Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
. 2005 Jun 1;61(Pt 6):606–608. doi: 10.1107/S1744309105016301

Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of an aminoglycoside kinase from Legionella pneumophila

Christopher T Lemke a, Jiyoung Hwang b, Bing Xiong a, Nicholas P Cianciotto c, Albert M Berghuis a,b,*
PMCID: PMC1952339  PMID: 16511108

Two crystal forms of the antibiotic resistance enzyme APH(9)-Ia from L. pneumophila are reported.

Keywords: antibiotic resistance, aminoglycosides, kinases, spectinomycin

Abstract

9-Aminoglycoside phosphotransferase type Ia [APH(9)-Ia] is a resistance factor in Legionella pneuemophila, the causative agent of legionnaires’ disease. It is responsible for providing intrinsic resistance to the antibiotic spectinomycin. APH(9)-Ia phosphorylates one of the hydroxyl moieties of spectinomycin in an ATP-dependent manner, abolishing the antibiotic properties of this drug. Here, the crystallization and preliminary X-ray studies of this enzyme in two crystal forms is reported. One of the these crystal forms provides diffraction data to a resolution of 1.7 Å.

1. Introduction

Concomitant with the increased use of antibiotics for medical and agricultural purposes, there has been a rise in resistance to these drugs (Cizman, 2003). The mechanisms by which bacteria overcome the effects of bactericidal and bacteriostatic compounds are diverse and include up-regulation of active efflux pumps and methylation of antibiotic targets (Walsh, 2000; Wright, 2003). For aminoglycosides such as kanamycin and gentamicin, the mechanism that is predominantly observed clinically is chemical alteration of the drug catalyzed by aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. The modified antibiotic has a dramatically reduced affinity for its target, the 30S ribosome, resulting in a resistance phenotype. Three different classes of enzymes that confer resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics have thus far been identified in pathogenic bacteria: aminoglyco­side N-­acetyltransferases, O-adenyltransferases and O-phosphotransferases (kinases) (Azucena & Mobashery, 2001; Wright et al., 1998). Most of these enzymes are encoded on plasmids, consistent with the rapid dissemination of resistance factors among bacteria. However, some aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes are chromosomally encoded, thus providing intrinsic resistance to certain antibiotics (Suter et al., 1997; Wybenga-Groot et al., 1999).

Structural studies of all three classes of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes have been reported (Smith & Baker, 2002; Wright et al., 1998). However, for aminoglycoside kinases, this information is limited to the crystal structures of two closely related enzymes: APH(3′)-IIIa (Burk et al., 2001; Fong & Berghuis, 2002; Hon et al., 1997) and APH(3′)-IIa (Nurizzo et al., 2003), which share 33% identity in amino-acid sequence and are structurally highly homologous. These studies have shown that aminoglycoside kinases are structurally related to eukaryotic protein kinases. In fact, inspired by this homology, it has been demonstrated that some protein kinase inhibitors of the isoquinolinesulfonamide family, which are competitive with ATP, are also capable of inhibiting aminoglycoside kinases (Daigle et al., 1997).

Here, we report the crystallization and preliminary diffraction studies of 9-aminoglycoside phosphotransferase type Ia [APH(9)-Ia], also known as spectinomycin kinase, from Legionella pneumophila, the bacteria responsible for legionnaires’ disease. This enzyme provides resistance to only one antibiotic, spectinomycin, and is encoded on the chromosome (Suter et al., 1997; Thompson et al., 1998). These properties make APH(9)-Ia unlike most other aminoglycoside kinases, including APH(3′)-IIIa and APH(3′)-IIa, which provide resistance to multiple antibiotics and are plasmid-encoded (Fong & Berghuis, 2002; Nurizzo et al., 2003). The atypical properties of APH(9)-Ia are also mirrored in the sequence, which does not reveal significant similarity to either APH(3′)-IIIa or APH(3′)-IIa as assessed by the BLAST algorithm (Altschul et al., 1990). Furthermore, multiple sequence alignment of aminoglycoside kinases suggests that there is less than 4% identity between APH(9)-Ia and APH(3′)-IIIa or APH(3′)-IIa (Wright et al., 1998).

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Construction of the APH(9)-Ia expression vector

The APH(9)-Ia coding sequence was amplified by PCR such that NdeI and XhoI restriction sites were introduced at the N- and C-­termini, respectively. The PCR product was ligated into the pET21b expression vector (Novagen) at the corresponding restriction sites such that a six-histidine tag linked by the dipeptide LE was appended to the C-terminus of the enzyme. DNA sequencing was performed on the coding region of the resulting construct to ensure that the correct nucleic acid sequence had been conserved through the PCR and subsequent genetic manipulations. The resulting expression vector, pET21b-APH(9)H, was transformed into Escherichia coli strain BB101 {genotype ara Δ(lac proAB) ΔslyD (kan37 r) nalA argEam rif thi F′[lacI q proAB +] (λDE3)}. Starter cultures were prepared by inoculating 5 ml Luria–Bertani (LB) medium containing 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin and incubating overnight at 310 K. Each overnight growth was then pelleted and resuspended in 1 ml fresh medium and then diluted in 1 l LB containing 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin. This culture was grown at 310 K to an OD600 of 0.2, at which point the temperature was lowered to 289 K at a rate of approximately 0.25 K min−1. When the culture achieved an OD600 of 0.6, protein expression was induced by the addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM. Orbital shaking was maintained at 240 rev min−1 throughout bacterial growth. The cells were harvested 12–16 h post-induction by centrifugation (5000 rev min−1, 277 K, 15 min).

