growth and collectively form a significant proportion of those genes currently identified as exerting major effects on whole-body size and proportions. A number of imprinted genes have also been shown to have roles in the regulation of glucose-regulated metabolism (reviewed in reference 55).
To elucidate the role of Grb10 in adult life and dissect the signaling pathways it regulates in a physiological setting, we used mice with a disruption in the Grb10 genomic locus, termed Grb10Δ2-4 (12). As Grb10 has been strongly implicated in insulin signaling, experiments were aimed at addressing the potential role of this adapter protein in Insr signaling and glucose homeostasis in vivo. Adult Grb10Δ2-4 mice were found to have an increased muscle mass and reduced adiposity, together with improved glucose clearance and tissue-specific changes in insulin-induced Insr and IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Similar changes were observed at the IGF1R, and at the level of IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation, in response to IGF1. These findings indicate that Grb10 modulates Insr/IRS-1 signaling in a manner similar to that of Grb14 but with a different tissue specificity. However, unlike Grb14, Grb10 exerts an additional control over body composition that may contribute significantly to the metabolic phenotype.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice.
All mice were housed under standard conditions as described previously (5). Grb10Δ2-4 mice were maintained for several generations on a mixed C57BL/6×CBA genetic background and were genotyped using PCR assays (see reference 12). Experiments were carried out with the approval of the Garvan Institute/St. Vincent's Hospital Animal Ethics Committee, following guidelines issued by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, or were approved by the University of Bath ethical committee and carried out under license from the United Kingdom Home Office.
Analysis of tissue weights, gene expression, and histology.
Mice were killed by cervical dislocation, tissues were dissected free and dabbed briefly on paper towels to remove excess fluid, and wet weights were recorded immediately. Tissues were analyzed for β-galactosidase gene expression as previously described (5). Histological sections were cut from tissues embedded in paraffin wax and subsequently stained with hematoxylin and eosin according to standard procedures. Sections were viewed under a DMRB compound microscope (Leica Microsystems, Bensheim, Germany) and images captured using a SPOT RT camera and Advanced Spot RT 3.0 (Diagnostic Instruments, MI) software.
DXA analysis.
Adult mice killed by cervical dislocation were analyzed by dual-energy-X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a PIXImis scanner (Lunar, Madison, WI) with small-animal software, as previously described (40). The parameters that were evaluated included total area, lean tissue weight, and fat tissue weight. Lean and fat tissue weights were then expressed as percentages of total body weight prior to statistical analysis.
Leptin measurements.
Serum leptin concentrations were determined using a mouse leptin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Crystal Chem Inc., IL), as per the manufacturer's instructions, with absorbance measured with a TECAN Spectra plate reader.
Monitoring of food consumption.
Prior to the onset of food consumption measurements, mice were caged individually and allowed 1 week to adjust to recaging. At day 1 of the study, animals and their food were weighed. Over a period of 3 to 4 weeks, food consumption was assessed by weighing the food and the mice at five time points at the same time of day to calculate the amount of food consumed per gram of body weight per day.
GTT and ITT.
Glucose tolerance tests (GTT) and insulin tolerance tests (ITT) were performed to assess whole-body glucose metabolism. The GTT (2 g glucose given intraperitoneally [i.p.]/kg of body weight) and ITT (0.75 U insulin given i.p./kg) were performed on mice fasted overnight (approximately 16 h) that were matched for age and sex. Blood samples were obtained from the tail tip at the times indicated. Glucose concentrations were determined using either One-Touch ULTRA (Lifescan, CA) or Accu-CHEK II (Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Basel, Switzerland) glucometers. For plasma measurements, blood was collected into tubes and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min, with plasma transferred to a fresh tube prior to analysis. Plasma insulin concentrations were assayed using an ultrasensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden). The IGF1 concentration in plasma was determined by immunoenzymic assay (IDS).
Assessment of glucose dispersal to tissues.
GTT were performed with trace amounts of 2-[3H]DOG (deoxyglucose) and [U-14C]glucose to determine the clearance of 2-[3H]DOG into various tissues as indicated or the clearance of [U-14C]glucose into glycogen or lipid, respectively. Trace amounts of 2-[3H]DOG and [U-14C]glucose were mixed with 50% glucose in normal saline and injected into mice who fasted overnight (2 g glucose i.p./kg, 10 μCi/animal). During this radiolabeled GTT, blood was collected from the tail tip at various time points. Blood glucose and blood radioactivity were determined at each time point, and the area under the curve was calculated in both cases. At the end of the time course (90 min), the animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and tissues (liver, quadriceps muscle, tibialis muscle, white adipose tissue [WAT], and brown adipose tissue) collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
To analyze the clearance of 2-[3H]DOG into muscle and fat, tissue (30 to 50 mg) was homogenized in 1.5 ml of water with a Polytron homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min, and supernatant was collected. To determine the total counts, 200 μl of supernatant was analyzed by liquid scintillation counting. A 400-μl sample of the supernatant was passed through an anion exchange column (AS 1-X8 resin; Bio-Rad, CA) for determination of the free counts. Of the 6 ml of water used to wash the column, 1 ml of this was taken for analysis by liquid scintillation counting. The clearance of 2-[3H]DOG was calculated by correction for area under the curve for radioactive glucose during the GTT and for the weight of the tissue sample used.
For the determination of incorporation of radiolabeled glucose into glycogen, tissue samples of the liver and muscle (∼50 mg) were digested in 200 μl of 1 M KOH at 70°C for 20 min. After the addition of 75 μl of saturated NaSO4, glycogen was precipitated by the addition of 1.7 ml of 95% ethanol. The pellets were washed with 95% ethanol and redissolved in 1 ml of aminoglucosidase buffer. The clearance of radioactive glucose into glycogen was assessed by liquid scintillation counting of a sample of the glycogen solution and correction for the area under the curve for radioactive glucose during the GTT as well as for the weight of the tissue sample used.
To assess the incorporation of [U-14C]glucose into lipid, WAT was homogenized overnight in chloroform-methanol (2:1). Subsequently, 0.6% NaCl was added to facilitate separation of the organic and aqueous phases. The lower organic phase (containing extractable, neutral lipids) was collected and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen gas. After the extract was redissolved in ethanol, the sample was subjected to liquid scintillation counting. The clearance of radioactive glucose into lipid was calculated, taking into account the area under the curve for radioactive glucose during the GTT, and the weights of the tissue samples were analyzed.
Analysis of Insr and IGF1R signaling.
