Abstract
High mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) is a chromatin protein that has a dual function as a nuclear factor and as an extracellular factor. Extracellular HMGB1 released by damaged cells acts as a chemoattractant, as well as a proinflammatory cytokine, suggesting that HMGB1 is tightly connected to the process of tissue organization. However, the role of HMGB1 in bone and cartilage that undergo remodeling during embryogenesis, tissue repair, and disease is largely unknown. We show here that the stage-specific secretion of HMGB1 in cartilage regulates endochondral ossification. We analyzed the skeletal development of Hmgb1−/− mice during embryogenesis and found that endochondral ossification is significantly impaired due to the delay of cartilage invasion by osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and blood vessels. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that HMGB1 protein accumulated in the cytosol of hypertrophic chondrocytes at growth plates, and its extracellular release from the chondrocytes was verified by organ culture. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the chondrocyte-secreted HMGB1 functions as a chemoattractant for osteoclasts and osteoblasts, as well as for endothelial cells, further supporting the conclusion that Hmgb1−/− mice are defective in cell invasion. Collectively, these findings suggest that HMGB1 released from differentiating chondrocytes acts, at least in part, as a regulator of endochondral ossification during osteogenesis.
Bone formation occurs through two developmental processes: intramembranous ossification and endochondral ossification. Intramembranous ossification takes place in several craniofacial bones and the lateral part of clavicles, whereas endochondral ossification occurs in the long bones of the limbs, the basal part of the skull, vertebrae, ribs, and the medial part of the clavicles. In endochondral ossification, an intermediate step occurs during which cartilaginous templates prefigure future skeletal elements and play a major role in regulating the developing skeletal elements (33). First, mononucleated osteoclast precursors enter the mesenchyme surrounding the bone rudiments, proliferate, differentiate into tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive cells, and migrate together with endothelial cells through the nascent bone collar (7). Subsequently, they invade the calcified cartilage, filling the core of the diaphysis while fusing and differentiating into mature osteoclasts, and transform the core of the bone into a marrow cavity (15). Osteoclasts are derived from hematopoietic precursor cells formed by the fusion of monocytic cells at the bone sites to be resorbed, whereas osteoblasts arise from multipotential mesenchymal cells and further differentiate into bone-lining cells and osteocytes (30).
These events, including osteoclast migration and angiogenesis during endochondral ossification, are tightly coordinated by extracellular factors, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (37). When neovascularization of the cartilage anlage begins, membrane type 1 MMP (MT1-MMP) and MMP9 are expressed in the preosteoclasts and other chondroclastic cells of unknown origins (23). Mice deficient in Mmp9 exhibit a delay in osteoclast recruitment in specialized invasion and bone resorption models in vitro (15). It is also reported that the deletion of functional Mmp13 has profound effects on skeletal development (25). In Mmp13-null embryos, the growth plates were strikingly lengthened, a defect related predominantly to a delay in terminal events in the growth plates, with failure to resorb collagens, as well as a delay in ossification at the primary centers. In addition, VEGF signaling plays an important role of angiogenesis during skeletal development (59). Inhibition of VEGF by the administration of a soluble chimeric VEGF receptor protein to 24-day-old mice inhibited blood vessel invasion into the hypertrophic zone of long bone growth plates and resulted in impaired trabecular bone formation and expansion of the hypertrophic zone (17).
High mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) is a chromatin protein that is widely expressed and extremely conserved in mammals. There are three HMGB proteins: HMGB1, HMGB2, and HMGB3 with >80% amino acid identity, which are composed of two basic HMG-box domains (A and B) and a long acidic C-terminal tail (10). As a nuclear factor, HMGB1 acts as an architectural protein that can bend DNA to promote nucleoprotein interactions and facilitate diverse DNA modifications (2). Several groups have shown that HMGB1 also has an extracellular role as a proinflammatory cytokine (4, 51, 55). Two different routes for HMGB1 release into the extracellular milieu have been reported: active secretion by activated macrophages and monocytes (54) and passive release from necrotic or damaged cells (45). HMGB1 released by damaged cells acts as a chemoattractant for vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts and induces cytoskeleton reorganization and cell migration (13). HMGB1 also promotes the migration of local stem cells, such as vessel-associated stem cells (mesoangioblasts) (38), and endothelial cells (32, 46), suggesting that HMGB1 is tightly connected to the process of tissue organization. The biological relevance of HMGB1 in vivo was shown in Hmgb1−/− mice, which have a highly pleiotropic phenotype such as the inability to use glycogen stored in the liver (11). These mice survive for several days if given glucose parenterally; however, mutants remained much smaller than control littermates and had arched backs, posterior limbs splayed wide apart, and abnormal gait. These findings suggested that HMGB1 may participate in not only tissue repair after injury but also the organization of bone and cartilage development.
We show here that the stage-specific secretion of HMGB1 in cartilage regulates endochondral ossification, in part, by acting as a chemotactic factor for the cells that invade at the primary ossification center. These findings highlight the potential role of HMGB1 in skeletal homeostasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice.
The Hmgb1−/− mutant mice used in the present study were described before (11), except for their background, which is now pure BALB/c. All animal experiments were performed according to approved protocols according to institutional guidelines at The Scripps Research Institute. Mouse embryos for histomorphometry were littermates from Hmgb1+/− parents. The genotype of the mice was determined by PCR analysis of tail DNA. The wild-type Hmgb1 allele was detected by PCR with the primers wildtype-1 (5′-GCA GGC TTC GTT GTT TTC ATA CAG-3′) and wildtype-2 (5′-TCA AAG AGT AAT ACT GCC ACC TTC-3′), which generate a 495-bp fragment. The mutant Hmgb1 allele was detected by using two primers complementary to the neomycin resistance gene—Neo-1 (5′-TGG TTT GCA GTG TTC TGC CTA GC-3′) and Neo-2 (5′-CCC AGT CAT AGC CGA ATA GCC-3′)—which generate a 336-bp fragment.
Histological analysis.