2.2. Purification

The cell pellet was resuspended in 50 ml buffer A (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0) supplemented with 1 mg ml−1 lysozyme and incubated for 30 min at 277 K with mild agitation. The cells were then lysed by 20 cycles of sonication, each consisting of a 10 s pulse followed by 30 s of cooling on ice. The soluble fraction of the lysate was decanted after further centrifugation (15000g, 277 K, 30 min) and loaded directly onto 3 ml nickel–NTA resin (Qiagen) previously equilibrated with buffer A. The column was washed with 30 ml buffer A containing 5 mM imidazole and then with 20 ml buffer A containing 40 mM imidazole. The protein was eluted from the column with buffer A containing 300 mM imidazole in a single 15 ml fraction. The buffer was changed to 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5 and the protein was concentrated to approximately 20 mg ml−1 using an Ultrafree-15 Biomax-10K NMWL membrane concentrator (Millipore). Protein purity was assessed using SDS–PAGE and a single band corresponding to the APH(9)-Ia protein (molecular weight 39.6 kDa) was observed.

2.3. Crystallization

Crystallization of APH(9)-Ia was pursued under three different conditions, with the objective of ultimately gaining insight into the three-dimensional structures of the apoenzyme, the enzyme in complex with substrates and the enzyme in complex with an isoquinolinesulfonamide protein kinase inhibitor. Crystallization experiments were performed using the hanging-drop method, where drops consisting of equal volumes (2 µl) of protein and precipitant solutions were suspended from a siliconized glass cover slip over a reservoir containing 0.6–0.7 ml precipitant solution. The protein solution consisted of 10–15 mg ml−1 protein in 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5 and when appropriate a five-molar excess of ADP (Sigma) and spectinomycin (Sigma) or a five-molar excess of the kinase inhibitor CKI-7 (MJS Biolynx Inc.). In order to identify approximate conditions suitable for crystal growth, various precipitant solutions were tested at two temperatures (277 and 293 K) using commercial screening kits from Hampton Research, Emerald BioStructures and Nextal Biotechnologies. Subsequently identified conditions were optimized via a combination of various approaches, including variation of pH, alteration of the concentration of constituents, screening of additives (Hampton Research) and the employment of seeding.

2.4. Diffraction data collection

Diffraction data for APH(9)-Ia crystals grown under apoenzyme conditions and in the presence of substrates were collected at beamline X8C of the National Synchrotron Light Souce, Brookhaven National Laboratories, which is equipped with an ASDC Quantum CCD detector. Crystals were flash-frozen in a cold stream of nitrogen gas and data collection was performed at 100 K using an oscillation angle of 1.0° and a wavelength of 1.100 or 1.008 Å. Intensities were integrated and scaled using HKL2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Diffraction data for APH(9)-Ia crystals grown in the presence of the inhibitor CKI-7 were collected on a Rigaku rotating copper-anode generator equipped with Osmic confocal optics and an R-AXIS IV++ image-plate detector system. Analogous to data collection for other APH(9)-Ia crystals, crystals were flash-frozen in a cold stream and data collection was conducted at 100 K using an oscillation angle of 1.0°. Data processing of measured intensities was performed using MOSFLM (Leslie, 2003).

3. Results and discussion

Recombinant APH(9)-Ia from L. pneumophila was overexpressed in E. coli and purified to homogeneity with a yield of approximately 15–20 mg from 1 l bacterial culture. This is comparable to what others have achieved for this enzyme (Thompson et al., 1998). Crystallization experiments identified three distinct conditions for crystal growth dependent on the presence or absence of substrates and/or inhibitor (Fig. 1). Analysis of the diffraction data reveals that APH(9)-Ia crystallized in two different crystal forms (Table 1). Crystals grown under apoenzyme conditions and in the presence of CKI-7 both belong to the monoclinic space group P21, with very similar unit-cell parameters. This is surprising given the significant differences in crystallization conditions. However, this observation may imply that APH(9)-Ia does not undergo a significant conformational change upon inhibitor binding, as has been suggested for APH(3′)-IIIa (Fong & Berghuis, 2002, 2004), but unlike what has frequently been observed for protein kinases (Cherry & Williams, 2004). Alternatively, it may be that CKI-7 is not bound to the enzyme in this crystal form.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Micrographs of APH(9)-Ia crystals grown in apoenzyme conditions (a), in the presence of ADP and spectinomycin (b) and in the presence of the protein kinase inhibitor CKI-7 (c). The largest crystal dimensions for each were ∼0.8, 0.6 and 0.5 mm, respectively.