Mice (two to four per genotype) were fasted overnight and were anesthetized by injection of 30 mg pentobarbitone/kg. The peritoneal cavity was opened and recombinant human insulin (1 unit/kg) or IGF1 (0.25 mg/kg; GroPep, Adelaide, Australia) was injected into the inferior vena cava, following previously established protocols (the insulin protocol is described in reference 15 and the IGF1 protocol is described in reference 35). After 2 min (by the insulin protocol) or 5 min (by the IGF1 protocol), WAT, quadriceps muscles, and tibialis muscles were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The tissues were solubilized (after powdering, in the procedure for muscles) for 2 h at 4°C in modified radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (65 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 10% glycerol, pH 8.0) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 20 mM NaF, 1 mM Na orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Cleared tissue lysates were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted with antibodies against the Insr β subunit (BD Transduction Laboratories, CA), IGF1R β subunit (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), phosphorylated Insr/IGF1R (pY1162/3 and pY972; Biosource, CA), phosphotyrosine (clone 4G10; Upstate, Charlottesville, VA), IRS-1 (Upstate), phospho-IRS-1/2 (pY612, Biosource), and Akt or phospho-Akt (pS473 or pT308) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). Note that the pY1162/3 antibody detects both phosphorylated Insr and IGF1R β subunits, and the two receptors can be separated on polyacrylamide gels, with IGF1R migrating more slowly than Insr (see reference 34). In most immunoprecipitation experiments, the Insr was first immunoprecipitated from lysates by using a monoclonal antibody (Ab3; Oncogene Research Products, Darmstadt, Germany). In the case of coimmunoprecipitation of Insr and Grb10, the Insr was immunoprecipitated using a different monoclonal antibody (L55B10; Cell Signaling, CA) and Grb10 was detected using a rabbit polyclonal antibody (K20; Santa Cruz, CA). Note that in these experiments, tissue samples were collected from free-fed animals that had not been stimulated with insulin. Quantitation of immunolabeled bands was performed using immunoprecipitation lab gel H (BD Biosciences, CA) or L55B10 (Cell Signaling, CA).
Statistical analysis.
Results are presented as means ± standard errors of the means (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using either unpaired Student's t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) with appropriate post hoc tests with PRISM 4.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Differences with P values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS
Imprinted and restricted expression of Grb10 in the adult.
In our initial report on the phenotype of Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice, we focused on the fetal overgrowth leading to the birth of pups that are around 30% heavier than their wild-type littermates (12). Only mice inheriting the maternal Grb10Δ2-4 mutant allele (maternal [Grb10Δ2-4m/+] heterozygotes and Grb10Δ2-4m/p homozygotes) were affected, and the overgrowth included disproportion at the level of tissues and organs that was correlated with Grb10 expression levels in developing tissues. The presence of the β-galactosidase-neomycin resistance fusion gene cassette in the Grb10Δ2-4 allele provides a convenient method to follow expression from the Grb10 locus by assaying for β-galactosidase activity in situ. We previously found that reporter gene expression was widespread in the embryo and closely followed the pattern of expression from the endogenous Grb10 allele, as determined by mRNA in situ hybridization (12). Furthermore, expression of β-galactosidase from the Grb10Δ2-4 allele was used to confirm the imprinted nature of the Grb10 locus. Following transmission of the Grb10Δ2-4 allele from either males or females, expression in the fetus was predominantly from the maternal allele.
In the present study, we have extended our expression analysis to adult stages by comparing tissues that were dissected from wild-type mice, as well as from both maternal (Grb10Δ2-4m/+) heterozygotes and paternal (Grb10Δ2-4+/p) heterozygotes, and stained for β-galactosidase activity (Fig. 1A to E). Following maternal transmission of the Grb10Δ2-4 allele, staining was readily detectable in skeletal muscle, WAT, the intrinsic muscle of the tongue, and cells of pancreatic islets. Staining occurred throughout pancreatic islets, suggesting expression from both major endocrine cell types (α and β cells). Additionally, in females, there was distinct staining of the uterine horns and oviducts, while in male mice, β-galactosidase activity was present in the testes. When the testes were histologically examined, it appeared that the expression was restricted to the Leydig cells (not shown). We note that LacZ expression was not detected in adult liver. The only site of expression identified by β-galactosidase staining following paternal transmission of Grb10Δ2-4 was the hypothalamus, the organ in which expression in maternal heterozygotes was notably absent (Fig. 1E).
Reduced adiposity following Grb10 disruption.
The mean weights of Grb10Δ2-4m/+ males (38.11 ± 1.226 g) and females (35.08 ± 1.84 g) at 6 months of age were around 13% greater than those of wild-type male (33.73 ± 1.067 g) and female (30.97 ± 0.8418 g) littermates (Fig. 2A). The weight differential was, for both sexes, less than the 36% increase observed on the day of birth (see reference 13) but remained statistically significant (for males, a P value of 0.01; for females, a P value of 0.035). We focused mainly on a comparison of Grb10Δ2-4m/+ heterozygotes and wild-type littermate controls, since disruption of the maternal allele will ablate the majority of Grb10 expression in both the fetus and the adult. Consistent with this, we note that the analysis of Grb10Δ2-4+/p and Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals showed that they closely resembled wild-type and Grb10Δ2-4m/+ animals, respectively (including measures of body weight, proportions, and whole-body glucose metabolism; data not shown). Animals at 6 months of age were subjected to DXA to assess total body area, together with lean and fat tissue contents (Fig. 2B). The total body areas of Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice were significantly increased (for males, a P value of 0.001; for females, a P value of 0.0003), indicating that these animals remain larger than their wild-type littermates as adults. However, DXA analysis also revealed a significant difference in body fat content, expressed as percent total body weight, with Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice exhibiting a reduction compared to wild types (for males, a P value of 0.034; for females, a P value of 0.018). Conversely, Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice had significantly greater lean tissue contents (for males, a P value of 0.033; for females, a P value of 0.021). To further investigate the lean phenotype at the tissue level, renal and abdominal WAT depots were dissected free and weights were recorded (Fig. 2C). The adipose depots of 6-month-old Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice consistently weighed less than those of wild-type littermates, with significant differences seen for male abdominal (P = 0.045) and female renal (P = 0.035) depots. When these weight values were expressed as percentages of total body weight (Fig. 2D), abdominal and renal fat values were in all cases significantly reduced compared to those of wild-type littermates (for males, P values of 0.0005 and 0.003, respectively; for females, P values of 0.03 and 0.035, respectively), corroborating the data obtained from DXA analysis. Similarly, tibialis and quadriceps muscles were dissected from male mice at 17 to 18 weeks of age, and those from Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice were found to be significantly heavier than those from wild-type littermates (for tibialis muscles, a P value of 0.0006; for quadriceps muscles, a P value of 0.0011) (Fig. 2E); this difference was preserved when the same weight values were expressed as percentages of total body weight (for tibialis muscles, a P value of 0.0032; for quadriceps muscles, a P value of 0.0035) (Fig. 2F). To test the idea that the percent weight difference observed between wild-type and Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice diminished over time and was not an artifact of studying separate cohorts of neonatal and adult mice, the postnatal weights of some animals were monitored from birth to 80 days of age (Fig. 2G and H). The results showed that the weight difference diminished mainly during the postweaning period. Histological analyses have established no obvious differences in the appearance of WAT between wild-type (Fig. 1F) and Grb10Δ2-4m/+ (Fig. 1G) mice at this age, and there were no significant differences in either the mean sizes of adipocytes or the numbers of cells per μm2 (data not shown). Similarly, there were no obvious differences in muscle histology (data not shown).
Food intake and glucose metabolism in Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice.