Mice were sacrificed at various embryonic stages, dissected, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-phosphate-buffered saline at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, they were processed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. For HMGB1 immunostaining, rabbit anti-HMGB1 antibody (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and chicken anti-HMGB1 antibody (Shino-Test, Kanagawa, Japan) were used for limb sections and organ culture sections, respectively (51). For CD31 immunostaining, embryos were infiltrated in 20% sucrose, followed by OCT embedding to stain with rat anti-PECAM antibody (Pharmingen) and von Kossa and Safranin O/Fast Green staining (47). Whole-mount alcian blue and alizarin red S staining of skeletons were done as described previously (31), and the longitudinal diameters of calvariae, as well as the lengths and alizarin-positive regions of tibias, were measured by micrometer. Detection of apoptotic cells in paraffin sections of limbs was based on a modification of genomic DNA utilizing terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TUNEL [terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling] assay) and indirect detection of positive cells by fluorescein conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody using a MEBSTAIN Apoptosis Kit Direct (Medical and Biological laboratories, Nagoya, Japan). Immunofluorescence assay to determine HMGB1 translocation in chondrocytes was carried out with rabbit anti-HMGB1 antibody (Pharmingen) as described before (51).
Using a leukocyte acid phosphatase kit from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), TRAP staining was performed on paraffin sections according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. The determination of the numbers and distribution of TRAP-positive cells in longitudinal sections of bones was done as described previously (7, 56).
In situ hybridization.
Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-phosphate-buffered saline overnight at 4°C, processed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. RNA in situ hybridization was performed as described previously (3). Briefly, slides were deparaffinized, treated with proteinase K (1 μg/ml) for 20 min at 37°C, and hybridized with 35S-labeled antisense riboprobes in hybridization buffer (50% deionized formamide, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mg of yeast tRNA/ml, 10% dextran sulfate, and 1× Denhardt solution) in a humidified chamber at 60°C overnight. After hybridization, the slides were treated with RNase A, washed to a final stringency of 50% formamide, 2× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) at 60°C, dipped in emulsion, exposed for 3 days to 3 weeks, and developed. The probes for Indian hedgehog, MMP9, VEGF and MMP13, MT1-MMP, Runx2 and Osterix, and osteocalcin and osteopontin were provided by Y. Kawakami (Salk Institute), S. M. Krane (Harvard Medical School), Z. Werb (University of California, San Francisco), T. Vu (University of California, San Francisco), K. Nakashima (Tokyo Medical and Dental University), and S. Nomura (Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine), respectively. The HMGB1 probe was a 1.2-kb cDNA fragment encoding the COOH-terminal domain and the 3′-untranslated region (UTR). The Col1a1 probe was a 0.8-kb cDNA fragment encoding the COOH-terminal domain.
Organ culture.
Metatarsal bones and tibiae were harvested from mouse embryos at embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5) and E14.5, respectively. They were cultured for 5 days in conditioned medium as described previously (20). The expression levels of HMGB1 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the supernatant were assessed by immunoblotting with rabbit anti-HMGB1 antibody (Pharmingen) and goat anti-LDH antibody (Chemicon, Temecula, CA) as described previously (45). Rib chondrocytes were purified from the ventral parts of rib cartilage of 2- to 4-day-old BALB/c mice (28), followed by induction of necrosis as described previously (45), and were used as a positive control for the HMGB1 protein. The concentrations of HMGB1 released into conditioned supernatant were measured in triplicate with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using commercially available kits (Shino-Test) (57).
Preparation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts.
Human osteoclast precursor cells (Poietics; Cambrex Bio Science Walkersville, Inc., Walkersville, MD) were cultured in alpha-minimal essential medium (alpha-MEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin-streptomycin, and HEPES containing alpha-MEM medium with receptor activator of nuclear factor B ligand (RANKL; PeproTech EC, Ltd., London, United Kingdom) and M-CSF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Cells were incubated in a CO2 incubator in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C. After complete osteoclast differentiation at day 7, the medium was replaced with serum-free alpha-MEM; the cells were starved for 2 h and then used for chemotaxis assays. MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and cultured in alpha-MEM with 10% fetal bovine serum.
Chemotaxis assays.
Chemotaxis assays were performed as described previously (22). The assays were carried out in Boyden chambers with polycarbonate filters with 9-μm pores (Corning Costar, Corning, NY). Osteoclasts were prepared by sequential treatment with trypsin, and the remaining cells were then gently lifted off the plates with a rubber policeman. The osteoclasts were seeded in 48-transwell plates in alpha-MEM containing 0.1% (wt/vol) Albumax and kept for 4 h with or without addition of rat cytokine-quality HMGB1 (obtained from HMGBiotech, Milan, Italy) and VEGF (R&D Systems). Invasion was determined as the ratio of osteoclasts that migrated through the collagen gel to reach the lower side of the membrane compared to the total number of osteoclasts in the insert. The chemotaxis assays for MC3T3-E1 cells were also performed according to the method as described above. All experiments were performed at least twice in four replicates.
Three-dimensional pellet culture.
Mice rib chondrocytes were prepared from the ventral parts rib cartilage of 2- to 4-day-old C57BL/6 mice as described previously (36). Human articular chondrocytes were isolated from human cartilage, and a primary cell culture was established (21). Both types of chondrocytes were cultured in three-dimensional cell pellets for 18 days as described before (5). Briefly, 1-ml aliquots containing 2 × 105 cells each were added to 15-ml conical polypropylene centrifuge tubes (Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA), and the cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 600 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. The cultures were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Pellets were maintained up to 18 days in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium-F-12 supplemented with 50 μg of ascorbate phosphate (Sigma)/ml, 100 μg of pyruvate/ml, 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY), and 50 mg of ITS+Premix (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA; a final concentration of 6.25 μg of bovine insulin/ml, 6.25 μg of transferrin/ml, 6.25 ng of selenous acid/ml, 1.25 mg of bovine serum albumin/ml, and 5.35 μg of linoleic acid/ml)/ml. The medium was changed every 3 days. Cryostat-sectioned pellets were used for immunofluorescence assay. The supernatant of pelleted mouse rib chondrocytes and human articular chondrocytes was used for chemotaxis assay with or without addition of anti-HMGB1 IgY neutralizing HMGB1, a gift from Shino-Test (1), and control IgY (Promega, Madison, WI).