Table 1. Crystallization conditions and diffraction data and processing statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

  Apoenzyme Enzyme + ADP + spectinomycin Enzyme + CKI-7
Crystallization conditions 0.1 M MES pH 6.5, 30% PEG 200, 3% PEG 3000, 3% aminocaproic acid, 3% DMSO 0.1 M bicine pH 8.0, 8% PEG 8000, 0.2 M magnesium acetate, 10 mM manganese chloride 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.0, 10% MPD
Space group P21 P3121/P3221 P21
Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) a = 47.4, b = 70.7, c = 99.3, β = 95.9 a = b = 75.0, c = 140.1 a = 47.7, b = 70.4, c = 100.2, β = 96.4
VM3 Da−1) 2.09 2.87 2.11
Molecules per AU 2 1 2
Solvent content (%) 41.3 57.1 41.7
Radiation source BNL-NSLS X8C BNL-NSLS X8C Rotating anode
Wavelength (Å) 1.100 1.008 1.5418
Resolution range (Å) 50–1.7 (1.76–1.7) 50–2.4 (2.49–2.4) 50-2.7 (2.8–2.7)
Unique reflections 71575 (7004) 17846 (1785) 17847 (2113)
Redundancy 4.3 (3.5) 9.3 (6.5) 3.5 (2.7)
Completeness (%) 99.3 (97.9) 95.3 (87.5) 96.4 (78.4)
I/σ(I) 16.3 (3.9) 15.0 (4.2) 8.1 (3.0)
Rmerge (%) 6.1 (43.4) 9.0 (37.1) 6.3 (25.0)

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where Ii is the intensity of reflection i and 〈Ii〉 is the average intensity for that reflection.

We have attempted to determine the structure of APH(9)-Ia by molecular-replacement methods using APH(3′)-IIIa as a search model. Specifically, the following programs were tried: CNS (Brünger et al., 1998) and MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2000). However, none of our attempts provided a clear solution. This is not very surprising given the less than 4% identity between the search model and APH(9)-Ia, which is well below the limit of what has proven feasible (Schwarzenbacher et al., 2004). The structure-determination strategy will therefore focus on using selenomethionine-substituted enzyme and multiwavelength anomalous dispersion experiments (Hendrickson, 1991).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. JH acknowledges support from the CIHR strategic training program in Chemical Biology. AMB is the recipient of the Canada Research Chair in Structural Biology. Support for beamline X8C at the NSLS-BNL, Upton, New York was in part received from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

References

  1. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. (1990). J. Mol. Biol.215, 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azucena, E. & Mobashery, S. (2001). Drug. Resist. Updat.4, 106–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T. & Warren, G. L. (1998). Acta Cryst. D54, 905–921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burk, D. L., Hon, W. C., Leung, A. K. & Berghuis, A. M. (2001). Biochemistry, 40, 8756–8764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cherry, M. & Williams, D. H. (2004). Curr. Med. Chem.11, 663–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cizman, M. (2003). Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 21, 297–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Daigle, D. M., McKay, G. A. & Wright, G. D. (1997). J. Biol. Chem.272, 24755–24758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fong, D. H. & Berghuis, A. M. (2002). EMBO J.21, 2323–2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fong, D. H. & Berghuis, A. M. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 1897–1899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hendrickson, W. A. (1991). Science, 254, 51–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hon, W. C., McKay, G. A., Thompson, P. R., Sweet, R. M., Yang, D. S., Wright, G. D. & Berghuis, A. M. (1997). Cell, 89, 887–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leslie, A. G. W. (2003). MOSFLM User’s Guide, MOSFLM v.6.2.3. MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, England.
  13. Nurizzo, D., Shewry, S. C., Perlin, M. H., Brown, S. A., Dholakia, J. N., Fuchs, R. L., Deva, T., Baker, E. N. & Smith, C. A. (2003). J. Mol. Biol.327, 491–­506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol.276, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Schwarzenbacher, R., Godzik, A., Grzechnik, S. K. & Jaroszewski, L. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 1229–1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith, C. A. & Baker, E. N. (2002). Curr. Drug Targets Infect. Disord.2, 143–­160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Suter, T. M., Viswanathan, V. K. & Cianciotto, N. P. (1997). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41, 1385–1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thompson, P. R., Hughes, D. W., Cianciotto, N. P. & Wright, G. D. (1998). J. Biol. Chem.273, 14788–14795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (2000). Acta Cryst. D56, 1622–1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Walsh, C. (2000). Nature (London), 406, 775–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wright, G. D. (2003). Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.7, 563–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wright, G. D., Berghuis, A. M. & Mobashery, S. (1998). Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.456, 27–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wybenga-Groot, L. E., Draker, K., Wright, G. D. & Berghuis, A. M. (1999). Structure Fold. Des.7, 497–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES