Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2007 Aug 21;104(35):14157–14162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700477104

Soluble misfolded subfractions of mutant superoxide dismutase-1s are enriched in spinal cords throughout life in murine ALS models

Per Zetterström *,, Heather G Stewart *,‡,§, Daniel Bergemalm *,, P Andreas Jonsson *,, Karin S Graffmo *,, Peter M Andersen *,, Thomas Brännström *,, Mikael Oliveberg , Stefan L Marklund *,†,**
PMCID: PMC1955813  PMID: 17715066

Abstract

Mutants of superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) cause ALS by an unidentified cytotoxic mechanism. We have previously shown that the stable SOD1 mutants D90A and G93A are abundant and show the highest levels in liver and kidney in transgenic murine ALS models, whereas the unstable G85R and G127X mutants are scarce but enriched in the CNS. These data indicated that minute amounts of misfolded SOD1 enriched in the motor areas might exert the ALS-causing cytotoxicity. A hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) protocol was developed with the aim to determine the abundance of soluble misfolded SOD1 in tissues in vivo. Most G85R and G127X mutant SOD1s bound in the assay, but only minute subfractions of the D90A and G93A mutants. The absolute levels of HIC-binding SOD1 were, however, similar and broadly inversely related to lifespans in the models. They were generally enriched in the susceptible spinal cord. The HIC-binding SOD1 was composed of disulfide-reduced subunits lacking metal ions and also subunits that apparently carried nonnative intrasubunit disulfide bonds. The levels were high from birth until death and were comparable to the amounts of SOD1 that become sequestered in aggregates in the terminal stage. The HIC-binding SOD1 species ranged from monomeric to trimeric in size. These species form a least common denominator amongst SOD1 mutants with widely different molecular characteristics and might be involved in the cytotoxicity that causes ALS.

Keywords: disulfide bond, motor neuron, neurodegeneration


Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is characterized by motor neuron degeneration, resulting in progressive paralysis, and death from respiratory failure. Approximately 10% of ALS cases are familial (1) and in some of these the disease is linked to mutations in the CuZn-superoxide dismutase (SOD1) gene (2). Overall, ≈6% of all cases with ALS show SOD1 mutations, and more than 100 different such mutations have been identified (3). The mutations confer a cytotoxic gain of function to the enzyme (4, 5). SOD1 is ubiquitously expressed, and in several organs at higher levels than in the motor areas in the CNS (6, 7). Both the nature of the cytotoxicity, and the reasons for the particular susceptibility of some parts of the CNS remain unexplained.

It is likely that the different mutant SOD1s cause ALS by essentially the same mechanism. Still, the levels of different mutant SOD1s in the human CNS differ by more than 200-fold (7). Similar large differences are observed in the murine ALS models. In spinal cords from mice expressing the D90A, G93A, G85R and G127insTGGG (G127X) mutant human SOD1s (hSOD1s), the levels are 20, 14, 0.9, and 0.45 times as large, respectively, as the levels of the endogenous murine SOD1 (mSOD1) (8). In the high-level models, D90A and G93A, most hSOD1 lacks enzymatic activity owing to Cu-deficiency, and significant proportions lack the stabilizing intrasubunit disulfide bond. The G85R and G127X hSOD1s lack both enzymatic activity and the disulfide bond. Whereas the liver and kidney contain the highest levels of hSOD1 in the D90A and G93A models, the hSOD1 levels are highest in the CNS in the G85R and G127X hSOD1s models. From these data we have previously hypothesized that ALS is caused by misfolded SOD1 species enriched in the susceptible spinal cord. Such species would constitute minute subfractions of the high-level stable SOD1s and larger proportions of the G85R and G127X hSOD1s (8).

Misfolded proteins are likely to externalize parts of the hydrophobic interior, and may therefore show affinity in hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC). Destabilized mutant SOD1 species have previously been found to show affinity to hydrophobic matrices (9). Here we devised an HIC protocol with the aim to detect soluble hydrophobic forms of SOD1 that are present in the tissues. Most of the G85R and G127X mutants were found to bind, and minute subfractions of the D90A and G93A hSODs. The hydrophobic hSOD1 species are enriched in the spinal cords throughout the lifetime of the mice and mostly lack the native disulfide bond.

Results

Notes on the HIC Protocol.

The aim was to reflect the molecular composition of hSOD1 in vivo. After sacrifice, the tissues were rapidly excised, put on ice, homogenized, centrifuged at 20,000 × g, and the supernatants applied to the HIC columns. The lapse of time between sacrifice and HIC was ≈90 min. The binding time on the column was short, 5 min. Studies with different binding times suggested that the HIC-binding hSOD1 species were present in the applied extracts and not formed during chromatography [supporting information (SI) Fig. 4]. To block thiols and preserve disulfide bonds, iodoacetamide was added to all solutions. Native hSOD1 is very hydrophilic and only binds to Octyl-Sepharose under high salting-out conditions [≥1.4 M (NH4)2SO4]. No bound hSOD1 was eluted in the second step by the reduced salting-out effect of PBS diluted 1:10. High concentrations of ethylene glycol (60%) or guanidinium chloride (6.7 M) caused incomplete elution. Only with the use of 4% of SDS could all bound hSOD1 be eluted. Thus, the hSOD1 that binds to Octyl-Sepharose is either initially very hydrophobic, or becomes even more unfolded and strongly interacting after the primary binding.