Quantitative PCR.
Total RNA was extracted and oligo(dT)-primed cDNA was prepared from 500 ng of total RNA by using Superscript II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The resulting cDNAs were analyzed by using the SYBR green system for quantitative analysis of specific transcripts according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). All mRNA expression data were normalized to GAPDH expression in the corresponding sample. The primers used in real-time PCR are as follows: Col10a1, 5′-GCCTCAAATACCCTTTCTGC (sense) and 5′-GTGTCTTGGGGCTAGCAAGT (antisense); MMP13, 5′-GAAGACCTTGTGTTTGCAGAGC (sense) and 5′-CTCGGAGCCTGTCAACTGTG (antisense); Hmgb1, 5′-GGCTGACAAGGCTCGTTATG (sense) and 5′-GGGCGGTACTCAGAACAGAA (antisense); and GAPDH, 5′-ATGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCTGA (sense) and 5′-GATGCCTGCTTCACCACCTT (antisense).
Statistics.
The statistical analysis at present study was performed by using a two-tailed Student t test.
RESULTS
Analysis of skeletal development in Hmgb1−/− mice.
We first examined bone and cartilage development in Hmgb1−/− mice. Since Hmgb1−/− mice die soon after birth (11), we analyzed Hmgb1−/− embryos. Alcian blue staining revealed no apparent difference in skeletal formation between Hmgb1−/− and wild-type littermate embryos at E13.5 (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). At E16.5, however, Hmgb1−/− embryos were smaller than wild-type embryos, suggesting a discrepancy during ossification (Fig. 1A). At this stage, facial and skull bones formed by intramembranous ossification appeared similar between the two groups, although the shape of Hmgb1−/− calvariae was relatively flat and depressed. In contrast, sphenoid bones and the basioccipital region of the chondrocranium, which are formed by endochondral ossification, appeared to be reduced in size and in intensity of alizarin red staining in Hmgb1−/− mice (Fig. 1B). Other bones formed by endochondral ossification, such as the pelvis, had smaller alizarin red-stained zones (Fig. 1C). The radius and ulna of Hmgb1−/− forelimbs were not only reduced in size and calcification but abnormally bent, suggesting a reduction of mineralization (Fig. 1D). Moreover, fractures were observed in the humeri of some (4 of 14) Hmgb1−/− mice. Thorax formation showed severe hypoplasia accompanied by spinal scoliosis (Fig. 1E) and kyphosis (Fig. 1A). Ribs stained less intensely for alizarin red and were thin and bent (Fig. 1F). The clavicles were hypoplastic and crooked (Fig. 1G). At E16.5, the diameters of calvariae were similar in both groups, whereas the lengths of the Hmgb1−/− tibias reached 87% of that of the wild type, and the alizarin-positive region reached 64% of the wild-type length (Fig. 1H). These findings suggest that in Hmgb1−/− mice endochondral ossification is impaired, whereas intramembranous ossification is only affected slightly and was not investigated further.
HMGB1 expression in normal growth plates.
To investigate the mechanism of endochondral ossification defect in Hmgb1−/− embryos, we examined the localization of HMGB1 protein in the developing limbs of normal wild-type mice by immunohistochemistry. Safranin O staining showed that prehypertrophic cartilage appeared in the tibia at E14.5 (Fig. 2A), differentiating into hypertrophic cartilage, followed by calcified cartilage at E15.5 (Fig. 2C), and was replaced by bone marrow and bone trabeculae at E16.5 (Fig. 2E). By using the specific anti-HMGB1 polyclonal rabbit antibody which does not detect HMGB2 and HMGB3 (19), we found that HMGB1 was expressed in the prehypertrophic chondrocytes of the tibia at E14.5 (Fig. 2B) and in hypertrophic chondrocytes at E15.5 (Fig. 2D). Large magnifications of the humerus at E15.5 showed that HMGB1 was detected in the nuclei of prehypertrophic chondrocytes and in the cytosol of hypertrophic chondrocytes (Fig. 2G). On the other hand, resting and proliferating chondrocytes did not show any positive staining in either nuclei or cytoplasm. Not only large long bones but also other small long bones formed by endochondral ossification, such as metacarpal bones, exhibited HMGB1 expression in the nuclei of prehypertrophic chondrocytes, as well as in the cytoplasm of hypertrophic chondrocytes (Fig. 2H). This positive staining in hypertrophic cartilage was absent in Hmgb1−/− sections (Fig. 2I). These results indicate that HMGB1 is expressed and translocated from the nucleus to the cytosol during a specific stage of cartilage maturation. At the end of the cascade of chondrocyte maturation, terminal hypertrophic chondrocytes undergo apoptotic cell death (17). We analyzed HMGB1 expression and apoptosis in the radius at E15.5 and detected HMGB1 in hypertrophic chondrocytes (Fig. 2J) but not in terminal hypertrophic chondrocytes, which were positive for TUNEL staining (Fig. 2K), suggesting that HMGB1 was expressed just before cell death.
Impaired invasion of osteoclasts in Hmgb1−/− mice.
Next, we sought to identify which process during endochondral ossification was disturbed by Hmgb1 gene deficiency. To examine the rate of hypertrophic chondrocyte differentiation, we observed the expression of Indian hedgehog, a marker of prehypertrophic chondrocytes of cartilage elements (52), and found that it did not differ between wild-type (Fig. 3A) and Hmgb1−/− (Fig. 3B) tibias. Col10a1 appeared in the region of hypertrophic chondrocytes at E14.5 (Fig. 3C and D) and then declined in the most mature hypertrophic chondrocytes at the center of hypertrophic zones at E15.5 with a similar pattern in both groups (Fig. 3E and F). These findings indicate that Hmgb1 gene deficiency does not affect the onset of cartilage maturation. In contrast, MMP9-positive osteoclastic cells (53) were distributed around the perichondrium in the tibias and radii of wild-type mice at E15.5 (Fig. 4A and C) but were barely detectable in Hmgb1−/− bones (Fig. 4B and D). At E16.5, the discrepancy became more remarkable. In the wild-type radius, MMP9-positive cells were lining the transverse septae of cartilage-bone junctions that lead the vascular invasion front (Fig. 4E), whereas they were still located in the primary ossification center in Hmgb1−/− radius (Fig. 4F). The expression of MT1-MMP, which is highly expressed in osteoclasts (44), was similar to that of MMP9 (Fig. 4G and H). To confirm the apparent reduction in osteoclast numbers, we stained for TRAP and found significant reduction in the number of TRAP-positive cells in Hmgb1−/− tibias at E15.5 (Fig. 4I and J). Quantification of the number of these cells inside versus outside the calcified hypertrophic cartilage showed a significant difference between wild-type and Hmgb1−/− tibias (Fig. 4K). These findings demonstrate that osteoclast recruitment was suppressed in the Hmgb1−/− bones.
Altered vascularization of skeletal elements in Hmgb1−/− mice during development.
MMP9-positive cells enter the mesenchyme surrounding the bone rudiments and migrate together with endothelial cells through the nascent bone collar at the primary ossification center (15). Thus, we examined the vascularization in skeletal elements of Hmgb1−/− mice. Safranin O staining revealed that blood vessel invasion into the hypertrophic zone occurred in wild-type tibias at E15.5 (Fig. 5A) but not in Hmgb1−/− tibias (Fig. 5B). At E16.5, hypertrophic cartilage was replaced by bone marrow and bone trabeculae in wild-type mice (Fig. 5C). In contrast, the primary ossification center of Hmgb1−/− tibias was still intact with a wide hypertrophic zone and only the onset of blood vessel invasion (Fig. 5D). Using CD31 (PECAM) antibody, which is a marker of endothelial cells, we performed immunostaining and found that blood vessels started to invade the hypertrophic zone of wild-type tibia at E15.5 (Fig. 5E), but they were only on the surface of Hmgb1−/− tibia (Fig. 5F). At E16.5, blood vessels had fully penetrated into the primary ossification center and distributed in bone marrow in wild-type tibia (Fig. 5G), whereas they were still only surrounding the hypertrophic cartilage in Hmgb1−/− bone (Fig. 5H). At the growth plate, hypertrophic cartilage expresses VEGF, and inhibition of VEGF activity blocks the recruitment of MMP9-positive and TRAP-positive cells, as well as endothelial cells (17). We found no difference in VEGF expression in hypertrophic cartilage between wild-type and Hmgb1−/− tibia at E15.5 (Fig. 5I and J). MMP13, which is expressed by both terminal hypertrophic chondrocytes and osteoblasts, is also important for the vascularization of hypertrophic cartilage because it degrades native collagen, a major component of the hypertrophic cartilage (47). MMP13 expression in the calcified cartilage of the wild-type tibia resembled that of the Hmgb1−/− tibia (Fig. 5K and L). Taken together, these findings suggest that the cell invasion into hypertrophic cartilage by endothelial cells was disrupted in Hmgb1−/− bones during the process of endochondral ossification, although VEGF and MMP13 expression was unaltered.
Osteogenesis in Hmgb1−/− mice.
As shown in Fig. 1, Hmgb1−/− forelimbs appeared to be reduced in size and calcification and were abnormally bent or fractured. Since these findings suggest a reduction of bone mineralization, we investigated osteoblast differentiation in Hmgb1−/− bones. Using von Kossa staining, we found that calcified cartilage had progressed to bone marrow in the radii and ulnas of wild-type mice (Fig. 6A) but not in Hmgb1−/− mice (Fig. 6B). Osteopontin, a hypertrophic cartilage marker as well as an osteoblast marker (35), was strongly expressed in the calcified hypertrophic cartilage of Hmgb1−/− bones (Fig. 6D) in which Col1a1-positive cells, an early marker of osteoblast differentiation (18), were not found; these cells were accumulated at the collar surrounding the growth plate (Fig. 6F). In contrast, Col1a1-positive cells were widely distributed in the bone marrow of wild-type mice (Fig. 6E), suggesting that osteoblast invasion was suppressed in Hmgb1−/− limbs. The essential transcription factors for osteoblast differentiation, Runx2 (27) and Osterix (34), were highly expressed in the primary ossification center of the wild-type radius (Fig. 6G and I), whereas they were barely detectable in the Hmgb1−/− bones (Fig. 6H and J). Osteocalcin, which is thought to be a terminal marker for osteoblastic maturation (29), was found at the periphery of hypertrophic cartilage in Hmgb1−/− bones at E16.5 (Fig. 6L); however, it appeared in the bone marrow at E17.5 (data not shown) rather than at E16.5 as in wild-type mice (Fig. 6K). Thus, the delay in primary ossification of Hmgb1−/− hypertrophic cartilage was coupled to a delay in recruitment of osteoblasts, suggesting that subsequent osteoblastic differentiation progressed similarly in wild-type and Hmgb1−/− mice.
HMGB1 is released from differentiating cartilage in organ culture.
To examine the secretion of HMGB1 from chondrocytes, we used the cartilage organ culture system (20). Metatarsal bones were isolated from embryos at E15.5 and cultured in conditioned medium for up to 5 days. Immunohistochemistry revealed that HMGB1 was localized in hypertrophic chondrocytes on day 2 (Fig. 7A) and that expression was attenuated on day 5 (Fig. 7B). Von Kossa staining of the adjacent sections indicated that this expression occurred in hypertrophic cartilage and not in calcified cartilage (Fig. 7C and D). Using immunoblotting, we determined that HMGB1 was present in the supernatant, with a peak 3 days after the start of organ culture, and then it decreased (Fig. 7E), showing that HMGB1 was released into the medium by hypertrophic chondrocytes. This result was reproduced with a large long bone, the tibia, which was isolated from the embryos at E14.5 (Fig. 7F). Immunoblotting with LDH antibody was negative, indicating that HMGB1 was actively secreted and not released passively as a consequence of necrotic cell death (Fig. 7G). Using ELISA, we quantified the HMGB1 protein released into the medium of tibia organ culture and found that it peaked on days 3 through 5 at concentrations of >10 ng/ml (Fig. 7H).
HMGB1 is released specifically from hypertrophic chondrocytes.
It has been previously demonstrated that HMGB1 is released from osteoclasts and osteoblast-like cells (12, 42). To prove that the release of HMGB1 into the supernatant was from chondrocytes in organ culture, we used pellet cultures of rib growth plate chondrocytes, since this culture system mimics in vivo cartilage differentiation (5). Monolayer chondrocytes isolated from the ventral parts of mouse rib cartilage expressed HMGB1 only in the nucleus; however, when cultured as differentiating cell pellets, HMGB1 was localized in the cytosol (Fig. 8A). Extracellular HMGB1 was detected in the supernatant of pelleted rib chondrocytes on days 1 and 2; in contrast, articular chondrocytes, which do not differentiate to hypertrophic cartilage under the three-dimensional condition such as pellet or alginate culture (6, 40), did not release HMGB1 (Fig. 8B). Immunoblotting with LDH antibody showed that HMGB1 release was not caused by necrotic cell death (Fig. 8C). In addition, to examine HMGB1 expression in longer-term cultures, we maintained the rib chondrocyte pellets for 18 days. Quantitative PCR demonstrated that mRNA of cartilage maturation markers such as Col10a1 and MMP13 increased significantly, showing that chondrocyte differentiation had occurred (Fig. 8D). Only the medium from day 3 contained HMGB1 (Fig. 8E), although the mRNA level of HMGB1 did not significantly change between day 3 and 18. These results indicate that HMGB1 is secreted during the early phase of cartilage maturation.
HMGB1 is a chemoattractant for osteoclasts and osteoblasts.
As we showed in Fig. 4, 5, and 6, Hmgb1−/− embryos were defective in invasion by TRAP- and Col1a1-positive cells, as well as CD31-positive cells, at the primary ossification center. Since HMGB1 has chemotactic effects on endothelial cells (32, 46), we tested for similar effects on osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Recombinant HMGB1 at 10 ng/ml recruited osteoclasts in Boyden chambers, and peak migration occurred at 100 ng/ml; this level of efficacy was similar to that of VEGF used as a positive control (22) (Fig. 9A). Addition of HMGB1 to the upper chamber did not significantly activate osteoclast migration. HMGB1 also induced chemotaxis for MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells with a tendency similar to that described above (Fig. 9B), although VEGF did not (16). These findings suggest that osteoclast and osteoblast invasion at the primary ossification center might be a direct effect of HMGB1-induced chemoattraction.
Finally, we investigated whether HMGB1 released by differentiating chondrocytes could promote osteoclast migration. Using the supernatant of pelleted rib chondrocytes and articular chondrocytes cultured for 3 days (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), we compared the chemotactic effect for osteoclasts. The supernatant of articular chondrocytes did not recruit osteoclasts; however, the supernatant of rib chondrocytes attracted osteoclasts significantly, and the effect was abrogated by neutralizing anti-HMGB1 IgY (Fig. 9C). This result supports our hypothesis that differentiating chondrocytes could regulate cell migration directly via HMGB1 secretion.
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrates that the stage-specific secretion of HMGB1 in cartilage regulates endochondral ossification, at least in part, by acting as a chemotactic factor for osteoclasts and osteoblasts, as well as endothelial cells. We examined skeletal development in Hmgb1−/− embryos and found significant alterations in the bones formed by endochondral ossification, whereas calvariae, which are formed by intramembranous ossification, were somewhat misshapen, but the effect was slight, and the cartilage formation was not affected. The analysis of Hmgb1−/− limb sections revealed that the onset of cartilage differentiation was similar in Hmgb1−/− and wild-type embryos; however, the invasion of TRAP- and Col1a1-positive cells, as well as CD31-positive cells, into the primary ossification center was remarkably impaired in Hmgb1−/− limbs. Thus, the Hmgb1−/− growth plates are strikingly lengthened and deficient in osteoblast and osteoclast invasion as well as vascularization, which may result in weak bones that can bend or fracture.
To examine the expression of HMGB1 in developing limbs, we used in situ hybridization: HMGB1 mRNA expression was ubiquitous in the cells of all zones of the growth plate from E14.5 through E16.5 (data not shown). In contrast, HMGB1 protein was present in the nuclei of prehypertrophic chondrocytes in tibia at E14.5 and in the cytosol of hypertrophic chondrocytes at E15.5 but was not detectable in resting and proliferating chondrocytes. The active secretion of HMGB1 from chondrocytes was verified with organ culture and pellet culture systems; we found that HMGB1 was translocated from the nucleus to the cytosol and actively secreted at the early phase of chondrocyte differentiation, but the secretion ceased at the late phase. Interestingly, secretion from pelleted rib chondrocytes occurred actively without added any stimulatory factor, whereas articular chondrocytes did not release HMGB1 in pellet culture. Chondrocyte-secreted HMGB1 was sufficient to chemoattract osteoclasts and osteoblasts, as well as endothelial cells as previously shown by others (32, 46). These findings suggest that HMGB1 released from hypertrophic chondrocytes may regulate skeletal development by controlling cell invasion into the growth plate. At present, however, a potential role of HMGB1 as a nuclear factor, which is its other function, still remains possible in the developing cartilage.
Secretion of HMGB1 during specific stages of cell differentiation is not unique to chondrocytes and has been reported for dendritic cells (14) and neonatal rat type I astrocytes (41), although the mechanism of HMGB1 secretion during cell differentiation has yet to be elucidated. Thus far, Bonaldi et al. have reported that HMGB1 contains two nuclear localization signals (NLSs), and the acetylation of both NLSs is involved in the transport from the nucleus to the cytosol (8). Furthermore, HMGB1 can be phosphorylated, and the direction of transport is regulated by phosphorylation of both NLS regions (58). These findings suggest that HMGB1 release is independent from RNA expression and protein synthesis, which is compatible with our data showing that HMGB1 mRNA levels do not change in chondrocyte pellet cultures, despite its secretion.