Due to the significant decrease in adipose tissue mass observed for adult Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice, one obvious question to ask was whether these mice demonstrated hypophagia (reduced food consumption) compared to wild-type littermates. Feeding studies were performed on cohorts of both male and female mice at 6 months of age. The results, expressed as amounts of food in grams per gram of body weight per day, indicate that the food intake of Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice was not altered, with amounts of daily food intake being comparable to those of wild-type animals (for males, a P value of 0.94; for females, a P value of 0.86) (Fig. 3A). At the same time, levels of serum glucose, insulin, and leptin in animals fed ad libitum were measured (Fig. 3B). There was no significant difference between the levels of glucose or insulin; however, the mean serum leptin concentration in Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice (7.759 ± 0.7703 ng/ml; n = 13) was lower than that in wild-type animals (13.32 ± 1.971 ng/ml; n = 12), and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0126). Measurements of serum IGF1 levels in Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice at 17 to 18 weeks and also 18 months of age were analyzed, and in both cases, these mice showed no significant difference in comparison to wild-type littermates (data not shown). The reduced serum leptin concentration could be correlated with reduced adiposity in the mutant animals, since there was no significant difference when the data were expressed per gram of body fat for Grb10Δ2-4m/+ (12.41 ± 2.355 ng/ml/g fat) and wild-type (11.23 ± 1.236 ng/ml/g fat) mice (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, serum leptin levels were strongly correlated with body mass in wild-type animals (P = 0.0005), but there was no significant correlation in Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice (P = 0.1416) (Fig. 3D).
Glucose tolerance in male and female mice 6 to 10 months of age, with Grb10Δ2-4m/+, Grb10Δ2-4+/p, and Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals was assessed and compared with that of wild-type littermate controls (Fig. 4A and B). There were significantly improved abilities of both male and female Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice to clear a glucose load (as judged by a reduction in the incremental area under the curve). Male and female Grb10Δ2-4m/+ animals followed the same trend, though only males were significantly different from wild-type animals, while Grb10Δ2-4+/p animals had a glucose clearance profile that was essentially the same as that of the wild type. Most of our subsequent experiments were focused on homozygous mutant (Grb10Δ2-4m/p) animals that displayed the most pronounced change in their ability to clear glucose. To investigate whether the altered glucose tolerance seen for Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice might be detected in younger animals, an additional experiment was conducted with a cohort of male mice 18 to 22 weeks of age (Fig. 4C). Again, these animals exhibited a significant improvement in the ability to clear a glucose load compared with weight-matched wild-type males (P < 0.001). To investigate the mechanism for the enhanced glucose clearance, levels of serum insulin were also measured during the GTT. These were slightly lower in Grb10Δ2-4m/p males (Fig. 4D), consistent with the serum insulin concentration being reduced, though not significantly so, in older Grb10Δ2-4m/+ animals that had been fed ad libitum (Fig. 3B). Thus, the improved glucose tolerance could not be attributed to increased insulin levels.
To determine the role of individual tissues in the improved glucose tolerance, further tests were performed with adult male Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals and controls, with the glucose load labeled with trace amounts of 2-[3H]DOG (Fig. 5A) and [U-14C]glucose (Fig. 5B). Clearances of 2-[3H]DOG into quadriceps muscle and brown adipose tissue were very similar between the two genotypes, and although Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals showed a modest increase in uptake to tibialis muscle and WAT, these changes were not statistically significant. Nonsignificant trends for an increase in [U-14C]glucose incorporation into glycogen in quadriceps and tibialis muscle and into lipid in WAT were observed for Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals. However, incorporation into liver glycogen was significantly decreased, possibly reflecting clearance into the increased muscle mass of these mice (Fig. 2).
To test whether increased insulin sensitivity might contribute to the improved ability to clear a glucose load, we performed i.p. ITTs on mice at 17 to 21 weeks of age (Fig. 6). A trend towards increased insulin sensitivity was seen for both Grb10Δ2-4−m/+ and Grb10Δ2-4m/p males (Fig. 6A). In the case of females, both Grb10Δ2-4m/+ and Grb10Δ2-4m/p genotypes exhibited a significant enhancement in the ability of insulin to lower blood glucose levels (Fig. 6B). Similar results were obtained when younger (8- to 12-week-old) males and females were tested, suggesting that the increased insulin sensitivity is not strongly influenced by age (data not shown).
Insr signaling in skeletal muscle and WAT.
Conflicting data regarding the regulatory role of Grb10 in Insr signal transduction have been published (27). Therefore, we sought to establish whether changes occur in the insulin signaling pathway in Grb10Δ2-4 mutant animals. We focused on skeletal muscle (Fig. 7) and WAT (Fig. 8), as they are the two major insulin-responsive tissues that are sites of Grb10 expression in adult mice (Fig. 1). Cell lysates were prepared from tissues isolated from control and insulin-stimulated adult male mice. Western blot analysis revealed that Grb10Δ2-4m/p mouse samples exhibited a significant increase in the total amount of Insr, both in skeletal muscle (Fig. 7A) and in WAT (Fig. 8A). In order to establish an in vivo interaction between Grb10 and the Insr, coimmunoprecipitations were carried out on skeletal muscle samples using an anti-Insr antibody, followed by Western blotting with an anti-Grb10 antibody (Fig. 7B). Comparing samples from wild-type and Grb10Δ2-4m/+ animals, we detected Grb10 protein in the wild-type samples but not in the Grb10 mutant tissue, as expected. To determine whether Grb10 disruption altered tyrosine phosphorylation of the Insr, lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Insr antibody and Western blotted with two different anti-phosphotyrosine-specific antibodies. The first antibody was specific to phosphotyrosines 1162/1163 (pY1162/3) within the activation loop of the Insr. This revealed a significant decrease in insulin-stimulated receptor phosphorylation in skeletal muscle (Fig. 7C and D) and a marked reduction in WAT (Fig. 8B and C). The other antibody used (pY4G10) does not discriminate between Insr phosphotyrosine residues, and it also revealed a trend towards reduced insulin-stimulated Insr phosphorylation in Grb10Δ2-4m/p samples in both skeletal muscle (Fig. 7C and E) and WAT (Fig. 8B and D), although in both cases, this did not reach statistical significance. Taken together, these data suggest that Grb10 protects the Insr from activation loop dephosphorylation by specific PTPs in a manner similar to that recently reported for Grb14 (15, 46). Consistent with this, analysis of Insr immunoprecipitates from WAT for tyrosine phosphorylation at a site outside of the activation loop, pY972, showed no difference between wild-type and Grb10Δ2-4m/p mouse samples (Fig. 8E).
Tyrosine-612 phosphorylation of IRS-1 leads to binding of the p85 subunit of PI3K and subsequent activation of Akt, key events in insulin-induced signaling (reviewed in reference 51). To further investigate the possibility of altered signaling in this pathway, tissue lysates from insulin-treated animals were Western blotted with an antibody that recognizes this phosphorylation site as well as an antibody against total IRS-1 (Fig. 9A). Phosphorylated IRS-1 was significantly increased in the quadriceps muscle samples of Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice, and the difference appeared more pronounced when corrected for the total amount of IRS-1 present in each sample (Fig. 9B). Grb10Δ2-4m/p samples showed a significant increase in the level of phosphorylated IRS-1, though only after correcting for the totals amount of IRS-1 present, in both tibialis muscle (Fig. 9C) and WAT (Fig. 9D).