The HIC-Binding hSOD1 Is Enriched in the Spinal Cords in the Different Transgenic ALS Models.

The upper row of Fig. 1A shows an immunoblot of equal amounts of extracts of tissues from a 34-day-old G93A mouse. Liver and kidney contained considerably more hSOD1 than spinal cord and brain. Only minute subfractions of the hSOD1 bound in the HIC-assay, but both the absolute amount and the proportion was by far the greatest in the susceptible spinal cord (Fig. 1A Lower). Because there is evidence for early commencing noxious effects of mutant hSOD1s in spinal cords (7, 1012), the G93A transgenic mice were examined from birth until death. The high proportion (≈3%) of HIC-binding hSOD1 in spinal cord was seen from birth throughout life. On the first day, similar absolute levels of HIC-binding hSOD1 were also found in the other organs, but the “adult” pattern with less misfolded enzyme is reached already at 10 days. There was a slow rise in absolute levels in HIC-binding hSOD1 with the greatest amounts in terminally ill mice (Fig. 1C, Table 1, and SI Fig. 5).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Reduced immunoblots of soluble HIC-binding hSOD1 fractions in transgenic mice. (A) Total hSOD1 and the HIC-binding subfractions in tissue extracts from a 34-day-old G93A transgenic mouse. The figures indicate the fractions (percentages) of total hSOD1 that bound. (B) HIC-binding hSOD1 fractions of tissue extracts from 100-day-old G127, G85R, and wild-type hSOD1 mice. In addition to the monomer band at ≈17 kDa, tissues form G127X mice contain a prominent band at 33 kDa (7). In quantifications of G127X hSOD1, both bands were included. (C) HIC-binding hSOD1 subfractions in tissues of G93A mice of different ages (in days). Two spinal cords were pooled from 1-day-old and 10-day-old mice; the other data are from individual mice. The percentages and absolute amounts bound (μg/g of wet weight) in the spinal cords were, respectively, 5.3% and 11 at day 1, 3.5% and 19 at day 10, 3.2% and 44 at day 19, 4.8% and 50 at day 34, 3.8% and 43 at day 50, 2.8% and 42 at day 100, and 4.0% and 45 in the terminal mouse. (D) HIC-binding hSOD1 in tissues from D90A mice of different ages. The corresponding data for the D90A mice were, respectively, 0.49% and 4.1 at day 100, 0.33% and 4.8 at day 200, 0.43% and 6.2 at day 300, and 2.6% and 25 in the terminal mouse. Sp.c., spinal cord; Kidn., kidney.

Table 1.

Relative and absolute amounts of HIC-binding hSOD1 in tissues

Murine model n Spinal Cord
Brain
Liver
Kidney
Relative, % μg/g ww Relative, % μg/g ww Relative, % μg/g ww Relative, % μg/g ww
G127X 4 100 12 ± 4* 100 14 ± 4 100 15 ± 5 100 4.8 ± 1.4
G85R 4 79 ± 19 17 ± 6* 69 ± 13 13 ± 5 48 ± 11 9.2 ± 3.7 56 ± 20 5.5 ± 3.1
G93A 7 2.6 ± 1.1 35 ± 12 1.5 ± 0.8 10 ± 5 0.22 ± 0.08 7.5 ± 1.8 0.28 ± 0.15 3.5 ± 1.6
G93A term 4 3.7 ± 0.7 48 ± 7 2.1 ± 1.0 20 ± 8 0.26 ± 0.19 8.9 ± 4.8 0.35 ± 0.44 6.1 ± 5.4
D90A 5 0.47 ± 0.15 3.4 ± 1.1 0.26 ± 0.12 1.6 ± 0.9 0.14 ± 0.06 2.2 ± 1.3 0.14 ± 0.08 1.4 ± 0.8
D90A term 2 2.6/1.7 25/17 0.33/0.21 2.5/1.9 0.14/0.09 2.0/1.0 0.28/0.19 2.7/1.2
wtTg 4 0.13 ± 0.03 1.5 ± 0.4 0.08 ± 0.03 0.72 ± 0.16 0.07 ± 0.03 2.3 ± 0.8 0.07 ± 0.06 1.5 ± 1.2
wtTg 600 d 4 0.17 ± 0.06 3.3 ± 1.7 0.16 ± 0.06 2.5 ± 1.2 0.09 ± 0.05 2.9 ± 1.6 0.08 ± 0.04 1.3 ± 0.6

The means ± SD are shown. n, number. The mice were 100-day-old unless otherwise indicated. ww, wet weight.