The inhibition of the interaction between HMGB1 and the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), which is a specific receptor for HMGB1, suppresses the tumor proliferation, metastatic invasion, and expression of MMPs (48). RAGE is expressed in osteoclasts, osteoblasts (12), and endothelial cells (9), suggesting that RAGE might be associated with cell invasion during endochondral ossification; however, an analysis of Rage−/− mice (1) showed no alteration in skeletal development during embryogenesis (see Fig. S1B in the supplemental material). Moreover, Rage−/− mice manifest increased bone mass and bone mineral density and decreased bone resorptive activity due to a defect in osteoclast function (60). In our hands, however, MMP9 mRNA levels in calvariae at E18.5 were similar between wild-type and Hmgb1−/− mice (see Fig. S3A in the supplemental material), and MMP9-positive cells emerged in the bone marrow of developing limbs of both types of mice at E18.5 (see Fig. S3B in the supplemental material). The evidence that HMGB1-RAGE interaction is sufficient but not necessary for mesoangioblast migration (38) is a precedent for the idea that RAGE may not be the key receptor for HMGB1-induced cell recruitment at the primary ossification center. Additional HMGB1 receptors have been identified, including Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 (39), which appear in osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and endothelial cells (26, 49, 50), and syndecan (43), which is expressed in osteoblasts (24).
Our results indicate that HMGB1 might be important not only for tissue repair after injury but also for the organization of bone and cartilage development in the embryo. In endochondral ossification, a region of resting chondrocytes transforms into a zone of proliferating chondrocytes that then undergo hypertrophy and subsequently apoptosis (37). HMGB1 release from the hypertrophic cartilage occurs just before programmed cell death (Fig. 10), suggesting that HMGB1 may be an extracellular signal released from the tissue to be replaced (cartilage) toward the cells of new tissue to be formed (bone and bone marrow).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Yasuhiko Kawakami and Thiennu Vu for helpful discussions; Kim Henriksen, Noriyuki Namba, and Chisa Shukunami for technical advice; Yasuhiko Yamamoto and Hiroshi Yamamoto for providing Rage−/− mice; and Shingo Yamada for providing the neutralizing anti-HMGB1 IgY and ELISA kit. We especially thank Lilo Creighton for her excellent immunohistochemical technique.
This study was supported by grants from the NIH (AR47360, AR50631, and AG07996), NIBI (ID05-24), Arthritis Foundation, JST SORST, Genome Network Project (MEXT), and Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research (MEXT) (H.A.) and a postdoctoral fellowship of the Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology and Research Grant for Rheumatology Disease, Japan Rheumatism Foundation (N.T.).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 4 June 2007.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/.
REFERENCES
- 1.Abeyama, K., D. M. Stern, Y. Ito, K. Kawahara, Y. Yoshimoto, M. Tanaka, T. Uchimura, N. Ida, Y. Yamazaki, S. Yamada, Y. Yamamoto, H. Yamamoto, S. Iino, N. Taniguchi, and I. Maruyama. 2005. The N-terminal domain of thrombomodulin sequesters high-mobility group-B1 protein, a novel antiinflammatory mechanism. J. Clin. Investig. 115:1267-1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Agresti, A., and M. E. Bianchi. 2003. HMGB proteins and gene expression. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13:170-178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Albrecht, U., G. Eichele, J. A. Helms, and H. Lu. 1997. Molecular and cellular methods in developmental toxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
- 4.Andersson, U., H. Wang, K. Palmblad, A. C. Aveberger, O. Bloom, H. Erlandsson-Harris, A. Janson, R. Kokkola, M. Zhang, H. Yang, and K. J. Tracey. 2000. High mobility group 1 protein (HMG-1) stimulates proinflammatory cytokine synthesis in human monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 192:565-570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ballock, R. T., and A. H. Reddi. 1994. Thyroxine is the serum factor that regulates morphogenesis of columnar cartilage from isolated chondrocytes in chemically defined medium. J. Cell Biol. 126:1311-1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Binette, F., D. P. McQuaid, D. R. Haudenschild, P. C. Yaeger, J. M. McPherson, and R. Tubo. 1998. Expression of a stable articular cartilage phenotype without evidence of hypertrophy by adult human articular chondrocytes in vitro. J. Orthop. Res. 16:207-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blavier, L., and J. M. Delaisse. 1995. Matrix metalloproteinases are obligatory for the migration of preosteoclasts to the developing marrow cavity of primitive long bones. J. Cell Sci. 108(Pt. 12):3649-3659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bonaldi, T., F. Talamo, P. Scaffidi, D. Ferrera, A. Porto, A. Bachi, A. Rubartelli, A. Agresti, and M. E. Bianchi. 2003. Monocytic cells hyperacetylate chromatin protein HMGB1 to redirect it toward secretion. EMBO J. 22:5551-5560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brett, J., A. M. Schmidt, S. D. Yan, Y. S. Zou, E. Weidman, D. Pinsky, R. Nowygrod, M. Neeper, C. Przysiecki, A. Shaw, et al. 1993. Survey of the distribution of a newly characterized receptor for advanced glycation end products in tissues. Am. J. Pathol. 143:1699-1712. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bustin, M. 1999. Regulation of DNA-dependent activities by the functional motifs of the high-mobility-group chromosomal proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:5237-5246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Calogero, S., F. Grassi, A. Aguzzi, T. Voigtlander, P. Ferrier, S. Ferrari, and M. E. Bianchi. 1999. The lack of chromosomal protein Hmg1 does not disrupt cell growth but causes lethal hypoglycaemia in newborn mice. Nat. Genet. 22:276-280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Charoonpatrapong, K., R. Shah, A. G. Robling, M. Alvarez, D. W. Clapp, S. Chen, R. P. Kopp, F. M. Pavalko, J. Yu, and J. P. Bidwell. 2006. HMGB1 expression and release by bone cells. J. Cell Physiol. 207:480-490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Degryse, B., T. Bonaldi, P. Scaffidi, S. Muller, M. Resnati, F. Sanvito, G. Arrigoni, and M. E. Bianchi. 2001. The high mobility group (HMG) boxes of the nuclear protein HMG1 induce chemotaxis and cytoskeleton reorganization in rat smooth muscle cells. J. Cell Biol. 152:1197-1206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dumitriu, I. E., P. Baruah, B. Valentinis, R. E. Voll, M. Herrmann, P. P. Nawroth, B. Arnold, M. E. Bianchi, A. A. Manfredi, and P. Rovere-Querini. 2005. Release of high mobility group box 1 by dendritic cells controls T-cell activation via the receptor for advanced glycation end products. J. Immunol. 174:7506-7515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Engsig, M. T., Q. J. Chen, T. H. Vu, A. C. Pedersen, B. Therkidsen, L. R. Lund, K. Henriksen, T. Lenhard, N. T. Foged, Z. Werb, and J. M. Delaisse. 2000. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 and vascular endothelial growth factor are essential for osteoclast recruitment into developing long bones. J. Cell Biol. 151:879-889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fukuyama, R., T. Fujita, Y. Azuma, A. Hirano, H. Nakamuta, M. Koida, and T. Komori. 2004. Statins inhibit osteoblast migration by inhibiting Rac-Akt signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 315:636-642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gerber, H. P., T. H. Vu, A. M. Ryan, J. Kowalski, Z. Werb, and N. Ferrara. 1999. VEGF couples hypertrophic cartilage remodeling, ossification and angiogenesis during endochondral bone formation. Nat. Med. 5:623-628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gerstenfeld, L. C., S. D. Chipman, J. Glowacki, and J. B. Lian. 1987. Expression of differentiated function by mineralizing cultures of chicken osteoblasts. Dev. Biol. 122:49-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guazzi, S., A. Strangio, A. T. Franzi, and M. E. Bianchi. 2003. HMGB1, an architectural chromatin protein and extracellular signalling factor, has a spatially and temporally restricted expression pattern in mouse brain. Gene Expr. Patterns 3:29-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haaijman, A., R. N. D'Souza, A. L. Bronckers, S. W. Goei, and E. H. Burger. 1997. OP-1 (BMP-7) affects mRNA expression of type I, II, X collagen, and matrix Gla protein in ossifying long bones in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12:1815-1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hashimoto, S., R. L. Ochs, F. Rosen, J. Quach, G. McCabe, J. Solan, J. E. Seegmiller, R. Terkeltaub, and M. Lotz. 1998. Chondrocyte-derived apoptotic bodies and calcification of articular cartilage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3094-3099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Henriksen, K., M. Karsdal, J. M. Delaisse, and M. T. Engsig. 2003. RANKL and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induce osteoclast chemotaxis through an ERK1/2-dependent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 278:48745-48753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Holmbeck, K., P. Bianco, J. Caterina, S. Yamada, M. Kromer, S. A. Kuznetsov, M. Mankani, P. G. Robey, A. R. Poole, I. Pidoux, J. M. Ward, and H. Birkedal-Hansen. 1999. MT1-MMP-deficient mice develop dwarfism, osteopenia, arthritis, and connective tissue disease due to inadequate collagen turnover. Cell 99:81-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Imai, S., M. Kaksonen, E. Raulo, T. Kinnunen, C. Fages, X. Meng, M. Lakso, and H. Rauvala. 1998. Osteoblast recruitment and bone formation enhanced by cell matrix-associated heparin-binding growth-associated molecule (HB-GAM). J. Cell Biol. 143:1113-1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Inada, M., Y. Wang, M. H. Byrne, M. U. Rahman, C. Miyaura, C. Lopez-Otin, and S. M. Krane. 2004. Critical roles for collagenase-3 (Mmp13) in development of growth plate cartilage and in endochondral ossification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:17192-17197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kikuchi, T., T. Matsuguchi, N. Tsuboi, A. Mitani, S. Tanaka, M. Matsuoka, G. Yamamoto, T. Hishikawa, T. Noguchi, and Y. Yoshikai. 2001. Gene expression of osteoclast differentiation factor is induced by lipopolysaccharide in mouse osteoblasts via Toll-like receptors. J. Immunol. 166:3574-3579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Komori, T., H. Yagi, S. Nomura, A. Yamaguchi, K. Sasaki, K. Deguchi, Y. Shimizu, R. T. Bronson, Y. H. Gao, M. Inada, M. Sato, R. Okamoto, Y. Kitamura, S. Yoshiki, and T. Kishimoto. 1997. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 89:755-764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lefebvre, V., S. Garofalo, G. Zhou, M. Metsaranta, E. Vuorio, and B. De Crombrugghe. 1994. Characterization of primary cultures of chondrocytes from type II collagen/beta-galactosidase transgenic mice. Matrix Biol. 14:329-335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lian, J. B., G. S. Stein, C. Stewart, E. Puchacz, S. Mackowiak, M. Aronow, M. Von Deck, and V. Shalhoub. 1989. Osteocalcin: characterization and regulated expression of the rat gene. Connect. Tissue Res. 21:61-69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu, W., S. Toyosawa, T. Furuichi, N. Kanatani, C. Yoshida, Y. Liu, M. Himeno, S. Narai, A. Yamaguchi, and T. Komori. 2001. Overexpression of Cbfa1 in osteoblasts inhibits osteoblast maturation and causes osteopenia with multiple fractures. J. Cell Biol. 155:157-166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McLeod, M. J. 1980. Differential staining of cartilage and bone in whole mouse fetuses by alcian blue and alizarin red S. Teratology 22:299-301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mitola, S., M. Belleri, C. Urbinati, D. Coltrini, B. Sparatore, M. Pedrazzi, E. Melloni, and M. Presta. 2006. Cutting edge: extracellular high mobility group box-1 protein is a proangiogenic cytokine. J. Immunol. 176:12-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nakashima, K., and B. de Crombrugghe. 2003. Transcriptional mechanisms in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Trends Genet. 19:458-466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nakashima, K., X. Zhou, G. Kunkel, Z. Zhang, J. M. Deng, R. R. Behringer, and B. de Crombrugghe. 2002. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell 108:17-29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nomura, S., A. J. Wills, D. R. Edwards, J. K. Heath, and B. L. Hogan. 1988. Developmental expression of 2ar (osteopontin) and SPARC (osteonectin) RNA as revealed by in situ hybridization. J. Cell Biol. 106:441-450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Okubo, Y., and A. H. Reddi. 