Finally, we determined Akt activation in the same cell lysates by Western blotting with an antibody recognizing Akt phosphorylated at serine 473 (Fig. 10A). Interestingly, relative Akt activation was significantly higher in quadriceps muscles (Fig. 10B) and tibialis muscles (Fig. 10C) from Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals but only in the basal state and not in samples from insulin-treated animals. In WAT, the level of phosphorylated Akt was reduced in Grb10Δ2-4m/p samples, though this was statistically significant only in samples from insulin-treated animals (Fig. 10D). Consequently, at the dose of insulin and time point examined, the enhanced insulin-induced IRS-1 phosphorylation observed in muscle and adipose tissue of Grb10Δ2-4 mutant animals is not paralleled by a corresponding increase in Akt activation.
Igf1r signaling in skeletal muscle.
Several studies indicate that Grb10 may act as a negative regulator of Igf1r as well as Insr signaling. Since Igf1r signaling might contribute to either the growth or metabolic effects seen in Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice, we examined Igf1r signaling in skeletal muscles at the level of the receptor and downstream signaling components (Fig. 11). As expected, mice injected with a bolus of IGF1 demonstrated a marked increase in phosphorylation of Igf1r, IRS-1, and Akt. Compared with lysates from wild-type animals, lysates from the Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice were found to have a modest (10 to 20%) increase in Igf1r levels and, at the same time, a reduction in tyrosine phosphorylation within the activation loop (Y1162/3). Densitometric analysis revealed that Y1162/3 phosphorylation was reduced by approximately twofold in quadriceps muscles and to a lesser extent in tibialis muscles. Associated with the receptor hypophosphorylation, tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 was increased approximately twofold in both muscle types, but this did not result in a change in the level of Akt phosphorylation. The effects on IGF1-stimulated Igf1r signaling were therefore analogous to those observed at the Insr following stimulation with insulin.
DISCUSSION
The Grb10 adapter protein is capable of interacting strongly with the Insr, and a number of biochemical studies provide evidence that it may act to modulate Insr signaling (reviewed in references 27 and 36). Most of these studies have involved the expression of exogenous Grb10 in cultured cells, and the majority support a model in which Grb10 acts to inhibit Insr signaling, although evidence to the contrary has been presented (27). Here, in order to gain an insight into the physiological role of this protein, we examined mice with a disrupted Grb10 gene for evidence of changes in glucose metabolism and Insr signaling.
The mutant Grb10Δ2-4 allele includes the replacement of three exons, including the first two protein-coding exons, with a LacZ reporter gene (12). We have previously shown that expression from the LacZ reporter gene closely follows the endogenous pattern of Grb10 expression, as determined by mRNA in situ hybridization. During embryogenesis, Grb10 expression was widespread in tissues of mesodermal and endodermal origins, and this expression was predominantly from the maternal allele, confirming that Grb10 is subject to regulation by genomic imprinting. In this study, we found Grb10 expression in adult mice to be restricted to fewer tissues, including, notably, both canonical (skeletal muscle and WAT) and noncanonical (islets of Langherhans and hypothalamus) insulin-responsive tissues. These sites of expression were consistent with previous reports of Grb10 expression in rodents. Northern blots of mRNA from adult mouse tissues have shown high levels of Grb10 expression in skeletal muscles, WAT, hearts, and kidneys, with lower levels in brains, lungs, and testes (34, 47). No LacZ expression was detected in livers of adult Grb10Δ2-4 animals, which is consistent with both Northern analyses of mice (36, 47) and a reverse transcription-PCR study showing extinction of Grb10 expression in the liver of the postnatal rat (22). Use of the Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice allowed us to evaluate allele-specific expression following either maternal or paternal transmission of the LacZ-tagged allele. At most sites of expression, β-galactosidase activity was detected only from the maternal allele, demonstrating that imprinting of Grb10 is maintained into adulthood. The exception was the hypothalamus, in which Grb10 expression was exclusively from the paternal allele, establishing that Grb10 is oppositely imprinted in this tissue. Interestingly, expression from the paternal allele within the central nervous system also appears to be established during embryogenesis (A. S. Garfield and A. Ward, unpublished data) and is consistent with recently characterized brain-specific Grb10 transcripts that may be under the control of a putative regulatory element that is hypomethylated on the paternal allele in the brain (2, 26).
We next evaluated the body mass and composition of adult Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice. At 6 months of age, both male and female Grb10Δ2-4m/+ animals were approximately 13% heavier than wild-type littermates. This outcome compares with mean birth weights of Grb10Δ2-4m/+ animals being approximately 36% greater than normal (see reference 12). Thus, the increased body mass of Grb10Δ2-4m/+ animals persisted into adulthood, but the weight differential was, for both sexes, less than that observed on the day of birth. DXA measurements revealed that Grb10Δ2-4m/+ adults retain larger bodies and have altered body compositions, with increased lean tissue contents and reduced amounts of adipose, suggesting that the narrowing of the difference in body mass can, at least in part, be accounted for by reduced adiposity in Grb10Δ2-4m/+ animals. In support of this hypothesis, weight was monitored from birth to 80 days of age, for one cohort of animals, showing that the weight difference diminished mainly during the postweaning period. Furthermore, levels of the hormone leptin were reduced in sera from Grb10Δ2-4m/+ animals in proportion with the reduced WAT mass, consistent with the established correlation between leptin concentration and adipose tissue mass (20). However, while leptin levels could be correlated with body mass for wild-type animals (i.e., heavier wild types result from excess adipose deposition), there was no significant correlation for Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice, leading to the inference that, in this case, lean mass is the major contributing factor to variability in body size. Loss of the relationship between plasma leptin and body weight has been reported in studies using other models of mice with reduced adiposity, and in some cases, there is an associated reduction in the mean size of adipocytes (e.g., see references 6 and 32). This was not obviously the case for Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice, as histological analysis of gonadal WAT showed no difference between the sizes of the adipocytes of the Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice and those of the wild-type littermate controls. Measurements of food intake indicated that the lean phenotype was not associated with hypophagia and, despite reduced serum leptin levels, Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice ate appropriately for their body weight. Similar observations have been made in studies of myostatin gene (Mstn, also known as Gdf8) KO mice that also have increased lean body mass, in this case, due to a combination of increased skeletal muscle hypertrophy and hyperplasia (37, 41). This suggests that for both Grb10 and Mstn mutants, central sensitivity to leptin has been improved or the reduction in the leptin level has been compensated, perhaps through increased sensitivity to the antiorexigenic effects of insulin.