*, P < 0.05;

†, P < 0.01;

‡, P = 0.064 compared with 100-day-old wild-type hSOD1 transgenic mice (Mann–Whitney U test).

Tissue extracts of mice from the other transgenic models were also analyzed in the HIC assay (Fig. 1 B and D and Table 1). All G127X mutant hSOD1 in the extracts bound, and in the G85R mice the major proportion (Table 1). Only minute subfractions of the hSODs in D90A and wild-type hSOD1 transgenic mice bound. The greatest proportions and absolute amounts were seen in spinal cords, except in the G127X mice where spinal cord, brain and liver contained similar amounts. There was broadly an inverse relation between absolute levels of HIC-binding hSOD1 and life-spans of the models; they were highest in G93A mice and lowest in D90A mice. In the latter there was also a distinct rise in the terminal stage (Fig. 1D and Table 1). In all of the ALS models the spinal cord levels of HIC-binding hSOD1 were significantly greater than in mice expressing wild-type hSOD1 (Table 1). Skeletal muscle contained considerably less HIC-binding hSOD1 than the other tissues tested (data not shown). In Fig. 1 only the parts of the gels that contain hSOD1 subunits are shown. There are, however, no other significant bands present in the immunoblots (SI Fig. 5A).

Next to spinal cord, the highest levels of HIC-binding hSOD1 were generally found in the brain (Table 1). Evidence for mutant SOD1-induced damage to brain has also been reported both in the murine ALS models (13) and in humans (14, 15).

The HIC-binding of the endogenous mSOD1 was examined in a G93A mouse and the proportions were found to be 0.2% in spinal cord and brain, and less than 0.05% in liver and kidney, thus similar to the binding of wild-type hSOD1 in transgenic mice (Table 1).

In this study we expressed the absolute amounts of HIC-binding hSOD1 per g wet weight with the intention to reflect the concentration in the tissue. In five 100-day-old control mice the protein levels in spinal cord, brain, liver and kidney extracts corresponded to 24.3 ± 1.0, 28.9 ± 1.3, 102 ± 10, and 90 ± 4 mg/g of wet weight (mean ± SD) resp. Thus, expressed per amount of total protein extracted, the enrichment of HIC-binding hSOD1 in the CNS would appear even clearer.

Molecular Size of HIC-Binding SOD1.

Spinal cord extracts were subjected to gel chromatography (Fig. 2A). The G85R hSOD1, which lacks the disulfide bond (8), was 95% monomeric. The wild-type and the D90A and G93A mutant hSOD1s were mainly dimeric, but all contained significant amounts of monomers. Analysis by nonreducing immunoblots showed that the monomeric hSOD1 subfractions were mainly disulfide-reduced whereas the dimers carried the native disulfide bond (Fig. 2B). In the G85R, D90A, and wild-type hSOD1 chromatograms, there was virtually no hSOD1 present from the void volume (fraction 26) to the dimer peaks. In the G93A chromatogram, ≈0.7% of the hSOD1 eluted before the dimer peak, and this hSOD1 disappeared from the extract after passage of a HIC-column (not shown). The rest of the 3.8% HIC-binding hSOD1 in this extract thus eluted within the elution volumes of the large dimer-monomer peaks. The presence of small amounts of trimers cannot, however, be excluded because it would not be possible to distinguish them against the background of the large dimer peak.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Gel chromatography of spinal cord extracts from 100-day-old mice. (A) The distributions of the hSOD1s analyzed by immunoblots from the void volume to the end of the monomer peaks. Tubes 26–35 were virtually devoid of hSOD1 in the D90A, G85R, and wild-type hSOD1 chromatograms, and the data points were omitted. The G93A chromatogram contained minute amounts of hSOD1 in some of these fractions, and the data were multiplied by 10 to increase visibility. (B) Analysis of disulfide oxidation by nonreduced immunoblotting. Subunits lacking disulfide bond are more retarded in the gel than subunits restricted by the C57-C146 disulfide bond (8). Note that D90A mutant SOD1 has a higher mobility than wild-type and G93A mutant human SOD1s (17). The extracts were electrophoresed together with the dimer (tube 39) and monomer (tube 43) peak fractions.

We conclude that the apparent molecular weights of the HIC-binding hSOD1 fractions must be within the monomer-trimer range. We found no evidence for major association with other proteins such as chaperones. The monomeric disulfide-reduced fractions in the D90A, G93A, and wild-type hSOD1 spinal cord extracts are much greater than the HIC-binding fractions (Fig. 2 and Table 1), suggesting that natively folded monomers do not bind in the HIC assay.

Structure of the HIC-Binding hSOD1.