2003. Thyroxine downregulates Sox9 and promotes chondrocyte hypertrophy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 306:186-190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ortega, N., D. J. Behonick, and Z. Werb. 2004. Matrix remodeling during endochondral ossification. Trends Cell Biol. 14:86-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Palumbo, R., M. Sampaolesi, F. De Marchis, R. Tonlorenzi, S. Colombetti, A. Mondino, G. Cossu, and M. E. Bianchi. 2004. Extracellular HMGB1, a signal of tissue damage, induces mesoangioblast migration and proliferation. J. Cell Biol. 164:441-449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Park, J. S., D. Svetkauskaite, Q. He, J. Y. Kim, D. Strassheim, A. Ishizaka, and E. Abraham. 2004. Involvement of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in cellular activation by high mobility group box 1 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 279:7370-7377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Park, K., B. H. Min, D. K. Han, and K. Hasty. 2007. Quantitative analysis of temporal and spatial variations of chondrocyte behavior in engineered cartilage during long-term culture. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35:419-428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Passalacqua, M., M. Patrone, G. B. Picotti, M. Del Rio, B. Sparatore, E. Melloni, and S. Pontremoli. 1998. Stimulated astrocytes release high-mobility group 1 protein, an inducer of LAN-5 neuroblastoma cell differentiation. Neuroscience 82:1021-1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sakiyama, H., T. Nonaka, R. Masuda, N. Inoue, Y. Kuboki, M. Iijima, Y. Hirabayasi, M. Takahagi, K. Yoshida, K. Kuriiwa, M. Yoshida, and S. Imajoh-Ohmi. 2002. Characterization of mineral deposits formed in cultures of a hamster tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) double-positive cell line (CCP). Cell Tissue Res. 309:269-279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Salmivirta, M., H. Rauvala, K. Elenius, and M. Jalkanen. 1992. Neurite growth-promoting protein (amphoterin, p30) binds syndecan. Exp. Cell Res. 200:444-451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sato, T., M. del Carmen Ovejero, P. Hou, A. M. Heegaard, M. Kumegawa, N. T. Foged, and J. M. Delaisse. 1997. Identification of the membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase MT1-MMP in osteoclasts. J. Cell Sci. 110(Pt. 5):589-596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Scaffidi, P., T. Misteli, and M. E. Bianchi. 2002. Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation. Nature 418:191-195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schlueter, C., H. Weber, B. Meyer, P. Rogalla, K. Roser, S. Hauke, and J. Bullerdiek. 2005. Angiogenetic signaling through hypoxia: HMGB1: an angiogenetic switch molecule. Am. J. Pathol. 166:1259-1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stickens, D., D. J. Behonick, N. Ortega, B. Heyer, B. Hartenstein, Y. Yu, A. J. Fosang, M. Schorpp-Kistner, P. Angel, and Z. Werb. 2004. Altered endochondral bone development in matrix metalloproteinase 13-deficient mice. Development 131:5883-5895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Taguchi, A., D. C. Blood, G. del Toro, A. Canet, D. C. Lee, W. Qu, N. Tanji, Y. Lu, E. Lalla, C. Fu, M. A. Hofmann, T. Kislinger, M. Ingram, A. Lu, H. Tanaka, O. Hori, S. Ogawa, D. M. Stern, and A. M. Schmidt. 2000. Blockade of RAGE-amphoterin signalling suppresses tumour growth and metastases. Nature 405:354-360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Takami, M., N. Kim, J. Rho, and Y. Choi. 2002. Stimulation by Toll-like receptors inhibits osteoclast differentiation. J. Immunol. 169:1516-1523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Talreja, J., M. H. Kabir, B. F. M., D. J. Stechschulte, and K. N. Dileepan. 2004. Histamine induces Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 expression in endothelial cells and enhances sensitivity to gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial cell wall components. Immunology 113:224-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Taniguchi, N., K. Kawahara, K. Yone, T. Hashiguchi, M. Yamakuchi, M. Goto, K. Inoue, S. Yamada, K. Ijiri, S. Matsunaga, T. Nakajima, S. Komiya, and I. Maruyama. 2003. High mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 plays a role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis as a novel cytokine. Arthritis Rheum. 48:971-981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vortkamp, A., K. Lee, B. Lanske, G. V. Segre, H. M. Kronenberg, and C. J. Tabin. 1996. Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science 273:613-622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Vu, T. H., and Z. Werb. 2000. Matrix metalloproteinases: effectors of development and normal physiology. Genes Dev. 14:2123-2133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang, H., O. Bloom, M. Zhang, J. M. Vishnubhakat, M. Ombrellino, J. Che, A. Frazier, H. Yang, S. Ivanova, L. Borovikova, K. R. Manogue, E. Faist, E. Abraham, J. Andersson, U. Andersson, P. E. Molina, N. N. Abumrad, A. Sama, and K. J. Tracey. 1999. HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science 285:248-251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang, H., H. Yang, and K. J. Tracey. 2004. Extracellular role of HMGB1 in inflammation and sepsis. J. Intern. Med. 255:320-331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang, K., H. Yamamoto, J. R. Chin, Z. Werb, and T. H. Vu. 2004. Epidermal growth factor receptor-deficient mice have delayed primary endochondral ossification because of defective osteoclast recruitment. J. Biol. Chem. 279:53848-53856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yamada, S., K. Inoue, K. Yakabe, H. Imaizumi, and I. Maruyama. 2003. High mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) quantified by ELISA with a monoclonal antibody that does not cross-react with HMGB2. Clin. Chem. 49:1535-1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Youn, J. H., and J. S. Shin. 2006. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of HMGB1 is regulated by phosphorylation that redirects it toward secretion. J. Immunol. 177:7889-7897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zelzer, E., W. McLean, Y. S. Ng, N. Fukai, A. M. Reginato, S. Lovejoy, P. A. D'Amore, and B. R. Olsen. 2002. Skeletal defects in VEGF(120/120) mice reveal multiple roles for VEGF in skeletogenesis. Development 129:1893-1904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhou, Z., D. Immel, C. X. Xi, A. Bierhaus, X. Feng, L. Mei, P. Nawroth, D. M. Stern, and W. C. Xiong. 2006. Regulation of osteoclast function and bone mass by RAGE. J. Exp. Med. 203:1067-1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.