To investigate whether energy metabolism might be altered, mice 6 to 10 months of age were subjected to standard GTT, revealing that both Grb10Δ2-4m/+ and Grb10Δ2-4m/p males and also Grb10Δ2-4m/p females had a significantly improved ability to clear a glucose load. The observation that the effects seen in Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice were more pronounced than those in Grb10Δ2-4m/+ mice is likely to reflect the fact that although fetal Grb10 expression occurs predominantly from the maternal allele, there was some expression from the paternal allele (12). Alternatively, expression that we observed from the paternal Grb10 allele in the hypothalamus might contribute to the improved glucose homeostasis. A role for Grb10 in the hypothalamus has yet to be established; however, mice with a brain-specific KO of Insr were shown to have altered glucose homeostasis, including increased susceptibility to diet-induced obesity and mild insulin resistance (7), while mice with a brain-specific disruption of PTP-1B, known as a negative regulator of Insr signaling, had a contrasting phenotype, with reduced adiposity and improved sensitivity to both insulin and glucose (4). Trends for lower serum insulin levels in 18- to 22-week-old Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice during a GTT clearly demonstrated that the improved glucose tolerance was not the result of enhanced insulin release in response to the glucose load and suggested enhanced insulin action. This conclusion was confirmed by the results of ITT, for which Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals displayed a reduction in serum glucose levels greater than that displayed by wild-type controls, following the same challenge with exogenous insulin. To assess the role of different insulin-responsive tissues in the altered metabolic phenotype, we performed GTT for which the glucose load was labeled with trace amounts of 2-[3H]DOG and [U-14C]glucose. Although these experiments showed no significant differences in the clearance of 2-[3H]DOG or [U-14C]glucose into insulin-sensitive tissues per gram of fresh weight, there was a trend towards greater uptake of both labels into skeletal muscles and WAT in Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals. The greater mass of muscles in Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice indicates that on a whole-body basis, the improved glucose tolerance most likely results from increased glucose clearance into muscle. At the same time, Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals incorporated significantly less [U-14C]glucose into glycogen in the liver, a result which probably also reflects disposal of a larger portion of the glucose load into muscle tissue.
The availability of Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice has allowed us to determine, for the first time, the role of Grb10 in insulin signaling in a physiological context. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicated that Grb10 may interact directly with the Insr in vivo. Additionally, several changes occurred at the Insr/IRS-1 node of the insulin signaling network in Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals. In both quadriceps muscles and WAT from Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice, there was a modest but significant increase in Insr expression levels. This finding is consistent with evidence that Grb10 promotes the ubiquitin-targeted degradation of the Igf1r (59) and Insr (50). However, a marked reduction in receptor phosphorylation was detected in quadriceps muscles and WAT from Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice when an antibody specific for tyrosine phosphorylation within the activation loop (pY1162/3) was used. In contrast to the case with Grb14-deficient mice (15), this effect was not observed in the liver (data not shown), consistent with expression of Grb14, but not Grb10, in this organ. Only a modest reduction in the level of phosphorylated receptor was observed for Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals when an antibody that recognizes all tyrosine-phosphorylated forms of the Insr was used, suggesting that Grb10 preferentially protects the activation loop phosphotyrosines. This interpretation was supported by measurement of tyrosine phosphorylation at Y972, a site located near the Insr transmembrane domain that is thought to be involved in the docking of substrates such as IRS-1 and Shc (14). In contrast to the dramatic reduction in tyrosine phosphorylation seen within the activation loop, there was no significant change in pY972 phosphorylation in Grb10Δ2-4m/p tissue samples. Our data are therefore consistent with the recent study of Nouaille et al. (46), which determined that Grb14 protects the three tyrosines within the activation loop (Y1158, Y1162, and Y1163) from dephosphorylation by PTP-1B while at the same time favoring dephosphorylation of Y972. A model for interaction of Grb14 with the Insr based on the Insr/Grb14 BPS domain, Insr/APS SH2 domain, and Grb14 SH2 domain crystal structures provides a mechanistic basis for this, since pY1158 and pY1162 are engaged by the Grb14 SH2 domain, while pY1163 interacts with the BPS region (17). This model may also apply to binding of Grb10 to the Insr, since the key interacting residues are conserved between Grb10 and Grb14. Furthermore, this regulatory role of Grb10 may extend to the closely related Igf1r, since we observed a reduction in pY1162/3 phosphorylation in skeletal muscle from Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice, compared to wild-type animals, following IGF1 stimulation in vivo. Similarly, suppression of Grb10 by RNA interference resulted in hypophosphorylation of Igf1r Y1158 in IGF1-stimulated cells (18).
Despite the decrease in activation loop phosphorylation in skeletal muscle and WAT of Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice, relative tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in these mice was significantly greater than that in wild-type controls. Enhancement of IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was particularly marked in the quadriceps muscle. Contrasting effects on receptor and IRS-1 phosphorylation were also observed in Grb14-deficient livers following insulin stimulation (15) and in NIH 3T3 cells subjected to Grb10 knockdown followed by IGF1 treatment (18). A potential explanation for this apparent paradox is spatial segregation of signaling events. Dephosphorylation of the Insr by PTP-1B is thought to occur following receptor internalization into endosomes (3). If, in the absence of Grb10, dephosphorylation of Insr occurs predominantly in the endosomal compartment, then tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, which occurs at the plasma membrane (11), could still be enhanced due to loss of pseudosubstrate inhibition of the Insr (17) or increased Insr/IRS coupling due to the lack of steric repression by Grb10 (63). Furthermore, our observation that insulin-stimulated pY972 phosphorylation is essentially unaltered in Grb10-deficient mice suggests that Grb10 functions in a manner similar to that of Grb14 and regulates site-specific phosphorylation of the Insr (46). It is possible that in the absence of Grb10, the residual phosphorylated (predominantly at pY972) receptor has increased catalytic activity, due to loss of pseudosubstrate inhibition, that leads to enhanced IRS-1 activation. Alternatively, prolonged association of the Insr with IRS-1 could affect the susceptibility of IRS-1 to specific phosphatases. Overall, these data highlight Grb10 as an important physiological regulator of insulin-induced Insr and IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Also of note is that Grb10, like Grb14, performs this role in a tissue-specific manner. Thus, while both Grb10 and Grb14 regulate insulin signaling in skeletal muscle, only Grb14 gene disruption affects Insr and IRS-1 phosphorylation in liver and only Grb10 affects these end points in WAT (as shown in reference 15, this study, and data not shown). These findings are consistent with the expression profiles of the two adaptor proteins, with Grb14 expression highest in liver, lower in WAT, and lowest in muscle (9), while Grb10 expression is relatively high in skeletal muscle and WAT but absent from liver (see above).
A surprising observation was that the increased insulin-induced IRS-1 phosphorylation in Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals was not associated with enhanced Akt activation. This contrasts with the effects of Grb14 ablation (15). However, these data are consistent with the modest effects observed on 2-[3H]DOG uptake and [U-14C]glucose incorporation into glycogen or lipid in insulin-responsive tissues of Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice. Basal Akt activation in the skeletal muscles of Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice was significantly higher than that in the skeletal muscles of wild-type mice, while insulin-stimulated activation was essentially unaltered. The increased basal Akt activation was not always supported by elevated IRS-1 phosphorylation and cannot be explained by raised insulin levels. Insulin-induced Akt activation in WAT of the mutant mice was significantly lower than that in WAT of the wild-type mice. One possible explanation for the dissociation of IRS-1 phosphorylation from Akt activation is that the altered body composition of Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice results in compensatory negative feedback regulation of PI3K/Akt to avoid excessive glucose uptake by insulin-responsive tissues. For instance, Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals could express higher levels of SHIP2 or PTEN. These lipid phosphatases are known to dephosphorylate inositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate, and studies of mice have shown that both act as inhibitors of Akt activity in insulin-responsive tissues (8, 21, 33, 54, 58). An alternative, though not mutually exclusive, explanation is suggested by studies showing that Grb10 can interact directly with the p85 subunit of PI3K (16), and with Akt (28), to enhance the activity of these enzymes. Thus, in the absence of Grb10, activation of PI3K or Akt might be compromised.