HIC-binding hSOD1 is released from the columns only under strongly denaturing conditions, which limits the information that can be derived from studies on the eluted enzyme. All of the transgenic models contain significant fractions of disulfide-reduced hSOD1 (Fig. 2B) (8), which is structurally less stable (16) and might preferentially bind in the HIC by increased sampling of unfolded and partly folded states. To distinguish between hSOD1 carrying oxidized and reduced disulfide bonds, dilutions of the spinal cord extract and the HIC-binding fraction from a 34-day-old G93A were subjected to nonreduced immunoblotting (Fig. 3A). The upper band is disulfide-reduced hSOD1 and the lower is disulfide-oxidized (8). The proportion of disulfide-reduced hSOD1 in the extract was found to be 11% (8). Almost all of the HIC-binding hSOD1 appeared to be disulfide-reduced. Usage of step-wise diluted extract as a standard curve suggested that 12% of the disulfide-reduced hSOD1 in the extract had bound to the HIC-column. 12% of the 11% disulfide-reduced hSOD1 gives 1.32%. The proportion hSOD1 binding in the HIC assay was, however, 4.8%, as determined in reduced Western blots (cf. Fig. 1A). Thus, other HIC-binding hSOD1 species also exist.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Nonreduced immunoblots of soluble HIC-binding hSOD1 subfractions in spinal cords from transgenic mice. (A) Dilutions of the extract and the HIC-binding subfraction of a 34-day-old G93A mouse. The SDS/PAGE gel was cut in half, and the right side was subjected to in-gel reduction. The two halves were then mounted together for the electroblotting and immunostaining. (B) Similar analysis of the other transgenic models. (C) Comparison of a G85R spinal cord extract (Extr.) with a recombinant G85R/C6A/C111A hSOD1 preparation. The pair to the left shows the pattern in a regular reduced immunoblot, the intermediate a nonreduced immunoblot, and the pair to the right a nonreduced immunoblot subjected to in-gel reduction. The samples were electrophoresed on one gel, and the pieces were mounted together for electroblotting and immunostaining. (D) Comparison of a G93A spinal cord extract and the HIC-binding subfraction with various recombinant mutants harboring combinations of cysteine mutations. The spinal cord fractions were treated with iodoacetamide. The recombinant variants were denatured, reduced, deprived of metals, and allowed to form disulfide bonds spontaneously. The lower row shows nonreduced immunoblots subjected to in-gel reduction, and the upper row shows reduced immunoblots. Sp.c., spinal cord; extr., extract; bind., binding.

One peculiarity of hSOD1 is that species carrying disulfide bonds show reduced immunostaining when blotted onto PVDF membranes (8). The staining is increased by in-gel reduction before immunoblotting (Fig. 3A Right). Whereas the “disulfide-reduced” bands remain unchanged, the intensity of the “oxidized” bands in the diluted extracts are amplified. This appears to be mainly due to better availability of epitopes, because reduction of the blotted PVDF membranes also increases the immunostaining (SI Fig. 6). Several previously weak or invisible bands in the HIC-binding hSOD1 fraction now appear, but none at the position of a subunit carrying the native C57-C146 disulfide bond. Only one homogenous (reduced) band is visible if this 34-day HIC-binding fraction is treated with reductant in the sample buffer before electrophoresis (Fig. 1A). HIC-binding fractions from G93A mice ranging in age from 1 day until they were terminal were analyzed by nonreduced immunoblotting with in gel-reduction and, found to posses band patterns similar to that of the 34-day sample in Fig. 3A. Only very weak bands with higher molecular weights were observed (SI Fig. 5B). Such bands were also very scant in 20,000-g extracts of G93A spinal cords (SI Fig. 5C).

In a 100-day-old D90A mouse, disulfide-reduced hSOD1 accounted for more than half of the HIC-binding material, and here a band with the native C57-C146 bond appeared to exist (Fig. 3B). The wild-type hSOD1 fractions showed similar patterns, but at lower levels. In all of the G127X lanes, the in-gel reduction revealed a band with higher mobility. This species cannot carry the native disulfide bond because this truncation mutant lacks C146. The G85R lanes also show a band with a similar shift in mobility (Fig. 3B). This band does not appear to carry the native disulfide bond, because a recombinant G85R/C6A/C111A hSOD1 preparation with the native bond has a higher mobility (Fig. 3C). Upon reduction before electrophoresis, the mobilities are essentially equal.

Benchmarking by Comparison with Recombinant Variants.