Since studies on mouse fibroblasts have identified Grb10 as an endogenous negative regulator of Igf1r signaling (18) and IGF1 acts to increase muscle mass and decrease adipose content (39, 45), a potential explanation for the altered body composition and/or glucose metabolism in Grb10-deficient animals is increased IGF1 signaling in muscle. To test this hypothesis, we administered a bolus of IGF1 to wild-type and Grb10Δ2-4m/p mice and assayed signaling events in quadriceps and tibialis muscles. Igf1r levels exhibited a modest increase in Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice compared to that in controls. Stimulation of muscle cells with nanomolar concentrations of IGF1 results in tyrosine phosphorylation of both the Igf1r and Insr (52), and this could be detected upon IGF1 administration in vivo, since these receptors exhibit a difference in electrophoretic mobility (34). Densitometric analysis of the relative levels of IGF1-stimulated pY1162/3 activation loop phosphorylation revealed that this was reduced (approximately twofold in quadriceps muscles and slightly less in tibialis muscles) of Grb10Δ2-4m/p animals relative to wild-type controls. At the same time, IGF1-induced IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation exhibited an approximately twofold increase in both muscle types of Grb10-deficient animals compared to that in the muscles of wild types. Thus, despite reduced Igf1r phosphorylation, IGF1-induced signaling to IRS-1 was enhanced in muscle upon Grb10 gene disruption. These data are consistent with the effects of small interfering RNA-mediated Grb10 knockdown in mouse fibroblasts (18). However, the enhanced IRS-1 phosphorylation did not result in increased Akt activation, as determined by T308 phosphorylation. Overall, these experiments indicate that IGF1-induced signaling, at least to IRS-1, is increased in muscles of adult Grb10-deficient animals. Postnatal growth is not obviously enhanced in Grb10-deficient animals; indeed, the overall size increase in comparison to wild-type littermates diminishes between birth and adulthood, and genetic evidence indicates that Grb10 regulates fetal growth largely through a non-IGF pathway (12; unpublished data). However, altered Igf1r signaling might contribute to maintenance of increased muscle mass postnatally. The exploration of this possibility will require further characterization of the muscle phenotype and, as appropriate, the signaling pathways regulating muscle hyperplasia and hypertrophy. Of note in this regard, IGF1-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy is characterized by increased mTOR/p70S6K signaling without increased Akt phosphorylation (56).
Further work will be needed to separate the effects of Grb10 on body size and proportions, which might have secondary consequences for glucose-regulated metabolism, from any direct physiological effects mediated by its interaction with the Insr, or Igf1r, and downstream signaling molecules. Transgenic mice overexpressing Grb10 during postnatal life were recently shown to exhibit insulin resistance, leading to diabetes in some individuals (53). Thus, the effect of Grb10 excess on glucose sensitivity mirrored that seen in our Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice. The Grb10 transgenic mice were of normal sizes at birth but as adults had body weights that were reduced by some 10 to 15% compared to the weights of wild-type controls, and their pancreases were reported to have increased adipocyte contents (though it was not clear whether this reflected a more general increase in body fat content). As in Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice, these changes in body size and tissue composition could contribute to the altered glucose metabolism, though it is interesting to note that an increase in skeletal muscle alone may not be sufficient to significantly alter blood glucose regulation, since Mstn KO mice had unaltered serum glucose and insulin levels (fed or fasting) and responded normally to GTT (41).
Mouse gene KO studies have established that several factors known to interact directly with the Insr can each have a significant influence over the systemic regulation of glucose levels. It is striking that Grb10Δ2-4 mutant mice share phenotypic features with mice lacking either PTP-1B (19, 32) or the signaling adaptor proteins APS (42) and Grb14 (15), including enhanced Insr signaling (PTP-1B and Grb14) and improved glucose tolerance (all three KO models), despite reduced levels of circulating insulin. Each of these factors could be considered a potential therapeutic target for improved insulin action, with the possibility that the targeting of specific molecules might allow differential modulation of Insr signaling in different tissues (for instance, enhanced Insr signaling in adipose tissue of Grb10 KO mice but not PTP-1B KO, Grb14 KO, or APS KO mice) and with potentially different physiological outcomes (e.g., Grb10 KO and PTP-1B KO mice were found to be lean, whereas adiposity was unaltered in Grb14 KO and APS KO mice). These differences might, in part, be due to overlapping functions, particularly between the three adaptor proteins, that may differ at the level of individual tissues.
Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a relationship between restricted fetal growth and an increased susceptibility to insulin resistance, obesity, and type 2 diabetes, as well as other features of the metabolic syndrome in adulthood. This phenomenon of fetal programming has been modeled in animals, typically by using dietary restriction during pregnancy (23, 48, 49). The underlying mechanism has not been determined but is likely to have an epigenetic basis. Indeed, recent studies of mice have shown that manipulations of the diet during pregnancy can affect patterns of DNA methylation in the offspring (61, 62). Affected genes include at least some of those that are imprinted. This study, together with our previous report (12), indicates that Grb10 forms a link between fetal growth regulation and adult metabolic health status, a result which, together with the imprinted nature of the Grb10 gene, suggests Grb10 as a candidate for involvement in the fetal-programming phenomenon.
Acknowledgments
We thank Iryna Withington, Tracey Crew, and 5WL1 staff for technical assistance and members of the Ward and Daly laboratories for stimulating discussions.
The work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) and by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. F.M.S. was funded in part by a CASE award sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 11 June 2007.