To elucidate the identities of the multiple bands in HIC-binding hSOD1, recombinant hSOD1s with combinations of mutated cysteines were analyzed by nonreducing Western blots with in-gel reduction (Fig. 3D Lower). These variants were denatured, reduced and metal-deprived, and allowed to spontaneously form and shuffle disulfide bonds upon dialysis and heating in nonreducing sample buffer. Over 98% of the soluble hSOD1 variants oxidized under these conditions were found to electrophorese as monomers. They were electrophoresed together with a G93A spinal cord extract and the HIC-binding subfraction, both treated with iodoacetamide to block thiol groups and prevent disulfide shuffling. The cysteine-lacking CallA mutant electrophoresed at the position of the disulfide-reduced band in the homogenate, and the C6A/C111A mutant at the position of subunits carrying the native disulfide bond, as also previously shown (8). The mutants that could theoretically form multiple intrasubunit disulfide bonds, also showed multiple bands. The only cysteine-containing variant lacking a band at the position of the subunit with a native C57-C146 disulfide bond was C6A/C57A. The single band of this mutant apparently carried a C111-C146 disulfide bond because it was amplified by in-gel reduction (not shown). The HIC-binding G93A likewise lacked the native C57-C146 band but showed several other bands, including one that had lower mobility than all those seen in the other samples. If reduced in the sample buffer, the recombinant variants and fractions from the mice showed one band, all with nearly equal mobilities (Fig. 3D Upper). This study suggests that the multiple bands in the HIC-binding samples may represent disulfide-reduced subunits as well as subunits containing several different nonnative disulfide linkages. Glutathionylation of cysteines might explain the band with lowest mobility (16). Such modifications exist in vivo (17).

To further define structural requirements for HIC-binding, a variety of recombinant variants were examined both by HIC and gel chromatography. The set included all hSOD1s present in the murine models used in this study (except G127X), variants with and without the disulfide bond, with and without the prosthetic metals, and with a native or disrupted dimer interface (SI Fig. 7 A and B). The conclusion from this study is that holo- or apo-dimers do not bind in the HIC assay. Monomers with and without the disulfide bond do neither bind as long as Zn is liganded. Monomers lacking prosthetic metals bind to various extents, and the binding is increased by the absence of the disulfide bond.

The HIC-Binding hSOD1 Is Not Present in Mitochondria.

Owing to high expression levels, insufficient Cu-charging and partial disulfide reduction, stable hSOD1 variants are artificially overloaded into CNS mitochondria in transgenic mice (18). In the G93A mouse 10% of the hSOD1 is mitochondrial. To examine whether any HIC-binding hSOD1 is present in mitochondria, a G93A spinal cord from a 100-day-old mouse was gently homogenized and centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 30 min. The pellet contained nearly 100% of the mitochondrial marker succinate dehydrogenase. It should also contain most other organelles, debris and vesicles formed by closing of disrupted neurites and glial extensions, leading to entrapment of cytosol. Both the primary supernatant and a 20,000 × g supernatant of the pellet extracted by sonication were subjected to HIC. The total hSOD1 as well as the HIC-binding fraction were found to distribute 70%/30% between the primary extract and the extract of the pellet. The cytosol marker lactate dehydrogenase showed a 60%/40% distribution. Thus we found no evidence for preferential location of the HIC-binding hSOD1 in mitochondria.

Discussion

Molecular Structures of the HIC-Binding hSOD1 in Tissues.

The G127X truncation mutant lacks the disulfide bond and strand 8 in the β barrel, leaving unprotected edges in β strands 1 and 7. It should show limited native folding. The truncated part is the one that folds last on the downhill slope of the major folding barrier of hSOD1 (19). Thus, it is also a part that would unfold first upon denaturation of hSOD1 subunits, and a part of the protein that could be susceptible to local rearrangements by thermal motions. The existence of multiple ALS-linked C-terminal truncation mutations shows that any common disease-causing species must be partially ruptured and likely expose hydrophobic structures (3). In the HIC assay, no dimeric variants bound. Monomers, with or without the disulfide bond, lacked affinity as long as Zn was liganded (SI Fig. 7 A and B). Thus Zn appears more important for structural integrity than the disulfide bond, as previously found (16). We conclude that only species with a major degree of unfolding or destabilization are captured in the HIC assay.

The disulfide-reduced hSOD1 in the tissue extracts was found to be monomeric (Fig. 2). In the D90A, G93A and wild-type hSOD1 models the major proportion of these monomers lacked HIC affinity, most likely because of liganding of Zn. The disulfide-reduced hSOD1 in the homogenates probably lacked Cu (8). Monomers are, however, on the unfolding pathway of SOD1 (20, 21), suggesting that loss of the disulfide bond could be a key precursor step in a sequence that leads to the formation of cytotoxic species. Notably, the native C57-C146 disulfide bond was mostly absent in the HIC-binding hSOD1 species detected in the spinal cords (Fig. 3 A and B).

A fraction of the species that bound in the HIC assay lacked disulfide bond and should not, according to the analyses on model variants, coordinate prosthetic metals (SI Fig. 7 A and B). Notably, Zn-deficient SOD1 has been shown to exert cytotoxic effects in cultured motor neurons (22). Many additional HIC-binding hSOD1 species were also detected (Fig. 3 A and B). Comparison with spontaneously oxidized recombinant cysteine-mutated hSOD1 variants, suggested that the HIC-binding fractions might include species carrying illicit intrasubunit disulfide bonds (Fig. 3C). Such species would be locked in nonnative conformations, leading to exposure of internal hydrophobic structures. In the model that was most closely examined, G93A, these forms appeared to predominate, and were present throughout life. The hSOD1 that is present as insoluble aggregates in terminal spinal cords is partially composed of disulfide-linked dimers and multimers (23, 24). Because SOD1 is mainly present in the reducing cytosol, the presence of the oxidized species is surprising. It is tempting to speculate that the species carrying nonnative intrasubunit and intersubunit disulfide bonds are formed under the same circumstances. We found no evidence, however, for the presence of the HIC-binding nonnatively oxidized subunits in the oxidizing mitochondrial compartment.

Aggregates or Soluble Misfolded SOD1 as ALS-Inducing Species.

SOD1-containing aggregates/inclusions can be found both in ALS patients carrying SOD1 mutations (7, 25), and in transgenic models (8). In the latter, they accumulate in the final phase concomitantly with the appearance of overt symptoms, and are commonly suggested to cause the disease (24, 26). Their appearance probably reflects a terminal disruption of the protein surveillance and degrading systems. The HIC-binding hSOD1 species are likely to be precursors of the aggregates. Indeed, many of the recombinant hSOD1 variants found to bind in the HIC assay were sticky and tended to oligomerize (SI Fig. 7 A and B). The G127X hSOD1 is so aggregation-prone that 20% is continuously present as detergent-soluble protoaggregates (7). In the G93A model there was a slight and in the D90A mice a more distinct increase with time in the spinal cord levels of HIC-binding hSOD1 (Fig. 1 C and D and Table 1). In both cases the increases were far less marked than the terminal surge seen in dense SOD1 aggregates (8).

The total amount of SOD1 sequestered in the terminal aggregates is, however, small. In the high-level D90A and G93A models, aggregated hSOD1 accounts for less than 10% of the hSOD1 in the spinal cords. In the G85R and G127X models the hSOD1 levels in the terminal aggregates are just below the small amounts of soluble protein (8, 18). The amount of detergent-resistant aggregated hSOD1 in terminal G93A mice is 18 μg/g of wet weight (8), thus comparable to the amount of soluble HIC-binding SOD1 present throughout life in this model (Fig. 1C and Table 1). In a patient carrying the G127X mutation, the levels in ventral horn aggregates were 2–4% of the level of total SOD1 in controls (7) and in ALS cases homozygous for the D90A mutation the levels are below 0.5% (K.S.G., P.A.J., S.L.M., T.B. and P.M.A., unpublished data). The absolute levels of aggregated SOD1 are thus very low, because SOD1 accounts for only 0.1% of the tissue protein in ventral horns of human controls (7). Although whole tissue was analyzed in these studies, motor neuron somas and neurites have been estimated to account for 20% of the volume of spinal cord ventral horns (27). Thus, the levels must be low in motor neurons also. Blockage of general protein-handling systems such as chaperones and proteasomes are thus unlikely mechanisms of SOD1 aggregate-induced cytotoxicity. If the aggregates are causative, more specific mechanisms must be involved.

Numerous studies have documented early commencement of noxious effects of mutant hSOD1s in murine spinal cords, long before the appearance of aggregates (7, 1012). In the most closely examined model, G93A, we have now shown that HIC-binding hSOD1 is enriched in the spinal cord already from birth, preceding signs of injury. These species could thus be the proximate initiators of damage to the motor areas. The misfolded SOD1 might mislocalize, or expose internal structures that interact with essential cellular factors in ways that cause cytotoxicity. Soluble misfolded SOD1 should be more amenable to engagement in such reactions than misfolded SOD1 sequestered in large aggregates.

One limitation of the present study is that whole tissue is analyzed, whereas primarily motor neurons are injured in ALS. There is, however, evidence that the motor neuron demise is caused by effects of mutant SOD1s in multiple cell types in the motor areas which supports the present approach, reviewed in (28).

Conclusions

Herein we demonstrate a life-long enrichment of soluble HIC-binding hSOD1 in the susceptible spinal cord. The levels are comparable to the levels of hSOD1 that are sequestered in terminal aggregates. The HIC-binding hSOD1 appears mainly to be composed of species that lack disulfide bond and liganded metal ions, or are conformationally locked by nonnative intrasubunit disulfide bonds. Common to these species is increased exposure of hydrophobic moieties that are normally protected in the interior of the protein. They form a least common denominator for ALS-associated hSOD1 mutations, ranging from point mutations with widely different molecular characteristics to a defective C-terminally truncated variant.

Materials and Methods

Mice.