REFERENCES
- 1.Accili, D., J. Drago, E. J. Lee, M. D. Johnson, M. H. Cool, P. Salvatore, L. D. Asico, P. A. Jose, S. I. Taylor, and H. Westphal. 1996. Early neonatal death in mice homozygous for a null allele of the insulin receptor gene. Nat. Genet. 12:106-109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arnaud, P., D. Monk, M. Hitchins, E. Gordon, W. Dean, C. V. Beechey, J. Peters, W. Craigen, M. Preece, P. Stanier, G. E. Moore, and G. Kelsey. 2003. Conserved methylation imprints in the human and mouse GRB10 genes with divergent allelic expression suggests differential reading of the same mark. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12:1005-1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Asante-Appiah, E., and B. P. Kennedy. 2003. Protein tyrosine phosphatases: the quest for negative regulators of insulin action. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 284:E663-E670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bence, K. K., M. Delibegovic, B. Xue, C. Z. Gorgun, G. S. Hotamisligil, B. G. Neel, and B. B. Kahn. 2006. Neuronal PTP1B regulates body weight, adiposity and leptin action. Nat. Med. 12:917-924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bennett, W. R., T. E. Crew, J. M. W. Slack, and A. Ward. 2003. Structural-proliferative units and organ growth: effects of insulin-like growth factor 2 on growth of colon and skin. Development 130:1079-1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bluher, M., M. D. Michael, O. D. Peroni, K. Ueki, N. Carter, B. B. Kahn, and C. R. Kahn. 2002. Adipose tissue selective insulin receptor knockout protects against obesity and obesity-related glucose intolerance. Dev. Cell 3:25-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bruning, J. C., D. Gautam, D. J. Burks, J. Gillette, M. Schubert, P. C. Orban, R. Klein, W. Krone, D. Muller-Wieland, and C. R. Kahn. 2000. Role of brain insulin receptor in control of body weight and reproduction. Science 289:2122-2125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Butler, M., R. A. McKay, I. J. Popoff, W. A. Gaarde, D. Witchell, S. F. Murray, N. M. Dean, S. Bhanot, and B. P. Monia. 2002. Specific inhibition of PTEN expression reverses hyperglycemia in diabetic mice. Diabetes 51:1028-1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cariou, B., N. Capitaine, V. Le Marcis, N. Vega, V. Bereziat, M. Kergoat, M. Laville, J. Girard, H. Vidal, and A. F. Burnol. 2004. Increased adipose tissue expression of Grb14 in several models of insulin resistance. FASEB J. 18:965-967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cariou, B., D. Perdereau, K. Cailliau, E. Browaeys-Poly, V. Bereziat, M. Vasseur-Cognet, J. Girard, and A. F. Burnol. 2002. The adapter protein ZIP binds Grb14 and regulates its inhibitory action on insulin signaling by recruiting protein kinase Czeta. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:6959-6970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ceresa, B. P., A. W. Kao, S. R. Santeler, and J. E. Pessin. 1998. Inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis selectively attenuates specific insulin receptor signal transduction pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:3862-3870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Charalambous, M., F. M. Smith, W. R. Bennett, T. E. Crew, F. Mackenzie, and A. Ward. 2003. Disruption of the imprinted Grb10 gene leads to disproportionate overgrowth by an Igf2 independent mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:8292-8297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Charalambous, M., A. Ward, and L. D. Hurst. 2003. Evidence for a priming effect on maternal resource allocation: implications for interbrood competition. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 270:S100-S103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Combettes-Souverain, M., and T. Issad. 1998. Molecular basis of insulin action. Diabetes Metab. 24:477-489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cooney, G., R. J. Lyons, A. J. Crew, T. E. Jensen, J. C. Molero, C. J. Mitchell, T. J. Biden, C. J. Ormandy, D. E. James, and R. J. Daly. 2004. Improved glucose homeostasis and enhanced insulin signalling in Grb14-deficient mice. EMBO J. 23:582-593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deng, Y., S. Bhattacharya, O. R. Swamy, R. Tandon, Y. Wang, R. Janda, and H. Riedel. 2003. Growth factor receptor-binding protein 10 (Grb10) as a partner of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in metabolic insulin action. J. Biol. Chem. 278:39311-39322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Depetris, R. S., J. Hu, I. Gimpelevich, L. J. Holt, R. J. Daly, and S. R. Hubbard. 2005. Structural basis for inhibition of the insulin receptor by the adaptor protein Grb14. Mol. Cell 20:325-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dufresne, A. M., and R. J. Smith. 2005. The adapter protein GRB10 is an endogenous negative regulator of insulin-like growth factor signaling. Endocrinology 146:4399-4409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Elchebly, M., P. Payette, E. Michaliszyn, W. Cromlish, S. Collins, A. L. Loy, D. Normandin, A. Cheng, J. Himms-Hagen, C.-C. Chan, C. Ramachandran, M. J. Gresser, M. L. Tremblay, and B. P. Kennedy. 1999. Increased insulin sensitivity and obesity resistance in mice lacking the protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B gene. Science 283:1544-1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Friedman, J. M., and J. L. Halaas. 1998. Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature 395:763-770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fukui, K., T. Wada, S. Kagawa, K. Nagira, M. Ikubo, H. Ishihara, M. Kobayashi, and T. Sasaoka. 2005. Impact of the liver-specific expression of SHIP2 (SH2-containing inositol 5′-phosphatase 2) on insulin signaling and glucose metabolism in mice. Diabetes 54:1958-1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gruppuso, P. A., J. M. Boylan, and C. A. Vaslet. 2000. Identification of candidate growth-regulating genes that are overexpressed in late gestation fetal liver in the rat. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1494:242-247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hales, C. N., and S. E. Ozanne. 2003. For debate: fetal and early postnatal growth restriction lead to diabetes, the metabolic syndrome and renal failure. Diabetologia 46:1013-1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Han, D. C., T.-L. Shen, and J.-L. Guan. 2001. The Grb7 family proteins: structure, interactions with other signalling molecules and potential cellular functions. Oncogene 20:6315-6321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.He, W., D. W. Rose, J. M. Olefsky, and T. A. Gustafson. 1998. Grb10 interacts differentially with the insulin receptor, insulin-like growth factor I receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor via the Grb10 Src homology 2 (SH2) domain and a second novel domain located between the pleckstrin homology and SH2 domains. J. Biol. Chem. 273:6860-6867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hikichi, T., T. Kohda, T. Kaneko-Ishino, and F. Ishino. 2003. Imprinting regulation of the murine Meg1/Grb10 and human GRB10 genes; roles of brain-specific promoters and mouse-specific CTCF-binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:1398-1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Holt, L. J., and K. Siddle. 2005. Grb10 and Grb14: enigmatic regulators of insulin action—and more? Biochem. J. 388:393-406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jahn, T., P. Seipel, S. Urschel, C. Peschel, and J. Duyster. 2002. Role for the adaptor protein Grb10 in the activation of Akt. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:979-991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Joshi, R. L., B. Lamothe, N. Cordonnier, K. Mesbah, E. Monthioux, J. Jami, and D. Bucchini. 1996. Targeted disruption of the insulin receptor gene in the mouse results in neonatal lethality. EMBO J. 15:1542-1547. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kasus-Jacobi, A., D. Perdereau, C. Auzan, E. Clauser, E. Van Obberghen, F. Mauvais-Jarvis, J. Girard, and A.-F. Burnol. 1998. Identification of the rat adapter Grb14 as an inhibitor of insulin actions. J. Biol. Chem. 273:26026-26035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kitamura, T., C. R. Kahn, and D. Accili. 2003. Insulin receptor knockout mice. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65:313-332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Klaman, L. D., O. Boss, O. D. Peroni, J. K. Kim, J. L. Martino, J. M. Zabolotny, N. Moghal, M. Lubkin, Y. B. Kim, A. H. Sharpe, A. Stricker-Krongrad, G. I. Shulman, B. G. Neel, and B. B. Kahn. 2000. Increased energy expenditure, decreased adiposity, and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B-deficient mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5479-5489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kurlawalla-Martinez, C., B. Stiles, Y. Wang, S. U. Devaskar, B. B. Kahn, and H. Wu. 2005. Insulin hypersensitivity and resistance to streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice lacking PTEN in adipose tissue. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:2498-2510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Laviola, L., F. Giorgino, J. C. Chow, J. A. Baquero, H. Hansen, J. Ooi, J. Zhu, H. Riedel, and R. J. Smith. 1997. The adapter protein Grb10 associates preferentially with the insulin receptor as compared with the IGF-I receptor in mouse fibroblasts. J. Clin. Investig. 99:830-837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee, A. V., S. T. Taylor, J. Greenall, J. D. Mills, D. W. Tonge, P. Zhang, J. George, M. L. Fiorotto, and D. L. Hadsell. 2003. Rapid induction of IGF-IR signaling in normal and tumor tissue following intravenous injection of IGF-I in mice. Horm. Metab. Res. 35:651-655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lim, M. A., H. Riedel, and F. Liu. 2004. Grb10: more than a simple adaptor protein. Front. Biosci. 9:387-403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lin, J., H. B. Arnold, M. A. Della-Fera, M. J. Azain, D. L. Hartzell, and C. A. Baile. 2002. Myostatin knockout in mice increases myogenesis and decreases adipogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 291:701-706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu, F., and R. A. Roth. 1995. Grb-IR: a SH2-domain-containing protein that binds to the insulin receptor and inhibits its function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:10287-10291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mauras, N., and M. W. Haymond. 2005. Are the metabolic effects of GH and IGF-I separable? Growth Horm. IGF Res. 15:19-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.McDougall, K. E., M. J. Perry, R. L. Gibson, J. M. Bright, S. M. Colley, J. B. Hodgin, O. Smithies, and J. H. Tobias. 2002. Estrogen-induced osteogenesis in intact female mice lacking ERbeta. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 283:E817-E23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McPherron, A. C., and S. J. Lee. 2002. Suppression of body fat accumulation in myostatin-deficient mice. J. Clin. Investig. 109:595-601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Minami, A., M. Iseki, K. Kishi, M. Wang, M. Ogura, N. Furukawa, S. Hayashi, M. Yamada, T. Obata, Y. Takeshita, Y. Nakaya, Y. Bando, K. Izumi, S. A. Moodie, F. Kajiura, M. Matsumoto, K. Takatsu, S. Takaki, and Y. Ebina. 2003. Increased insulin sensitivity and hypoinsulinemia in APS knockout mice. Diabetes 52:2657-2665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Miyoshi, N., Y. Kuroiwa, T. Kohda, H. Shitara, H. Yonekawa, T. Kawabe, H. Hasegawa, S. C. Barton, M. A. Surani, T. Kaneko-Ishino, and F. Ishino. 1998. Identification of the Meg1/Grb10 imprinted gene on mouse proximal chromosome 11, a candidate for the Silver-Russell syndrome gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1102-1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mounier, C., L. Lavoie, V. Dumas, K. Mohammad-Ali, J. Wu, A. Nantel, J. J. M. Bergeron, D. Y. Thomas, and B. I. Posner. 2001. Specific inhibition by hGRB10ζ of insulin-induced glycogen synthase activation: evidence for a novel signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 173:15-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Musaro, A., K. McCullagh, A. Paul, L. Houghton, G. Dobrowolny, M. Molinaro, E. R. Barton, H. L. Sweeney, and N. Rosenthal. 2001. Localized Igf-1 transgene expression sustains hypertrophy and regeneration in senescent skeletal muscle. Nat. Genet. 27:195-200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nouaille, S., C. Blanquart, V. Zilberfarb, N. Boute, D. Perdereau, J. Roix, A. F. Burnol, and T. Issad. 2006. Interaction with Grb14 results in site-specific regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor. EMBO Rep. 7:512-518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ooi, J., V. Yajnik, D. Immanuel, M. Gordon, J. J. Moskow, A. M. Buchberg, and B. Margolis. 1995. The cloning of Grb10 reveals a new family of SH2 domain proteins. Oncogene 10:1621-1630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ozanne, S. E., D. Fernandez-Twinn, and C. N. Hales. 2004. Fetal growth and adult diseases. Semin. Perinatol. 28:81-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ozanne, S. E., and C. N. Hales. 2002. Pre- and early postnatal nongenetic determinants of type 2 diabetes. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2002:1-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ramos, F. J., P. R. Langlais, D. Hu, L. Q. Dong, and F. Liu. 2006. Grb10 mediates insulin-stimulated degradation of the insulin receptor: a mechanism of negative regulation. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 290:E1262-E1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Saltiel, A. R., and C. R. Kahn. 2001. Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 414:799-806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shefi-Friedman, L., E. Wertheimer, S. Shen, A. Bak, D. Accili, and S. R. Sampson. 2001. Increased IGFR activity and glucose transport in cultured skeletal muscle from insulin receptor null mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 281:E16-E24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shiura, H., N. Miyoshi, A. Konishi, N. Wakisaka-Saito, R. Suzuki, K. Muguruma, T. Kohda, S. Wakana, M. Yokoyama, F. Ishino, and T. Kaneko-Ishino. 2005. Meg1/Grb10 overexpression causes postnatal growth retardation and insulin resistance via negative modulation of the IGF1R and IR cascades. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 329:909-916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sleeman, M. W., K. E. Wortley, K. M. Lai, L. C. Gowen, J. Kintner, W. O. Kline, K. Garcia, T. N. Stitt, G. D. Yancopoulos, S. J. Wiegand, and D. J. Glass. 2005. Absence of the lipid phosphatase SHIP2 confers resistance to dietary obesity. Nat. Med. 11:199-205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Smith, F. M., A. S. Garfield, and A. Ward. 2006. Regulation of growth and metabolism by imprinted genes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 113:279-291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Song, Y. H., M. Godard, Y. Li, S. R. Richmond, N. Rosenthal, and P. Delafontaine. 2005. Insulin-like growth factor I-mediated skeletal muscle hypertrophy is characterized by increased mTOR-p70S6K signaling without increased Akt phosphorylation. J. Investig. Med. 53:135-142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stein, E. G., T. A. Gustafson, and S. R. Hubbard. 2001. The BPS domain of Grb10 inhibits the catalytic activity of the insulin and IGF1 receptors. FEBS Lett. 493:106-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Stiles, B., Y. Wang, A. Stahl, S. Bassilian, W. P. Lee, Y. J. Kim, R. Sherwin, S. Devaskar, R. Lesche, M. A. Magnuson, and H. Wu. 2004. Liver-specific deletion of negative regulator Pten results in fatty liver and insulin hypersensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:2082-2087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vecchione, A., A. Marchese, P. Henry, D. Rotin, and A. Morrione. 2003. The Grb10/Nedd4 complex regulates ligand-induced ubiquitination and stability of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:3363-3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang, J., H. Dai, N. Yousaf, M. Moussaif, Y. Deng, A. Boufelliga, O. R. Swamy, M. E. Leone, and H. Riedel. 1999. Grb10, a positive, stimulatory signaling adapter in platelet-derived growth factor BB-, insulin-like growth factor I-, and insulin-mediated mitogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:6217-6228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Waterland, R. A., and R. L. Jirtle. 2004. Early nutrition, epigenetic changes at transposons and imprinted genes, and enhanced susceptibility to adult chronic diseases. Nutrition 20:63-68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Waterland, R. A., and R. L. Jirtle. 2003. Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:5293-5300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wick, K. R., E. D. Werner, P. Langlais, F. J. Ramos, L. Q. Dong, S. E. Shoelson, and F. Liu. 2003. Grb10 inhibits insulin-stimulated insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway by disrupting the association of IRS-1/IRS-2 with the insulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 278:8460-8467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]