Homozygous line 716 G127X mice (7), homozygous line 134 D90A mice (29), and heterozygous G85R (30), G93AGur (G1H) and wild-type hSOD1 (N1029) transgenic mice (4) backcrossed 10–30 generations in C57BL/6 mice were studied. The mean lifespans of the mouse lines carrying mutant hSOD1s were 216, 447, 370, and 135 days, respectively. The time from first symptom to death were 12, 50, 31, and 50 days, respectively. C57BL/6 mice were controls.

Preparation of Tissue Homogenates.

After sacrifice tissues were rapidly excised, carefully weighed, put on ice, and homogenized in 25 ml per g of wet weight of ice-cold PBS (10 mM K phosphate, pH 7.0, in 0.15 M NaCl) containing EDTA-free Complete (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) antiproteolytic mixture and 20 mM iodoacetamide, by using an Ultraturrax (IKA, Staufen, Germany) for two minutes and sonication for 1 min. The homogenates were centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatants were directly subjected to HIC or gel chromatography.

Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography.

One milliliter of Octyl-Sepharose CL-4B (GE Health Care, Uppsala, Sweden) was packed in 0.8 × 10-cm columns. The columns were run stepwise at 22°C and allowed to empty spontaneously. The eluents were bubbled with argon and contained 5 mM iodoacetamide. A 250-μl sample was added, followed by 250 μl of PBS. After 5 min, the columns were eluted twice with 2.5 ml × PBS followed by 2 × 2.5 ml × PBS diluted 1:10. Finally, the columns were eluted with 2.5 ml × 4% SDS in 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 6.8.

Preparation and Treatment of Recombinant hSOD1 Variants.

The variants were prepared as described (31). Preparation of apo forms was carried out as described previously (20). To allow formation of nonnative disulfide bonds, hSOD1 variants were incubated for 7 h at 22°C in 3.5 M guanidinium chloride, 10 mM Tris-(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP) and 5 mM diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) at pH 7.0. The samples were then dialyzed against pH 7.0 PBS containing 1 mM DTPA, centrifuged at 20,000 × g to remove aggregates, and the supernatants collected.

Gel Chromatography.

The samples (250 μl) were applied to a 1 cm × 30 cm Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden), eluted at 22°C with argon-bubbled PBS containing 5 mM iodoacetamide at 45 ml/hour, and collected in 0.3-ml fractions.

Immunoblotting, Quantification of SOD1 Protein, Determination of Disulfide-Reduced SOD1, In-Gel Reduction, and Total Protein Analysis.

The Western blots were carried out as previously described by using species-specific antibodies raised against peptides corresponding to amino acids 24–39 and 24–36 of the human and murine SOD1 sequences, respectively (7). The chemiluminescence of the blots was recorded in a ChemiDoc apparatus and analyzed by Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad). To determine HIC-binding percentages, the SDS-eluted fractions were run in reduced immunoblots together with appropriate dilutions of the tissue extracts as standards. The hSOD1 concentrations of the extracts were in turn determined in immunoblots by using wild-type hSOD1 with the concentration determined by quantitative amino acid analysis as original standard (17). The absolute amounts of HIC-binding hSOD1 was calculated from these two assays. The proportion (%) disulfide-reduced SOD1 was determined by nonreduced western immunoblotting (omission of reductant in the sample buffer) as previously detailed (8). 20 mM iodoacetamide was mostly added to the sample buffer. In some experiments, after electrophoresis the nonreducing gels were immersed for 10 min at 22°C in transfer buffer containing 2% mercaptoethanol before electroblotting onto PVDF membranes (in-gel reduction).

Total protein in extracts was determined with the Bio-Rad Protein Assay standardized with BSA.

Partitioning of Hydrophobic hSOD1 to Mitochondria.

A spinal cord was gently homogenized in a Dounce glass-pestle homogenizer at 4°C by using a procedure optimized for recovery of intact mitochondria (18). The homogenate was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 30 min, and this primary supernatant was collected. The pellet was sonicated in half the original volume of PBS and then centrifuged at 20,000 × g. 250 μl of the primary and secondary supernatants were subjected to HIC.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Figures

Acknowledgments

We thank Jörgen Andersson, Eva Bern, Ingalis Fransson, Karin Hjertkvist, Ann-Charlott Nilsson, Ulla-Stina Spetz, Karin Wallgren, and Agneta Öberg for technical assistance and Dr. D. W. Cleveland (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Department of Medicine and Neuroscience, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA) for the G85R hSOD1 transgenic mice. This work was supported by the Swedish Science Council, the Swedish Brain Fund/Hållsten Fund, the Swedish Medical Society including the Björklund Fund for ALS Research, the Swedish Association of Persons with Neurological Disabilities, the King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria Fund, and the Västerbotten County Council.

Abbreviations

DTPA

diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid

HIC

hydrophobic interaction chromatography

SOD1

CuZn-superoxide dismutase.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0700477104/DC1.

References

  • 1.Haverkamp LJ, Appel V, Appel SH. Brain. 1995;118:707–719. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.3.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosen DR, Siddique T, Patterson D, Figlewicz DA, Sapp P, Hentati A, Donaldson D, Goto J, Oregan JP, Deng HX, et al. Nature. 1993;362:59–62. doi: 10.1038/362059a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Andersen PM, Sims KB, Xin WW, Kiely R, O'Neill G, Ravits J, Pioro E, Harati Y, Brower RD, Levine JS, et al. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2003;2:62–73. doi: 10.1080/14660820310011700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gurney ME, Pu H, Chiu AY, Dal Canto MC, Polchow CY, Alexander DD, Caliendo J, Hentati A, Kwon YW, Deng HX, et al. Science. 1994;264:1772–1775. doi: 10.1126/science.8209258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andersen PM, Nilsson P, Ala-Hurula V, Keranen ML, Tarvainen I, Haltia T, Nilsson L, Binzer M, Forsgren L, Marklund SL. Nat Genet. 1995;10:61–66. doi: 10.1038/ng0595-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marklund SL. J Clin Invest. 1984;74:1398–1403. doi: 10.1172/JCI111550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jonsson PA, Ernhill K, Andersen PM, Bergemalm D, Brannstrom T, Gredal O, Nilsson P, Marklund SL. Brain. 2004;127:73–88. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jonsson PA, Graffmo KS, Andersen PM, Brannstrom T, Lindberg M, Oliveberg M, Marklund SL. Brain. 2006;129:451–464. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tiwari A, Xu Z, Hayward LJ. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:29771–29779. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504039200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mourelatos Z, Gonatas NK, Stieber A, Gurney ME, Dal Canto MC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:5472–5477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Williamson TL, Cleveland DW. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:50–56. doi: 10.1038/4553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vukosavic S, Stefanis L, Jackson-Lewis V, Guegan C, Romero N, Chen C, Dubois-Dauphin M, Przedborski S. J Neurosci. 2000;20:9119–9125. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-09119.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kostic V, Gurney ME, Deng HX, Siddique T, Epstein CJ, Przedborski S. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:497–504. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hirano A. Neuropathology. 1998;18:363–369. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Turner MR, Hammers A, Al Chalabi A, Shaw CE, Andersen PM, Brooks DJ, Leigh PN. Brain. 2005;128:1323–1329. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Furukawa Y, O'Halloran TV. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:17266–17274. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500482200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Marklund SL, Andersen PM, Forsgren L, Nilsson P, Ohlsson PI, Wikander G, Oberg A. J Neurochem. 1997;69:675–681. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69020675.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bergemalm D, Jonsson PA, Graffmo KS, Andersen PM, Brannstrom T, Rehnmark A, Marklund SL. J Neurosci. 2006;26:4147–4154. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5461-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nordlund A, Oliveberg M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:10218–10223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601696103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lindberg MJ, Normark J, Holmgren A, Oliveberg M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:15893–15898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403979101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lindberg MJ, Bystrom R, Boknas N, Andersen PM, Oliveberg M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9754–9759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501957102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Estevez AG, Crow JP, Sampson JB, Reiter C, Zhuang Y, Richardson GJ, Tarpey MM, Barbeito L, Beckman JS. Science. 1999;286:2498–2500. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang J, Xu G, Borchelt DR. J Neurochem. 2006;96:1277–1288. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03642.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Furukawa Y, Fu R, Deng HX, Siddique T, O'Halloran TV. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:7148–7153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602048103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bruijn LI, Houseweart MK, Kato S, Anderson KL, Anderson SD, Ohama E, Reaume AG, Scott RW, Cleveland DW. Science. 1998;281:1851–1854. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5384.1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang J, Xu G, Slunt HH, Gonzales V, Coonfield M, Fromholt D, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Borchelt DR. Neurobiol Dis. 2005;20:943–952. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Burke RE, Marks WE. In: Computational Neuroanatomy: Principles and Methods. Ascoli GA, editor. Totowa, NJ: Humana; 2002. pp. 27–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Boillee S, Vande VC, Cleveland DW. Neuron. 2006;52:39–59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jonsson PA, Graffmo KS, Brannstrom T, Nilsson P, Andersen PM, Marklund SL. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006;65:1126–1136. doi: 10.1097/01.jnen.0000248545.36046.3c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bruijn LI, Becher MW, Lee MK, Anderson KL, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Sisodia SS, Rothstein JD, Borchelt DR, Price DL, et al. Neuron. 1997;18:327–338. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80272-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ahl IM, Lindberg MJ, Tibell LA. Protein Expr Purif. 2004;37:311–319. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2004.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Figures
pnas_0700477104_1.pdf (127.7KB, pdf)
pnas_0700477104_2.pdf (404.8KB, pdf)
pnas_0700477104_3.pdf (94.3KB, pdf)
pnas_0700477104_4.pdf (122KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES